CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 431Remote-Sensing Image ClassificationDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningRemote Sensing and Land Use

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LoveDA: A Remote Sensing Land-Cover Dataset for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentation

Open access
Wang, Junjue, Zheng, Zhuo, Ma, Ailong, Lu, Xiaoyan, Zhong, Yanfei·2021·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2110.08733arXiv 2110.08733
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Deep learning approaches have shown promising results in remote sensing high spatial resolution (HSR) land-cover mapping. However, urban and rural scenes can show completely different geographical landscapes, and the inadequate generalizability of these algorithms hinders city-level or national-level mapping. Most of the existing HSR land-cover datasets mainly promote the research of learning semantic representation, thereby ignoring the model transferability. In this paper, we introduce the Land-cOVEr Domain Adaptive semantic segmentation (LoveDA) dataset to advance semantic and transferable learning. The LoveDA dataset contains 5987 HSR images with 166768 annotated objects from three different cities. Compared to the existing datasets, the LoveDA dataset encompasses two domains (urban and rural), which brings considerable challenges due to the: 1) multi-scale objects; 2) complex background samples; and 3) inconsistent class distributions. The LoveDA dataset is suitable for both land-cover semantic segmentation and unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) tasks. Accordingly, we benchmarked the LoveDA dataset on eleven semantic segmentation methods and eight UDA methods. Some exploratory studies including multi-scale architectures and strategies, additional background supervision, and pseudo-label analysis were also carried out to address these challenges. The code and data are available at https://github.com/Junjue-Wang/LoveDA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2110.08733

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The essential idea of discrepancy-based and adversarial-based UDA methods is to align the feature distributions of the source and target domains.

    “The essential idea of these two types of UDA methods is to align the feature distributions of the source and target domains (Sun and Saenko, 2016, Ganin et al., 2016, Wang et al., 2021).”

