Eight Things to Know about Large Language Models
Open accessAbstract
The widespread public deployment of large language models (LLMs) in recent months has prompted a wave of new attention and engagement from advocates, policymakers, and scholars from many fields. This attention is a timely response to the many urgent questions that this technology raises, but it can sometimes miss important considerations. This paper surveys the evidence for eight potentially surprising such points: 1. LLMs predictably get more capable with increasing investment, even without targeted innovation. 2. Many important LLM behaviors emerge unpredictably as a byproduct of increasing investment. 3. LLMs often appear to learn and use representations of the outside world. 4. There are no reliable techniques for steering the behavior of LLMs. 5. Experts are not yet able to interpret the inner workings of LLMs. 6. Human performance on a task isn't an upper bound on LLM performance. 7. LLMs need not express the values of their creators nor the values encoded in web text. 8. Brief interactions with LLMs are often misleading.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LLMs are known to be sensitive to textual instructions and inputs.
“However, it is unclear how reliable LLMs are as evaluators, as they are known to be sensitive to textual instructions and inputs (Dong et al., 2022;Turpin et al., 2023;Bowman, 2023).”
From Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluators (2024) · cites this paper as Bowman, 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Hao, X.-B., & Zhang, G.-G. (2017) · Encycl. Semantic Comput. Robotic Intell. · doi:10.1142/s2425038416300184 · Cited by 86,177 · cited 1×
“Modern LLMs are built on artificial neural networks: They work by computing and updating numeric activation values for internal components that are very loosely modeled on human neurons (Bengio et al., 2017).”
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 48,293 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…translation of ‘cat’ in French is‘ ”, such that a typical continuation of the text should represent a completion of the intended task (Radford et al., 2019; Raffel et al., 2020). match high-quality human demonstrations on the task (Radford et al., 2018; Devlin et al., 2019; Ouyang et al., 2022).”
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Large language models (LLMs, e.g. GPT-3, PALM, LLaMA, and GPT-4; Brown et al., 2020; Chowdhery et al., 2022; Touvron et al., 2023; OpenAI, 2023b) and products built on them, such as ChatGPT, have recently prompted an enormous amount of attention from journalists, (Klein, 2023; Perrigo, 2023; Oliver, 2023), policymaker…”
InfluentialMastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search
Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16961 · Cited by 15,612 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This is analogous to the techniques used to produce superhuman performance at games like Go (Silver et al., 2016).”
Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision
Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.00020 · Cited by 15,293 · see citing works
Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer
Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., Roberts, A., Lee, K., Narang, S., Matena, M., Zhou, Y., Li, W., & Liu, P. J. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.10683 · Cited by 10,929 · see citing works
On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922 · Cited by 6,988 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…arise with the development of deployment of large-scale AI systems, including issues around environmental impacts, access, mis-use, privacy, safety, and the concentration of power (Amodei et al., 2016; Bender et al., 2021; Bommasani et al., 2021; Birhane et al., 2022; Weidinger et al., 2022, i.a.).”
LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models
Touvron, H., Lavril, T., Izacard, G., Martinet, X., Lachaux, M.-A., Lacroix, T., Rozière, B., Goyal, N., Hambro, E., Azhar, F., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.13971 · Cited by 4,602 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Large language models (LLMs, e.g. GPT-3, PALM, LLaMA, and GPT-4; Brown et al., 2020; Chowdhery et al., 2022; Touvron et al., 2023; OpenAI, 2023b) and products built on them, such as ChatGPT, have recently prompted an enormous amount of attention from journalists, (Klein, 2023; Perrigo, 2023; Oliver, 2023), policymaker…”
InfluentialChain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q., & Zhou, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.11903 · Cited by 4,263 · see citing works
Training Language Models to Follow Instructions with Human Feedback
Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., et al. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-2011 · Cited by 3,117 · see citing works
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258 · Cited by 2,676 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…arise with the development of deployment of large-scale AI systems, including issues around environmental impacts, access, mis-use, privacy, safety, and the concentration of power (Amodei et al., 2016; Bender et al., 2021; Bommasani et al., 2021; Birhane et al., 2022; Weidinger et al., 2022, i.a.).”
PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways
Chowdhery, A., Narang, S., Devlin, J., Bosma, M., Mishra, G., Roberts, A., Barham, P., Chung, H. W., Sutton, C., Gehrmann, S., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.02311 · Cited by 2,590 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Large language models (LLMs, e.g. GPT-3, PALM, LLaMA, and GPT-4; Brown et al., 2020; Chowdhery et al., 2022; Touvron et al., 2023; OpenAI, 2023b) and products built on them, such as ChatGPT, have recently prompted an enormous amount of attention from journalists, (Klein, 2023; Perrigo, 2023; Oliver, 2023), policymaker…”
InfluentialJain, S., & Wallace, B. C. (2019) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1357 · Cited by 2,287 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Often, ad-hoc techniques that at first seem to provide insight into the behavior of an LLM are later found to be severely misleading (Feng et al., 2018; Jain & Wallace, 2019; Bolukbasi et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2022).”
Large language models are zero-shot reasoners
Kojima, T., Gu, S. (., Reid, M., Matsuo, Y., & Iwasawa, Y. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-1613 · Cited by 2,013 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The chain-of-thought reasoning strategies mentioned in Section 2 are an especially clear example of this: Simply prompting a model to “think step by step” can lead it to perform well on entire categories of math and reasoning problems that it would otherwise fail on (Kojima et al., 2022).”
Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models
Kaplan, J., McCandlish, S., Henighan, T., Brown, T. B., Chess, B., Child, R., Gray, S., Radford, A., Wu, J., & Amodei, D. (2020) · arXiv · Cited by 1,749 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Scaling law results (Kaplan et al., 2020; Brown et al., 2020; Hoffmann et al., 2022) have been a major driving factor in the recent surge of research and investment into LLMs (Ganguli et al., 2022a).”
Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4
Bubeck, S., Chandrasekaran, V., Eldan, R., Gehrke, J., Horvitz, E., Kamar, E., Lee, P., Lee, Y. T., Li, Y., Lundberg, S., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.12712 · Cited by 1,526 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This can include the ability to internally represent the spatial layout of the setting of a story (Patel & Pavlick, 2022; Bubeck et al., 2023).”
Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models
Chung, H. W., Hou, L., Longpre, S., Zoph, B., Tay, Y., Fedus, W., Li, Y., Wang, X., Dehghani, M., Brahma, S., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.11416 · Cited by 1,441 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Indeed, many control techniques work better with larger models, at least for simple tasks(Hendrycks et al., 2020; Bai et al., 2022a; Chung et al., 2022; Ganguli et al., 2023).”
Fralick, M., Sacks, C. A., Muller, D., Vining, T., Ling, E., Drazen, J., & Hardin, C. (2023) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-6259-3 · Cited by 1,395 · see citing works
Concrete Problems in AI Safety
Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P., Schulman, J., & Mané, D. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.06565 · Cited by 1,314 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…arise with the development of deployment of large-scale AI systems, including issues around environmental impacts, access, mis-use, privacy, safety, and the concentration of power (Amodei et al., 2016; Bender et al., 2021; Bommasani et al., 2021; Birhane et al., 2022; Weidinger et al., 2022, i.a.).”
Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models
Wei, J., Tay, Y., Bommasani, R., Raffel, C., Zoph, B., Borgeaud, S., Yogatama, D., Bosma, M., Zhou, D., Metzler, D., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.07682 · Cited by 1,264 · see citing works
DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled AttentionPreprint
He, P., Liu, X., Gao, J., & Chen, W. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.03654 · Cited by 1,224 · see citing works
Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools
Schick, T., Dwivedi-Yu, J., Dessì, R., Raileanu, R., Lomeli, M., Zettlemoyer, L., Cancedda, N., & Scialom, T. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.04761 · Cited by 1,150 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…al., 2019; Stiennon et al., 2020; Ouyang et al., 2022; Bai et al., 2022a), integration with image processing systems, (Alayrac et al., 2022; OpenAI, 2023b), or integration with other software tools (Nakano et al., 2021; Menick et al., 2022; Collins et al., 2022; Schick et al., 2023; OpenAI, 2023a).”
