Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Overview and Field Guide for Future Research Directions
Open accessAbstract
Autonomous driving has achieved significant milestones in research and development over the last two decades. There is increasing interest in the field as the deployment of autonomous vehicles (AVs) promises safer and more ecologically friendly transportation systems. With the rapid progress in computationally powerful artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, AVs can sense their environment with high precision, make safe real-time decisions, and operate reliably without human intervention. However, intelligent decision-making in such vehicles is not generally understandable by humans in the current state of the art, and such deficiency hinders this technology from being socially acceptable. Hence, aside from making safe real-time decisions, AVs must also explain their AI-guided decision-making process in order to be regulatory compliant across many jurisdictions. Our study sheds comprehensive light on the development of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) approaches for AVs. In particular, we make the following contributions. First, we provide a thorough overview of the state-of-the-art and emerging approaches for XAI-based autonomous driving. We then propose a conceptual framework that considers the essential elements for explainable end-to-end autonomous driving. Finally, we present XAI-based prospective directions and emerging paradigms for future directions that hold promise for enhancing transparency, trustworthiness, and societal acceptance of AVs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
XAI for autonomous systems offers rationales and accountability on intervention choices in crucial traffic situations.
“Based in the existing research summarized in Table 2, it can be concluded that XAI for autonomous systems is a catalogue of AI-driven methodologies that (1) guarantee a plausible degree of safety for a vehicle's major decisions, (2) offer rationales and accountability on the intervention choices in crucial traffic situations, and (3) follow all traffic regulations set forth by the law enforcement”
From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [79]
XAI for autonomous systems follows all traffic regulations set forth by law enforcement agencies.
“Based in the existing research summarized in Table 2, it can be concluded that XAI for autonomous systems is a catalogue of AI-driven methodologies that (1) guarantee a plausible degree of safety for a vehicle's major decisions, (2) offer rationales and accountability on the intervention choices in crucial traffic situations, and (3) follow all traffic regulations set forth by the law enforcement”
From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [79]
Nine criteria have been proposed in the National Association of City Transportation Officials' automated vehicle manifesto as a framework for upcoming autonomous driving governance.
“Nine criteria have been proposed in the National Association of City Transportation Officials' automated vehicle manifesto as a framework for upcoming autonomous driving governance (Fig. 13) [50], [79].”
From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [79]
ISO/TC 204 is the main standard facilitating the systematic use of autonomous vehicle technology and delivers an extensive manual on the entire system and infrastructure elements of ITS.
“The main standard facilitating the systematic use of autonomous vehicle technology in this context is ISO/TC 204, which delivers an extensive manual on the entire system and infrastructure elements of ITS [45], [79], [80].”
From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [79]
The marketplace for automotive intelligent hardware, technology, and operations will expand from $1.25 billion in 2017 to $28.5 billion by 2025.
“The marketplace for automotive intelligent hardware, technology, and operations will expand from $1.25 billion in 2017 to $28.5 billion by 2025 as per [79].”
From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [79]
An effective user interaction is established when consumers' and stakeholders' cross-model evaluation is incorporated into the modelled layout of autonomous systems, as demonstrated in recent empirical research by Atakishiyev et al.
“An effective user interaction is established when consumers' and stakeholders' cross-model evaluation is incorporated into the modelled layout of autonomous systems, as demonstrated in a recent empirical research by Atakishiyev et al. [79].”
From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [79]
Such a form of rationalization is applicable to a wide range of autonomous system scenarios.
“In reality, it's worth emphasizing that such a form of rationalization is applicable to a wide range of autonomous system scenarios [79], [91].”
From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [79]
According to Intel's analysis, automated cars would save commuters' annual travel time by 250 million hours and contribute to saving more than 500,000 lives solely in the United States between 2035 and 2045.
“According to Intel's analysis on the anticipated merits of automated cars, the employment of such innovations on roadways would save commuters' annual travel time by 250 million hours and contribute to saving more than 500,000 lives, solely in The United States of America, between the years 2035-2045 [79], [80].”
From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [79]
XAI for autonomous systems guarantees a plausible degree of safety for a vehicle's major decisions.
“Based in the existing research summarized in Table 2, it can be concluded that XAI for autonomous systems is a catalogue of AI-driven methodologies that (1) guarantee a plausible degree of safety for a vehicle's major decisions, (2) offer rationales and accountability on the intervention choices in crucial traffic situations, and (3) follow all traffic regulations set forth by the law enforcement”
From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [79]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Chamola, V., Hassija, V., Sulthana, A. R., Ghosh, D., Dhingra, D., & Sikdar, B. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3294569 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Nomological Deductive Reasoning for Trustworthy, Human-Readable, and Actionable AI Outputs
Hakizimana, G., & Ledezma Espino, A. (2025) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a18060306 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Atakishiyev, S., Salameh, M., Yao, H., & Goebel, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Huawei Technologies (Canada) (CA)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- 101603-101625
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2112.11561
- OpenAlex
- W4400810536
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 87 · 2025: 149 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 45.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute
- University of Alberta
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
- Keywords
- explainable AI, autonomous driving, autonomous vehicles, explainable decision-making, transparency, trustworthiness, social acceptance, regulatory compliance, conceptual framework, end-to-end autonomous driving
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
