PreprintCited by 16Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and Applications

Efficient approximation of experimental Gaussian boson sampling

Open access
Villalonga, Benjamin, Niu, Murphy Yuezhen, Li, Li, Neven, Hartmut, Platt, John C., Smelyanskiy, Vadim N., Boixo, Sergio·2021·arXiv

Abstract

Two recent landmark experiments have performed Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) with a non-programmable linear interferometer and threshold detectors on up to 144 output modes (see Refs.~\onlinecite{zhong_quantum_2020,zhong2021phase}). Here we give classical sampling algorithms with better total variation distance and Kullback-Leibler divergence than these experiments and a computational cost quadratic in the number of modes. Our method samples from a distribution that approximates the single-mode and two-mode ideal marginals of the given Gaussian boson sampler, which are calculated efficiently. One implementation sets the parameters of a Boltzmann machine from the calculated marginals using a mean field solution. This is a 2nd order approximation, with the uniform and thermal approximations corresponding to the 0th and 1st order, respectively. The $k$th order approximation reproduces Ursell functions (also known as connected correlations) up to order $k$ with a cost exponential in $k$ and high precision, while the experiment exhibits higher order Ursell functions with lower precision. This methodology, like other polynomial approximations introduced previously, does not apply to random circuit sampling because the $k$th order approximation would simply result in the uniform distribution, in contrast to GBS.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2109.11525

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Borealis's output cannot be efficiently spoofed in cross-entropy benchmarks using a generalization of the most recent polynomial-time algorithms.

    “In addition, its output cannot be efficiently spoofed in cross-entropy benchmarks using a generalization of the most recent polynomial-time algorithms3.”
  • The generalized greedy adversarial spoofer is unable to spoof the samples generated by our machine at the cross-entropy benchmark used for scoring the different adversaries.

    “We generalized the greedy algorithm introduced by Villalonga et al.3 to work with photon-number-resolved samples and find that it is unable to spoof the samples generated by our machine at the cross-entropy benchmark that we use for scoring the different adversaries.”

    From Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor (2022) · cites this paper as Villalonga et al.3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Villalonga, B., Niu, M. Y., Li, L., Neven, H., Platt, J. C., Smelyanskiy, V. N., & Boixo, S.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3201374345
Cited by
16
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
Gaussian boson sampling, threshold detectors, total variation distance, Kullback-Leibler divergence, Boltzmann machine, mean-field approximation, marginal distributions, polynomial approximation, quantum advantage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review