The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detecting Anomalies within Time Series using Local Neural Transformations
Open accessAbstract
We develop a new method to detect anomalies within time series, which is essential in many application domains, reaching from self-driving cars, finance, and marketing to medical diagnosis and epidemiology. The method is based on self-supervised deep learning that has played a key role in facilitating deep anomaly detection on images, where powerful image transformations are available. However, such transformations are widely unavailable for time series. Addressing this, we develop Local Neural Transformations(LNT), a method learning local transformations of time series from data. The method produces an anomaly score for each time step and thus can be used to detect anomalies within time series. We prove in a theoretical analysis that our novel training objective is more suitable for transformation learning than previous deep Anomaly detection(AD) methods. Our experiments demonstrate that LNT can find anomalies in speech segments from the LibriSpeech data set and better detect interruptions to cyber-physical systems than previous work. Visualization of the learned transformations gives insight into the type of transformations that LNT learns.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LNT, TRL-CPC, TS-CP2, and Skip-Step CPC were proposed following the architecture of CPC.
“Following the architecture of CPC, LNT [110], TRL-CPC [111], TS-CP 2 [112], and Skip-Step CPC [113] were proposed.”
From Self-Supervised Learning for Time Series Analysis: Taxonomy, Progress, and Prospects (2024) · cites this paper as [110]
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Self-Supervised Learning for Time Series Analysis: Taxonomy, Progress, and Prospects
Zhang, K., Wen, Q., Zhang, C., Cai, R., Jin, M., Liu, Y., Zhang, J. Y., Liang, Y., Pang, G., Song, D., et al. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3387317 · Cited by 295
“Following the architectureofCPC,LNT[110],TRL-CPC[111],TS-CP 2 [112], and Skip-Step CPC [113] were proposed.”
MethodGuo, H., Zhou, Z., Zhao, D., & Gaaloul, W. (2023) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2023.09.028 · Cited by 56
Can Industrial Intrusion Detection Be SIMPLE?
Wolsing, K., Thiemt, L., van Sloun, C., Wagner, E., Wehrle, K., & Henze, M. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-17143-7_28 · Cited by 18
Self-supervised Spatial-Temporal Normality Learning for Time Series Anomaly Detection
Chen, Y., Xu, H., Pang, G., Qiao, H., Zhou, Y., & Shang, M. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70365-2_9 · Cited by 15
Sánchez-Ferrera, A., Calvo, B., & Lozano, J. A. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3770575 · Cited by 15
Self-Supervised Anomaly Detection With Neural Transformations
Qiu, C., Kloft, M., Mandt, S., & Rudolph, M. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3519543 · Cited by 17
Self-citationContrastive Time Series Anomaly Detection by Temporal Transformations
Li, B., & Müller, E. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn54540.2023.10191358 · Cited by 8
Generic Machine Learning Framework for Fully-Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Contaminated Data
Ulmer, M., Zgraggen, J., & Huber, L. G. (2024) · International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management · doi:10.36001/ijphm.2024.v15i1.3589 · Cited by 4
Skip-Step Contrastive Predictive Coding for Time Series Anomaly Detection
Zhang, K., Wen, Q., Zhang, C., Sun, L., & Liu, Y. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp48485.2024.10447104 · Cited by 2
Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning in Medical Signal Processing: Literature Review and Case Study
Alouani, Z., Daanouni, O., Saleh, S., Moujahid, H., Cherradi, B., & Bouattane, O. (2024) · International Conference on Circuit, Systems and Communication (ICCSC) · doi:10.1109/iccsc62074.2024.10616756 · Cited by 1
Sagar, S., & Suchithra, M. S. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2374845/v1 · Cited by 1
A Novel Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Approach Using Neural Transformation in Cloud Environment
Zhang, R., Chen, J., Song, Y., Shan, W., Chen, P., & Xia, Y. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-23498-9_9
Metadata
- Authors
- Schneider, T., Qiu, C., Kloft, M., Latif, D. A., Staab, S., Mandt, S., & Rudolph, M.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2202.03944
- OpenAlex
- W4221145755
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KL 2698/2-1, 2698/2, KL 2698/5-1, 2698/2-1)
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (S21010C, B0770E)
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Keywords
- anomaly detection, time series, self-supervised learning, training objectives, anomaly score, cyber-physical systems, LibriSpeech
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review