PreprintCited by 9Robot Manipulation and LearningReinforcement Learning in RoboticsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Learning Multi-Stage Tasks with One Demonstration via Self-Replay

Open access
Di Palo, Norman, Johns, Edward·2021·arXiv

Abstract

In this work, we introduce a novel method to learn everyday-like multi-stage tasks from a single human demonstration, without requiring any prior object knowledge. Inspired by the recent Coarse-to-Fine Imitation Learning method, we model imitation learning as a learned object reaching phase followed by an open-loop replay of the demonstrator's actions. We build upon this for multi-stage tasks where, following the human demonstration, the robot can autonomously collect image data for the entire multi-stage task, by reaching the next object in the sequence and then replaying the demonstration, and then repeating in a loop for all stages of the task. We evaluate with real-world experiments on a set of everyday-like multi-stage tasks, which we show that our method can solve from a single demonstration. Videos and supplementary material can be found at https://www.robot-learning.uk/self-replay.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2111.07447

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5][5] A. Zhan, P. Zhao, L. Pinto, P. Abbeel, and M. Laskin. A framework for efficient robotic manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.07975 , 2020. - · arXiv
  2. [32][32] E. Johns. Back to reality for imitation learning. In Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), Blue Sky Track , 2021. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Di Palo, N., & Johns, E.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3214310824
Cited by
8
References
33
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Royal Academy of Engineering
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
imitation learning, robot learning from demonstration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review