    From Enabling country-scale land cover mapping with meter-resolution satellite imagery (2023) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. H. Alemohammad and K. Booth. LandCoverNet: A global benchmark land cover classification training dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.03111, 2020. · arXiv
  2. A. Boguszewski, D. Batorski, N. Ziemba-Jankowska, T. Dziedzic, and A. Zambrzycka. LandCover.ai: Dataset for automatic mapping of buildings, woodlands, water and roads from aerial imagery. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1102-1110, 2021.
  3. A. Chaurasia and E. Culurciello. Linknet: Exploiting encoder representations for efficient semantic segmentation. In 2017 IEEE Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP), pages 1-4. IEEE, 2017.
  4. L.-C. Chen, Y. Zhu, G. Papandreou, F. Schroff, and H. Adam. Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 801-818, 2018.
  5. Q. Chen, L. Wang, Y. Wu, G. Wu, Z. Guo, and S. L. Waslander. Aerial imagery for roof segmentation: A large-scale dataset towards automatic mapping of buildings. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 147:42-55, 2019.
  6. W. Chen, Z. Jiang, Z. Wang, K. Cui, and X. Qian. Collaborative global-local networks for memory-efficient segmentation of ultra-high resolution images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8924-8933, 2019.
  7. I. Demir, K. Koperski, D. Lindenbaum, G. Pang, J. Huang, S. Basu, F. Hughes, D. Tuia, and R. Raskar. Deepglobe 2018: A challenge to parse the earth through satellite images. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pages 172-181, 2018.
  8. Y. Dong, T. Liang, Y. Zhang, and B. Du. Spectral-spatial weighted kernel manifold embedded distribution alignment for remote sensing image classification. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 51(6):3185-3197, 2020.
  9. Y. Duan, H. Huang, Z. Li, and Y. Tang. Local manifold-based sparse discriminant learning for feature extraction of hyperspectral image. IEEE transactions on cybernetics, 2020.
  10. J. Iqbal and M. Ali. Weakly-supervised domain adaptation for built-up region segmentation in aerial and satellite imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 167:263-275, 2020.
  11. C. Jun, Y. Ban, and S. Li. Open access to earth land-cover map. Nature, 514(7523):434-434, 2014.
  12. A. Kirillov, R. Girshick, K. He, and P. Dollár. Panoptic feature pyramid networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 6399-6408, 2019.
  13. H. Li, P. Xiong, J. An, and L. Wang. Pyramid attention network for semantic segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.10180, 2018. · arXiv
  14. Q. Lian, F. Lv, L. Duan, and B. Gong. Constructing self-motivated pyramid curriculums for cross-domain semantic segmentation: A non-adversarial approach. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 6758-6767, 2019.
  15. J. Long, E. Shelhamer, and T. Darrell. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3431-3440, 2015.
  16. M. Long, Y. Cao, J. Wang, and M. Jordan. Learning transferable features with deep adaptation networks. In International conference on machine learning, pages 97-105. PMLR, 2015.
  17. X. Lu, T. Gong, and X. Zheng. Multisource compensation network for remote sensing cross-domain scene classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 58(4):2504-2515, 2019.
  18. Y. Luo, L. Zheng, T. Guan, J. Yu, and Y. Yang. Taking a closer look at domain shift: Category-level adversaries for semantics consistent domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2507-2516, 2019.
  19. A. Ma, J. Wang, Y. Zhong, and Z. Zheng. Factseg: Foreground activation-driven small object semantic segmentation in large-scale remote sensing imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2021.
  20. D. Marcos, M. Volpi, B. Kellenberger, and D. Tuia. Land cover mapping at very high resolution with rotation equivariant cnns: Towards small yet accurate models. ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing, 145:96-107, 2018.
  21. K. Mei, C. Zhu, J. Zou, and S. Zhang. Instance adaptive self-training for unsupervised domain adaptation. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23-28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XXVI 16, pages 415-430. Springer, 2020.
  22. F. Milletari, N. Navab, and S.-A. Ahmadi. V-net: Fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation. In 2016 fourth international conference on 3D vision (3DV), pages 565-571. IEEE, 2016.
  23. L. Mou, Y. Hua, and X. X. Zhu. A relation-augmented fully convolutional network for semantic segmen- tation in aerial scenes. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 12416-12425, 2019.
  24. E. Othman, Y. Bazi, F. Melgani, H. Alhichri, N. Alajlan, and M. Zuair. Domain adaptation network for cross-scene classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(8):4441-4456, 2017.
  25. J. Pang, C. Li, J. Shi, Z. Xu, and H. Feng. R 2 -CNN: Fast tiny object detection in large-scale remote sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(8):5512-5524, 2019.
  26. X. Peng, Q. Bai, X. Xia, Z. Huang, K. Saenko, and B. Wang. Moment matching for multi-source domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 1406-1415, 2019.
  27. X. Peng, B. Usman, N. Kaushik, D. Wang, J. Hoffman, and K. Saenko. Visda: A synthetic-to-real benchmark for visual domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pages 2021-2026, 2018.
  28. D. Sulla-Menashe and M. A. Friedl. User guide to collection 6 modis land cover (mcd12q1 and mcd12c1) product. USGS: Reston, VA, USA, pages 1-18, 2018.
  29. B. Sun and K. Saenko. Deep coral: Correlation alignment for deep domain adaptation. In European conference on computer vision, pages 443-450. Springer, 2016.
  30. O. Tasar, Y. Tarabalka, A. Giros, P. Alliez, and S. Clerc. Standardgan: Multi-source domain adaptation for semantic segmentation of very high resolution satellite images by data standardization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pages 192-193, 2020.
  31. C. Tian, C. Li, and J. Shi. Dense fusion classmate network for land cover classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pages 192-196, 2018.
  32. Y.-H. Tsai, W.-C. Hung, S. Schulter, K. Sohn, M.-H. Yang, and M. Chandraker. Learning to adapt structured output space for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 7472-7481, 2018.
  33. A. Van Etten, D. Lindenbaum, and T. M. Bacastow. Spacenet: A remote sensing dataset and challenge series. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.01232, 2018. · arXiv
  34. H. Venkateswara, J. Eusebio, S. Chakraborty, and S. Panchanathan. Deep hashing network for unsupervised domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5018-5027, 2017.
  35. M. Volpi and V. Ferrari. Semantic segmentation of urban scenes by learning local class interactions. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pages 1-9, 2015.
  36. H. Wang, T. Shen, W. Zhang, L.-Y. Duan, and T. Mei. Classes matter: A fine-grained adversarial approach to cross-domain semantic segmentation. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 642-659. Springer, 2020.
  37. J. Wang, Y. Zhong, Z. Zheng, A. Ma, and L. Zhang. RSNet: the search for remote sensing deep neural networks in recognition tasks. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 59(3):2520-2534, 2021.
  38. X. Wang, Y. Jin, M. Long, J. Wang, and M. I. Jordan. Transferable normalization: Towards improving transferability of deep neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 1953-1963, 2019.
  39. S. Waqas Zamir, A. Arora, A. Gupta, S. Khan, G. Sun, F. Shahbaz Khan, F. Zhu, L. Shao, G.-S. Xia, and X. Bai. isaid: A large-scale dataset for instance segmentation in aerial images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pages 28-37, 2019.
  40. Y. Xiao, X. Su, Q. Yuan, D. Liu, H. Shen, and L. Zhang. Satellite video super-resolution via multiscale deformable convolution alignment and temporal grouping projection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, pages 1-19, 2021.
  41. L. Yan, B. Fan, H. Liu, C. Huo, S. Xiang, and C. Pan. Triplet adversarial domain adaptation for pixel-level classification of vhr remote sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 58(5):3558-3573, 2019.
  42. Q. ZHANG, J. Zhang, W. Liu, and D. Tao. Category anchor-guided unsupervised domain adaptation for semantic segmentation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32:435-445, 2019.
  43. H. Zhao. National urban population and construction land in 2016 (by cities). China Statistics Press, 2016.
  44. H. Zhao, J. Shi, X. Qi, X. Wang, and J. Jia. Pyramid scene parsing network. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2881-2890, 2017.
  45. Z. Zheng, Y. Zhong, J. Wang, and A. Ma. Foreground-aware relation network for geospatial object seg- mentation in high spatial resolution remote sensing imagery. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4096-4105, 2020.
  46. Z. Zhou, M. M. R. Siddiquee, N. Tajbakhsh, and J. Liang. Unet++: A nested u-net architecture for medical image segmentation. In Deep learning in medical image analysis and multimodal learning for clinical decision support, pages 3-11. Springer, 2018.
  47. Y. Zou, Z. Yu, B. Kumar, and J. Wang. Unsupervised domain adaptation for semantic segmentation via class-balanced self-training. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 289-305, 2018.
  48. Y. Zou, Z. Yu, X. Liu, B. Kumar, and J. Wang. Confidence regularized self-training. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 5982-5991, 2019.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, J., Zheng, Z., Ma, A., Lu, X., & Zhong, Y.
Affiliations
Wuhan University (CN)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2110.08733
arXiv
2110.08733
OpenAlex
W3206476077
Cited by
431
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 91 · 2025: 107 · 2024: 137 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 17
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (41771385, 41801267)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M622522)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017 YFB0504202)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Remote Sensing and Land Use
Keywords
high-resolution remote sensing images, land cover mapping, semantic segmentation, domain adaptation, unsupervised domain adaptation, transferability, pseudo-labeling, class distribution shift

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review