The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 29 of the 55 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Enabling country-scale land cover mapping with meter-resolution satellite imagery
Open accessAbstract
High-resolution satellite images can provide abundant, detailed spatial information for land cover classification, which is particularly important for studying the complicated built environment. However, due to the complex land cover patterns, the costly training sample collections, and the severe distribution shifts of satellite imageries caused by, e.g., geographical differences or acquisition conditions, few studies have applied high-resolution images to land cover mapping in detailed categories at large scale. To fill this gap, we present a large-scale land cover dataset, Five-Billion-Pixels. It contains more than 5 billion labeled pixels of 150 high-resolution Gaofen-2 (4 m) satellite images, annotated in a 24-category system covering artificial-constructed, agricultural, and natural classes. In addition, we propose a deep-learning-based unsupervised domain adaptation approach that can transfer classification models trained on labeled dataset (referred to as the source domain) to unlabeled data (referred to as the target domain) for large-scale land cover mapping. Specifically, we introduce an end-to-end Siamese network employing dynamic pseudo-label assignment and class balancing strategy to perform adaptive domain joint learning. To validate the generalizability of our dataset and the proposed approach across different sensors and different geographical regions, we carry out land cover mapping on five megacities in China and six cities in other five Asian countries severally using: PlanetScope (3 m), Gaofen-1 (8 m), and Sentinel-2 (10 m) satellite images. Over a total study area of 60,000 km2, the experiments show promising results even though the input images are entirely unlabeled. The proposed approach, trained with the Five-Billion-Pixels dataset, enables high-quality and detailed land cover mapping across the whole country of China and some other Asian countries at meter-resolution.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper introduces Five-Billion-Pixels, a 24-class, 4 m Gaofen-2 land cover dataset with more than 5 billion labeled pixels over 50,000 km² in China, and proposes a Siamese-network unsupervised domain adaptation method with dynamic pseudo-label assignment and class balancing for large-scale mapping. Experiments on five Chinese megacities and six additional Asian cities over 60,000 km² show the approach can map detailed land cover from unlabeled PlanetScope, Gaofen-1, and Sentinel-2 imagery.
Key findings
- Five-Billion-Pixels contains more than 5 billion labeled pixels from 150 GF-2 images, covers over 50,000 km², and uses 24 categories spanning artificial-constructed, agricultural, and natural classes.
- On the Five-Billion-Pixels benchmark, U-Net achieved OA 80.35%, mF1 57.34%, and mIOU 44.51%; DeepLabv3+ achieved OA 79.87%, mF1 54.84%, and mIOU 42.12%, outperforming object-oriented deep models and spectral–spatial methods.
- For five Chinese megacities, the proposed approach reached sparse-label OA 74.08%, mF1 53.87%, mIOU 43.14%, and dense-label OA 81.28%, mF1 46.79%, mIOU 37.36%, outperforming DS-only and compared UDA methods.
- For six additional Asian cities, the proposed approach reached sparse-label OA 81.14%, mF1 51.20%, mIOU 40.81%, and dense-label OA 80.85%, mF1 55.33%, mIOU 43.99%, with adversarial UDA methods showing severe negative adaptation.
Methods
- The dataset was manually annotated in four phases—coarse labeling, fine labeling, fine checking, and spot checking—using GF-2 4 m multispectral imagery; 120 images were used for training and 30 for testing in the benchmark.
- The UDA approach pre-trains U-Net on Five-Billion-Pixels, builds a Siamese network with shared parameters for source and target branches, assigns pseudo-labels to target pixels selected by lowest Shannon entropy, dynamically increases the number of selected pixels over training, and weights the joint loss by source-domain class distribution.
- Land cover mapping was tested on five Chinese megacities using PlanetScope, Gaofen-1, and Sentinel-2 images and six additional Asian cities using Sentinel-2 images, with evaluation by OA, mF1, mIOU, and UA on sparse and dense labels.
Limitations
- The paper states that obvious errors occur in forested mountains and at mosaic borders, that natural-class classification relies heavily on spectral information and can accumulate pseudo-label errors under spectral shifts, and that lake/river are heavily confused in the additional Asian cities while roads are less refined and discontinuous.
- The paper states that pseudo-labels are difficult to capture contextual information, causing some local misclassifications such as park into pond and garden land in Chengdu, and that λ = 0.9 introduces too many pseudo-label errors while 150 epochs gives limited improvement over 100.
- The text makes evident that the study covers only 11 cities rather than full country-scale mapping, that dense annotation was impossible for entire test images, and that comparison with Dynamic World and World Cover is only an approximate visual comparison due to different acquisition times.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
29 of 55 cited sources checked · 15 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
Five-Billion-Pixels extends the land cover dataset GID.
“we propose the Five-Billion-Pixels dataset, which extends the land cover dataset GID (Tong et al., 2020, Yang et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
A rigid alignment of two dispersive domains may further accumulate intra-domain variance.
“In this context, a rigid alignment of two dispersive domains may further accumulate intra-domain variance (Tsai et al., 2018, Yan et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Tsai et al., 2018 source
The Introduction says feature alignment across domains can be difficult for semantic segmentation because high-dimensional features encode diverse visual cues. Section 6.1 (GTA5) also reports that feature-space adaptation can fail to match source and target distributions effectively. Neither passage says rigid alignment of dispersive domains accumulates intra-domain variance; no page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.79)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Yan et al., 2019 source
- Premisecitation
Compared with conventional land cover classification methods, deep models can accurately characterize complex contextual information contained in high-resolution images.
“Thus, compared with conventional land cover classification methods, deep models can accurately characterize complex contextual information contained in high-resolution images (Tong et al., 2020, Huang et al., 2018a, Zhang et al., 2019, Srivastava et al., 2019, Zhong et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Current pseudo-labeling approaches empirically choose a confidence threshold or set a fixed proportion for sample collection, which is hard to guarantee the accuracy of pseudo-labels assigned by the prediction model to its unknown domain.
“The current approaches are empirically choosing a confidence threshold (Xu et al., 2020, Peng et al., 2021) or setting a fixed proportion for sample collection (Tong et al., 2020, Zhang et al., 2021a, Yan et al., 2019, Wang et al., 2022), which is hard to guarantee the accuracy of pseudo-labels assigned by the prediction model to its unknown domain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Xu et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Peng et al., 2021 source
- cites Tong et al., 2020 source
Section 3.2.2 says the method selects the top µ target samples in each category and acknowledges that pseudo-labels may be inaccurate. But µ is a fixed number, not a fixed proportion, and the method additionally checks pseudo-labels against labeled source samples before using them. The copy provides no page number for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Deep models' performance strongly relies on the quality and quantity of training data.
“their performance strongly relies on the quality and quantity of training data (LeCun et al., 2015, Xia et al., 2017, Ding et al., 2021)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites LeCun et al., 2015 source
- cites Xia et al., 2017 source
Section 2.3 says that training large deep networks on aerial datasets with only hundreds or thousands of images can lead to overfitting and lower accuracy, supporting the importance of training-data quantity. The paper discusses dataset diversity and image relevance, but the cited passages do not establish a comparable dependence of model performance on training-data quality. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Ding et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
An incomplete category system will make the model unable to meet the actual mapping requirements.
“an incomplete category system will make the model unable to meet the actual mapping requirements (Long et al., 2021, Xiong et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Long et al., 2021 source
In “Categories Involved in Interpretation” (page unavailable), the paper says datasets with limited scene categories cannot capture the varied semantic content of remote-sensing images. In “IV. An Example: Million-AID” (page unavailable), it says models trained on such datasets usually have weak generalization and emphasizes category completeness for practical applications. It does not establish that an incomplete category system necessarily makes a model unable to meet actual mapping requirements. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Xiong et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Even if a practicable deep model is already trained on a well-annotated dataset, it may not be valid for other geographical areas or sensors because of feature distribution shifts between source and target domains.
“Even if a practicable deep model is already trained on a well-annotated dataset, it may not be valid for other geographical areas or sensors because of the feature distribution shifts between the source and target domains (Tuia et al., 2016, Tong et al., 2020, Huang et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites Tuia et al., 2016 source
The Introduction says a pre-trained model may not transfer accurately to a new image, and the Transfer Learning and Domain Adaptation section describes different geographical areas and shifts in feature distributions. The discussion of mosaicking also explains why a model trained for one sensor may not work with another. These passages concern classifiers generally, however; they do not establish the claim specifically for deep models. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Tong et al., 2020 source
- cites Huang et al., 2023 source
- Premisecitation
To adapt DCNNs to a new domain, having examples of its feature distribution is the best way.
“To adapt DCNNs to a new domain, there is no better way than having examples of its feature distribution (Tuia et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Tuia et al., 2016 source
The section “Adaptation of the classifier by active learning” says that labeled examples from the target domain can efficiently help adapt a classifier. It does not address DCNNs specifically or establish that having examples of the target feature distribution is the best way to adapt them. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Semantic segmentation models can predict dense classification maps for arbitrary-sized images in an end-to-end, pixels-to-pixels manner.
“In contrast, semantic segmentation models can predict dense classification maps for arbitrary-sized images in an end-to-end, pixels-to-pixels manner (Wurm et al., 2019, Chen et al., 2020, Mou et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Wurm et al., 2019 source
- cites Chen et al., 2020 source
The Introduction says semantic segmentation models provide dense labels within an image patch, and §3.4.2 describes a pixel-labeling architecture whose output has the same dimensions as its input. The paper does not establish that the models accept arbitrary-sized images or explicitly describe prediction as end-to-end; §3.4.3 instead discusses testing specific patch sizes. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Mou et al., 2019 source
Section 3.1 (Overview; page unavailable) describes a fully convolutional network that upsamples feature maps to full resolution to produce segmentation maps. Section 2 (Related Work; page unavailable) also describes deep CNNs as enabling end-to-end aerial image parsing. Our copy does not establish that the model accepts arbitrary-sized images, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Five-Billion-Pixels consists of 150 high-resolution Gaofen-2 satellite images.
“It contains more than 5 billion labeled pixels of 150 high-resolution Gaofen-2 (4 m) satellite images, annotated in a 24-category system covering artificial-constructed, agricultural, and natural classes.”
- Also stated in: § Study data · plain
“Our new dataset, named Five-Billion-Pixels, consists of 150 GF-2 satellite images annotated in a more complete category system (see Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Study data · plain
- Findingown data
Five-Billion-Pixels contains more than 5 billion labeled pixels.
“It contains more than 5 billion labeled pixels of 150 high-resolution Gaofen-2 (4 m) satellite images, annotated in a 24-category system covering artificial-constructed, agricultural, and natural classes.”
- Also stated in: § Contribution of this paper · plain
“It has the spatial resolution of 4 m, covers areas over 50,000 km2 in China, and contains more than 5 billion labeled pixels.”
- Also stated in: § Five-Billion-Pixels · plain
“On this basis, more than 5 billion pixels are carefully annotated, which can provide abundant samples for advancing research in data-driven methodologies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Contribution of this paper · plain
- Findingown data
Five-Billion-Pixels is annotated in a 24-category system covering artificial-constructed, agricultural, and natural classes.
