MineRL Diamond 2021 Competition: Overview, Results, and Lessons Learned
Open accessAbstract
Reinforcement learning competitions advance the field by providing appropriate scope and support to develop solutions toward a specific problem. To promote the development of more broadly applicable methods, organizers need to enforce the use of general techniques, the use of sample-efficient methods, and the reproducibility of the results. While beneficial for the research community, these restrictions come at a cost -- increased difficulty. If the barrier for entry is too high, many potential participants are demoralized. With this in mind, we hosted the third edition of the MineRL ObtainDiamond competition, MineRL Diamond 2021, with a separate track in which we permitted any solution to promote the participation of newcomers. With this track and more extensive tutorials and support, we saw an increased number of submissions. The participants of this easier track were able to obtain a diamond, and the participants of the harder track progressed the generalizable solutions in the same task.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Collecting diamonds in Minecraft from scratch without human data is a substantial challenge in artificial intelligence that requires exploring farsighted strategies from pixels and sparse rewards in an open world.
“This achievement has been posed as a substantial challenge in artificial intelligence that requires exploring farsighted strategies from pixels and sparse rewards in an open world3.”
From Mastering diverse control tasks through world models (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
The MineRL competition environment is an established standard in the literature.
“Although the MineRL competition environment19 is an established standard in the literature3,20, it provides a complex dictionary action space that requires additional set-up to connect agents.”
From Mastering diverse control tasks through world models (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models
Wang, G., Xie, Y., Jiang, Y., Mandlekar, A., Xiao, C., Zhu, Y., Fan, L., & Anandkumar, A. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.16291 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
“[65] Anssi Kanervisto, Stephanie Milani, Karolis Ramanauskas, Nicholay Topin, Zichuan Lin, Junyou Li, Jianing Shi, Deheng Ye, Qiang Fu, Wei Yang, Weijun Hong, Zhongyue Huang, Haicheng Chen, Guangjun Zeng, Yue Lin, Vincent Micheli, Eloi Alonso, François Fleuret, Alexander Nikulin, Yury Belousov, Oleg Svidchenko, and Al…”
BackgroundMastering diverse control tasks through world models
Hafner, D., Pasukonis, J., Ba, J., & Lillicrap, T. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08744-2 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Zhu, X., Chen, Y., Tian, H., Tao, C., Su, W., Yang, C., Huang, G., Li, B., Lu, L., Wang, X., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.17144 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Human-Timescale Adaptation in an Open-Ended Task Space
Adaptive Agent Team, Bauer, J., Baumli, K., Baveja, S., Behbahani, F., Bhoopchand, A., Bradley-Schmieg, N., Chang, M., Clay, N., Collister, A., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.07608 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“, 2016) has been proposed as a challenge for Open-Endedness and RL (Fan et al., 2022; Grbic et al., 2021; Kanervisto et al., 2022), but unlike XLand it does not admit control of the full simulation stack, thereby limiting the smoothness of the task space.”
BackgroundCai, S., Wang, Z., Ma, X., Liu, A., & Liang, Y. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01320 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
DreamCraft: Text-Guided Generation of Functional 3D Environments in Minecraft
Earle, S., Kokkinos, F., Nie, Y., Togelius, J., & Răileanu, R. (2024) · International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG) · doi:10.1145/3649921.3649943 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Trade-Offs in Navigation Problems Using Value-Based Methods
Csereoka, P., & Micea, M. V. (2025) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai6030053 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Extended Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning for Autonomous Agents in Minecraft Game
Moon, H.-J., & Cho, S.-B. (2024) · IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) · doi:10.1109/cec60901.2024.10611988
- Authors
- Kanervisto, A., Milani, S., Ramanauskas, K., Topin, N., Lin, Z., Li, J., Shi, J., Ye, D., Fu, Q., Yang, W., Hong, W., Huang, Z., Chen, H., Zeng, G., Lin, Y., Micheli, V., Alonso, E., Fleuret, F., Nikulin, A., Belousov, Y., Svidchenko, O., & Shpilman, A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2202.10583
- OpenAlex
- W4221154819
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
- Keywords
- Minecraft, sample efficiency, reproducibility, generalization, barriers to entry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
