CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 98Digital Media Forensic DetectionFace recognition and analysisGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

GAN-generated Faces Detection: A Survey and New Perspectives

Open access
Wang, Xin, Guo, Hui, Hu, Shu, Chang, Ming-Ching, Lyu, Siwei·2022·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2202.07145arXiv 2202.07145
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) have led to the generation of very realistic face images, which have been used in fake social media accounts and other disinformation matters that can generate profound impacts. Therefore, the corresponding GAN-face detection techniques are under active development that can examine and expose such fake faces. In this work, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of recent progress in GAN-face detection. We focus on methods that can detect face images that are generated or synthesized from GAN models. We classify the existing detection works into four categories: (1) deep learning-based, (2) physical-based, (3) physiological-based methods, and (4) evaluation and comparison against human visual performance. For each category, we summarize the key ideas and connect them with method implementations. We also discuss open problems and suggest future research directions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2202.07145

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current survey papers provide extensive taxonomies and theoretical discussions but lack empirical evaluations that would enable researchers to understand the relative strengths and limitations of different approaches.

    “While current survey papers [5, 7, 9, 15] provide extensive taxonomies and theoretical discussions, they lack empirical evaluations that would enable researchers to understand the relative strengths and limitations of different approaches.”

    From Deepfake detection across image, video, and audio: a comprehensive survey with empirical evaluation of generalization and robustness (2026) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Introduction and §3 describe a taxonomy of GAN-face detection methods, and §4 says a sufficiently large-scale benchmark dataset for empirical evaluation is lacking (page numbers unavailable). But §3 also points to Table 1’s performance comparison, which reports test datasets and accuracy figures for multiple methods. The claim is supported if it means a common benchmark evaluation, but overstates the absence of empirical comparisons altogether. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Current survey papers primarily focus on reviewing detection methods based on their accuracy performance within the same dataset (within-domain evaluation), which achieves high accuracy often exceeding 95%.

    “Current survey papers [5-9, 15, 15, 16] primarily focus on reviewing detection methods based on their accuracy performance within the same dataset (within-domain evaluation), which achieves high accuracy (often exceeding 95%).”

    From Deepfake detection across image, video, and audio: a comprehensive survey with empirical evaluation of generalization and robustness (2026) · cites this paper as [7]

    Section 3 says the survey compares detection methods by dataset and performance, and its Table 1 lists many reported accuracies above 95%. But neither that table nor the discussion of related surveys in Section 5 establishes that current surveys primarily focus on within-domain evaluation; the table also does not identify all its results as within-domain. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Existing surveys fail to examine how detectors perform when facing new data types, unseen manipulation techniques, or emerging generator architectures.

    “While surveys report impressive within-domain accuracies, they fail to examine how these same detectors perform when facing new data types, unseen manipulation techniques, or emerging generator architectures [5, 7, 9, 15].”

    From Deepfake detection across image, video, and audio: a comprehensive survey with empirical evaluation of generalization and robustness (2026) · cites this paper as [7]

    Section 4 (page unavailable) says a large-scale benchmark for GAN-face detection is lacking, and §6.1 identifies detection of faces from newer GAN models as an ongoing challenge. But the survey also discusses cross-model and cross-data evaluations, so it does not support the categorical claim that surveys fail to examine such conditions; it does not establish the claim about unseen manipulation techniques. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • While existing surveys have extensively reviewed deepfake detection methods from theoretical and architectural perspectives, there remains a critical gap in systematic empirical evaluations of these methods under diverse evaluation protocols.

    “While existing surveys have extensively reviewed deepfake detection methods from theoretical and architectural perspectives [5-7, 15, 15, 25], there remains a critical gap in systematic empirical evaluations of these methods under diverse evaluation protocols.”

    From Deepfake detection across image, video, and audio: a comprehensive survey with empirical evaluation of generalization and robustness (2026) · cites this paper as [7]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Distortion techniques effectively obscure generation artifacts, substantially reducing detection performance.

    “[17, 200] show these techniques effectively obscure generation artifacts, substantially reducing detection performance.”