Chatting about ChatGPT: How May AI and GPT Impact Academia and Libraries?Preprint
Lund, B. D., & Ting, W. (2023) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4333415 · Cited by 1,089 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…built on them, such as ChatGPT, have recently prompted an enormous amount of attention from journalists, (Klein, 2023; Perrigo, 2023; Oliver, 2023), policymakers (J & C, 2023; Bartz, 2023; Lieu, 2023), and scholars from many fields (Chan, 2022; Lund & Wang, 2023; Choi et al., 2023; Biswas, 2023).”
Climbing towards NLU: On Meaning, Form, and Understanding in the Age of Data
Bender, E. M., & Koller, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.463 · Cited by 1,082 · see citing works
Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning
Alayrac, J.-B., Donahue, J., Luc, P., Miech, A., Barr, I., Hasson, Y., Lenc, K., Mensch, A., Millican, K., Reynolds, M., et al. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-1723 · Cited by 966 · see citing works
Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigm
Reynolds, L., & McDonell, K. (2021) · Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411763.3451760 · Cited by 952 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…complete a task when asked, but will then perform the task correctly once the request is reworded or reframed slightly, leading to the emerging craft of prompt engineering (Brown et al., 2020; Reynolds & McDonell, 2021; Radford et al., 2021; Dohan et al., 2022; White et al., 2023; Si et al., 2023).”
Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inference
McCoy, R. T., Pavlick, E., & Linzen, T. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1334 · Cited by 944 · cited 1× · see citing works
“LLMs can memorize specific examples or strategies for solving tasks from their training data without internalizing the reasoning process that would allow them to do those tasks robustly (see, e.g. McCoy et al., 2019; Magar & Schwartz, 2022).”
Taxonomy of Risks posed by Language Models
Weidinger, L., Uesato, J., Rauh, M., Griffin, C., Huang, P.-S., Mellor, J., Glaese, A., Cheng, M., Balle, B., Kasirzadeh, A., et al. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533088 · Cited by 764 · see citing works
Hart, B. M., & Risley, T. (1992) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.28.6.1096 · Cited by 595 · see citing works
PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Model
Driess, D., Xia, F., Sajjadi, M. S. M., Lynch, C., Chowdhery, A., Ichter, B., Wahid, A., Tompson, J., Vuong, Q., Yu, T., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.03378 · Cited by 591 · cited 1× · see citing works
“LLMs augmented with additional tools can extend this into grounded domains like robotics (Sharma et al., 2022; Driess et al., 2023).”
ChatGPT and the future of medical writing
Biswas, S. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.223312 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models
Srivastava, A., Rastogi, A., Rao, A., Shoeb, A. A. M., Abid, A., Fisch, A., Brown, A. R., Santoro, A., Gupta, A., Garriga-Alonso, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.04615 · Cited by 569 · cited 7× · see citing works
“show that the tasks in BIG-Bench (Srivastava et al., 2022), a standard broad-coverage benchmark for LLM abilities, show a range of different kinds of trend that collectively make scaling-law style predictions unreliable (Figure 3).”
InfluentialSelf-citationLearning to summarize from human feedback
Stiennon, N., Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Ziegler, D. M., Lowe, R., Voss, C., Radford, A., Amodei, D., & Christiano, P. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.01325 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
ChatGPT Goes to Law SchoolPreprint
Choi, J. H., Hickman, K. E., Monahan, A., & Schwarcz, D. B. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4335905 · Cited by 522 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…built on them, such as ChatGPT, have recently prompted an enormous amount of attention from journalists, (Klein, 2023; Perrigo, 2023; Oliver, 2023), policymakers (J & C, 2023; Bartz, 2023; Lieu, 2023), and scholars from many fields (Chan, 2022; Lund & Wang, 2023; Choi et al., 2023; Biswas, 2023).”
Do Prompt-Based Models Really Understand the Meaning of Their Prompts?Preprint
Webson, A., & Pavlick, E. (2021) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.01247 · Cited by 522 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Sometimes the details of these failures cast doubts on the quality of other related evaluations (Webson & Pavlick, 2022; Ullman, 2023).”
Pretrained Transformers Improve Out-of-Distribution RobustnessPreprint
Hendrycks, D., Liu, X., Wallace, E., Dziedzic, A., Krishnan, R., & Song, D. (2020) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.06100 · Cited by 505 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Indeed, many control techniques work better with larger models, at least for simple tasks(Hendrycks et al., 2020; Bai et al., 2022a; Chung et al., 2022; Ganguli et al., 2023).”
Mapping the Early Language Environment Using All-Day Recordings and Automated Analysis
Gilkerson, J., Richards, J. A., Warren, S. F., Montgomery, J. K., Greenwood, C. R., Kimbrough Oller, D., Hansen, J. H. L., & Paul, T. D. (2017) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2016_ajslp-15-0169 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Bai, Y., Jones, A., Ndousse, K., Askell, A., Chen, A., DasSarma, N., Drain, D., Fort, S., Ganguli, D., Henighan, T., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.05862 · Cited by 442 · cited 5× · see citing works
“In particular, popular approaches involving reinforcement learning and red-teaming allow model developers to guide models toward a persona and set of values more or less of their choosing (Dinan et al., 2019; Bai et al., 2022a; Ganguli et al., 2022b).”
InfluentialTowards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What MattersPreprint
Wang, B., Min, S., Deng, X., Shen, J., Wu, Y., Zettlemoyer, L., & Sun, H. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.10001 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences
Ziegler, D. M., Stiennon, N., Wu, J., Brown, T. B., Radford, A., Amodei, D., Christiano, P., & Irving, G. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.08593 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learning
D'Amour, A., Heller, K., Moldovan, D., Adlam, B., Alipanahi, B., Beutel, A., Chen, C., Deaton, J., Eisenstein, J., Hoffman, M. D., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.03395 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Prompting GPT-3 To Be ReliablePreprint
Si, C., Gan, Z., Yang, Z.-Y., Wang, S.-H., Wang, J., Boyd-Graber, J. L., & Wang, L.-J. (2022) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.09150 · Cited by 395 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Often, a model will fail to complete a task when asked, but will then perform the task correctly once the request is reworded or reframed slightly, leading to the emerging craft of prompt engineering (Brown et al., 2020; Reynolds & McDonell, 2021; Radford et al., 2021; Dohan et al., 2022; White et al., 2023; Si et al.…”
Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models
Zhou, D., Schärli, N., Hou, L., Wei, J., Scales, N., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Cui, C., Bousquet, O., Le, Q., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.10625 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Compute Trends Across Three Eras of Machine Learning
Sevilla, J., Heim, L., Ho, A., Besiroglu, T., Hobbhahn, M., & Villalobos, P. (2022) · 2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9891914 · Cited by 363 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Instead, the qualitative differences between them stem from vast differences in scale: Training GPT-3 used roughly 20,000× more computation than training the original GPT (Sevilla et al., 2022), as well as significantly more data and parameters.”
Bai, Y., Kadavath, S., Kundu, S., Askell, A., Kernion, J., Jones, A., Chen, A., Goldie, A., Mirhoseini, A., & Kaplan, J. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.08073 · Cited by 326 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Similarly, as noted in Section 7, recent methods can dramatically reduce explicit bias and toxicity in models’ output, largely by exploiting the fact that models can often recognize these bad behaviors when asked (Dinan et al., 2019; Bai et al., 2022b; Ganguli et al., 2023).”
Self-citationData Contamination: From Memorization to Exploitation
Magar, I., & Schwartz, R. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.08242 · Cited by 325 · cited 1×
“LLMs can memorize specific examples or strategies for solving tasks from their training data without internalizing the reasoning process that would allow them to do those tasks robustly (see, e.g. McCoy et al., 2019; Magar & Schwartz, 2022).”
