Cited by 21Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureGene Regulatory Network AnalysisDNA and Biological Computing

Leveraging quantum computing for dynamic analyses of logical networks in systems biology

Open access
Weidner, Felix M., Schwab, Julian D., Wölk, Sabine, Rupprecht, Felix, Ikonomi, Nensi, Werle, Silke D., Hoffmann, Steve, Kühl, Michael +1 more·2023·Patterns

Abstract

The dynamics of cellular mechanisms can be investigated through the analysis of networks. One of the simplest but most popular modeling strategies involves logic-based models. However, these models still face exponential growth in simulation complexity compared with a linear increase in nodes. We transfer this modeling approach to quantum computing and use the upcoming technique in the field to simulate the resulting networks. Leveraging logic modeling in quantum computing has many benefits, including complexity reduction and quantum algorithms for systems biology tasks. To showcase the applicability of our approach to systems biology tasks, we implemented a model of mammalian cortical development. Here, we applied a quantum algorithm to estimate the tendency of the model to reach particular stable conditions and further revert dynamics. Results from two actual quantum processing units and a noisy simulator are presented, and current technical challenges are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100705

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [50]Rieffel E.G. Polak W.H. Quantum Computing: A Gentle Introduction 2011 MIT Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weidner, F. M., Schwab, J. D., Wölk, S., Rupprecht, F., Ikonomi, N., Werle, S. D., Hoffmann, S., Kühl, M., & Kestler, H. A.
Affiliations
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
  • Leibniz Institute on Aging - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI) (DE)
Corresponding author
Kestler, Hans A.
Venue
Patterns
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-03
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
100705
ISSN
2666-3899 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4323835315
Cited by
21
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patterns (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (submittedVersion)
  • Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01ZX1708C)
  • International Business Machines Corporation
  • BMBF Berlin
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (217328187, 450627322, 288342734, SFB 1074, SFB 1506)
  • Ministerium fur Wirtschaft Arbeit und Wohnungsbau Baden-Wurttemberg
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Biological Computing
Keywords
quantum computing, Boolean networks, systems biology, quantum algorithms, stable states, computational complexity reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review