“It contains more than 5 billion labeled pixels of 150 high-resolution Gaofen-2 (4 m) satellite images, annotated in a 24-category system covering artificial-constructed, agricultural, and natural classes.”
- Also stated in: § Contribution of this paper · plain
“Its category system covers artificial-constructed, agricultural, and natural classes, which well-reflects the distribution of real-world ground objects and can widely benefit land-cover-related studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Contribution of this paper · plain
- Findingown data
The Gaofen-2 images in Five-Billion-Pixels have a spatial resolution of 4 m.
“It contains more than 5 billion labeled pixels of 150 high-resolution Gaofen-2 (4 m) satellite images, annotated in a 24-category system covering artificial-constructed, agricultural, and natural classes.”
- Also stated in: § Contribution of this paper · plain
“It has the spatial resolution of 4 m, covers areas over 50,000 km2 in China, and contains more than 5 billion labeled pixels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Contribution of this paper · plain
- Findingown data
Five-Billion-Pixels covers areas over 50,000 km2 in China.
“It has the spatial resolution of 4 m, covers areas over 50,000 km2 in China, and contains more than 5 billion labeled pixels.”
- Also stated in: § Five-Billion-Pixels · plain
“The 150 GF-2 satellite images contained in Five-Billion-Pixels have a total geographical coverage of over 50,000 km2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Five-Billion-Pixels · plain
- Findingown data
Paddy field and garden land located in the suburbs of Bangkok and Yangon are correctly identified by the approach.
“Paddy field and garden land located in the suburbs of Bangkok and Yangon are correctly identified”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Dense built-up areas of Seoul and Tokyo are well distinguished by the approach.
“the dense built-up areas of Seoul and Tokyo are well distinguished”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the additional six Asian cities, lake and river are heavily confused in water bodies.
“Obvious errors occur in water bodies, where lake and river are heavily confused.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Compared to the baseline, the approach obviously boosts performance on the additional six Asian cities.
“Compared to the baseline, our approach obviously boosts the performance”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
From 100 to 150 epochs, the change in performance flattens out.
“from 100 to 150, the change in performance flattens out.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Part of arbor forest in Naypyidaw is misclassified as irrigated field.
“Part of arbor forest in Naypyidaw is misclassified as irrigated field.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The category distribution of Five-Billion-Pixels is quite imbalanced.
“As can be seen, the category distribution of Five-Billion-Pixels is quite imbalanced.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Deep-learning-based methods bring huge performance margins compared with methods based on spectral-spatial features and shallow classifiers on the Five-Billion-Pixels benchmark.
“It can be seen that deep-learning-based methods bring huge performance margins compared with methods based on spectral–spatial features and shallow classifiers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
DeepLabv3+ achieves the best results for urban functional areas, including stadium, square, overpass, railway station, park, and artificial meadow, which contain complicated spatial structures.
“DeepLabv3+ achieves the best results for urban functional areas, including stadium, square, overpass, railway station, park, and artificial meadow, which contain complicated spatial structures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The accuracy of each city first rises as λ increases and then falls as it becomes larger.
“the accuracy of each city first rises as λ increases and then falls as it becomes larger.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Rural residential areas spread around Delhi are accurately extracted by the approach.
“rural residential areas spread around Delhi are accurately extracted”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Within deep-learning-based methods, semantic segmentation models (U-Net and DeepLabv3+) significantly outperform object-oriented methods (ResNet101 and GoogLeNet) on the Five-Billion-Pixels benchmark.
“Within deep-learning-based methods, semantic segmentation models (U-Net and DeepLabv3+) significantly outperform object-oriented methods (ResNet101 and GoogLeNet).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Even if the proportion of different categories is controlled to be consistent in the object-oriented approaches, their accuracy still cannot be improved.
“This is why even if we control the proportion of different categories to be consistent in the object-oriented approaches (see Section 4.1.1), their accuracy still cannot be improved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Results on sparse label and dense label are generally comparable in the additional six Asian cities.
“the results on sparse label and dense label are generally comparable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There is an obvious performance improvement when the epoch number is raised from 50 to 100.
“there is an obvious performance improvement when the epoch number is raised from 50 to 100.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The highest accuracy values for different categories are achieved by different models, mainly DeepLabv3+ and U-Net.
“The highest accuracy values for different categories are achieved by different models, mainly DeepLabv3+ and U-Net.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Road extraction results in the additional six Asian cities are much less refined than those in Chinese cities.
“the extraction results of road are much less refined than those in Chinese cities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Road lines in the additional six Asian cities results are discontinuous.
“road lines in this set of results are discontinuous.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The image source of Five-Billion-Pixels is collected from more than 60 dispersed administrative districts in China.
“The image source of Five-Billion-Pixels is collected from more than 60 dispersed administrative districts in China, as Fig. 1 shows.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The performance gap between comparison methods and the approach is greater in the additional six Asian cities than in Chinese megacities.
“The performance gap between the comparison methods and our approach is greater in these six cities than in Chinese megacities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Within each domain, the distribution of almost every category is dispersive.
“within each domain, the distribution of almost every category is dispersive”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The approach achieves fully automated classification with unlabeled high-resolution satellite images.
“We achieve fully automated classification with unlabeled high-resolution satellite images”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The discrete pseudo-labels used in the UDA approach are validated to be capable of improving the classification results.
“the discrete pseudo-labels used in our UDA approach are validated to be capable of improving the classification results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Distribution shifts occur between different domains.
“distribution shifts occur between different domains”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The results for mountainous forest surrounding the cities, especially Beijing and Chengdu, are not satisfactory.
“the results for mountainous forest surrounding the cities, especially Beijing and Chengdu, are not that satisfactory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Within each domain, the distribution of different categories may be partially mixed.
“within each domain, the distribution of different categories may be partially mixed”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The partial mixing of different categories is evident in forest and cropland categories of DS.
“The last case is evident in forest and cropland categories of DS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The results are able to distinguish forest, built-up, water bodies, and cropland that are relatively consistent with Dynamic World and World Cover.
“our results are able to distinguish forest, built-up, water bodies, and cropland that are relatively consistent with Dynamic World and World Cover.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The paper presents a large-scale land cover dataset, Five-Billion-Pixels, which can provide the remote sensing community with a high-quality benchmark to advance land cover classification algorithms.
“we present a large-scale land cover dataset, Five-Billion-Pixels, which can provide the remote sensing community with a high-quality benchmark to advance land cover classification algorithms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The approach performs well in most areas of each Chinese megacity.
“while our approach performs well in most areas of each Chinese megacity”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The proposed deep-learning-based unsupervised domain adaptation approach can transfer classification models trained on a labeled dataset to unlabeled data for large-scale land cover mapping.
“we propose a deep-learning-based unsupervised domain adaptation approach that can transfer classification models trained on labeled dataset (referred to as the source domain) to unlabeled data (referred to as the target domain) for large-scale land cover mapping.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The negative adaptation caused by intra-domain diversity and class imbalance can be mitigated by the proposed approach even under very complicated practical situations.
“The negative adaptation caused by intra-domain diversity and class imbalance can, therefore, be mitigated by our approach even under very complicated practical situations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
In the final round of spot checking, 10% samples of Five-Billion-Pixels were examined and no obvious errors were observed.
“In the final round of spot checking, 10% samples of Five-Billion-Pixels are examined and no obvious errors are observed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 10% sample examined in the final spot checking is representative of the entire Five-Billion-Pixels dataset.
- Interpretationnone given
The proposed UDA approach avoids changing the domain distributions in a rigid way but softly corrects the domain shifts according to the knowledge learned in the source domain.
“It avoids changing the domain distributions in a rigid way but softly corrects the domain shifts according to the knowledge learned in the source domain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Restricted, hand-crafted rules cannot fully define and represent the complicated land structures or patterns in high-resolution images.
“restricted, hand-crafted rules cannot fully define and represent the complicated land structures or patterns in high-resolution images (Yuan et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yuan et al., 2020 source
- Premisereasoning
The incomplete land cover category systems of existing large-scale datasets prevent them from fully bridging the gap between algorithmic research and real-world applications.
“Although these large-scale datasets possess adequate data amount and data diversity, their incomplete land cover category systems prevent them from fully bridging the gap between algorithmic research and real-world applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Due to the narrow swath of high-resolution images and cloud obscuration, it is often necessary to jointly use numerous images captured at different times and positions by the same sensor, or even by multiple satellite sensors, to mosaic large-scale land cover maps.
“Furthermore, due to the narrow swath of high-resolution images and the problem of cloud obscuration, it is often necessary to jointly use numerous images captured at different times and positions by the same sensor, or even by multiple satellite sensors, to mosaic large-scale land cover maps (Xu et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Xu et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
Low-/medium-spatial resolution remote sensing images are insufficient to distinguish heterogeneous land cover categories, especially for categories mainly distributed in the built environment.
“due to the lack of spatial information, these images are insufficient to distinguish heterogeneous land cover categories, especially for the categories mainly distributed in the built environment, such as buildings, traffic infrastructures, artificial water areas, and urban green spaces.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Class imbalance is prevalent in actual land cover patterns.
“Secondly, class imbalance is prevalent in the actual land cover patterns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
High-resolution images provide richer texture, shape, and spatial distribution information of ground objects, which contribute significantly to detailed mapping in highly heterogeneous areas.
“Compared with low-/medium-spatial resolution images, they provide richer texture, shape, and spatial distribution information of ground objects, which contribute significantly to detailed mapping in high heterogeneous areas, e.g., densely populated megacities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
These issues make it difficult for existing UDA methods to satisfy the demands of large-scale land cover mapping applications.
“These issues make it difficult for existing UDA methods to satisfy the demands of large-scale land cover mapping applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The proposed approach, trained with Five-Billion-Pixels, enables high-quality and detailed land cover mapping across the whole country of China and some other Asian countries at meter-resolution.
“The proposed approach, trained with the Five-Billion-Pixels dataset, enables high-quality and detailed land cover mapping across the whole country of China and some other Asian countries at meter-resolution.”
- Also stated in: § Contribution of this paper · hedged
“Encouraging experimental results are achieved over a total area of 60,000 km2, demonstrating the potential of the proposed dataset and approach for high-quality, detailed land cover mapping across the whole country of China and some other Asian countries at meter-resolution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Contribution of this paper · hedged
- Premisereasoning
The above factors render it difficult for high-resolution satellite images to be employed practically for large-scale land cover mapping applications.
“The above factors render it difficult for high-resolution satellite images to be employed practically for large-scale land cover mapping applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
During a global alignment, a few common categories may pull the entire domain toward their optimal distribution, causing negative adaptation to other categories.
“During a global alignment, a few common categories may, thus, pull the entire domain toward their optimal distribution, causing negative adaptation to other categories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
For large-scale land cover mapping, both domains may contain images from diverse imaging conditions, resulting in a widely dispersed feature space within each domain.