The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Research
Birhane, A., Kalluri, P., Card, D., Agnew, W., Dotan, R., & Bao, M. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533083 · Cited by 317 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…arise with the development of deployment of large-scale AI systems, including issues around environmental impacts, access, mis-use, privacy, safety, and the concentration of power (Amodei et al., 2016; Bender et al., 2021; Bommasani et al., 2021; Birhane et al., 2022; Weidinger et al., 2022, i.a.).”
WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback
Nakano, R., Hilton, J., Balaji, S., Wu, J., Ouyang, L., Kim, C., Hesse, C., Jain, S., Kosaraju, V., Saunders, W., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.09332 · Cited by 272 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…al., 2019; Stiennon et al., 2020; Ouyang et al., 2022; Bai et al., 2022a), integration with image processing systems, (Alayrac et al., 2022; OpenAI, 2023b), or integration with other software tools (Nakano et al., 2021; Menick et al., 2022; Collins et al., 2022; Schick et al., 2023; OpenAI, 2023a).”
Pathologies of Neural Models Make Interpretations Difficult
Feng, S., Wallace, E., Grissom, A., Iyyer, M., Rodríguez, P., & Boyd-Graber, J. L. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1407 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Predictability and Surprise in Large Generative Models
Ganguli, D., Hernandez, D., Lovitt, L., Askell, A., Bai, Y., Chen, A., Conerly, T., Dassarma, N., Drain, D., Elhage, N., et al. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533229 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?
Schaeffer, R., Miranda, B., & Koyejo, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.15004 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know
Kadavath, S., Conerly, T., Askell, A., Henighan, T., Drain, D., Perez, E., Schiefer, N., Hatfield-Dodds, Z., DasSarma, N., Tran-Johnson, E., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.05221 · Cited by 187 · cited 2× · see citing works
“• Models can distinguish common misconceptions from true facts (Wei et al., 2022a), and often show well-calibrated internal representations for how likely a claim is to be true (Kadavath et al., 2022; Wei et al., 2022a; Burns et al., 2023).”
Self-citationGoal Misgeneralization in Deep Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Langosco, L., Koch, J., Sharkey, L. D., Pfau, J., Orseau, L., & Krueger, D. (2021) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.14111 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Build it Break it Fix it for Dialogue Safety: Robustness from Adversarial Human Attack
Dinan, E., Humeau, S., Chintagunta, B., & Weston, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1461 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Chan, A. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00148-6 · Cited by 155 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…built on them, such as ChatGPT, have recently prompted an enormous amount of attention from journalists, (Klein, 2023; Perrigo, 2023; Oliver, 2023), policymakers (J & C, 2023; Bartz, 2023; Lieu, 2023), and scholars from many fields (Chan, 2022; Lund & Wang, 2023; Choi et al., 2023; Biswas, 2023).”
Harms from Increasingly Agentic Algorithmic Systems
Chan, A., Salganik, R., Markelius, A., Pang, C., Rajkumar, N., Krasheninnikov, D., Langosco, L., He, Z., Duan, Y., Carroll, M., et al. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594033 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Show Your Work: Scratchpads for Intermediate Computation with Language Models
Nye, M., Andreassen, A. J., Gur-Ari, G., Michalewski, H., Austin, J., Bieber, D., Dohan, D., Lewkowycz, A., Bosma, M., Luan, D., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.00114 · Cited by 144 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…learning on practical tasks appears to have been discovered only after it was trained, and its capacity for chain-of-thought reasoning was discovered only several months after it was broadly deployed to the public (Nye et al., 2021; Wei et al., 2022b; Kojima et al., 2022; Zhou et al., 2023).”
Could a Large Language Model be Conscious?
Chalmers, D. J. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.07103 · Cited by 143 · cited 2× · see citing works
“• Similarly, questions of consciousness, sentience, rights, and moral patienthood in LLMs (see, e.g. Schwitzgebel & Garza, 2020; Shevlin, 2021; Chalmers, 2023), are worth distinguishing from the issues above.”
Skill Induction and Planning with Latent LanguagePreprint
Sharma, P., Torralba, A., & Andreas, J. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.01517 · Cited by 133 · cited 1× · see citing works
“LLMs augmented with additional tools can extend this into grounded domains like robotics (Sharma et al., 2022; Driess et al., 2023).”
Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learned
Ganguli, D., Lovitt, L., Kernion, J., Askell, A., Bai, Y., Kadavath, S., Mann, B., Perez, E., Schiefer, N., Ndousse, K., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.07858 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Self-citationA Survey of Race, Racism, and Anti-Racism in NLP
Field, A., Blodgett, S. L., Talat, Z., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.149 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Language Models as Agent Models
Andreas, J. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.01681 · Cited by 92 · cited 1× · see citing works
“• Models can make inferences about what the author of a document knows or believes and use these inferences to predict how the document will be continued (Andreas, 2022).”
Implicit Representations of Meaning in Neural Language Models
Li, B. Z., Nye, M., & Andreas, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.143 · Cited by 84 · cited 1× · see citing works
“• Models use internal representations of the properties and locations of objects described in stories, which evolve as more information about these objects is revealed (Li et al., 2021).”
Large Language Models Fail on Trivial Alterations to Theory-of-Mind Tasks
Ullman, T. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.08399 · Cited by 81 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Sometimes the details of these failures cast doubts on the quality of other related evaluations (Webson & Pavlick, 2022; Ullman, 2023).”
Can Language Models Encode Perceptual Structure Without Grounding? A Case Study in Color
Abdou, M., Kulmizev, A., Hershcovich, D., Frank, S., Pavlick, E., & Søgaard, A. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.06129 · Cited by 70 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Evidence for this claim includes the following results, spanning many established experimental methods and models: • Models’ internal representations of color words closely mirror objective facts about human color perception (Abdou et al., 2021; Patel & Pavlick, 2022; Søgaard, 2023).”
The alignment problem from a deep learning perspective
Ngo, R., Chan, L., & Mindermann, S. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.00626 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic Task
Li, K., Hopkins, A. K., Bau, D., Viégas, F., Pfister, H., & Wattenberg, M. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.13382 · Cited by 61 · cited 2× · see citing works
“• Models that are trained to play board games from descriptions of individual game moves, without ever seeing a full depiction of the game board, learn internal representations of the state of the board at each turn (Li et al., 2023).”
Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervision
Burns, C., Ye, H., Klein, D., & Steinhardt, J. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.03827 · Cited by 55 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…built on them, such as ChatGPT, have recently prompted an enormous amount of attention from journalists, (Klein, 2023; Perrigo, 2023; Oliver, 2023), policymakers (J & C, 2023; Bartz, 2023; Lieu, 2023), and scholars from many fields (Chan, 2022; Lund & Wang, 2023; Choi et al., 2023; Biswas, 2023).”
InfluentialGrounding the Vector Space of an Octopus: Word Meaning from Raw Text
Søgaard, A. (2023) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-023-09622-4 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluations
Perez, E., Ringer, S., Lukošiūtė, K., Nguyen, K., Chen, E., Heiner, S., Pettit, C., Olsson, C., Kundu, S., Kadavath, S., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.09251 · Cited by 53 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This can surface in the form of problems that Perez et al. (2022) call sycophancy , where a model answers subjective questions in a way that flatters their user’s stated beliefs, and sandbagging , where models are more likely to endorse common misconceptions when their user appears to be less…”
Self-citationTeaching language models to support answers with verified quotes
Menick, J., Trebacz, M., Mikulik, V., Aslanides, J., Song, F., Chadwick, M., Glaese, M., Young, S., Campbell-Gillingham, L., Irving, G., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.11147 · Cited by 53 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…al., 2019; Stiennon et al., 2020; Ouyang et al., 2022; Bai et al., 2022a), integration with image processing systems, (Alayrac et al., 2022; OpenAI, 2023b), or integration with other software tools (Nakano et al., 2021; Menick et al., 2022; Collins et al., 2022; Schick et al., 2023; OpenAI, 2023a).”
