The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Succinct Differentiation of Disparate Boosting Ensemble Learning Methods for Prognostication of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Diagnosis
Open accessAbstract
Prognostication of medical problems using the clinical data by leveraging the Machine Learning techniques with stellar precision is one of the most important real world challenges at the present time. Considering the medical problem of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome also known as PCOS is an emerging problem in women aged from 15 to 49. Diagnosing this disorder by using various Boosting Ensemble Methods is something we have presented in this paper. A detailed and compendious differentiation between Adaptive Boost, Gradient Boosting Machine, XGBoost and CatBoost with their respective performance metrics highlighting the hidden anomalies in the data and its effects on the result is something we have presented in this paper. Metrics like Confusion Matrix, Precision, Recall, F1 Score, FPR, RoC Curve and AUC have been used in this paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The study had strengths including the use of standardised diagnostic criteria, thorough biochemical evaluation, and participant recruitment from a tertiary care facility.
“This study has significant strengths, such as the use of standardised diagnostic criteria, thorough biochemical evaluation, and participant recruitment from a tertiary care facility [22].”
From Prevalence of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) and Its Association with Metabolic Syndrome in Reproductive-Aged Women: A Cross-Sectional Study: PCOS and Metabolic Syndrome in Reproductive-Aged Women (2025) · cites this paper as [22]
The Approach and Features sections (p. 2) discuss a dataset and possible PCOS predictors, while the Conclusion (p. 8) describes a comparison of boosting methods. Searching for diagnostic criteria, biochemical evaluation, and tertiary-care recruitment found no passage documenting those claimed study strengths. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Pramila P. Shinde and Seema Shah. A review of machine learning and deep learning applications. In 2018 Fourth International Conference on Computing Communication Control and Automation (ICCUBEA) , pages 1-6, 2018. doi:10.1109/ICCUBEA.2018.8697857. · DOI
- David Opitz and Richard Maclin. Popular ensemble methods: An empirical study. Journal of artificial intelligence research , 11:169-198, 1999.
- Leo Breiman. Random forests. Machine learning , 45(1):5-32, 2001.
- Jerome H. Friedman. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics , 29:11891232, 2001.
- Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining , pages 785-794, 2016.
- Andrew Y Ng. Feature selection, l 1 vs. l 2 regularization, and rotational invariance. In Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning , page 78, 2004.
- Liudmila Prokhorenkova, Gleb Gusev, Aleksandr Vorobev, Anna Veronika Dorogush, and Andrey Gulin. Catboost: unbiased boosting with categorical features. Advances in neural information processing systems , 31, 2018.
- David MW Powers. Evaluation: from precision, recall and f-measure to roc, informedness, markedness and correlation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.16061 , 2020. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Luqman, M. S., Zeba, A., Tanveer, N., & Kareem, S. (2025) · DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICO-LIFE-SCIENCES · doi:10.69750/dmls.02.05.0131 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Gupta, A., Shetty, S., Joshi, R., & Laban, R. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Mumbai (IN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- Pages
- 1-5
- arXiv
- 2201.00418
- OpenAlex
- W4210852440
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Control (ICAC3) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
- Keywords
- polycystic ovary syndrome, PCOS diagnosis, adaptive boosting, gradient boosting, XGBoost, CatBoost, medical data classification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