    From Deepfake detection across image, video, and audio: a comprehensive survey with empirical evaluation of generalization and robustness (2026) · cites this paper as [200]

    Section 6.3, “Robust to Adversarial Attack” (page unavailable), says adversarial perturbations can disrupt fake-image detection, supporting a reduction in detection effectiveness for that kind of image alteration. It does not say that distortion techniques obscure generation artifacts or quantify a substantial performance reduction. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 91

  1. Rameen Abdal, Yipeng Qin, and Peter Wonka, 'Image2StyleGAN++: How to edit the embedded images?', in CVPR, (2020).
  2. Enes Altuncu, Virginia NL Franqueira, and Shujun Li, 'Deepfake: Definitions, performance metrics and standards, datasets and bench- marks, and a meta-review', arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.10913, (2022). · arXiv
  3. Sarah Barrington and Hany Farid, 'A comparative analysis of human and ai performance in forensic estimation of physical attributes', Sci- entific Reports, 13(1), 4784, (2023).
  4. David Bau, Hendrik Strobelt, William Peebles, et al., 'Semantic photo manipulation with a generative image prior', ACM TOG, (2019).
  5. Kratika Bhagtani, Amit Kumar Singh Yadav, Emily R Bartusiak, Ziyue Xiang, Ruiting Shao, Sriram Baireddy, and Edward J Delp, 'An overview of recent work in media forensics: Methods and threats', arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.12067, (2022). · arXiv
  6. Matyáš Boháček and Hany Farid, 'Protecting world leaders against deep fakes using facial, gestural, and vocal mannerisms', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(48), e2216035119, (2022).
  7. Matyáš Boháček and Hany Farid, 'A geometric and photometric ex- ploration of gan and diffusion synthesized faces', in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion, pp. 874-883, (2023).
  8. Andrew Brock, Jeff Donahue, and Karen Simonyan, 'Large scale GAN training for high fidelity natural image synthesis', arXiv:1809.11096, (2018). · arXiv
  9. Junyi Cao, Chao Ma, Taiping Yao, Shen Chen, Shouhong Ding, and Xiaokang Yang, 'End-to-end reconstruction-classification learning for face forgery detection', in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 4113-4122, (2022).
  10. Qiong Cao, Li Shen, Weidi Xie, Omkar M Parkhi, and Andrew Zis- serman, 'VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and age', in FG. IEEE, (2018).
  11. Yihan Cao, Siyu Li, Yixin Liu, Zhiling Yan, Yutong Dai, Philip S Yu, and Lichao Sun, 'A comprehensive survey of ai-generated content (aigc): A history of generative ai from gan to chatgpt', arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04226, (2023). · arXiv
  12. Anpei Chen, Ruiyang Liu, Ling Xie, Zhang Chen, Hao Su, and Jingyi Yu, 'SofGAN: A portrait image generator with dynamic styling', ACM transactions on graphics, (2021).
  13. Beijing Chen, Weijin TAN, et al., 'Distinguishing between natural and gan-generated face images by combining global and local features', Chinese Journal of Electronics, (2022).
  14. Bowen Cheng, Ross Girshick, Piotr Dollár, et al., 'Boundary IoU: Improving object-centric image segmentation evaluation', in CVPR, (2021).
  15. Umur Aybars Ciftci, Ilke Demir, and Lijun Yin, 'Fakecatcher: Detec- tion of synthetic portrait videos using biological signals', IEEE trans- actions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, (2020).
  16. Duc-Tien Dang-Nguyen et al., 'Raise: A raw images dataset for digital image forensics', in ACM multimedia systems conference, (2015).
  17. Debayan Deb, Xiaoming Liu, and Anil K Jain, 'Unified detection of digital and physical face attacks', in 2023 IEEE 17th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG), pp. 1- 8. IEEE, (2023).
  18. Chengdong Dong, Ajay Kumar, and Eryun Liu, 'Think twice before detecting gan-generated fake images from their spectral domain im- prints', in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vi- sion and Pattern Recognition, pp. 7865-7874, (2022).
  19. Ziv Epstein, Aaron Hertzmann, Investigators of Human Creativity, Memo Akten, Hany Farid, Jessica Fjeld, Morgan R Frank, Matthew Groh, Laura Herman, Neil Leach, et al., 'Art and the science of gener- ative ai', Science, 380(6650), 1110-1111, (2023).