Risks from Learned Optimization in Advanced Machine Learning Systems
Hubinger, E., van Merwijk, C., Mikulik, V., Skalse, J., & Garrabrant, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.01820 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
The Capacity for Moral Self-Correction in Large Language Models
Ganguli, D., Askell, A., Schiefer, N., Liao, T. I., Lukošiūtė, K., Chen, A., Goldie, A., Mirhoseini, A., Olsson, C., Hernandez, D., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.07459 · Cited by 53 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Indeed, many control techniques work better with larger models, at least for simple tasks(Hendrycks et al., 2020; Bai et al., 2022a; Chung et al., 2022; Ganguli et al., 2023).”
Self-citationSelf-critiquing models for assisting human evaluators
Saunders, W., Yeh, C., Wu, J., Bills, S., Ouyang, L., Ward, J., & Leike, J. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.05802 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
What Do NLP Researchers Believe? Results of the NLP Community MetasurveyPreprint
Michael, J., Holtzman, A., Parrish, A., Mueller, A., Wang, A., Chen, A., Madaan, D., Nangia, N., Pang, R. Y., Phang, J., et al. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.12852 · Cited by 50 · cited 1× · see citing works
“36% of another sample of 480 researchers (in a survey targeting the language-specific venue ACL) agreed that “It is plausible that decisions made by AI or machine learning systems could cause a catastrophe this century that is at least as bad as an all-out nuclear war” (Michael et al., 2022).”
Self-citationKenton, Z., Everitt, T., Weidinger, L., Gabriel, I., Mikulik, V., & Irving, G. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.14659 · Cited by 45 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In particular, models can misinterpret ambiguous prompts or incentives in unreasonable ways, including in situations that appear unambiguous to humans, leading them to behave unexpectedly (D’Amour et al., 2020; Kenton et al., 2021).”
The Dangers of Underclaiming: Reasons for Caution When Reporting How NLP Systems Fail
Bowman, S. R. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.516 · Cited by 45 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Similarly, even observing that an LLM consistently fails at some task is far from sufficient evidence that no other LLM can do that task (Bowman, 2022).”
Self-citationDesigning AI with Rights, Consciousness, Self-Respect, and Freedom
Schwitzgebel, E., & Garza, M. (2020) · Ethics of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190905033.003.0017 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
How Could We Know When a Robot was a Moral Patient?
Shevlin, H. (2021) · Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics · doi:10.1017/s0963180120001012 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Schuster, S., & Linzen, T. (2022) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.03472 · Cited by 34 · cited 1×
“There are many sound scientific results showing that recent LLMs fail at language and commonsense reasoning tasks, sometimes relatively simple ones, under good-faith attempts to elicit good behavior (Pandia & Ettinger, 2021; Schuster & Linzen, 2022).”
Shaking the foundations: delusions in sequence models for interaction and controlPreprint
Ortega, P. A., Kunesch, M., Delétang, G., Genewein, T., Grau-Moya, J., Veness, J., Buchli, J., Degrave, J., Piot, B., Pérolat, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.10819 · Cited by 33 · cited 1× · see citing works
“But it is also likely to increase the risk of much more dangerous errors that cause a system to remain effective while strategically pursuing the wrong goal (Krueger et al., 2020; Ortega et al., 2021; Chan et al., 2023).”
A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPT
(2024) · Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs · doi:10.64346/plop2023p05 · Cited by 32 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Often, a model will fail to complete a task when asked, but will then perform the task correctly once the request is reworded or reframed slightly, leading to the emerging craft of prompt engineering (Brown et al., 2020; Reynolds & McDonell, 2021; Radford et al., 2021; Dohan et al., 2022; White et al., 2023; Si et al.…”
An Interpretability Illusion for BERTPreprint
Bolukbasi, T., Pearce, A., Yuan, A., Coenen, A., Reif, E., Viégas, F. B., & WATTENBERG, M. P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.07143 · Cited by 32 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Often, ad-hoc techniques that at first seem to provide insight into the behavior of an LLM are later found to be severely misleading (Feng et al., 2018; Jain & Wallace, 2019; Bolukbasi et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2022).”
Do Language Models Know the Way to Rome?
Liétard, B., Abdou, M., & Søgaard, A. (2021) · BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.07971 · Cited by 32 · cited 2×
“Models also use similar representations for facts about real-world geography (Liétard et al., 2021).”
Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback
Uesato, J., Kushman, N., Kumar, R., Song, F., Siegel, N., Wang, L., Creswell, A., Irving, G., & Higgins, I. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.14275 · Cited by 25 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In addition, promising-looking techniques that elicit reasoning in natural language do not reliably correspond to the processes that LLMs use to reason, and model-generated explanations can also be systematically misleading (Lipton, 2018; Christiano, 2022; Uesato et al., 2022).”
Pandia, L., & Ettinger, A. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.119 · Cited by 25 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There are many sound scientific results showing that recent LLMs fail at language and commonsense reasoning tasks, sometimes relatively simple ones, under good-faith attempts to elicit good behavior (Pandia & Ettinger, 2021; Schuster & Linzen, 2022).”
Pretraining Language Models with Human Preferences
Korbak, T., Shi, K., Chen, A., Bhalerao, R., Buckley, C. L., Phang, J., Bowman, S. R., & Perez, E. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.08582 · Cited by 23 · cited 1× · see citing works
“5 Indeed, in some cases, exposing models to more examples of unwanted behavior during pretraining can make it easier to make them avoid that behavior in deployment, reversing the intuitive link between training data and model behavior (Korbak et al. 2023; see also Appendix C in Chung et al. 2022).”
Self-citationDohan, D., Xu, W., Lewkowycz, A., Austin, J., Bieber, D., Lopes, R. G., Wu, Y., Michalewski, H., Saurous, R. A., Sohl-dickstein, J., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.10342 · Cited by 22 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…complete a task when asked, but will then perform the task correctly once the request is reworded or reframed slightly, leading to the emerging craft of prompt engineering (Brown et al., 2020; Reynolds & McDonell, 2021; Radford et al., 2021; Dohan et al., 2022; White et al., 2023; Si et al., 2023).”
Optimal Policies Tend To Seek Power
Turner, A. M., Smith, L., Shah, R., Critch, A., & Tadepalli, P. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.01683 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Hidden Incentives for Auto-Induced Distributional Shift
Krueger, D., Maharaj, T., & Leike, J. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.09153 · Cited by 14 · cited 1× · see citing works
“But it is also likely to increase the risk of much more dangerous errors that cause a system to remain effective while strategically pursuing the wrong goal (Krueger et al., 2020; Ortega et al., 2021; Chan et al., 2023).”
Collins, K. M., Wong, C., Feng, J., Wei, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.05718 · Cited by 13 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…al., 2019; Stiennon et al., 2020; Ouyang et al., 2022; Bai et al., 2022a), integration with image processing systems, (Alayrac et al., 2022; OpenAI, 2023b), or integration with other software tools (Nakano et al., 2021; Menick et al., 2022; Collins et al., 2022; Schick et al., 2023; OpenAI, 2023a).”
Unit Testing for Concepts in Neural Networks
Lovering, C., & Pavlick, E. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00514 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Parametrically Retargetable Decision-Makers Tend To Seek Power
Turner, A. M., & Tadepalli, P. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.13477 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
OpenAI, Achiam, J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F. L., Almeida, D., Altenschmidt, J., Altman, S., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.08774 · cited 7×
“…up beyond GPT-3 has produced further economically valuable returns: The subsequent GPT-4 model outperforms qualified humans on many graduate and professional exams (OpenAI, 2023b), and its development helped prompt a multi-billion-dollar investment in the company that built it (Capoot, 2023).”
Influential
Flagged first, then by citations
34 of the 128 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Bengio, Y., Goodfellow, I., and Courville, A. Deep learn- ing. MIT press Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017. ISBN 9780262035613.