“First, for large-scale land cover mapping, both domains may contain images from diverse imaging conditions, resulting in a widely dispersed feature space within each domain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Due to the wide geographical distribution, Five-Billion-Pixels can reflect the variation of landscapes with different climate, altitude, and geology.
“Due to the wide geographical distribution, Five-Billion-Pixels can reflect the variation of landscapes with different climate, altitude, and geology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Due to the impact of cloud obscuration, swath width, and revisit period, it is necessary to utilize images captured in different seasons and lighting conditions to mosaic the complete image map for each city.
“And, due to the impact of cloud obscuration, swath width, and revisit period, it is necessary to utilize images captured in different seasons and lighting conditions to mosaic the complete image map for each city.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Because the study areas are overly large, it is impossible to densely annotate each test image for quantitative evaluation.
“Because the study areas are overly large, it is impossible to densely annotate each test image for quantitative evaluation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Conventional methods lack discriminative ability for high-resolution images with complicated spatial information.
“This shows that conventional methods lack discriminative ability for high-resolution images with complicated spatial information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Models are biased towards common and simple classes in training because those classes cover a much smaller area in the cities compared to residential and agricultural categories.
“These classes cover a much smaller area in the cities compared to residential and agricultural categories, and the models will be biased towards common and simple classes in training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The approach can mine reliable pseudo-labels even for very different geographical regions.
“which indicates that our approach can mine reliable pseudo-labels even for very different geographical regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Since pseudo-labels are assigned to DT, class balancing can reduce the distribution bias caused by unbalanced categories.
“Since we assign pseudo-labels to DT, it is possible to reduce the distribution bias caused by unbalanced categories through this strategy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A larger epoch number means fewer pixels are selected at the beginning, which better ensures the quality of the pseudo-labels.
“a larger epoch number means fewer pixels are selected at the beginning, which better ensures the quality of the pseudo-labels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
There is great heterogeneity in images acquired by different sensors.
“There is great heterogeneity in images acquired by different sensors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Neither sparse label nor dense label can pull apart the gap between overall accuracy and edge accuracy in the additional six Asian cities.
“Therefore, neither sparse label nor dense label can pull apart the gap between overall accuracy and edge accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: ST-2 has lower spatial resolution than PS and GF-1, and cannot present very fine edges in both ground truth and results.
- Interpretationreasoning
The misclassification of mountains is caused by severe spectral shifts due to different image sources and different imaging conditions.
“This is caused by the severe spectral shifts due to different image sources and different imaging conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
U-Net's skip-connection design helps compensate for information loss in the encoding path, which is significant for classification of satellite images that rely heavily on spectral information.
“This design helps to compensate for the information loss in the encoding path, which is significant for the classification of satellite images that rely heavily on spectral information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A larger number of training iterations enables the model to fully adapt to the target domain.
“a larger number of training iterations enables the model to fully adapt to the target domain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
DeepLabv3+'s deep features are better at describing contextual and spatial relationships.
“This is because the deep features learned by DeepLabv3+ are better at describing contextual and spatial relationships.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The paper proposes an unsupervised domain adaptation approach that can deal with complicated real-world distribution shifts.
“we propose an unsupervised domain adaptation approach that can deal with complicated real-world distribution shifts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The land cover mapping results for five megacities in China and six cities in other Asian countries show the generalizability of the approach across different sensors and geographical regions.
“The land cover mapping results for five megacities in China and six cities in other Asian countries show the generalizability of our approach across different sensors and geographical regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
U-Net can more accurately represent the spectra, textures, and sharp boundaries of ground objects.
“This shows that U-Net can more accurately represent the spectra, textures, and sharp boundaries of ground objects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The annotation of newly acquired images does not need to be dense and pixel-wise when a large-scale, well-annotated dataset is already available.
“the annotation of newly acquired images do not need to be dense and pixel-wise when a large-scale, well-annotated dataset is already available.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Probably not a substantial claim. 41
- It may state two separate claims as one. 55
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationAn insufficient amount of data may lead to overfitting of the model.
“An insufficient amount of data may lead to overfitting of the model”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Long et al., 2021 source
- cites Xiong et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationDiverse imaging conditions lead to shifts in feature distributions of ground objects, which causes the classification method optimal for the source domain to drop drastically in performance on the target domain.
“The attendant problem is that diverse imaging conditions will lead to shifts in feature distributions of ground objects, which causes the classification method optimal for certain annotated images (referred to as the source domain) to drop drastically in performance on newly acquired images (referred to as the target domain) (Tuia et al., 2016, Tong et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe essential idea of discrepancy-based and adversarial-based UDA methods is to align the feature distributions of the source and target domains.
“The essential idea of these two types of UDA methods is to align the feature distributions of the source and target domains (Sun and Saenko, 2016, Ganin et al., 2016, Wang et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationInsufficient data diversity may lead to low generalization capability of the model.
“insufficient data diversity may lead to low generalization capability of the model”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Long et al., 2021 source
- cites Xiong et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationMost densely labeled land cover datasets with sub-meter to meter-spatial resolutions have geographical coverage areas below 10 km2 and are located in concentrated regions.
“But most of them have geographical coverage areas below 10 km2 and are located in concentrated regions, such as ISPRS Potsdam (ISPRS-Contest, 2018), ISPRS Vaihingen (ISPRS-Contest, 2018), Zurich Summer (Volpi and Ferrari, 2015), RIT-18 (Kemker et al., 2018), and Zeebruges (Marcos et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationWorld Cover and Dynamic World cover only basic land cover categories (11 and 9 classes) and have limited ability to depict urban environments.
“Although they are highly accurate and real-time, they cover only basic land cover categories (11 and 9 classes) and have limited ability to depict urban environments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Zanaga et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Brown et al., 2022 source
The Methods taxonomy (page unavailable) lists nine broad Dynamic World classes, including a single built-area class. Usage Notes says built area, as a mixed class, had lower accuracy in one derived-product assessment, but Technical Validation reports high agreement for built area in single-image predictions. The paper does not establish WorldCover’s 11-class count or assess its ability to depict urban environments, so it supports only the Dynamic World portion of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThere are two general strategies for deep-learning-based land cover classification: object-oriented approaches based on DCNNs and semantic segmentation approaches based on end-to-end DCNNs.
“There are two general strategies for deep-learning-based land cover classification: object-oriented approaches based on DCNNs and semantic segmentation approaches based on end-to-end DCNNs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Huang et al., 2018a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Zhang et al., 2019 source
Section 2.3 describes an object-based CNN, but uses it for land-use rather than land-cover classification. Section 4.2 also discusses fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. The paper does not present these as the two general strategies for deep-learning-based land-cover classification. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Srivastava et al., 2019 source
The Introduction and Related Work distinguishes CNN-based patch classification from classifying all pixels in one forward pass, and the Methods contrasts urban-object classification with pixel-level semantic segmentation. It does not frame these as the two general strategies for deep-learning-based land-cover classification, or specify the claimed object-oriented DCNN versus end-to-end DCNN division. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationClass balancing is a common strategy for training semantic segmentation models, but it is rarely used in UDA approaches because the category information in the target domain is unknown.
“Class balancing is a common strategy for the training of semantic segmentation models (Long et al., 2015), but it is rarely used in UDA approaches because the category information in the target domain is unknown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Long et al., 2015 source
Probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationA Siamese network has two branches with identical architecture that share parameters during initialization and training, allowing it to learn information from two distributions simultaneously.
“Siamese network has two branches, each of which have an input and an output (Zagoruyko and Komodakis, 2015). The two branches have an identical architecture and share the same parameters during both initialization and training, which allows the Siamese network to learn information from two distributions simultaneously, as presented in Fig. 7.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Zagoruyko and Komodakis, 2015 source
Section 3.1 (page not provided) describes a Siamese network with two branches that have identical architecture and share weights; each branch takes one image patch as input and produces an output. It does not say that this arrangement lets the network learn from two distributions simultaneously, or discuss parameter sharing specifically during initialization. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe built environment and the quality of people's lives are under the combined effects of various land categories.
“The built environment and the quality of people’s lives are under the combined effects of various land categories (Zhu et al., 2022)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhu et al., 2022 source
The Perspectives and discussions section says that how cities are physically built shapes quality of life, and the Experimental results section describes different built-up land classes and possible inequality in living conditions. The paper does not establish that various land categories have a combined effect on both the built environment and quality of life. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationU-Net achieves concatenation of each corresponding encoding and decoding stages using skip connection of feature maps, so that more raw information of the input image is retained and added to the decoding path.
“It is worth noting that U-Net specially achieves concatenation of each corresponding encoding and decoding stages using skip connection of feature maps, as illustrated in Fig. 7, so that more raw information of the input image is retained and added to the decoding path.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Ronneberger et al., 2015 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationU-Net's best performance on those categories is because recognition of these categories relies heavily on textural and spectral information, and U-Net retains more raw image information through its concatenation structure.
“The recognition of these categories relies heavily on textural and spectral information. U-Net has stronger discriminative ability for them because it retains more raw image information through the concatenation structure (Ronneberger et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Ronneberger et al., 2015 source
The Network Architecture section (p. 4) describes concatenating feature maps from the contracting path with upsampled features, and Experiments (pp. 6–7) reports strong segmentation results. The paper does not say that the cited categories depend on textural and spectral information, that concatenation retains more raw image information, or that this explains U-Net’s performance on those categories. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationSentinel satellite data are utilized in the state-of-the-art global land cover mapping projects, ESA's World Cover and Google's Dynamic World.
“Sentinel satellite data are utilized in the state-of-the-art global land cover mapping projects, ESA’s World Cover (Zanaga et al., 2021) and Google’s Dynamic World (Brown et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Zanaga et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Brown et al., 2022 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenAgricultural and natural categories that are easier to classify occupy a larger total area in the additional six Asian cities, and there are fewer complex urban functional classes located in the test areas.
“agricultural and natural categories that are easier to classify occupy a larger total area in these six cities, and there are fewer complex urban functional classes located in the test areas.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAdversarial-based UDA methods demonstrate severe negative adaptation; they tend to classify complex areas into common categories when the distributions of the source and target domains are very different.
“The adversarial-based UDA methods demonstrate severe negative adaptation; they tend to classify complex areas into common categories when the distributions of the source and target domains are very different.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataFish pond along the coast of Guangzhou and paddy field in the suburbs of Wuhan are correctly identified by our approach.
“Fish pond along the coast of Guangzhou and paddy field in the suburbs of Wuhan are correctly identified.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationResNet101 behaves better than GoogLeNet in overall and has significantly superior results on railway station, airport, shrub forest, natural meadow, and artificial meadow.
“ResNet101 behaves better than GoogLeNet in overall and has significantly superior results on railway station, airport, shrub forest, natural meadow, and artificial meadow.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataDeepLabv3+ performs better on river than U-Net, and U-Net can recognize lake and irrigated field more accurately.