  20. Jianwei Fei, Yunshu Dai, Peipeng Yu, Tianrun Shen, Zhihua Xia, and Jian Weng, 'Learning second order local anomaly for general face forgery detection', in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 20270-20280, (2022).
  21. Yong Fu, Tanfeng Sun, Xinghao Jiang, Ke Xu, and Peisong He, 'Ro- bust GANs-face detection based on dual-channel CNN network', in CISP-BMEI. IEEE, (2019).
  22. Candice R. Gerstner and Hany Farid, 'Detecting real-time deep-fake videos using active illumination', in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops, pp. 53-60, (June 2022).
  23. Michael Goebel, Lakshmanan Nataraj, Tejaswi Nanjundaswamy, et al., 'Detection, attribution and localization of GAN generated im- ages', arXiv:2007.10466, (2020). · arXiv
  24. Lore Goetschalckx, Alex Andonian, Aude Oliva, and Phillip Isola, 'GANalyze: Toward visual definitions of cognitive image properties', in ICCV, (2019).
  25. Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, et al., 'Generative adversarial nets', in NeurIPS, (2014).
  26. Jianping Gou, Baosheng Yu, et al., 'Knowledge distillation: A survey', IJCV, (2021).
  27. Qiqi Gu, Shen Chen, Taiping Yao, Yang Chen, Shouhong Ding, and Ran Yi, 'Exploiting fine-grained face forgery clues via progressive en- hancement learning', in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Arti- ficial Intelligence, volume 36, pp. 735-743, (2022).
  28. Hui Guo, Shu Hu, Xin Wang, Ming-Ching Chang, and Siwei Lyu, 'Eyes tell all: Irregular pupil shapes reveal GAN-generated faces', ICASSP, (2022).
  29. Hui Guo, Shu Hu, Xin Wang, Ming-Ching Chang, and Siwei Lyu, 'Robust attentive deep neural network for exposing GAN-generated faces', IEEE Access, (2022).
  30. Hui Guo, Xin Wang, and Siwei Lyu, 'Detection of real-time deep- fakes in video conferencing with active probing and corneal reflec- tion', ICASSP, (2023).
  31. Shu Hu, Lipeng Ke, Xin Wang, and Siwei Lyu, 'Tkml-ap: Adversar- ial attacks to top-k multi-label learning', in ICCV, pp. 7649-7657, (2021).
  32. Shu Hu, Yuezun Li, and Siwei Lyu, 'Exposing GAN-generated faces using inconsistent corneal specular highlights', in ICASSP. IEEE, (2021).
  33. Nils Hulzebosch, Sarah Ibrahimi, and Marcel Worring, 'Detecting CNN-generated facial images in real-world scenarios', in CVPR Work- shops, (2020).
  34. Abdul Jabbar, Xi Li, and Bourahla Omar, 'A survey on generative ad- versarial networks: Variants, applications, and training', ACM Com- puting Surveys, (2021).
  35. Ali Jahanian, Lucy Chai, and Phillip Isola, 'On the "steerability" of generative adversarial networks', in ICLR, (2019).
  36. Hyeonseong Jeon, Youngoh Bang, Junyaup Kim, and Simon S Woo, 'T-GD: Transferable GAN-generated images detection framework', ICML, (2020).
  37. Yonghyun Jeong, Doyeon Kim, Youngmin Ro, and Jongwon Choi, 'Frepgan: robust deepfake detection using frequency-level perturba- tions', in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelli- gence, volume 36, pp. 1060-1068, (2022).
  38. Wei Jiang and Wentao Dong, 'Facke: a survey on generative models for face swapping', arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.11203, (2022). · arXiv
  39. Felix Juefei-Xu, Run Wang, Yihao Huang, et al., 'Counter- ing malicious deepfakes: Survey, battleground, and horizon', arXiv:2103.00218, (2021). · arXiv
  40. Felix Juefei-Xu, Run Wang, Yihao Huang, Qing Guo, Lei Ma, and Yang Liu, 'Countering malicious deepfakes: Survey, battleground, and horizon', International Journal of Computer Vision, 130(7), 1678- 1734, (2022).
  41. Tero Karras, Miika Aittala, Samuli Laine, Erik Härkönen, Janne Hell- sten, Jaakko Lehtinen, and Timo Aila, 'Alias-free generative adversar- ial networks', NeurIPS, 34, (2021).
  42. Tero Karras et al., 'Progressive growing of GANs for improved qual- ity, stability, and variation', ICLR, (2018).
  43. Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, and Timo Aila, 'A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks', in CVPR, (2019).
  44. Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, Miika Aittala, Janne Hellsten, Jaakko Lehtinen, and Timo Aila, 'Analyzing and improving the image quality of StyleGAN', in CVPR, (2020).
  45. Zahra Khanjani, Gabrielle Watson, and Vandana P Janeja, 'How deep are the fakes? focusing on audio deepfake: A survey', arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.14203, (2021). · arXiv