- Hoffmann, J., Borgeaud, S., Mensch, A., Buchatskaya, E., Cai, T., Rutherford, E., de las Casas, D., Hendricks, L. A., Welbl, J., Clark, A., Hennigan, T., Noland, E., Millican, K., van den Driessche, G., Damoc, B., Guy, A., Osindero, S., Simonyan, K., Elsen, E., Vinyals, O., Rae, J. W., and Sifre, L. An empirical analysis of compute-optimal large language model training. In Oh, A. H., Agarwal, A., Belgrave, D., and Cho, K. (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022. URL https: //openreview.net/forum?id=iBBcRUlOAPR.
- Levesque, H., Davis, E., and Morgenstern, L. The Winograd schema challenge. In Thirteenth international conference on the principles of knowledge representation and rea- soning, 2012.
- Lipton, Z. C. The mythos of model interpretability: In machine learning, the concept of interpretability is both important and slippery. Queue, 16(3):31-57, 2018.
- Patel, R. and Pavlick, E. Mapping language models to grounded conceptual spaces. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A survey on large language model (LLM) security and privacy: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
Yao, Y., Duan, J., Xu, K., Cai, Y., Sun, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · High-Confidence Computing · doi:10.1016/j.hcc.2024.100211 · Cited by 1,083 · see citing works
Impact of AI assistance on student agency
Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., Gašević, D., & Siemens, G. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104967 · Cited by 548 · see citing works
The application of large language models in medicine: A scoping review
Meng, X., Yan, X., Zhang, K., Liu, D., Cui, X., Yang, Y., Zhang, M., Cao, C., Wang, J., Wang, X., et al. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.109713 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
“40,41 Additionally, LLMs can simplify complex medical statistics for better comprehension.”
Security and Privacy Challenges of Large Language Models: A Survey
Das, B. C., Amini, M. H., & Wu, Y. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3712001 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
“Since LLMs work through prompt-based techniques [69], [38], the main way to jailbreak LLMs is to deceive them by asking tricky questions and generating inappropriate content or forbidden scenarios [70].”
Perkins, M., Roe, J., Postma, D., McGaughran, J., & Hickerson, D. (2024) · Journal of Academic Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10805-023-09492-6 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
“The body of scholarship around LLMs is notably immature (Bowman, 2023), but understanding the implications of these advanced AI tools in relation to academic integrity is crucial.”
On Protecting the Data Privacy of Large Language Models (LLMs): A Survey
Yan, B., Li, K., Xu, M., Dong, Y., Zhang, Y., Ren, Z., & Cheng, X. (2024) · International Conference on Meta Computing (ICMC) · doi:10.1109/icmc60390.2024.00008 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
AI Transparency in the Age of LLMs: A Human-Centered Research Roadmap
Liao, Q. V., & Vaughan, J. W. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.01941 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
“Given the complexity and massive scale of present-day LLMs, there are currently no techniques that would provide us with a complete picture of the knowledge reflected in a model or the reasoning that is used to produce its output (Bowman, 2023).”
BackgroundTransformers and large language models in healthcare: A review
Nerella, S., Bandyopadhyay, S., Zhang, J., Contreras, M., Siegel, S., Bumin, A., Silva, B., Sena, J., Shickel, B., Bihorac, A., et al. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102900 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
“Parameter-efficient models such as Stanford Alpaca [32] and efficient finetuning approaches of Quantized LLMs such as QLoRA [34] have been introduced to address situations where computational resources are limited.”
The Challenges of Machine Learning: A Critical Review
Barbierato, E., & Gatti, A. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13020416 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
“This capability has far-reaching implications across various domains [26,27].”
BackgroundGenerative Artificial Intelligence in Education: From Deceptive to Disruptive.
Alier, M., García‐Peñalvo, F. J., & Camba, J. D. (2024) · International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.9781/ijimai.2024.02.011 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
“However, recent evidence suggests that LLMs are developing internal representations of the world, enabling them to reason abstractly beyond the specific linguistic structure of texts [24].”
BackgroundHolderried, F., Stegemann-Philipps, C., Herrmann-Werner, A., Festl-Wietek, T., Holderried, M., Eickhoff, C., & Mahling, M. (2024) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/59213 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
“Furthermore, LLMs might elicit unexpected behaviors and escape prompts, thereby resulting in problematic interactions [46].”
How understanding large language models can inform the use of ChatGPT in physics education
Polverini, G., & Gregorcic, B. (2023) · European Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6404/ad1420 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
“It could just mean that we have not yet learned how to formulate the prompt in a good way [58].”
BackgroundFrom task structures to world models: what do LLMs know?
Yildirim, I., & Paul, L. A. (2024) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.02.008 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Using Large Language Models for Hyperparameter OptimizationPreprint
Zhang, M. R., Desai, N., Bae, J., Lorraine, J., & Ba, J. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.04528 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
“However, models can face characteristic challenges of current language models, including hallucinations (Bowman, 2023).”
BackgroundHuang, D., Markovitch, D. G., & Stough, R. A. (2024) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103600 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Putman, T., Schaper, K., Matentzoglu, N., Rubinetti, V., Alquaddoomi, F. S., Cox, C., Caufield, J., Elsarboukh, G., Gehrke, S., Hegde, H. B., et al. (2023) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1082 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
“…the release of successively larger Generative Pre-training Transformer ( GPT ) models by OpenAI ( openai.com ) , researchers and software engineers have found that these models can produce comprehensive and informative responses to various questions without requiring additional training ( 40 ) .”
Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluators
Wang, P., Li, L., Chen, L., Cai, Z., Zhu, D., Lin, B., Cao, Y., Kong, L., Liu, Q., Liu, T., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.511 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Educational data augmentation in physics education research using ChatGPT
Kieser, F., Wulff, P., Kuhn, J., & Küchemann, S. (2023) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.19.020150 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
“, training epochs), and training data size [31].”
BackgroundOpportunities and risks of large language models in psychiatry
Obradovich, N., Khalsa, S., Khan, W., Suh, J., Perlis, R. H., Ajilore, O., & Paulus, M. P. (2024) · NPP—Digital Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s44277-024-00010-z · Cited by 107 · see citing works
“The application of LLMs in mental health research and care, while promising, is not without potential challenges [61].”
POSTER: Identifying and Mitigating Vulnerabilities in LLM-Integrated Applications
Jiang, F., Xu, Z., Niu, L., Wang, B., Jia, J., Li, B., & Poovendran, R. (2024) · ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security (ASIA CCS) · doi:10.1145/3634737.3659433 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“The vulnerabilities and risks of LLM have been studied in recent works including (Abid et al., 2021; Bender et al., 2021; Bommasani et al., 2021; Bowman, 2023; Gehman et al., 2020; OpenAI, 2023b; Weidinger et al., 2021; Perez & Ribeiro, 2022; Kang et al., 2023).”
BackgroundRecent Advances in Large Language Models for Healthcare
Nassiri, K., & Akhloufi, M. A. (2024) · BioMedInformatics · doi:10.3390/biomedinformatics4020062 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
“Rather than improvements in architectural design, the amount of data, parameters, and computational resources appear to be a driving factor in the capabilities of LLMs [93].”
BackgroundRe-evaluating GPT-4’s bar exam performance
Martínez, E. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-024-09396-9 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
“…AI system as compared to those of a human is no easy task (Hernandez-Orallo 2020; Burden and Hernández-Orallo 2020; Raji et al. 2021; Bowman 2022, 2023; Kojima et al. 2022), and in the context of the legal profession specifically, there are various reasons to doubt the usefulness of the bar exam…”
BackgroundDynamic Retrieval Augmented Generation of Ontologies using Artificial Intelligence (DRAGON-AI)
Toro, S., Anagnostopoulos, A., Bello, S., Blumberg, K., Cameron, R., Carmody, L., Diehl, A., Dooley, D. M., Duncan, W., Fey, P., et al. (2023) · Journal of Biomedical Semantics · doi:10.1186/s13326-024-00320-3 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
“Note that by definition OWL DL reasoning is always completely precise as all entailments follow from existing axioms”
BackgroundThe Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Educational Measurement: Opportunities and Ethical Challenges
Bulut, O., Beiting-Parrish, M., Casabianca, J., Slater, S. C., Jiao, H., Song, D., Ormerod, C., Fabiyi, D. G., Ivan, R., Walsh, C., et al. (2024) · Chinese/English Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation · doi:10.59863/miql7785 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
“In fact, not even experts and LLM developers can reliably interpret how a specific output was reached (Bowman, 2023).”
