Efficient approximation of experimental Gaussian boson sampling
Open accessAbstract
Two recent landmark experiments have performed Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) with a non-programmable linear interferometer and threshold detectors on up to 144 output modes (see Refs.~\onlinecite{zhong_quantum_2020,zhong2021phase}). Here we give classical sampling algorithms with better total variation distance and Kullback-Leibler divergence than these experiments and a computational cost quadratic in the number of modes. Our method samples from a distribution that approximates the single-mode and two-mode ideal marginals of the given Gaussian boson sampler, which are calculated efficiently. One implementation sets the parameters of a Boltzmann machine from the calculated marginals using a mean field solution. This is a 2nd order approximation, with the uniform and thermal approximations corresponding to the 0th and 1st order, respectively. The $k$th order approximation reproduces Ursell functions (also known as connected correlations) up to order $k$ with a cost exponential in $k$ and high precision, while the experiment exhibits higher order Ursell functions with lower precision. This methodology, like other polynomial approximations introduced previously, does not apply to random circuit sampling because the $k$th order approximation would simply result in the uniform distribution, in contrast to GBS.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Borealis's output cannot be efficiently spoofed in cross-entropy benchmarks using a generalization of the most recent polynomial-time algorithms.
“In addition, its output cannot be efficiently spoofed in cross-entropy benchmarks using a generalization of the most recent polynomial-time algorithms3.”
From Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor (2022) · cites this paper as [3]
The generalized greedy adversarial spoofer is unable to spoof the samples generated by our machine at the cross-entropy benchmark used for scoring the different adversaries.
“We generalized the greedy algorithm introduced by Villalonga et al.3 to work with photon-number-resolved samples and find that it is unable to spoof the samples generated by our machine at the cross-entropy benchmark that we use for scoring the different adversaries.”
From Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor (2022) · cites this paper as Villalonga et al.3
Cites
Quantum computational advantage using photons
Zhong, H.-S., Wang, H., Deng, Y.-H., Chen, M.-C., Peng, L.-C., Luo, Y.-H., Qin, J., Wu, D., Ding, X., Hu, Y., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abe8770 · Cited by 2,405 · see citing works
Self-citationPhase-Programmable Gaussian Boson Sampling Using Stimulated Squeezed Light
Zhong, H.-S., Deng, Y.-H., Qin, J., Wang, H., Chen, M.-C., Peng, L.-C., Luo, Y.-H., Wu, D., Gong, S.-Q., Su, H., et al. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.180502 · Cited by 434 · cited 4× · see citing works
“4, datasets 2.b show the experiment degrades with power [2].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationDetailed study of Gaussian boson sampling
Kruse, R., Hamilton, C. S., Sansoni, L., Barkhofen, S., Silberhorn, C., & Jex, I. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.032326 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Gaussian boson sampling using threshold detectors
Quesada, N., Arrazola, J. M., & Killoran, N. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.062322 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Regimes of Classical Simulability for Noisy Gaussian Boson Sampling
Qi, H., Brod, D. J., Quesada, N., & García-Patrón, R. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.100502 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Quadratic Speed-Up for Simulating Gaussian Boson Sampling
Quesada, N., Chadwick, R. S., Bell, B. A., Arrazola, J. M., Vincent, T., Qi, H., & García−Patrón, R. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.010306 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor
Madsen, L. S., Laudenbach, F., Askarani, M. F., Rortais, F., Vincent, T., Bulmer, J. F. F., Miatto, F. M., Neuhaus, L., Helt, L. G., Collins, M. J., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04725-x · Cited by 1,031 · see citing works
- Authors
- Villalonga, B., Niu, M. Y., Li, L., Neven, H., Platt, J. C., Smelyanskiy, V. N., & Boixo, S.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2109.11525
- OpenAlex
- W3201374345
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- Gaussian boson sampling, threshold detectors, total variation distance, Kullback-Leibler divergence, Boltzmann machine, mean-field approximation, marginal distributions, polynomial approximation, quantum advantage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review