“DeepLabv3+ performs better on river than U-Net. And U-Net can recognize lake and irrigated field more accurately.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe five Chinese megacities are sparsely labeled with 5.21×107 pixels and densely labeled with 7.77×106 pixels.
“In total, the five Chinese megacities are sparsely labeled with 5.21×10⁷ pixels and densely labeled with 7.77×10⁶ pixels, and the percentage of each category in test areas is displayed in Table 2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningThe other six Asian cities are located in South, Southeast, and East Asia, respectively.
“And the other six Asian cities are located in South, Southeast, and East Asia, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningThe highest accuracy of Wuhan is reached when λ value is 0.7, while in other cities it is 0.5.
“The highest accuracy of Wuhan is reached when λ value is 0.7, while in other cities it is 0.5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningU-Net behaves best on industrial area, urban residential, rural residential, different agriculture, and different forest classes.
“U-Net behaves best on industrial area, urban residential, rural residential, different agriculture, and different forest classes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningRegardless of the method type, there are high performance discrepancies of different categories; all methods behave poorly on square, overpass, railway station, airport, garden land, park, and pond.
“Another issue worth noting is that regardless of the method type, there are high performance discrepancies of different categories. For instance, all methods behave poorly on square, overpass, railway station, airport, garden land, park, and pond.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataGoogLeNet and ResNet101 fail in extracting road and misclassify paddy field into fish pond.
“GoogLeNet and ResNet101 fail in extracting road and misclassify paddy field into fish pond.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningThere are significant differences between data sources and distribution shifts between images within each city.
“As a result, not only are there significant differences between data sources, but there are also distribution shifts between images within each city, as displayed in Fig. 4.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningFive-Billion-Pixels is mainly collected from human activity areas (cities, villages, cultivated lands, and mountainous areas around cities), and its category system covers all land categories except mangroves, tundra and permanent ice.
“As Five-Billion-Pixels are mainly collected from human activity areas (cities, villages, cultivated lands, and mountainous areas around cities), the category system covers all land categories except mangroves, tundra and permanent ice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataDeepLabv3+ can segment more complete and smooth airport, bare land, and stadium, while U-Net results contain a lot of noise.
“In columns 1 to 3, DeepLabv3+ can segment more complete and smooth airport, bare land, and stadium, respectively. And the results of U-Net contain a lot of noise.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe approach improves the results of paddy field in Bangkok, railway station in Delhi, irrigated field in Naypyidaw, arbor forest in Seoul, industrial area in Tokyo, and airport in Yangon.
“our approach improves the results of paddy field in Bangkok, railway station in Delhi, irrigated field in Naypyidaw, arbor forest in Seoul, industrial area in Tokyo, and airport in Yangon.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataMLP+Fusion can identify some water areas, RF+Fusion can identify some water, built-up, and paddy field areas, but the rest of the map is heavily confused.
“MLP+Fusion can identify some water areas, RF+Fusion can identify some water, built-up, and paddy field areas, but the rest of the map is heavily confused.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenOur approach is able to distinguish industrial area, urban residential in city center, rural residential dispersed in suburb, transportation networks, and river systems for each of five Chinese megacities, despite images from different sensors and no annotated information.
“Although images from different sensors are utilized, and there is no annotated information on them, our approach is able to distinguish industrial area, urban residential in city center, rural residential dispersed in suburb, transportation networks, and river systems for each city.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataDeepLabv3+ and U-Net can segment clear road networks and different built-up areas.
“In contrast, DeepLabv3+ and U-Net can segment clear road networks and different built-up areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataThe category system of Five-Billion-Pixels contains a number of land use classes subdivided from land cover classes in GB/T 21010-2017.
“Notably, the category system contains a number of land use classes subdivided from land cover classes in GB/T 21010-2017, including: stadium and square from public service land; road, overpass, railway station, and airport from transportation land; park and artificial meadow from artificial non-agricultural vegetated areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe additional Asian cities are sparsely labeled with a total of 2.40×106 pixels and densely labeled with a total of 1.29×106 pixels.
“The additional Asian cities are sparsely labeled with a total of 2.40×10⁶ pixels and densely labeled with a total of 1.29×10⁶ pixels, and the percentage of each category in test areas is listed in Table 3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenThe Chinese megacities are separately located in the eastern, western, northern, southern, and central regions of China.
“The Chinese megacities cover a total geographical area of 53,088 km2 and are separately located in the eastern, western, northern, southern, and central regions of China.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningIn Delhi, Naypyidaw, and Seoul, comparison methods classify built-up areas into irrigated field, and in Tokyo, high-rise residential and industrial area are misclassified as low-rise residential.
“in Delhi, Naypyidaw, and Seoul, the comparison methods classify built-up areas into irrigated field, and in Tokyo, high-rise residential and industrial area are misclassified as low-rise residential.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningDeepLabv3+ tends to identify ground objects as independent "instances", whereas U-Net struggles to aggregate land information into homogeneous segmented regions.
“DeepLabv3+ tends to identify ground objects as independent “instances”, whereas it seems difficult for U-Net to aggregate land information into homogeneous segmented regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenThe Chinese megacities cover a total geographical area of 53,088 km2.
“The Chinese megacities cover a total geographical area of 53,088 km2 and are separately located in the eastern, western, northern, southern, and central regions of China.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningResults on dense label are generally better than on sparse label in OA, while sparse label outperforms dense label in mF1 and mIOU.
“It can be seen that the results on dense label are generally better than that on sparse label in OA, while sparse label outperforms dense label in mF1 and mIOU.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningObvious errors occur in the forested mountains and at the mosaic borders; small areas of mountains around Beijing are misclassified as water bodies, and some areas of mountains around Chengdu are misclassified as irrigated field.
“Obvious errors occur in the forested mountains and at the mosaic borders. Small areas of mountains around Beijing are misclassified as water bodies, and some areas of mountains around Chengdu are misclassified as irrigated field.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataU-Net shows superior performance in columns 4 to 5, correctly classifying irrigated field, which are partially misclassified by DeepLabv3+ as garden land and road, which cannot be clearly extracted by DeepLabv3+ from dense built-up areas.
“U-Net shows superior performance in columns 4 to 5, where it correctly classifies irrigated field, which are partially misclassified by DeepLabv3+ as garden land and road, which cannot be clearly extracted by DeepLabv3+ from dense built-up areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningNew high-rise residential buildings are mixed with old ones, which have the same appearance as rural settlements, creating a special urban landscape in China.
“new high-rise residential buildings are mixed with old ones, which have the same appearance as rural settlements, creating a special urban landscape.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenThe Five-Billion-Pixels dataset covers a large amount of irrigated field reclaimed in the mountains of northwestern China, and their spectral and texture features may be similar to those of mountainous arbor forest in winter.
“the Five-Billion-Pixels dataset covers a large amount of irrigated field reclaimed in the mountains of northwestern China, and their spectral and texture features may be similar to those of mountainous arbor forest in winter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenThe category system of Five-Billion-Pixels covers artificial-constructed, agricultural, and natural classes, more closely resembling the distributions of ground objects in the real world.
“This category system covers artificial-constructed, agricultural, and natural classes, more closely resembling the distributions of ground objects in the real world.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenThe labeled areas of Five-Billion-Pixels are double-checked and ensured to be correct.
“The labeled areas are double-checked and ensured to be correct.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisenone givenThe model always tends to select more easy samples, which may exacerbate the category imbalance.
“Furthermore, the model always tends to select more easy samples, which may exacerbate the category imbalance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Premisenone givenDense annotation for each newly captured image is not realistic.
“However, dense annotation for each newly captured image is not realistic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationDeep Convolutional Neural Networks can adaptively approximate the relationship between image information and land information through multi-layer transformations.
“Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNNs) are able to adaptively approximate the relationship between image information and land information through multi-layer transformations (Zhu et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhu et al., 2017 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThe detailed information in high-resolution images brings about much more complicated land structures and patterns, which leads to great challenges in land cover classification.
“But at the same time, the detailed information brings about much more complicated land structures and patterns (Yuan et al., 2020), which leads to great challenges in land cover classification with high-resolution images.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yuan et al., 2020 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
PremisereasoningFew studies have applied high-resolution images to land cover mapping in detailed categories at large scale.
“few studies have applied high-resolution images to land cover mapping in detailed categories at large scale.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningThe quality of pseudo-labels depends on the way they are selected.
“However, the quality of pseudo-labels depends on the way they are selected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenThe category system of Five-Billion-Pixels covers artificial-constructed, agricultural, and natural classes, which well-reflects the distribution of real-world ground objects and can widely benefit land-cover-related studies.
“Its category system covers artificial-constructed, agricultural, and natural classes, which well-reflects the distribution of real-world ground objects and can widely benefit land-cover-related studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe distinctive characteristic of those categories is that they are composed of multiple basic ground cover types, which causes them to be easily misclassified into other categories.
“In addition, the distinctive characteristic of these categories is that they are composed of multiple basic ground cover types; for example, railway station contains multiple tracks and stadium-like building roof, park includes grass and woods, and airport contains roads and lawns, which causes them to be easily misclassified into other categories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningThe performance advantages of deep learning, especially of semantic segmentation models, demonstrate the importance of large-scale, pixel-wise annotated datasets for advancing land cover classification research.
“The performance advantages of deep learning, especially of semantic segmentation models, demonstrate the importance of large-scale, pixel-wise annotated datasets for advancing land cover classification research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisenone givenObject-oriented approaches and semantic segmentation approaches have different requirements for training data: object-oriented approaches allow each input sample to have one label, while semantic segmentation approaches require a label for each pixel.
“Since object-oriented approaches and semantic segmentation approaches have different requirements for training data, i.e., object-oriented approaches only allow each input sample to have one label, while semantic segmentation approaches require a label for each pixel of input sample, we prepare different training data for them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningWhen λ is set to 0.9, 90% pixels in the target domain are involved in the last training epoch, too many errors in pseudo-labels, thus leading to an obvious decrease in the accuracy of each city.
“when λ is set to 0.9, 90% pixels in the target domain are involved in the last training epoch, too many errors in pseudo-labels, thus, lead to an obvious decrease in the accuracy of each city.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningThe discontinuity of road lines is due to feature distribution differences caused by diverse architectural styles and city landscapes in different countries.
“This is due to the feature distribution differences caused by the diverse architectural styles and city landscapes in different countries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe latest semantic segmentation models typically consist of two main paths: an encoder path that reduces feature map size and captures higher-level information, and a decoder path that recovers spatial resolution and object boundaries.
“The latest semantic segmentation models typically consist of two main paths: the encoder path that gradually reduces feature map size and captures higher-level information, and the decoder path that gradually recovers spatial resolution as well as clear object boundaries (Chen et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationResNet101's superior performance on those categories is due to its residual connection structure that enables combination of different levels of features, allowing it to learn low-level features to distinguish natural classes and high-level features to identify artificial buildings with complex structures.
