PreprintCited by 20Speech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio ProcessingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Improving Distortion Robustness of Self-supervised Speech Processing Tasks with Domain Adaptation

Open access
Huang, Kuan Po, Fu, Yu-Kuan, Zhang, Yu, Lee, Hung-yi·2022·arXiv

Abstract

Speech distortions are a long-standing problem that degrades the performance of supervisely trained speech processing models. It is high time that we enhance the robustness of speech processing models to obtain good performance when encountering speech distortions while not hurting the original performance on clean speech. In this work, we propose to improve the robustness of speech processing models by domain adversarial training (DAT). We conducted experiments based on the SUPERB framework on five different speech processing tasks. In case we do not always have knowledge of the distortion types for speech data, we analyzed the binary-domain and multi-domain settings, where the former treats all distorted speech as one domain, and the latter views different distortions as different domains. In contrast to supervised training methods, we obtained promising results in target domains where speech data is distorted with different distortions including new unseen distortions introduced during testing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2203.16104

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Y. Ganin, E. Ustinova, H. Ajakan, P. Germain, H. Larochelle, F. Laviolette, M. Marchand, and V. Lempitsky, "Domain- adversarial training of neural networks," The journal of machine learning research, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 2096-2030, 2016.
  2. P. Warden, "Speech commands: A public dataset for single-word speech recognition," Dataset available from http://download. ten- sorflow. org/data/speech commands v0, vol. 1, 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, K. P., Fu, Y.-K., Zhang, Y., & Lee, H.-Y.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
Pages
2193-2197
ISSN
2308-457X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4296068785
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.63
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Interspeech (USB) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
domain adaptation, robustness to distortion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review