Moral consideration for AI systems by 2030
Sebo, J., & Long, R. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00379-1 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
“These systems are already advanced, and further advances are very likely, given the trend of returns to increased scale in data and computation [4, 5].”
Emergent World Models and Latent Variable Estimation in Chess-Playing Language ModelsPreprint
Karvonen, A. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.15498 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
“Others have argued that, to an extent, LLMs are developing an internal representation of the world (Bowman, 2023).”
BackgroundNannini, L., Balayn, A., & Smith, A. L. (2023) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594074 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Frontier AI Regulation: Managing Emerging Risks to Public Safety
Anderljung, M., Barnhart, J., Korinek, A., Leung, J., O'Keefe, C., Whittlestone, J., Avin, S., Brundage, M., Bullock, J., Cass-Beggs, D., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.03718 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
“Reliably controlling powerful AI models’ behavior, in other words, remains a largely unsolved technical problem [19, 17, 92, 93, 65] and the subject of ongoing research.”
BackgroundEvaluating Correctness and Faithfulness of Instruction-Following Models for Question Answering
Adlakha, V., BehnamGhader, P., Lu, X. H., Meade, N., & Reddy, S. (2024) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00667 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
“, 2023) and are sensitive to input instructions (Bowman, 2023).”
BackgroundBrohi, S., Mastoi, Q.-U.-A., Jhanjhi, N. Z., & Pillai, T. R. (2025) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a18080499 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence-enhanced retinal imaging as a biomarker for systemic diseases
Wang, J.-Y., Wang, Y.-X., Zeng, D., Zhu, Z., Li, D., Liu, Y., Sheng, B., Grzybowski, A., & Wong, T. Y. (2025) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.100786 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“Large language model (LLM), including DeepSeek, GPT-o1 and 4o (OpenAI), LLaMA (Meta), PaLM (Google), BERT (Google), Gemini (Google), Copilot (Microsoft) and Claude (Anthropic) have recently drawn considerable interest from journalists, policymakers, and scholars across fields [73, 74].”
XAI meets LLMs: A Survey of the Relation between Explainable AI and Large Language ModelsPreprint
Cambria, E., Malandri, L., Mercorio, F., Nobani, N., & Seveso, A. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.15248 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“1) Issues: Bowman [2023] critically examines LLMs, highlighting their unpredictability and the emergent nature of their capabilities with scaling.”
BackgroundLow-code LLM: Visual Programming over LLMsPreprint
Cai, Y., Mao, S., Wu, W., Wang, Z., Liang, Y., Ge, T., Wu, C., You, W., Song, T., Xia, Y., et al. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.08103 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Chan, S. T. S., Lo, N. P. K., & Wong, A. M. H. (2024) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/15607 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
‘AI coaching’: democratising coaching service or offering an ersatz?
Bachkirova, T., & Kemp, R. (2024) · Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/17521882.2024.2368598 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“They work by remixing and recombining existing writing by repeatedly predicting the next typically used words, thus generating convincing language, without understanding the meaning of the language processed (Bowman, 2023).”
BadLlama: cheaply removing safety fine-tuning from Llama 2-Chat 13B
Gade, P. M., Lermen, S., Rogers-Smith, C., & Ladish, J. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.00117 · Cited by 39
“As AI developers train models using more data, compute, and discover more efficient training methods, future language models will likely be significantly more capable of harm than current models (Bowman, 2023).”
BackgroundGene Set Summarization Using Large Language ModelsPreprint
joachimiak, M. P., Caufield, J., Harris, N., Kim, H., & Mungall, C. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.13338 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“…been shown to exhibit “behavior” such as sycophancy (telling the user what they want to hear) and sandbagging (detecting naivety on the part of the user and providing false information)(Bowman, 2023), all of which are potential risks when interpreting scientific data using background knowledge.”
BackgroundElecBench: a Power Dispatch Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language ModelsPreprint
Zhou, X.-Y., Zhao, H., Cheng, Y.-H., Cao, Y., Liang, G., Liu, G.-L., Liu, W.-X., Xu, Y., & Zhao, J.-H. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.05365 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“to align their with users’ preferences at the expense of factual accuracy [18 precise information is and fault diagnosis, decisions.”
BackgroundLarge Language Models are not Fair Evaluators
Wang, P., Li, L., Chen, L., Cai, Z., Zhu, D., Lin, B., Cao, Y., Liu, Q., Liu, T., & Sui, Z. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.17926 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“However, it is unclear how reliable LLMs are as evaluators, as they are known to be sensitive to textual instructions and inputs (Dong et al., 2022; Turpin et al., 2023; Bowman, 2023).”
BackgroundThe shutdown problem: an AI engineering puzzle for decision theorists
Thornley, E. (2024) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-024-02153-3 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“The AI systems which emerge from this process can perform remarkably well on many tasks, but even the engineers overseeing the training process have little idea what goes on inside them (Bowman, 2023; sec.”
InfluentialA Comprehensive Survey on Vector Database: Storage and Retrieval Technique, Challenge
Ma, L., Zhang, R., Han, Y., Yu, S., Wang, Z., Ning, Z., Zhang, J., Xu, P., Li, P., Qiao, Z., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.11703 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“According to [38], LLMs can improve their capabilities predictably with increasing data scale, even without targeted innovation.”
Epistemological Fault Lines Between Human and Artificial Intelligence
Quattrociocchi, W., Capraro, V., & Perc, M. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.19466 · Cited by 33
“Increasing the volume of data and the number of parameters refines a function approxima-tor but does not alter the underlying computation [37].”
Pelaez, S., Verma, G., Ribeiro, B., & Philip Shapira, A. (2024) · Quantitative Science Studies · doi:10.1162/qss_a_00285 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“This pattern aligns with the scaling law suggesting that substantial performance improvements are achieved by scaling up LLMs (Bowman, 2023).”
BackgroundLoya, M., Sinha, D., & Futrell, R. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.241 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Abedi, M., Alshybani, I., Shahadat, M., & Murillo, M. S. (2023) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/md04b0 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“Building on the foundations of Large Language Models (LLMs), chatbots have rapidly become a pivotal component of human-computer interaction [79,80].”
BackgroundSeger, E., Dreksler, N., Moulange, R., Dardaman, E., Schuett, J., Wei, K., Winter, C., Arnold, M., Ó hÉigeartaigh, S., Korinek, A., et al. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4596436 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“Increasingly capable foundation models are bringing with them an array of new behaviors and safety challenges that arise unpredictably and are not well-understood by developers [133].”
BackgroundReason, T., Rawlinson, W. D., Langham, J., Gimblett, A., Malcolm, B., & Klijn, S. L. (2024) · PharmacoEconomics - Open · doi:10.1007/s41669-024-00477-8 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“Large language models (LLMs), such as Generative Pre-Trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4), are mathematical models that work by repeatedly predicting the next word [7, 8].”
BackgroundFischer, R., Luczak-Rösch, M., & Karl, J. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.03612 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“…there is increasing concern that these LLMs may not express the values of their creators or the training data that were used to develop the models (Bowman, 2023) and there is increasing evidence that they produce biased or toxic output (Bender & Koller, 2020; Chan et al., 2023; Pellert et al.,…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialChan, S., Lo, N., & Wong, A. (2024) · rEFLections · doi:10.61508/refl.v31i3.277514 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“Trained on extensive datasets of textual information, LLMs are designed to produce natural language responses that closely resemble human-generated feedback (Bowman, 2023).”
Atallah, S., Banda, N., Banda, A., & Roeck, N. A. (2023) · Techniques in Coloproctology · doi:10.1007/s10151-023-02837-8 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“Inter-estingly, human performance for a task does not define the upper bound of LLMs [8–10].”