“Owing to the residual connection structure (He et al., 2016) that enables the combination of different levels of features, ResNet101 can learn low-level features to distinguish natural classes as well as high-level features to identify artificial buildings with complex structures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites He et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenCompared to discrepancy-based and adversarial-based UDA methods that force the two distributions to be aligned in feature space, pseudo-labeling is more flexible and potentially more dependable for complicated real-world situations.
“Compared to discrepancy-based and adversarial-based UDA methods, which force the two distributions to be aligned in feature space, pseudo-labeling is more flexible and potentially more dependable for complicated real-world situations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningSemantic segmentation models outperform object-oriented methods because they can capture contextual information over larger areas and simultaneously maintain more accurate edges for ground objects by assigning labels to each pixel.
“This is because semantic segmentation models can capture contextual information over larger areas and simultaneously maintain more accurate edges for ground objects by assigning labels to each pixel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenIf there are errors in pseudo-labels, a small number of mistakes may eventually lead to a relatively large bias during iterative training.
“If there are errors in pseudo-labels, a small number of mistakes may eventually lead to a relatively large bias during the iterative training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationDeepLabv3+'s best results on those categories are due to atrous convolution and spatial pyramid pooling, which allow it to capture multi-level contextual information.
“Due to the atrous convolution (Chen et al., 2017b) and spatial pyramid pooling (Chen et al., 2018) adopted in DeepLabv3+, it can capture multi-level contextual information for these categories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2017b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Chen et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenThe proposed UDA approach can softly correct the domain shifts by adaptively learning the distribution of unlabeled data.
“we propose a UDA approach that can softly correct the domain shifts by adaptively learning the distribution of unlabeled data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningUsing only a very small number of pseudo-labels in the initial iterations of domain joint learning leads to two problems: DT provides very few training samples at the beginning, and the samples selected from DT may be extremely homogeneous.
“To avoid introducing incorrect category information in the training, only a very small number of pseudo-labels are used in the initial iterations of domain joint learning, which leads to two problems: (1) DT can only provide very few training samples at the beginning; (2) the samples selected from DT may be extremely homogeneous.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenThese annotations are only used for accuracy assessment and not for model training.
“Note that these annotations are only used for accuracy assessment and not for model training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe greater performance gap in the additional six Asian cities is because the feature distributions of the source and target domains are more disparate, making it harder for adversarial-based approaches to find a suitable match and introducing more intra-domain variance by rigid alignment.
“This is because in this scenario, the feature distributions of the source and target domains are more disparate, it is harder for the adversarial-based approaches to find a suitable match between the two distributions, and more intra-domain variance is introduced into the model by the rigid alignment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe network may give reliable predictions for only a small number of pixels when it is not adapted to DT, and as it gradually learns the distribution of DT, it can make reliable predictions for an increasing number of pixels.
“An intuitive interpretation of this design is that the network may give reliable predictions for only a small number of pixels when it is not adapted to DT, and as the network gradually learns the distribution of DT, it can make reliable predictions for an increasing number of pixels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisenone givenUnlike artificial-constructed categories, the classification of natural classes relies more on spectral information.
“Unlike artificial-constructed categories, the classification of natural classes relies more on spectral information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe higher optimal λ in Wuhan may be because the sensors of GF-1 and GF-2 have more similar imaging processes, resulting in closer distributions of the source and target domains, and the quality of the pseudo-label can be guaranteed to some extent even if 70% pixels are selected at the end of training, whereas using more pseudo-labels in other cities would introduce more errors.
“This may be because the sensors of GF-1 and GF-2 have more similar imaging processes, resulting in closer distributions of the source and target domains, and the quality of the pseudo-label can be guaranteed to some extent even if 70% pixels are selected at the end of training, whereas using more pseudo-labels in other cities would introduce more errors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: GF-1 and GF-2 have more similar imaging processes, resulting in closer distributions of the source and target domains.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationShannon Entropy is used as an indicator to quantify the confidence of each image pixel, with lower information entropy representing higher classification confidence.
“Shannon Entropy (Xu et al., 2020) is employed as our indicator to quantify the confidence of each image pixel. Lower information entropy represents higher classification confidence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Xu et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe poor performance on those categories is due to two factors: they represent small percentages in the Five-Billion-Pixels dataset, and they are inherently easier to confuse with other categories.
“This is due to two factors, first, these categories represent small percentages in the Five-Billion-Pixels dataset, and second, they are inherently easier to confuse with other categories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningWhen spectral shifts are particularly significant, pseudo-labels inevitably contain errors, which will continuously accumulate in iterative domain adaptation learning.
“When the spectral shifts are particularly significant, pseudo-labels inevitably contain errors, which will continuously accumulate in iterative domain adaptation learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningIn domain joint learning, the DCNNs model is likely to assign irrigated field pseudo-labels to a small number of arbor forest samples in DT, and these errors will further accumulate in continuous iterative training, eventually leading to misclassification in the land cover mapping results.
“the DCNNs model is likely to assign irrigated field pseudo-labels to a small number of arbor forest samples in DT. And these errors will further accumulate in continuous iterative training, eventually leading to misclassification in the land cover mapping results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Features of forest and cropland are largely influenced by geographical location and seasonal changes.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenThe approach is proven to be generalizable across images captured by different sensors, especially for ST-2 images that are free and open.
“our approach is proven to be generalizable across images captured by different sensors, especially for ST-2 images that are free and open.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThis problem is caused by the inherent constraints of UDA and the intrinsic properties of vegetation categories.
“Since this problem is caused by the inherent constraints of UDA and the intrinsic properties of vegetation categories”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataOwing to the extensive, fine, and accurate annotating for Five-Billion-Pixels, the results present clear transportation networks and river systems, as well as different agricultural and urban functional areas.
“owing to our extensive, fine, and accurate annotating for Five-Billion-Pixels, our results present clear transportation networks and river systems, as well as different agricultural and urban functional areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough only 11 cities were studied, the approach can be easily generalized to other cities, towns, and villages throughout China and even other Asian countries.
“Although we studied only 11 cities in this paper, our approach can be easily generalized to other cities, towns, and villages throughout China and even other Asian countries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningFor other countries and regions with very different land distributions and land category systems than China, it has potential to perform land cover mapping based on Five-Billion-Pixels and semi-supervised domain adaptation with sparse annotations in the form of patches or polygons.
“for other countries and regions with very different land distributions and land category systems than China, it has potential to perform land cover mapping based on Five-Billion-Pixels and, for example, semi-supervised domain adaptation with sparse annotations in the form of patches or polygons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductown dataDue to the different acquisition time of the original images, the comparison with Dynamic World and World Cover can only be an approximate visual comparison.
“Due to the different acquisition time of the original images, we can only make an approximate visual comparison.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataThe work has the potential to be extended to land cover mapping at country-scale and to contribute to various applications involving land cover information.
“our work has the potential to be extended to land cover mapping at country-scale and to contribute to various applications involving land cover information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The 10% sample examined in the final spot checking is representative of the entire Five-Billion-Pixels dataset.
“In the final round of spot checking, 10% samples of Five-Billion-Pixels are examined and no obvious errors are observed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The effective spatial resolution of PS is 3.7–4.1 m.
“Since the 3 m resolution of PS is obtained by resampling the raw data and its effective spatial resolution is 3.7−4.1 m, we use the original image resolution of GF-2 to adapt it.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Five-Billion-Pixels dataset is representative of the target cities' land cover distributions.
“To adapt deep models to satellite images with different resolutions, we construct a multi-scale source domain using Five-Billion-Pixels.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Land cover mapping at large scale in high resolution remains a challenging task.
“Yet land cover mapping on a large-scale in high-resolution remains a challenging task.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Recognition of heterogeneous ground objects in high-resolution satellite images is difficult.
“the recognition of heterogeneous ground objects in high-resolution satellite images is quite difficult.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Different land cover categories depend on different types of information for identification: urban functional buildings rely more on structure and shape features, dense built-up areas require spatial relationships, and agricultural and natural categories require texture and spectral information.
“classifying independent urban functional buildings relies more on structure and shape features, distinguishing dense built-up areas requires spatial relationships, and the identification of agricultural and natural categories cannot be done without texture and spectral information.”
The paper relies on this without support.
ST-2 has lower spatial resolution than PS and GF-1, and cannot present very fine edges in both ground truth and results.
“the spatial resolution of ST-2 is lower than those of PS and GF-1, and it cannot present very fine edges in both ground truth and results.”
The paper relies on this without support.
GF-1 and GF-2 have more similar imaging processes, resulting in closer distributions of the source and target domains.
“the sensors of GF-1 and GF-2 have more similar imaging processes, resulting in closer distributions of the source and target domains”
The paper relies on this without support.
Features of forest and cropland are largely influenced by geographical location and seasonal changes.
“their features are largely influenced by geographical location and seasonal changes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Rapid urban development in China causes new high-rise residential buildings to be mixed with old ones, which have the same appearance as rural settlements.
“because of the rapid urban development in China, new high-rise residential buildings are mixed with old ones, which have the same appearance as rural settlements”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Entropy is calculated from feature values rather than probabilities
MinorThe stated entropy formula takes the logarithm of feature values, which are specified as arbitrary real numbers; it can therefore be undefined for negative values and is not necessarily between 0 and 1. The paper obtains category probabilities only afterward by applying softmax.
“In the DT branch, entropy map ExT∈R^(H×W) is calculated as (1) ExT^(h,w)=(−1)/(log(K))∑k=1KFxT^(h,w,k)log(FxT^(h,w,k)),where ExT^(h,w)∈[0,1] is the value of ExT at pixel (h,w).”
“where FxT^(h,w)∈R^K is the feature vector of pixel located at (h,w), and PxT^(h,w)∈R^K, of which the kth element represents the probability that this pixel belongs to class k.”
Table 7 reports an impossible combination of mean F1 and mean IOU
MinorFor each category, F1 = 2·IOU/(1+IOU). Consequently, a mean IOU of 19.21% permits a mean F1 of at most 32.23%, but the AdaptSeg+DPA row reports 32.35%; rounding cannot account for the difference.
