PreprintCited by 16Speech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and dialogue systemsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

WAVPROMPT: Towards Few-Shot Spoken Language Understanding with Frozen Language Models

Open access
Gao, Heting, Ni, Junrui, Qian, Kaizhi, Zhang, Yang, Chang, Shiyu, Hasegawa-Johnson, Mark·2022·arXiv

Abstract

Large-scale auto-regressive language models pretrained on massive text have demonstrated their impressive ability to perform new natural language tasks with only a few text examples, without the need for fine-tuning. Recent studies further show that such a few-shot learning ability can be extended to the text-image setting by training an encoder to encode the images into embeddings functioning like the text embeddings of the language model. Interested in exploring the possibility of transferring the few-shot learning ability to the audio-text setting, we propose a novel speech understanding framework, WavPrompt, where we finetune a wav2vec model to generate a sequence of audio embeddings understood by the language model. We show that WavPrompt is a few-shot learner that can perform speech understanding tasks better than a naive text baseline. We conduct detailed ablation studies on different components and hyperparameters to empirically identify the best model configuration. In addition, we conduct a non-speech understanding experiment to show WavPrompt can extract more information than just the transcriptions. Code is available at https://github.com/Hertin/WavPrompt

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2203.15863

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other recent audio LLMs primarily focus on only speech.

    “Other recent audio LLMs [11,12,13,14] primarily focus on only speech.”

    From Joint Audio and Speech Understanding (2023) · cites this paper as [11]

    Section 3.1 (page not available) lists four speech datasets, supporting the characterization that WAVPROMPT primarily focuses on speech. But it also lists a non-speech dataset, and Section 3.5 reports a non-speech sound-classification experiment. The claim that it focuses on *only* speech is therefore not supported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. A. Radford, J. Wu, R. Child, D. Luan, D. Amodei, I. Sutskever et al., "Language models are unsupervised multitask learners," OpenAI blog, vol. 1, no. 8, p. 9, 2019.
  2. T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. D. Kaplan, P. Dhari- wal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell et al., "Lan- guage models are few-shot learners," Advances in neural informa- tion processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 1877-1901, 2020.
  3. Z. Zhao, E. Wallace, S. Feng, D. Klein, and S. Singh, "Calibrate before use: Improving few-shot performance of language mod- els," in International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2021, pp. 12 697-12 706.
  4. M. Tsimpoukelli, J. Menick, S. Cabi, S. Eslami, O. Vinyals, and F. Hill, "Multimodal few-shot learning with frozen language mod- els," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, 2021.
  5. A. Baevski, Y. Zhou, A. Mohamed, and M. Auli, "wav2vec 2.0: A framework for self-supervised learning of speech repre- sentations," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, pp. 12 449-12 460, 2020.
  6. W.-N. Hsu, D. F. Harwath, C. Song, and J. R. Glass, "Text- free image-to-speech synthesis using learned segmental units," in ACL, 2021.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gao, H., Ni, J., Qian, K., Zhang, Y., Chang, S., & Hasegawa-Johnson, M.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
Pages
2738-2742
ISSN
2308-457X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4297841687
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4
FWCI
1.94
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Interspeech (USB) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Center for Cognitive Computing Systems Research
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
few-shot learning, spoken language understanding, frozen language models, prompt-based fine-tuning, speech recognition, low-resource languages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review