PreprintCited by 159Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesQuantum Information and Cryptography

Application-Oriented Performance Benchmarks for Quantum Computing

Open access
Lubinski, Thomas, Johri, Sonika, Varosy, Paul, Coleman, Jeremiah, Zhao, Luning, Necaise, Jason, Baldwin, Charles H., Mayer, Karl +1 more·2021·arXiv

Abstract

In this work we introduce an open source suite of quantum application-oriented performance benchmarks that is designed to measure the effectiveness of quantum computing hardware at executing quantum applications. These benchmarks probe a quantum computer's performance on various algorithms and small applications as the problem size is varied, by mapping out the fidelity of the results as a function of circuit width and depth using the framework of volumetric benchmarking. In addition to estimating the fidelity of results generated by quantum execution, the suite is designed to benchmark certain aspects of the execution pipeline in order to provide end-users with a practical measure of both the quality of and the time to solution. Our methodology is constructed to anticipate advances in quantum computing hardware that are likely to emerge in the next five years. This benchmarking suite is designed to be readily accessible to a broad audience of users and provides benchmarks that correspond to many well-known quantum computing algorithms.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2110.03137

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Algorithm-oriented benchmarks use specific quantum algorithms and require width and depth to specify behaviour, unlike quantum volume.

    “Unlike random circuits, these benchmarks use specific quantum algorithms such as the Quantum Fourier Transformation or Grover's Search algorithm, which have different circuit depths for the same number of qubits (width).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lubinski, T., Johri, S., Varosy, P., Coleman, J., Zhao, L., Necaise, J., Baldwin, C. H., Mayer, K., & Proctor, T.
Affiliations
  • IonQ (United States) (US)
  • Colorado School of Mines (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • D-Wave Systems (Canada) (CA)
  • Quantinuum (United States) (US)
  • Sandia National Laboratories California (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
Volume
4
Pages
1-32
ISSN
2689-1808 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3202692017
Cited by
159
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 7
FWCI
14.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DENA0003525, 0003525)
  • Office of Science (DE-NA0003525)
  • National Nuclear Security Administration (DENA-0003525)
  • Advanced Scientific Computing Research (DE-NA-0003525)
  • Sandia National Laboratories (DE‐NA,0003525, 0003525)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
quantum computing benchmarks, solution time, quantum algorithms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review