“| AdaptSeg+DPA | | 64.46 | 32.35 | 19.21 | | 60.80 | 34.94 | 22.37 |”
“mF1 is the category mean of F1-score. mIOU is the category mean of the intersection over union (IOU)”
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Long, J., Shelhamer, E., & Darrell, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298965 · Cited by 38,834
(2008) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · Cited by 33,051
Textural Features for Image Classification
Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K., & Dinstein, I. (1973) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1973.4309314 · Cited by 22,886
Chen, L.-C., Papandreou, G., Kokkinos, I., Murphy, K., & Yuille, A. L. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2017.2699184 · Cited by 22,392
Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation
Chen, L.-C., Zhu, Y., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F., & Adam, H. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_49 · Cited by 20,054
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Shelhamer, E., Long, J., & Darrell, T. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2572683 · Cited by 11,898
Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networks
Ganin, Y., Ustinova, E., Ajakan, H., Germain, P., Larochelle, H., Laviolette, F., Marchand, M., & Lempitsky, V. (2017) · Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58347-1_10 · Cited by 8,318
Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation
Chen, L.-C., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F., & Adam, H. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.05587 · Cited by 7,517
Selective Search for Object Recognition
Uijlings, J. R. R., van de Sande, K. E. A., Gevers, T., & Smeulders, A. W. M. (2013) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-013-0620-5 · Cited by 5,980
2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
(2009) · doi:10.1109/cvpr14067.2009 · Cited by 5,646
Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptation
Tzeng, E., Hoffman, J., Saenko, K., & Darrell, T. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.316 · Cited by 5,154
Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptation
Sun, B., & Saenko, K. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49409-8_35 · Cited by 3,757
Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change
Olofsson, P., Foody, G. M., Herold, M., Stehman, S. V., Woodcock, C. E., & Wulder, M. A. (2014) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.015 · Cited by 3,420
Deep Learning in Remote Sensing: A Comprehensive Review and List of Resources
Zhu, X. X., Tuia, D., Mou, L., Xia, G.-S., Zhang, L., Xu, F., & Fraundorfer, F. (2017) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2017.2762307 · Cited by 3,400
Self-citationDeep learning in remote sensing applications: A meta-analysis and review
Ma, L., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Ye, Y., Yin, G., & Johnson, B. A. (2019) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.04.015 · Cited by 2,456
AID: A benchmark data set for performance evaluation of aerial scene classification
Xia, G.-S., Hu, J., Hu, F., Shi, B., Bai, X., Zhong, Y., Zhang, L., & Lu, X. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2017.2685945 · Cited by 2,372
Self-citationDeep learning in environmental remote sensing: Achievements and challenges
Yuan, Q., Shen, H., Li, T., Li, Z., Li, S., Jiang, Y., Xu, H., Tan, W., Yang, Q., Wang, J., et al. (2020) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2020.111716 · Cited by 1,697
ADVENT: Adversarial Entropy Minimization for Domain Adaptation in Semantic Segmentation
Vu, T.-H., Jain, H., Bucher, M., Cord, M., & Perez, P. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00262 · Cited by 1,524
Learning to Adapt Structured Output Space for Semantic Segmentation
Tsai, Y.-H., Hung, W.-C., Schulter, S., Sohn, K., Yang, M.-H., & Chandraker, M. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00780 · Cited by 1,430
Gong, P., Liu, H., Zhang, M., Li, C., Wang, J., Huang, H., Clinton, N., Ji, L., Li, W., Bai, Y., et al. (2019) · 中国科学通报:英文版 · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2019.03.002 · Cited by 1,329
Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Residual Transfer NetworksPreprint
Long, M., Han, Z., Wang, J., & Jordan, M. I. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.04433 · Cited by 1,282
DeepGlobe 2018: A Challenge to Parse the Earth through Satellite Images
Demir, İ., Koperski, K., Lindenbaum, D., Pang, G., Huang, J., Basu, S., Hughes, F., Tuia, D., & Raskar, R. (2018) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2018.00031 · Cited by 1,250
Dynamic world, near real-time global 10 m land use land cover mapping
Brown, C. F., Brumby, S. P., Guzder-Williams, B., Birch, T., Hyde, S. B., Mazzariello, J., Czerwinski, W., Pasquarella, V. J., Haertel, R., Ilyushchenko, S., et al. (2022) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01307-4 · Cited by 1,154
Learning to compare image patches via convolutional neural networks
Zagoruyko, S., & Komodakis, N. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7299064 · Cited by 1,140
Land-cover classification with high-resolution remote sensing images using transferable deep models
Tong, X.-Y., Xia, G.-S., Lu, Q., Shen, H., Li, S., You, S., & Zhang, L. (2020) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.111322 · Cited by 978
Self-citationLuo, Y., Zheng, L., Guan, T., Yu, J., & Yang, Y. (2019) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00261 · Cited by 842
Object Detection in Aerial Images: A Large-Scale Benchmark and Challenges
Ding, J., Xue, N., Xia, G.-S., Bai, X., Yang, W., Yang, M. Y., Belongie, S., Luo, J., Datcu, M., Pelillo, M., et al. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3117983 · Cited by 678
Self-citationDomain adaptation for the classification of remote sensing data: An overview of recent advances
Tuia, D., Persello, C., & Bruzzone, L. (2016) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2016.2548504 · Cited by 675
Huang, B., Zhao, B., & Song, Y. (2018) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2018.04.050 · Cited by 591
Griffiths, P., Nendel, C., & Hostert, P. (2018) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2018.10.031 · Cited by 578
Algorithms for semantic segmentation of multispectral remote sensing imagery using deep learning
Kemker, R., Salvaggio, C., & Kanan, C. (2018) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.04.014 · Cited by 558
Joint deep learning for land cover and land use classification
Zhang, C., Sargent, I., Pan, X., Li, H., Gardiner, A., Hare, J., & Atkinson, P. M. (2019) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.014 · Cited by 451
LoveDA: A Remote Sensing Land-Cover Dataset for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentation
Wang, J., Zheng, Z., Ma, A., Lu, X., & Zhong, Y. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.08733 · Cited by 431
Deep Learning Meets SAR: Concepts, models, pitfalls, and perspectives
Zhu, X. X., Montazeri, S., Ali, M., Hua, Y., Wang, Y., Mou, L., Shi, Y., Xu, F., & Bamler, R. (2021) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2020.3046356 · Cited by 422
Self-citationBreaking new ground in mapping human settlements from space – The Global Urban Footprint
Esch, T., Heldens, W., Hirner, A., Keil, M., Marconcini, M., Roth, A., Zeidler, J., Dech, S., & Strano, E. (2017) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.10.012 · Cited by 403
SpaceNet: A Remote Sensing Dataset and Challenge SeriesPreprint
Etten, A. V., Lindenbaum, D., & Bacastow, T. M. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.01232 · Cited by 342
Ienco, D., Interdonato, R., Gaetano, R., & Minh, D. H. T. (2019) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.09.016 · Cited by 335
Wurm, M., Stark, T., Zhu, X. X., Weigand, M., & Taubenböck, H. (2019) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.02.006 · Cited by 332
Self-citationClasses Matter: A Fine-Grained Adversarial Approach to Cross-Domain Semantic Segmentation
Wang, H., Shen, T., Zhāng, W., Duan, L., & Mei, T. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58568-6_38 · Cited by 330
Marcos, D., Volpi, M., Kellenberger, B., & Tuia, D. (2018) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.01.021 · Cited by 287
Shao, Y., Lunetta, R. S., Wheeler, B. M., Iiames, J. S., & Campbell, J. B. (2015) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.023 · Cited by 254
Bruzzone, L., & Prieto, D. F. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/36.905255 · Cited by 253
On Creating Benchmark Dataset for Aerial Image Interpretation: Reviews, Guidances, and Million-AID
Long, Y., Xia, G.-S., Li, S., Yang, W., Yang, M. Y., Zhu, X. X., Zhang, L., & Li, D. (2021) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2021.3070368 · Cited by 250
Self-citationMatasci, G., Volpi, M., Kanevski, M., Bruzzone, L., & Tuia, D. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2014.2377785 · Cited by 228
Hermosilla, T., Wulder, M. A., White, J. C., & Coops, N. C. (2021) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2021.112780 · Cited by 211
Global land cover mapping using Earth observation satellite data: Recent progresses and challenges
Yifang Ban, A., Gong, P., & Giri, C. P. (2015) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.01.001 · Cited by 205
Huang, X., Wen, D., Li, J., & Qin, R. (2017) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2017.05.001 · Cited by 203
Huang, X., Li, J., Yang, J., Zhang, Z., Li, D., & Liu, X. (2021) · Science China Earth Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11430-020-9797-9 · Cited by 202
The first all-season sample set for mapping global land cover with Landsat-8 data
Li, C., Gong, P., Wang, J., Zhu, Z., Biging, G. S., Yuan, C., Hu, T., Zhang, H., Wang, Q., Li, X., et al. (2017) · 中国科学通报:英文版 · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2017.03.011 · Cited by 194
A Relation-Augmented Fully Convolutional Network for Semantic Segmentation in Aerial Scenes
Mou, L., Hua, Y., & Zhu, X. X. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.01270 · Cited by 183
Self-citationIntegrating Google Earth imagery with Landsat data to improve 30-m resolution land cover mapping
Li, W., Dong, R., Fu, H., Wang, J., Yu, L., & Gong, P. (2019) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.111563 · Cited by 177
Yu, L., Wang, J., & Gong, P. (2013) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431161.2013.798055 · Cited by 173
Zhang, L., Lan, M., Zhang, J., & Tao, D. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2021.3104032 · Cited by 173
Semantic segmentation of urban scenes by learning local class interactions
Volpi, M., & Ferrari, V. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2015.7301377 · Cited by 152
Srivastava, S., Vargas-Muñoz, J. E., & Tuia, D. (2019) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.014 · Cited by 151
Towards operational validation of annual global land cover maps
Tsendbazar, N., Herold, M., Li, L., Tarko, A., de Bruin, S., Masiliū̄nas, D., Lesiv, M., Fritz, S., Buchhorn, M., Smets, B., et al. (2021) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2021.112686 · Cited by 147
The urban morphology on our planet–Global perspectives from space
Zhu, X. X., Qiu, C., Hu, J., Shi, Y., Wang, Y., Schmitt, M., & Taubenböck, H. (2022) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2021.112794 · Cited by 146
Self-citationZhong, Y., Su, Y., Wu, S., Zheng, Z., Zhao, J. J., Ma, A., Zhu, Q., Ye, R., Li, X., Pellikka, P., et al. (2020) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2020.111838 · Cited by 116
Triplet adversarial domain adaptation for pixel-level classification of VHR remote sensing images
Yan, L., Fan, B., Liu, H., Huo, C., Xiang, S., & Pan, C. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2019.2958123 · Cited by 115
Ji, S., Wang, D., & Luo, M. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2020.3020804 · Cited by 110
EarthNets: Empowering artificial intelligence for Earth observation
Xiong, Z., Zhang, F., Wang, Y., Shi, Y., & Zhu, X. X. (2024) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2024.3466998 · Cited by 108
Self-citationChen, T.-H. K., Qiu, C., Schmitt, M., Zhu, X. X., Sabel, C. E., & Prishchepov, A. V. (2020) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2020.112096 · Cited by 104
Self-citationWang, J., Ma, A., Zhong, Y., Zheng, Z., & Zhang, L. (2022) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2022.113058 · Cited by 102
Liu, C., Huang, X., Zhu, Z., Chen, H., Tang, X., & Gong, J. (2019) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.03.033 · Cited by 92
Castillo-Navarro, J., Saux, B. L., Boulch, A., Audebert, N., & Lefèvre, S. (2021) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-020-05943-y · Cited by 85
Semi-supervised bidirectional alignment for remote sensing cross-domain scene classification
Huang, W., Shi, Y., Xiong, Z., Wang, Q., & Zhu, X. X. (2023) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.11.013 · Cited by 76
Self-citationEarthNets: Empowering AI in Earth ObservationPreprint
Xiong, Z., Zhang, F., Wang, Y., et al. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.04936 · Cited by 63
Mapping Urban Areas in China Using Multisource Data With a Novel Ensemble SVM Method
Huang, X., Hu, T., Li, J., Wang, Q., & Benediktsson, J. A. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2018.2805829 · Cited by 61
LandCoverNet: A global benchmark land cover classification training datasetPreprint
Alemohammad, H., & Booth, K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.03111 · Cited by 59
Bahirat, K., Bovolo, F., Bruzzone, L., & Chaudhuri, S. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2011.2174154 · Cited by 55
Global land characterisation using land cover fractions at 100 m resolution
Masiliū̄nas, D., Tsendbazar, N., Herold, M., Lesiv, M., Buchhorn, M., & Verbesselt, J. (2021) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2021.112409 · Cited by 55
Liu, W., & Qin, R. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2019.2962039 · Cited by 53
Unmixing-based Sentinel-2 downscaling for urban land cover mapping
Xu, F., & Somers, B. (2020) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.11.009 · Cited by 49
Multitarget Domain Adaptation for Remote Sensing Classification Using Graph Neural Network
Saha, S., Zhao, S., & Zhu, X. X. (2022) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2022.3149950 · Cited by 44
Self-citationA novel co-training approach for urban land cover mapping with unclear Landsat time series imagery
Hu, T., Huang, X., Li, J., & Zhang, L. (2018) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2018.08.017 · Cited by 38
High-Squint SAR Imaging of Maritime Ship Targets
Xu, X., Su, F., Gao, J., & Jin, X. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2020.3036452 · Cited by 35
Peng, D., Guan, H., Zang, Y., & Bruzzone, L. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2021.3093004 · Cited by 33
DFENet for Domain Adaptation-Based Remote Sensing Scene Classification
Zhang, X., Yao, X., Feng, X., Cheng, G., & Han, J. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2021.3119914 · Cited by 26
Hidden Path Selection Network for Semantic Segmentation of Remote Sensing Images
Yang, K., Tong, X.-Y., Xia, G.-S., Shen, W., & Zhang, L. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2022.3197334 · Cited by 22
Self-citationHypothesis Testing in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Applications in Alzheimer's Disease.
