The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Remaining Useful Life Prediction Using Temporal Deep Degradation Network for Complex Machinery with Attention-based Feature Extraction
Open accessAbstract
The precise estimate of remaining useful life (RUL) is vital for the prognostic analysis and predictive maintenance that can significantly reduce failure rate and maintenance costs. The degradation-related features extracted from the sensor streaming data with neural networks can dramatically improve the accuracy of the RUL prediction. The Temporal deep degradation network (TDDN) model is proposed to make the RUL prediction with the degradation-related features given by the one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D CNN) feature extraction and attention mechanism. 1D CNN is used to extract the temporal features from the streaming sensor data. Temporal features have monotonic degradation trends from the fluctuating raw sensor streaming data. Attention mechanism can improve the RUL prediction performance by capturing the fault characteristics and the degradation development with the attention weights. The performance of the TDDN model is evaluated on the public C-MAPSS dataset and compared with the existing methods. The results show that the TDDN model can achieve the best RUL prediction accuracy in complex conditions compared to current machine learning models. The degradation-related features extracted from the high-dimension sensor streaming data demonstrate the clear degradation trajectories and degradation stages that enable TDDN to predict the turbofan-engine RUL accurately and efficiently.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“as degradationrelated features extracted from the sensor data can dramatically improve the accuracy of RUL prediction (Qin, Cai, Gao, Zhang, Cheng and Chen, 2022).”
From Impact of Sensor Degradation on Measurement Uncertainty in Prognostics and Maintenance Decision-Making: State of the art and challenges (2025) · cites this paper as Qin, Cai, Gao, Zhang, Cheng and Chen, 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- [1][1] X.-S. Si, W. Wang, C.-H. Hu, D.-H. Zhou, Remaining useful life estimation-a review on the statistical data driven approaches, European journal of operational research 213 (1) (2011) 1-14. -
- [8][8] J. Zhu, N. Chen, W. Peng, Estimation of bearing remaining useful life based on multiscale convolutional neural network, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 66 (4) (2018) 3208-3216. -
- [10][10] C. Ord´ o˜ nez, F. S. Lasheras, J. Roca-Pardinas, F. J. de Cos Juez, A hybrid arima-svm model for the study of the remaining useful life of aircraft engines, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 346 (2019) 184-191. -
- [12][12] N. Gebraeel, M. Lawley, R. Liu, V. Parmeshwaran, Residual life predictions from vibration-based degradation signals: a neural network approach, IEEE Transactions on industrial electronics 51 (3) (2004) 694-700. -
- [14][14] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, G. E. Hinton, Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks, Advances in neural information processing systems 25 (2012) 1097-1105. -
- [16][16] G. E. Dahl, D. Yu, L. Deng, A. Acero, Context-dependent pre-trained deep neural networks for large-vocabulary speech recognition, IEEE Transactions on audio, speech, and language processing 20 (1) (2011) 30-42. -
- [17][17] A. Graves, A.-r. Mohamed, G. Hinton, Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks, in: 2013 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, Ieee, 2013, pp. 6645-6649. -
- [19][19] K. Cho, B. Van Merri¨ enboer, C. Gulcehre, D. Bahdanau, F. Bougares, H. Schwenk, Y. Bengio, Learning phrase representations using rnn encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation, arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.1078 (2014). · arXiv
- [20][20] F. O. Heimes, Recurrent neural networks for remaining useful life estimation, in: 2008 international conference on prognostics and health management, IEEE, 2008, pp. 1-6. -
- [21][21] S. Zheng, K. Ristovski, A. Farahat, C. Gupta, Long short-term memory network for remaining useful life estimation, in: 2017 IEEE international conference on prognostics and health management (ICPHM), IEEE, 2017, pp. 88-95. -
- [22][22] F. Wang, X. Liu, G. Deng, X. Yu, H. Li, Q. Han, Remaining life prediction method for rolling bearing based on the long short-term memory network, Neural Processing Letters 50 (3) (2019) 2437-2454. -
- [25][25] Z. Chen, M. Wu, R. Zhao, F. Guretno, R. Yan, X. Li, Machine remaining useful life prediction via an attentionbased deep learning approach, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 68 (3) (2020) 2521-2531. -
- [26][26] M. Ragab, Z. Chen, M. Wu, C.-K. Kwoh, R. Yan, X. Li, Attention sequence to sequence model for machine remaining useful life prediction, arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.09868 (2020). - · arXiv
- [27][27] G. S. Babu, P. Zhao, X.-L. Li, Deep convolutional neural network based regression approach for estimation of remaining useful life, in: International conference on database systems for advanced applications, Springer, 2016, pp. 214-228. -
- [31][31] Y. Song, S. Gao, Y. Li, L. Jia, Q. Li, F. Pang, Distributed attention-based temporal convolutional network for remaining useful life prediction, IEEE Internet of Things Journal (2020). -
- [32][32] Y.-L. Boureau, J. Ponce, Y. LeCun, A theoretical analysis of feature pooling in visual recognition, in: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on machine learning (ICML-10), 2010, pp. 111-118. -
- [33][33] A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, I. Polosukhin, Attention is all you need, arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.03762 (2017). - · arXiv
- [34][34] A. Saxena, K. Goebel, D. Simon, N. Eklund, Damage propagation modeling for aircraft engine run-to-failure simulation, in: 2008 international conference on prognostics and health management, IEEE, 2008, pp. 1-9. -
- [38][38] J. Li, X. Li, D. He, A directed acyclic graph network combined with cnn and lstm for remaining useful life prediction, IEEE Access 7 (2019) 75464-75475. -
- [39][39] L. Van der Maaten, G. Hinton, Visualizing data using t-sne., Journal of machine learning research 9 (11) (2008).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thai, T.-T. N., Do, P., Iung, B., & Gardoni, P. (2025) · International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management · doi:10.36001/ijphm.2025.v16i4.4306 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Qin, Y., Cai, N., Gao, C., Zhang, Y., Cheng, Y., & Chen, X.
- Affiliations
- State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment (CN)
- Thermal Power Research Institute (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2202.10916
- OpenAlex
- W4225645141
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (21773182)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Keywords
- remaining useful life prediction, attention mechanism, degradation feature extraction, 1D convolutional neural network, turbofan engine, prognostics and health management, predictive maintenance, C-MAPSS dataset, degradation trajectory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review