  46. Federica Lago, Cecilia Pasquini, Rainer Böhme, et al., 'More real than real: A study on human visual perception of synthetic faces', arXiv:2106.07226, (2021). · arXiv
  47. Trung-Nghia Le, Huy H Nguyen, Junichi Yamagishi, and Isao Echizen, 'Robust deepfake on unrestricted media: Generation and de- tection', in Frontiers in Fake Media Generation and Detection, 81- 107, Springer, (2022).
  48. Chuqiao Li, Zhiwu Huang, Danda Pani Paudel, Yabin Wang, Mo- hamad Shahbazi, Xiaopeng Hong, and Luc Van Gool, 'A continual deepfake detection benchmark: Dataset, methods, and essentials', in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pp. 1339-1349, (2023).
  49. Haodong Li, Bin Li, Shunquan Tan, and Jiwu Huang, 'Detection of deep network generated images using disparities in color compo- nents', arXiv:1808.07276, (2018). · arXiv
  50. Lin Li, Lixin Qin, Zeguo Xu, Youbing Yin, Xin Wang, Bin Kong, Jun- jie Bai, Yi Lu, Zhenghan Fang, Qi Song, et al., 'Using artificial intel- ligence to detect covid-19 and community-acquired pneumonia based on pulmonary ct: evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy', Radiology, 296(2), E65-E71, (2020).
  51. Chenhao Lin, Jingyi Deng, Pengbin Hu, Chao Shen, Qian Wang, and Qi Li, 'Towards benchmarking and evaluating deepfake detection', arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.02115, (2022). · arXiv
  52. Yunfan Liu, Qi Li, Qiyao Deng, Zhenan Sun, and Ming-Hsuan Yang, 'Gan-based facial attribute manipulation', arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.12683, (2022). · arXiv
  53. Zhengzhe Liu, Xiaojuan Qi, and Philip HS Torr, 'Global texture en- hancement for fake face detection in the wild', in CVPR, (2020).
  54. Ziwei Liu, Ping Luo, Xiaogang Wang, and Xiaoou Tang, 'Deep learn- ing face attributes in the wild', in ICCV, (December 2015).
  55. Asad Malik, Minoru Kuribayashi, Sani M Abdullahi, and Ah- mad Neyaz Khan, 'Deepfake detection for human face images and videos: A survey', IEEE Access, 10, 18757-18775, (2022).
  56. Hadi Mansourifar and Weidong Shi, 'One-shot GAN generated fake face detection', arXiv:2003.12244, (2020). · arXiv
  57. Francesco Marra, Diego Gragnaniello, Luisa Verdoliva, and Gio- vanni Poggi, 'Do GANs leave artificial fingerprints?', in MIPR. IEEE, (2019).
  58. Francesco Marra, Cristiano Saltori, et al., 'Incremental learning for the detection and classification of GAN-generated images', in WIFS. IEEE, (2019).
  59. Momina Masood, Mariam Nawaz, Khalid Mahmood Malik, Ali Javed, Aun Irtaza, and Hafiz Malik, 'Deepfakes generation and detection: State-of-the-art, open challenges, countermeasures, and way forward', Applied Intelligence, 53(4), 3974-4026, (2023).
  60. Falko Matern, Christian Riess, and Marc Stamminger, 'Exploiting visual artifacts to expose deepfakes and face manipulations', in WACVW. IEEE, (2019).
  61. Scott McCloskey and Michael Albright, 'Detecting GAN-generated imagery using color cues', arXiv:1812.08247, (2018). · arXiv
  62. Yisroel Mirsky and Wenke Lee, 'The creation and detection of deep- fakes: A survey', ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(1), 1-41, (2021).
  63. Huaxiao Mo, Bolin Chen, and Weiqi Luo, 'Fake faces identification via convolutional neural network', in ACM IH&MMSEC, (2018).
  64. Shivansh Mundra, Gonzalo J Aniano Porcile, Smit Marvaniya, James R Verbus, and Hany Farid, 'Exposing gan-generated profile photos from compact embeddings', in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 884- 892, (2023).
  65. Thanh Thi Nguyen, Cuong M Nguyen, et al., 'Deep learning for deep- fakes creation and detection: A survey', arXiv:1909.11573, (2022). · arXiv
  66. Yunsheng Ni, Depu Meng, Changqian Yu, Chengbin Quan, Dongchun Ren, and Youjian Zhao, 'Core: Consistent representation learning for face forgery detection', in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 12-21, (2022).
  67. Ahmad Nickabadi, Maryam Saeedi Fard, Nastaran Moradzadeh Farid, and Najmeh Mohammadbagheri, 'A comprehensive survey on se- mantic facial attribute editing using generative adversarial networks', arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.10587, (2022). · arXiv
  68. Sophie Nightingale et al., 'Synthetic faces: how perceptually convinc- ing are they?', Journal of Vision, (2021).
  69. Sophie Nightingale and Hany Farid, 'Synthetic faces are more trust- worthy than real faces', Journal of Vision, 22(14), 3068-3068, (2022).