Zhou, H., Ravi, S. N., Ithapu, V. K., Johnson, S. C., Wahba, G., & Singh, V. (2016) · PubMed · Cited by 18
Wang, Z., & Wang, R. (2021) · Brachytherapy · doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2021.06.137
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Lee, D.-H., et al., 2013. Pseudo-label: The simple and efficient semi-supervised learning method for deep neural networks. In: International Conference on Machine Learning Workshops, Vol. 3. p. 896.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Land Use and Land Cover Classification Meets Deep Learning: A Review
Zhao, S., Tu, K., Ye, S., Tang, H., Hu, Y., & Xie, C. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23218966 · Cited by 152
A semantic-enhanced multi-modal remote sensing foundation model for Earth observation
Wu, K., Zhang, Y., Ru, L., Dang, B., Lao, J., Yu, L., Luo, J., Zhu, Z., Sun, Y., Zhang, J., et al. (2025) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-025-01078-8 · Cited by 130
A Frequency Decoupling Network for Semantic Segmentation of Remote Sensing Images
Li, X., Xu, F., Yu, A., Lyu, X., Gao, H., & Zhou, J. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2025.3531879 · Cited by 110
Marsocci, V., Jia, Y., Bellier, G. L., Kerekes, D., Zeng, L., Häfner, S., Gerard, S., Brune, E., Yadav, R., Shibli, A., et al. (2025) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2025.3628194 · Cited by 109
EarthNets: Empowering artificial intelligence for Earth observation
Xiong, Z., Zhang, F., Wang, Y., Shi, Y., & Zhu, X. X. (2024) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2024.3466998 · Cited by 108
Self-citationMultispectral Semantic Segmentation for Land Cover Classification: An Overview
Ramos, L., & Sappa, A. D. (2024) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2024.3438620 · Cited by 69
Training data in satellite image classification for land cover mapping: a review
Moraes, D., Campagnolo, M. L., & Caetano, M. (2024) · European Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/22797254.2024.2341414 · Cited by 56
On China’s earth observation system: mission, vision and application
Li, D., Wang, M., Guo, H., & Jin, W. (2024) · Geo-spatial Information Science · doi:10.1080/10095020.2024.2328100 · Cited by 54
Li, Y., Dang, B., Li, W., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i20.30226 · Cited by 47
Vision-Language Modeling Meets Remote Sensing: Models, datasets, and perspectives
Weng, X., Pang, C., & Xia, G.-S. (2025) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2025.3572702 · Cited by 47
Self-citationRamos, L., & Sappa, A. D. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-84795-1 · Cited by 44
Li, Z., Weng, Q., Zhou, Y., Dou, P., & Ding, X. (2024) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2024.114190 · Cited by 43
One for All: Toward Unified Foundation Models for Earth Vision
Xiong, Z., Wang, Y., Zhang, F., & Zhu, X. X. (2024) · IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) · doi:10.1109/igarss53475.2024.10641637 · Cited by 42
Self-citationScale-aware deep reinforcement learning for high resolution remote sensing imagery classification
Liu, Y., Zhong, Y., Shi, S., & Zhang, L. (2024) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2024.01.013 · Cited by 39
Liu, Y., Shi, S., Wang, J., & Zhong, Y. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01547 · Cited by 36
CloudSeg: A multi-modal learning framework for robust land cover mapping under cloudy conditions
Xu, F., Shi, Y., Yang, W. T., Xia, G.-S., & Zhu, X. X. (2024) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2024.06.001 · Cited by 36
Self-citationCoarse-to-fine semantic segmentation of satellite images
Chen, H., Yang, W. T., Liu, L., & Xia, G.-S. (2024) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2024.07.028 · Cited by 28
Self-citationChen, P., Liu, Y., Ren, Y., Zhang, B., & Zhao, Y. (2025) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs17111845 · Cited by 26
Yu, B., Li, J., & Huang, X. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102689 · Cited by 25
Cui, H., Guo Zhang, A., Chen, Y., Li, X., Hou, S., Li, H., Ma, X., Guan, N., & Tang, X. (2023) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2023.11.015 · Cited by 25
Forecasting Land-Use and Land-Cover Change Using Hybrid CNN–LSTM Model
Varma, B., Naik, N. N., Chandrasekaran, K., Venkatesan, M., & Rajan, J. (2024) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2024.3389671 · Cited by 25
Class Imbalance in the Automatic Interpretation of Remote Sensing Images: A Review
Chen, P., Ren, Y., Zhang, B., & Zhao, Y. (2025) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2025.3555567 · Cited by 24
Chen, Y., Cui, H., Guo Zhang, A., Li, X., Xie, Z., Li, H., & Li, D. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2024.3523537 · Cited by 23
LoveNAS: Towards multi-scene land-cover mapping via hierarchical searching adaptive network
Wang, J., Zhong, Y., Ma, A., Zheng, Z., Wan, Y., & Zhang, L. (2024) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2024.01.011 · Cited by 23
Zhong, J., Zeng, T., Xu, Z., Wu, C., Qian, S., Xu, N., Chen, Z., Lyu, X., & Li, X. (2025) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs17030402 · Cited by 22
REST: Holistic Learning for End-to-End Semantic Segmentation of Whole-Scene Remote Sensing Imagery
Chen, W., Bruzzone, L., Dang, B., Gao, Y., Deng, Y., Yu, J.-G., Yuan, L., & Li, Y. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2025.3609767 · Cited by 20
Li, W., Cui, Y., Liu, X., Deng, C., & Zhang, S. (2023) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ad0701 · Cited by 20
Dong, R., Mou, L., Chen, M., Li, W., Tong, X., Yuan, S., Zhang, L., Zheng, J., Zhu, X. X., & Fu, H. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01539 · Cited by 20
Self-citationGlobal high categorical resolution land cover mapping via weak supervision
Tong, X., Dong, R., & Zhu, X. X. (2025) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2024.12.017 · Cited by 19
Self-citationChen, Y., Guo Zhang, A., Cui, H., Li, X., Hou, S., Zhu, C., Xie, Z., & Li, D. (2025) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2025.02.014 · Cited by 19
Ma, H., Yang, X., Fan, R., Han, W., He, K., & Wang, L. (2024) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2024.3459916 · Cited by 18
Ji, C., & Tang, H. (2025) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2025.105070 · Cited by 15
da Silva, M. P., Correa, S. P. L. P., Schaefer, M. A. R., Reis, J. C. S., Nunes, I. M., dos Santos, J. A., & Oliveira, H. (2025) · Computers & Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.cag.2025.104434 · Cited by 15
Integrated urban land cover analysis using deep learning and post‐classification correction
Techapinyawat, L., Timms, A., Lee, J., Huang, Y., & Hua, Z. (2024) · Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1111/mice.13277 · Cited by 14
RBP-MTL: Agricultural Parcel Vectorization via Region-Boundary-Parcel Decoupled Multitask Learning
Pan, Y., Wang, X., Wang, Y., & Zhong, Y. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2024.3367850 · Cited by 13
Lightweight Bit-Depth Recovery Network for Gaofen Satellite Multispectral Image Compression
Zhang, W., Li, D., Zhang, H., Yu, P., & Gao, W. (2024) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2024.3476990 · Cited by 13
Hu, S. H., Yang, Z., Xing, H., Chen, Z., Liu, W., Ao, Z., Liu, Y., & Li, J. (2024) · International Journal of Geographical Information Systems · doi:10.1080/13658816.2024.2442096 · Cited by 12
EarthView: A Large Scale Remote Sensing Dataset for Self-Supervision
Velazquez, D. A., Rodríguez, P., Alonso, S., Gonfaus, J. M., Gonzàlez, J., Richarte, G., Marín, J., Bengio, Y., & Lacoste, A. (2025) · IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW) · doi:10.1109/wacvw65960.2025.00136 · Cited by 12
Zhao, J., Yuan, Z., Mi, X., Yang, J. D., Chen, X., Meng, X., Zhu, H., Meng, Y., Jiang, Z., & Zhang, Z. (2025) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2025.06.005 · Cited by 11
Li, J., Zhang, H., Chen, L., He, B., & Chen, H. (2025) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs17122048 · Cited by 10
Chen, X., Zhang, M., Yan, S., Liu, Y., & Chen, C. (2025) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2025.3610145 · Cited by 10
Klotz, J., Burgert, T., & Demir, B. (2025) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2025.3624789 · Cited by 10
Vegetation mapping of Yunnan Province by integrating remote sensing, field observations, and models
Xiahou, M., Peng, M., Shen, Z., Wen, Q., Wang, C., Liu, Y., Zhang, Q., Peng, L., Yu, C., Ou, X., et al. (2025) · Science China Earth Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11430-024-1509-3 · Cited by 9
A flexible framework for identifying urban villages using Sentinel-2 observations and deep learning
Wu, Y., Li, X., Gong, Y., & Mwaniki, D. (2025) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2025.104631 · Cited by 9
Zhang, E., Huang, X., Li, J., & Zhou, J. (2025) · Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.34133/remotesensing.0811 · Cited by 9
FLAIR-HUB: Large-scale multimodal dataset for land cover and crop mapping
Garioud, A., Giordano, S., David, N., & Gonthier, N. (2026) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2026.04.017 · Cited by 9
Zeng, Y., Guo, J., & Zhu, X. X. (2025) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2025.107051 · Cited by 9
Self-citationShi, W. Y., Sui, H., Zhang, C., Zhou, N., Zhou, M. T., Wang, J. X., & Du, Z. T. (2025) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2025.03.021 · Cited by 8
IRSAMap: Toward Large-Scale, High-Resolution Land Cover Map Vectorization
Meng, Y. Q., Deng, L., Xi, Z., Chen, J., Chen, J., Yue, A., Liu, D., Li, K., Wang, C., Li, K., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2025.3600249 · Cited by 8