BackgroundInfluentialIn-Context Learning User Simulators for Task-Oriented Dialog Systems
Terragni, S., Filipavicius, M., Khau, N., Guedes, B., Manso, A., & Mathis, R. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.00774 · Cited by 29
“The recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have been remarkable (Bowman, 2023), with OpenAI’s GPT-3 (Brown et al.”
MethodHuo, B., Calabrese, E., Sylla, P., Kumar, S., Ignacio, R. C., Oviedo, R., Hassan, I., Slater, B. J., Kaiser, A., Walsh, D. S., et al. (2024) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-024-10807-w · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“While Rahsepar et al. reported that the converse was true when evaluating lung cancer screening recommendations provided by these LLMs [22], computer scientists recognize that reinforcement learning, as described in creating the scenarios, can both strength and weaken model behaviors [23].”
Cugurullo, F. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00476-9 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“As computer scientist Sam Bowman remarks, ‘any attempt at a precise explanation of an LLM’s behavior is doomed to be too complex for any human to understand’ given the countless connections among artificial neurons at play in the production of just one piece of text [46].”
Lo, N., Chan, S., & Wong, A. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251352907 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“The comparative advantage of GenAI based on large language models (LLMs) is that they are more able to respond sensibly to unanticipated data, drawing on a massive pool of training data to provide tailored responses to new prompts (Bowman, 2023).”
A Survey of LLM Datasets: From Autoregressive Model to AI Chatbot
Du, F., Ma, X.-J., Yang, J., Liu, Y., Luo, C.-R., Wang, X., Jiang, H.-O., & Jing, X. (2024) · Journal of Computer Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s11390-024-3767-3 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Detecting Scams Using Large Language Models
Jiang, L. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.03147 · Cited by 26
Anderljung, M., Smith, E. T., O'Brien, J., Soder, L., Bucknall, B., Bluemke, E., Schuett, J., Trager, R., Strahm, L., & Chowdhury, R. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.14711 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“Given LLMs’ general-purpose nature and complexity [47], no single individual or team could possess all the wide-ranging expertise and perspectives needed to answer all the relevant questions [20].”
BackgroundReport of the 1st Workshop on Generative AI and LawPreprint
Cooper, A. F., Lee, K., Grimmelmann, J., Ippolito, D., Callison-Burch, C., Choquette-Choo, C. A., Mireshghallah, N., Brundage, M., Mimno, D., Choksi, M. Z., et al. (2023) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.06477 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“Similarly, it appears that LLMs are subject to sycophancy , where a model answers subjective questions in a way that flatters their user’s stated beliefs, and sandbagging , where models are more likely to endorse common misconceptions when their user appears to be less educated” [12, 79].”
BackgroundReviving Static Charts Into Live Charts
Ying, L., Wang, Y., Li, H., Dou, S., Zhang, H., Jiang, X., Qu, H., & Wu, Y. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2024.3397004 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Developing a fully auto-generated Live Chart that satisfies every user’s needs and ensures the quality of the narration by GPT-3 [77], [78] is an arduous task, if not impossible, as our user study confirms the challenge due to participants’ diverse preferences for Live Chart styles.”
BackgroundLLMSecCode: Evaluating Large Language Models for Secure Coding
Rydén, A., Näslund, E., Schiller, E., & Almgren, M. (2024) · International Conference on Cyber Security Cryptography and Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.16100 · Cited by 18
“LLMs are powerful AI models designed to understand and generate human-like text; see recent surveys by Zhao et al. [2023] and Bowman [2023].”
BackgroundLa inteligencia artificial en la educación
Norman-Acevedo, E. (2023) · Panorama · doi:10.15765/pnrm.v17i32.3681 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“…que «predicen» la relación entre palabras, tras haber sido entrenados, con o sin supervisión, con extensos volúmenes de texto, y llegan a abarcar cien billones de parámetros, lo que equivale a recabar más de tres cuar-tas partes toda la internet pública (Bowman, 2023; Wikipedia Contributors, 2024).”
Can Large Language Models Simulate Spoken Human Conversations?
Mayor, E., Bietti, L., & Bangerter, A. (2025) · Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1111/cogs.70106 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“Bowman (2023) noted that smaller LLMs may exhibit random performance for some tasks that larger models successfully complete.”
Is GPT-OSS Good? A Comprehensive Evaluation of OpenAI's Latest Open Source Models
Bi, Z.-Q., Chen, K.-Y., Tseng, C.-Y., Zhang, D., Wang, T.-Y., Luo, H.-Y., Chen, L., Huang, J.-M., Guan, J., Hao, J., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.12461 · Cited by 17
“Static leaderboards encourage overfitting and contamination [40], while benchmark construction may embed biases [41].”
Evidence of a log scaling law for political persuasion with large language modelsPreprint
Hackenburg, K., Tappin, B. M., Röttger, P., Hale, S. A., Bright, J., & Margetts, H. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.14508 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“Recent research has underscored, for example, that many tasks exhibit U-shaped, inverse, or logarithmic scaling patterns [54, 32], making it much more difficult to predict scaling of performance in niche but critical downstream domains [18, 55, 7].”
BackgroundPernaa, J., Ikävalko, T., Takala, A., Vuorio, E., Pesonen, R. M., & Haatainen, O. (2024) · Informatics · doi:10.3390/informatics11020020 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“AI chatbots represent cutting-edge information technology that will soon be applied throughout society in all kinds of tasks to increase productivity [1,15].”
BackgroundInfluentialBuilding Resilient SMEs: Harnessing Large Language Models for Cyber Security in Australia
Kereopa-Yorke, B. (2023) · Journal of AI, Robotics & Workplace Automation · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.02612 · Cited by 17
On the Unexpected Abilities of Large Language Models
Nolfi, S. (2024) · Adaptive Behavior · doi:10.1177/10597123241256754 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
The Relevance of Large Language Models for Project Management
Karnouskos, S. (2024) · IEEE Open Journal of the Industrial Electronics Society · doi:10.1109/ojies.2024.3412222 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“LLMs evolve with the interactions they carry out and get more capable while exhibiting emergent behavior that does not express the values of their creators and it is challenging to interpret their inner workings [45].”
BackgroundLarge Language Models in Qualitative Research: Can We Do the Data Justice?
Schroeder, H., Quere, M. A. L., Randazzo, C., Mimno, D., & Schoenebeck, S. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.07362 · Cited by 15
“Prior research supports this finding: the chatbot is an example of a user interface metaphor [48]; specific systems drive perceptions of broader technologies with Galloway’s interface effect [27]; and brief interactions with systems produce misleading impressions of overall performance [13].”
MethodIntroducing ChatSQC: Enhancing statistical quality control with augmented AI
Megahed, F. M., Chen, Y., Zwetsloot, I. M., Knoth, S., Montgomery, D. C., & Jones‐Farmer, L. A. (2024) · Journal of Quality Technology · doi:10.1080/00224065.2024.2372328 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Much of the research concerning LLMs, including many pioneering studies that introduced novel methods or theories, is not published in peer-reviewed venues (Bowman 2023).”
Delving into the Reversal Curse: How Far Can Large Language Models Generalize?
Lin, Z., Fu, Z.-H., Liu, K., Xie, L., Lin, B., Wang, W., Cai, D., Wu, Y., & Ye, J.-P. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.18808 · Cited by 13
“Central to the discourse on LLMs is the debate over whether their capabilities stem from merely memorizing massive pretraining corpus [33, 9], or extend from a deeper understanding of human language and the ability to generalize their knowledge to new tasks and settings [24, 4].”
BackgroundKrajka, J., & Olszak, I. (2024) · Roczniki Humanistyczne · doi:10.18290/rh247206.8 · Cited by 13
“Bowman (2023) notes that there are no reliable techniques for steering the behaviour of LLMs, and experts are not yet able to interpret their inner functioning.”