  70. Sophie J Nightingale, Shruti Agarwal, and Hany Farid, 'Perceptual and computational detection of face morphing', Journal of Vision, 21(3), (2021).
  71. Sophie J Nightingale and Hany Farid, 'Ai-synthesized faces are indis- tinguishable from real faces and more trustworthy', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, (2022).
  72. Ehsan Nowroozi, Mauro Conti, and Yassine Mekdad, 'Detecting high-quality gan-generated face images using neural networks', arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.01716, (2022). · arXiv
  73. Samay Pashine, Sagar Mandiya, Praveen Gupta, and Rashid Sheikh, 'Deep fake detection: Survey of facial manipulation detection solu- tions', arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.12605, (2021). · arXiv
  74. Leandro A Passos, Danilo Jodas, Kelton AP da Costa, Luis A Souza Júnior, Danilo Colombo, and João Paulo Papa, 'A review of deep learning-based approaches for deepfake content detection', arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.06095, (2022). · arXiv
  75. Ivan Perov, Daiheng Gao, et al., 'Deepfacelab: A simple, flexible and extensible face swapping framework', arXiv:2005.05535, (2020). · arXiv
  76. Minh Tam Pham et al., 'A dual benchmarking study of facial forgery and facial forensics', arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.12912, (2021). · arXiv
  77. Alec Radford, Luke Metz, et al., 'Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks', arXiv:1511.06434, (2015). · arXiv
  78. Omer Sagi and Lior Rokach, 'Ensemble learning: A survey', Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 8(4), (2018).
  79. Iman Saleem and Bahja Khudair Shukr, 'Techniques and challenges for generation and detection face morphing attacks: A survey', Iraqi Journal of Science, 385-404, (2023).
  80. Ulrich Scherhag, Christian Rathgeb, Johannes Merkle, Ralph Brei- thaupt, and Christoph Busch, 'Face recognition systems under mor- phing attacks: A survey', IEEE Access, 7, 23012-23026, (2019).
  81. Yujun Shen, Jinjin Gu, Xiaoou Tang, and Bolei Zhou, 'Interpreting the latent space of GANs for semantic face editing', in CVPR, (2020).
  82. Kaede Shiohara and Toshihiko Yamasaki, 'Detecting deepfakes with self-blended images', in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 18720-18729, (2022).
  83. Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman, 'Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition', arXiv:1409.1556, (2014). · arXiv
  84. P Swathi and Saritha Sk, 'Deepfake creation and detection: A sur- vey', in 2021 Third International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications (ICIRCA), pp. 584-588. IEEE, (2021).
  85. Run Wang, Felix Juefei-Xu, Lei Ma, Xiaofei Xie, et al., 'Fakespotter: A simple yet robust baseline for spotting AI-synthesized fake faces', IJCAI, (2020).
  86. Sheng-Yu Wang, Oliver Wang, Richard Zhang, Andrew Owens, and Alexei A Efros, 'CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for now', in CVPR, (2020).
  87. Weihao Xia, Yulun Zhang, Yujiu Yang, Jing-Hao Xue, Bolei Zhou, and Ming-Hsuan Yang, 'GAN inversion: A survey', arXiv:2101.05278, (2021). · arXiv
  88. Xin Yang, Yuezun Li, Honggang Qi, and Siwei Lyu, 'Exposing GAN- synthesized faces using landmark locations', in ACM Workshop on IHMMSec, (2019).
  89. Ning Yu, Larry S Davis, and Mario Fritz, 'Attributing fake images to GANs: Learning and analyzing GAN fingerprints', in ICCV, (2019).
  90. Peipeng Yu, Zhihua Xia, Jianwei Fei, and Yujiang Lu, 'A survey on deepfake video detection', Iet Biometrics, 10(6), 607-624, (2021).
  91. Tao Zhang, 'Deepfake generation and detection, a survey', Multimedia Tools and Applications, 81(5), 6259-6276, (2022).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, X., Guo, H., Hu, S., Chang, M.-C., & Lyu, S.
Affiliations
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
ISSN
0922-6389 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2202.07145
arXiv
2202.07145
OpenAlex
W4226146350
Cited by
98
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 11
FWCI
26.28
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (2153112)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Keywords
synthetic face detection, deepfakes, disinformation, synthetic image detection, fake social media accounts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review