Xu, R., Samat, A., Zhu, E., Li, E., & Li, W. (2024) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs16111974 · Cited by 8
Zhang, G., Zhao, C., Jia, M., Zhang, R., Jiang, H., & Wang, Z. (2025) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113557 · Cited by 7
Agricultural Intelligence (AI)'s Impact on Society 5.0 Farming
Rana, P., Ahmad, M., Stephen, T., & Chemingui, H. (2024) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-4326-5.ch005 · Cited by 7
Guo, Y., Zhang, Z., Shang, Y., Zhao, T., Deng, S., Yang, Y., & Yin, J. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2025.3565600 · Cited by 6
Liu, M., Liu, P., Zhao, L., Ma, Y., Chen, L., & Xu, M. (2024) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2024.2356122 · Cited by 6
Adapting Cross-Sensor High-Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery for Land Use Classification
Li, W., Sun, K., & Wei, J. (2025) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs17050927 · Cited by 6
Wang, C., Li, K., Yang, W., Wang, X., Wang, J., Zhao, Z., Gu, Y., & Xu, Z. (2024) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2024.109012 · Cited by 6
Liu, Z., Zhang, Z., Meng, Y. Q., & Tang, P. (2024) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2024.2353110 · Cited by 5
He, W., Li, L., & Gao, X. (2024) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs16111987 · Cited by 5
Lee, Y., Lee, D., Kwak, T., & Kim, Y. (2025) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs17183233 · Cited by 5
Zhang, Z., Jing, W., Li, H., Tao, C., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs15205056 · Cited by 5
Xi, Z., Meng, Y., Chen, J., Deng, Y., Liu, D., Kong, Y., & Yue, A. (2023) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs15235498 · Cited by 5
Chen, P., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Ren, Y., Zhang, B., & Gao, X. (2024) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431161.2024.2349266 · Cited by 5
Zhang, F., Zhou, L., Yu, X., & Gong, Z. (2025) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103651 · Cited by 4
Dong, R., Yuan, S., Feng, L., Zhang, J., Li, W., Chen, M., Luo, B., Zhang, W., & Fu, H. (2025) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103839 · Cited by 4
Ramos, L., & Sappa, A. D. (2026) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2026.133533 · Cited by 4
Luan, W., Li, G., Zhong, B., Geng, J., Li, X., Li, H., & He, S. (2023) · Land · doi:10.3390/land12081616 · Cited by 4
Tan, J., Zhang, C., Dang, B., & Li, Y. (2025) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51701.2025.00176 · Cited by 4
Multi-source remote sensing imagery collaboration method based on super-resolution reconstruction
Li, G., Han, W., Wei, J., Shang, M., Xiong, D., Zhai, X., Dong, Y., & Zhang, L. (2024) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431161.2024.2440135 · Cited by 3
Li, Z., Wang, H., Wang, Y., Chen, G., Chen, J. M., & Чэн, Б. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2025.3601626 · Cited by 3
Lee, C., Lee, J., Kim, T., Lee, H., Javed, A., Chung, M., & Han, Y. (2025) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs18010028 · Cited by 3
Aldabbagh, Y. A. N., Alnasrawi, A. I. Z., & Ministry of Education (2025) · Jordanian Journal of Informatics and Computing · doi:10.63180/jjic.thestap.2025.1.6 · Cited by 3
Ji, Y., Wang, C., Chen, J., Chen, J., Yue, A., Meng, Y., & Sui, C. (2026) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2026.3658442 · Cited by 3
Zhao, Y., Liu, D., Zhu, X., Luo, M., Huang, B., Song, C., & Duan, X. (2026) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2026.115371 · Cited by 3
Self-citationMulti-Faceted Adaptive Token Pruning for Efficient Remote Sensing Image Segmentation
Zhang, C., & Yao, J. (2025) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs17142508 · Cited by 3
Kim, Y., & Yoon, H. (2024) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2024.104113 · Cited by 3
Kavitha, J. C., Subitha, D., Bhandari, D., & Jaluka, D. K. (2024) · International Conference on Modeling, Simulation & Intelligent Computing (MoSICom) · doi:10.1109/mosicom63082.2024.10881361 · Cited by 2
Rodríguez-Dorna, A., Alonso, L., Costas, F., Picos, J., & Armesto, J. (2025) · Geocarto International · doi:10.1080/10106049.2025.2538802 · Cited by 2
Wambugu, N. M., Wang, R., Shi, T., Chan, T. N., Fei, J., Zhang, Y., Zhou, J., Jia, Z., & Guo, B. (2026) · ISPRS Open Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.ophoto.2026.100128 · Cited by 2
Environmental Analysis using Remote Sensing Data
Aakash, D., Kirubavathy, K. J., & Thulasi Bai, V. (2023) · International Conference on Recent Advances in Science and Engineering Technology (ICRASET) · doi:10.1109/icraset59632.2023.10420225 · Cited by 2
ABNet: An Aggregated Backbone Network Architecture for Fine Landcover Classification
Si, B., Wang, Z., Yu, Z., & Wang, K. (2024) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs16101725 · Cited by 2
Harvesting Data the Role of AI in Smart Farming and Precision Agriculture
Mahmood, M. H., Waseem, M., Abbas, M., Ahmad, M., & Ahmad, M. (2024) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-4252-7.ch003 · Cited by 2
Ni, H., Guan, H., Tong, X., & Chanussot, J. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2024.3525044 · Cited by 2
Self-citationWei, X., Zhao, Z., Chen, T., Zhang, X., Sun, S., Li, M., & Shi, T. (2025) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1517764 · Cited by 2
Al–Fatlawy, R. R., Raviprakash, P., Vybhavi, G. Y., Jagadish, S., & Sundaram, S. M. (2024) · International Conference on Distributed Systems, Computer Networks and Cybersecurity (ICDSCNC) · doi:10.1109/icdscnc62492.2024.10941568 · Cited by 2
Xia, J., Broni-Bediako, C., & Yokoya, N. (2025) · Remote Sensing Applications Society and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rsase.2025.101542 · Cited by 2
Bridging Domains and Resolutions: Deep Learning-Based Land Cover Mapping without Matched Labels
Cao, S., Tang, Y., Yan, E., Jiang, J., & Mo, D. (2024) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs16081449 · Cited by 1
Wang, R., Lu, D., Li, G., Li, Y., & Liu, W. (2025) · Smart Agricultural Technology · doi:10.1016/j.atech.2025.101292 · Cited by 1
Li, M., Tan, H. F., Zhai, H., & Ci, J. (2025) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs17223666 · Cited by 1
Construction of Remote Sensing Knowledge Graph for Spatiotemporal Analysis
Zhu, Q., Jia, Q., Xie, W., Liu, C., Shen, T., Zhang, Z., & Wang, Q. F. (2026) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2026.3655557 · Cited by 1
Ai, T., Liu, T., Jiang, H., & Gu, Y. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2026.3673962 · Cited by 1
Luo, J., Zhao, Y., Xuan, M., Zheng, J., Zhou, Y., & Liu, X. (2026) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs18060897 · Cited by 1
Amarante, G., Souza, M. T. P., Lima, G., Barreiros, W., Ferreira, R., & Teodoro, G. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-52071-z · Cited by 1
Li, Q., Chen, C., Cai, J., Huang, J. Y., Li, Y., & Liu, W. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2026.3710197 · Cited by 1
Deng, M., Chen, Y., Ding, G., Li, S., & Xie, X. (2026) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s26154671 · Cited by 1
夏侯, 明., 彭, 明., 沈, 泽., 温, 庆., 王, 崇., 刘, 彦., 张, 秋., 彭, 磊., 余, 昌., 欧, 晓., et al. (2025) · SCIENTIA SINICA Terrae · doi:10.1360/n072024-0156 · Cited by 1
Nguyen, T. D., He, Z., Xiang, W., & Rajasekaran, R. (2025) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2025.104743 · Cited by 1
Multi-Source Land Cover Classification with an Integrated Feature Set in Mekong Basin
Yan, J. J., Mi, X., Ma, Z., Zhu, H., Jiang, Z., Meng, Y., Liu, P., Yang, J. H., & Gu, X. (2024) · IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) · doi:10.1109/igarss53475.2024.10640626
Controlled-SAM and Context Promoting Network for Fine-Grained Semantic Segmentation
Zhang, J., Li, Y., He, L., Zhang, B., Niu, Z., Zhang, Y., & Luo, S. (2025) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2025.3581620
Mask Clustering-Based Annotation Engine for Large-Scale Submeter Land Cover Mapping
Chen, H., Xu, F., Saleh, T., Hao, W., & Xia, G.-S. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2025.3601164
Self-citationSystematic Review for the Application of CNN in Predicting Natural Disaster
Velásquez, R. M. A., Chozo, A. F. A., Herrera, E. E. B., & Melgarejo, D. M. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-00715-5_2
Metadata
- Authors
- Tong, X.-Y., Xia, G.-S., & Zhu, X. X.
- Affiliations
- Wuhan University (CN)
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Zhu, Xiao Xiang
- Venue
- ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-02
- Volume
- 196
- Pages
- 178-196
- ISSN
- 0924-2716 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9939933
- OpenAlex
- W4313908836
- Semantic Scholar
- 5f23ad23dbe17acba04e07fa5221576d5bb11a58
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 10
- FWCI
- 9.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- elib (German Aerospace Center) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- European Commission (HORIZON2020)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (519016653, ZH 498/18-1)
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01DD20001)
- Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie (W2-W3-100, 50EE2201C)
- Helmholtz Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Unit (ZT-I-PF-5-01)
- H2020 European Research Council (714087)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Remote Sensing and Land Use
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- land cover mapping, high-resolution satellite imagery, unsupervised domain adaptation, Siamese network, pseudo-labeling, data balancing, Gaofen-2, PlanetScope, Sentinel-2, Gaofen-1, cross-sensor generalization, cross-regional generalization, built environment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review