BackgroundKharitonova, K., Pérez‐Fernández, D., Gutiérrez-Hernando, J., Gutiérrez-Fandiño, A., Callejas, Z., & Griol, D. (2024) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2024.2321959 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“…with their vast size and extensive training data, demonstrate emergent abilities that surpass those of typical arti fi cial intelligence models (Bowman 2023; Kaplan et al. 2020) and their use have been explored recently for a myriad of applications in the healthcare domains, such as medical…”
Fischer, R. (2026) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781035341481
Chan, S., Lo, N., & Wong, A. (2024) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2024.2440182 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“LLMs are trained on significant amounts of textual data, allowing them to generate natural language that mimics human feedback (Bowman, 2023).”
RetractedDanchin, A. (2024) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/1751-7915.70014 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“The most familiar generative AI task developed today is text generation, or tasks that could be assimilated to text generation, such as the construction of a significant output that can use text-like representations as code [see Bowman, 2023 for a description of the process and its consequences].”
BackgroundFLEXTAF: Enhancing Table Reasoning with Flexible Tabular Formats
Zhang, X.-L., Wang, D., Dou, L.-X., Wang, B., Wu, D.-Y., Zhu, Q.-F., & Che, W.-X. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.08841 · Cited by 12
WALL-E: Embodied Robotic WAiter Load Lifting with Large Language ModelPreprint
Wang, T., Li, Y., Lin, H., Xue, X.-Y., & Fu, Y.-W. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.15962 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Some of the recent LLMs include GPT-3, PaLM, Galactica, LLaMA, GPT-4 and PaLM 2 [6, 27, 26, 1].”
BackgroundMini-Giants: "Small" Language Models and Open Source Win-Win
Zhou, Z., Li, L.-Z., Chen, X., & Li, A. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.08189 · Cited by 12
Golgoon, A., Filom, K., & Kannan, A. R. (2024) · International Conference on AI in Finance · doi:10.1145/3677052.3698612 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“In this paper, we focus on the interpretability question, beginning with a short introduction to the field of mechanistic interpretability in the next section.”
Accuracy of a Large Language Model as a new tool for optometry education
Cardona, G., Argilés, M., & Pérez-Mañá, L. (2023) · Clinical and experimental optometry · doi:10.1080/08164622.2023.2288174 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Exploring Sentence Parsing: OpenAI API-Based and Hybrid Parser-Based Approaches
Sewunetie, W., & Kovacs, L. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3360480 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Functioning as autoregressive language models, LLMs operate by taking an input text and iteratively predicting subsequent tokens or words [30].”
Sublime, J. (2024) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.15315 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“In particular, the recent public release of large language models (LLMs) algorithms (Wei et al., 2022a; Bowman, 2023) based on GPT-3.”
BackgroundGenerative artificial intelligence for literature reviews
Wagner, G., Prester, J., Mousavi, R., Lukyanenko, R., & Paré, G. (2026) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/02683962261425675 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“This discovery-oriented paradigm poses fundamental challenges to interpretability, leaving signi fi cant gaps in understanding model mechanisms and in reliably steering their behavior (Bowman, 2023).”
Zhang, Y., Huang, T., Liu, C., Miller, A. N., Yang, M., Harris, I. A., Sawaguchi, T., Miclau, T., Tian, M., Chui, C. S., et al. (2026) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076251412989 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
The problem of atypicality in LLM-powered psychiatry
Garcia, B., Chua, E. Y. S., & Brah, H. (2025) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2025-110972 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“However, in the case of paranoid patients, model-typical outputs—which take the patient’s claim seriously as a claim made by a typical user and respond in kind—may be inappropriate for the patient, because it can worsen their symptoms by engaging with it, thereby reinforcing their paranoia.”
From Neurons to Neutrons: A Case Study in Interpretability
Kitouni, O., Nolte, N., Pérez-Díaz, V. S., Trifinopoulos, S., & Williams, M. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.17425 · Cited by 9
“Another relevant line of work studies whether models build internal “world mod-els” (Li et al., 2022; Benchekroun et al., 2023; Bowman, 2023).”
BackgroundThekdi, S. A., & Aven, T. (2024) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2024.2340013 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Similarly, research has found that LLMs show promise in abilities to program and improve programming abilities (Haluptzok, Bowers, and Kalai 2022).”
InfluentialTaken out of context: On measuring situational awareness in LLMs
Berglund, L., Stickland, A. C., Balesni, M., Kaufmann, M., Tong, M., Korbak, T., Kokotajlo, D., & Evans, O. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.00667 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“This raises the question: could situational awareness emerge entirely in pretraining? We expect that as models scale, they learn ever more detailed representations (or internal models) of the outside world (Bowman, 2023; Branwen, 2021).”
BackgroundEpistemology in the Age of Large Language Models
Mugleston, J. D., Truong, V. H., Kuang, C., Sibiya, L., & Myung, J. (2025) · Knowledge · doi:10.3390/knowledge5010003 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“The question is, do they absorb the meanings of the words through sensory evidence?”
InfluentialKieser, F., Tschisgale, P., Rauh, S., Bai, X., Maus, H., Petersen, S., Stede, M., Neumann, K., & Wulff, P. (2024) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2024.1408817 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Instead, it may simply mean that the appropriate prompt has not yet been found (Polverini and Gregorcic, 2024; Bowman, 2023).”
BackgroundThe Convergence of Artificial Intelligence Foundation Models and 6G Wireless Communication Networks
Shoaib, M. R., Wang, Z., & Zhao, J. (2024) · IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference · doi:10.1109/vtc2024-spring62846.2024.10683090 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“RNNs face such scalability concerns during both model training and deployment phases [6].”
BackgroundLLM-based Extraction of Contradictions from Patents
Trapp, S., & Warschat, J. (2024) · TFC · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.14258 · Cited by 8
“[18, 19] Larger language models usually achieve significant performance improvements compared to smaller models, which can be described by so-called scaling laws [20, 21].”
BackgroundJustifiable Artificial Intelligence: Engineering Large Language Models for Legal Applications
Wehnert, S. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.15716 · Cited by 8
“As investment in LLMs grows, their capabilities in general may also improve [32].”
BackgroundFairJudge: An Adaptive, Debiased, and Consistent LLM-as-a-JudgePreprint
Yang, B., Feng, L., Chen, Y.-K., Zhang, Y., Xu, X., & Li, S. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.06625 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“(Gehrmann et al., 2021; Celikyilmaz et al., 2020; Bowman, 2024; Lin, 2004; Papineni et al., 2002; Achiam et al., 2023; Gilardi et al., 2023).”
Towards Predictive Communication: The Fusion of Large Language Models and Brain–Computer Interface
Carìa, A. (2025) · Italian National Conference on Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25133987 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“These models are trained on massive datasets to acquire a large collection of language features and statistical information regarding linguistic relationships [46].”
Machine Advisors: Integrating Large Language Models Into Democratic Assemblies
Špecián, P. (2024) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.1080/02691728.2024.2379271 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Yan, Z., Zhang, R., & Jia, F. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 9th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning · doi:10.1145/3675812.3675837 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Phishing Codebook: A Structured Framework for the Characterization of Phishing Emails
Saka, T., Jain, R., Vaniea, K., & Kokciyan, N. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.08967 · Cited by 6
“With advancements in semi-supervised learning [65] and language models [66], such structured information extraction can be achieved.”
BackgroundEnhancing Pipeline-Based Conversational Agents with Large Language ModelsPreprint
Foosherian, M., Purwins, H., Rathnayake, P., Alam, T., Teimao, R., & Thoben, K. (2023) · Tsinghua Interdisciplinary Workshop on Logic, Language and Meaning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.03748 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Such models can, for instance, possess emergent abilities, be hard to steer, and humans will likely have difficulties interpreting how they work (Bowman, 2023).”
Background
- Authors
- Bowman, S. R.
- Corresponding author
- Bowman, Samuel R.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2834-703X (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2304.00612
- OpenAlex
- W4410559688
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 128
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 39 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 40.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Critical AI (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2046556, 1922658)
- Open Philanthropy Project
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Keywords
- large language models, emergent behavior, AI policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review