PreprintCited by 196Machine Learning and Data ClassificationAdvanced Bandit Algorithms ResearchMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research

SMAC3: A Versatile Bayesian Optimization Package for Hyperparameter Optimization

Open access
Lindauer, Marius, Eggensperger, Katharina, Feurer, Matthias, Biedenkapp, André, Deng, Difan, Benjamins, Carolin, Ruhopf, Tim, Sass, René +1 more·2021·arXiv

Abstract

Algorithm parameters, in particular hyperparameters of machine learning algorithms, can substantially impact their performance. To support users in determining well-performing hyperparameter configurations for their algorithms, datasets and applications at hand, SMAC3 offers a robust and flexible framework for Bayesian Optimization, which can improve performance within a few evaluations. It offers several facades and pre-sets for typical use cases, such as optimizing hyperparameters, solving low dimensional continuous (artificial) global optimization problems and configuring algorithms to perform well across multiple problem instances. The SMAC3 package is available under a permissive BSD-license at https://github.com/automl/SMAC3.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2109.09831

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies have shown that other optimisation algorithms are suitable for the AutoMoDe family, including simulated annealing and sequential model-based algorithm configuration.

    “Recent studies have shown that other optimisation algorithms are suitable for the AutoMoDe family (e.g., simulated annealing 65 and sequential model-based algorithm configuration 66,67 ).”

    From Automatic design of stigmergy-based behaviours for robot swarms (2024) · cites this paper as [67]

    Section 2.4 (p. 3) describes SMAC as an algorithm-configuration optimizer, supporting the citation’s identification of that method. The paper does not report a study of the AutoMoDe family or establish that SMAC is suitable for it; the application-specific part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. E. Bakshy, L. Dworkin, B. Karrer, K. Kashin, B. Letham, A. Murthy, and S. Singh. Ae: A domain-agnostic platform for adaptive experimentation. In Proceedings of the international conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 1-8, 2018.
  2. K. Eggensperger, P. M¨ uller, N. Malik, M. Feurer, R. Sass, A. Klein, N. Awad, Marius Lindauer, and Frank Hutter. HPOBench: A collection of reproducible multi-fidelity benchmark problems for hpo. In Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Track on Datasets and Benchmarks , 2021.
  3. S. Falkner, A. Klein, and F. Hutter. BOHB: Robust and efficient hyperparameter optimization at scale. In J. Dy and A. Krause, editors, Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML'18) , volume 80, pages 1437-1446. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 2018.
  4. M. Feurer and F. Hutter. Hyperparameter optimization. In F. Hutter, L. Kotthoff, and J. Vanschoren, editors, Automated Machine Learning: Methods, Systems, Challenges , volume 5 of The Springer Series on Challenges in Machine Learning , chapter 1, pages 3-38. Springer, 2019. Available for free at http://automl.org/book.
  5. K. Kandasamy, K. Vysyaraju, W. Neiswanger, B. Paria, C. Collins, J. Schneider, B. Poczos, and E. Xing. Tuning hyperparameters without grad students: Scalable and robust Bayesian optimisation with Dragonfly. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 21(81): 1-27, 2020.
  6. M. Lindauer, K. Eggensperger, M. Feurer, A. Biedenkapp, J. Marben, P. M¨ uller, and F. Hutter. BOAH: A Tool Suite for Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization & Analysis of Hyperparameters. arXiv:1908.06756 [cs.LG] , 2019a. · arXiv
  7. J. Mockus, V. Tiesis, and A. Zilinskas. The application of Bayesian methods for seeking the extremum. Towards Global Optimization , 2(117-129), 1978.
  8. N. Srinivas, A. Krause, S. Kakade, and M. Seeger. Gaussian process optimization in the bandit setting: No regret and experimental design. In J. F¨ urnkranz and T. Joachims, editors, Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML'10) , pages 1015-1022. Omnipress, 2010.
  9. R. Turner, D. Eriksson, M. McCourt, J. Kiili, E. Laaksonen, Z. Xu, and I. Guyon. Bayesian optimization is superior to random search for machine learning hyperparameter tuning: Analysis of the black-box optimization challenge 2020. In H. Escalante and K. Hofmann, editors, NeurIPS 2020 Competition and Demonstration Track , volume 133 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 3-26. PMLR, 2020.
  10. A. Zela, T. Elsken, T. Saikia, Y. Marrakchi, T. Brox, and F. Hutter. Understanding and robustifying differentiable architecture search. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR'20) , 2020. Published online: iclr.cc .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindauer, M., Eggensperger, K., Feurer, M., Biedenkapp, A., Deng, D., Benjamins, C., Ruhopf, T., Sass, R., & Hutter, F.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3199199693
Cited by
195
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (INST 37/935-1, 37/935-1, INST~37/935-1 FUGG, 37/935-1 FUGG)
  • Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
  • Generalitat de Catalunya (10.13039/501100011033, 13039/501100011033, 501100011033, AEI/10.13039/501100011033, MCIN /AEI/10.13039/501100011033, PID2019)
  • Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AEI/10.13039/501100011033, MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/, 10.13039/501100011033, 13039/501100011033)
  • Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI//10.13039/501100011033/, 501100011033, 10.13039/501100011033, MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501 100 011 033, 13039, .13039/501100011033, MCIN / AEI/10, 10.13039, PID2019-109137GB-C21, AEI/10, PID2019)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Keywords
Bayesian optimization, hyperparameter optimization, automated machine learning, global optimization, multi-fidelity optimization, algorithm configuration, hyperparameter search

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review