Application-Oriented Performance Benchmarks for Quantum Computing
Open accessAbstract
In this work we introduce an open source suite of quantum application-oriented performance benchmarks that is designed to measure the effectiveness of quantum computing hardware at executing quantum applications. These benchmarks probe a quantum computer's performance on various algorithms and small applications as the problem size is varied, by mapping out the fidelity of the results as a function of circuit width and depth using the framework of volumetric benchmarking. In addition to estimating the fidelity of results generated by quantum execution, the suite is designed to benchmark certain aspects of the execution pipeline in order to provide end-users with a practical measure of both the quality of and the time to solution. Our methodology is constructed to anticipate advances in quantum computing hardware that are likely to emerge in the next five years. This benchmarking suite is designed to be readily accessible to a broad audience of users and provides benchmarks that correspond to many well-known quantum computing algorithms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Algorithm-oriented benchmarks use specific quantum algorithms and require width and depth to specify behaviour, unlike quantum volume.
“Unlike random circuits, these benchmarks use specific quantum algorithms such as the Quantum Fourier Transformation or Grover's Search algorithm, which have different circuit depths for the same number of qubits (width).”
From Neutral atom quantum computing hardware: performance and end-user perspective (2023) · cites this paper as [10]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
QASMBench: A Low-Level Quantum Benchmark Suite for NISQ Evaluation and Simulation
Li, A., Stein, S., Krishnamoorthy, S., & Ang, J. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing · doi:10.1145/3550488 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Neutral atom quantum computing hardware: performance and end-user perspective
Wintersperger, K., Dommert, F., Ehmer, T., Hoursanov, A., Klepsch, J., Mauerer, W., Reuber, G., Strohm, T., Yin, M., & Luber, S. (2023) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-023-00190-1 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Leveraging quantum computing for dynamic analyses of logical networks in systems biology
Weidner, F. M., Schwab, J. D., Wölk, S., Rupprecht, F., Ikonomi, N., Werle, S. D., Hoffmann, S., Kühl, M., & Kestler, H. A. (2023) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2023.100705 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lubinski, T., Johri, S., Varosy, P., Coleman, J., Zhao, L., Necaise, J., Baldwin, C. H., Mayer, K., & Proctor, T.
- Affiliations
- IonQ (United States) (US)
- Colorado School of Mines (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- D-Wave Systems (Canada) (CA)
- Quantinuum (United States) (US)
- Sandia National Laboratories California (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 1-32
- ISSN
- 2689-1808 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2110.03137
- OpenAlex
- W3202692017
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 14.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (DENA0003525, 0003525)
- Office of Science (DE-NA0003525)
- National Nuclear Security Administration (DENA-0003525)
- Advanced Scientific Computing Research (DE-NA-0003525)
- Sandia National Laboratories (DE‐NA,0003525, 0003525)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- quantum computing benchmarks, solution time, quantum algorithms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review