PreprintCited by 301Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Image Processing Techniques

Video Diffusion Models

Open access
Ho, Jonathan, Salimans, Tim, Gritsenko, Alexey, Chan, William, Norouzi, Mohammad, Fleet, David J.·2022·arXiv

Abstract

Generating temporally coherent high fidelity video is an important milestone in generative modeling research. We make progress towards this milestone by proposing a diffusion model for video generation that shows very promising initial results. Our model is a natural extension of the standard image diffusion architecture, and it enables jointly training from image and video data, which we find to reduce the variance of minibatch gradients and speed up optimization. To generate long and higher resolution videos we introduce a new conditional sampling technique for spatial and temporal video extension that performs better than previously proposed methods. We present the first results on a large text-conditioned video generation task, as well as state-of-the-art results on established benchmarks for video prediction and unconditional video generation. Supplementary material is available at https://video-diffusion.github.io/

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2204.03458

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Diffusion Probabilistic Models have outperformed GANs in image synthesis, demonstrating superior results in both quality and diversity.

    “Recently, Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DM) have outperformed GANs in image synthesis, demonstrating superior results in terms of both quality and diversity [42,67,85,86,140,164].”

    From Past, Present, and Future of Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition Using Wearables: A Surveying Tutorial on a Still Challenging Task (2025) · cites this paper as [86]

    The Introduction (p. 1) says diffusion models have produced high-quality images, and the References (p. 11) list a study titled “Diffusion models beat GANs on image synthesis.” This paper does not itself report an image-synthesis comparison establishing superiority over GANs in both quality and diversity; its own comparisons concern video generation. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. [2][2] Anurag Arnab, Mostafa Dehghani, Georg Heigold, Chen Sun, Mario Luˇ ci´ c, and Cordelia Schmid. ViViT: A video vision transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 6836-6846, 2021. -
  2. [3][3] Mohammad Babaeizadeh, Chelsea Finn, Dumitru Erhan, Roy H Campbell, and Sergey Levine. Stochastic variational video prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.11252 , 2017. - · arXiv
  3. [4][4] Mohammad Babaeizadeh, Mohammad Taghi Saffar, Suraj Nair, Sergey Levine, Chelsea Finn, and Dumitru Erhan. FitVid: Overfitting in pixel-level video prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.13195 , 2021. - · arXiv
  4. [5][5] Gedas Bertasius, Heng Wang, and Lorenzo Torresani. Is space-time attention all you need for video understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.05095 , 2(3):4, 2021. - · arXiv
  5. [6][6] Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru. Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, FAT 2018, 23-24 February 2018, New York, NY, USA , Proceedings of Machine Learning Research. PMLR, 2018. -
  6. [7][7] Kaylee Burns, Lisa Hendricks, Trevor Darrell, and Anna Rohrbach. Women also snowboard: Overcoming bias in captioning models. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) , 2018. -
  7. [8][8] Joao Carreira and Andrew Zisserman. Quo vadis, action recognition? a new model and the kinetics dataset. In proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 6299-6308, 2017. -
  8. [9][9] Joao Carreira, Eric Noland, Andras Banki-Horvath, Chloe Hillier, and Andrew Zisserman. A short note about kinetics-600. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.01340 , 2018. - · arXiv
  9. [10][10] Nanxin Chen, Yu Zhang, Heiga Zen, Ron J Weiss, Mohammad Norouzi, and William Chan. WaveGrad: Estimating gradients for waveform generation. International Conference on Learning Representations , 2021. -
  10. [11][11] Xi Chen, Nikhil Mishra, Mostafa Rohaninejad, and Pieter Abbeel. PixelSNAIL: An improved autoregressive generative model. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 863-871, 2018. -
  11. [12][12] Jaemin Cho, Abhay Zala, and Mohit Bansal. Dall-eval: Probing the reasoning skills and social biases of text-to-image generative transformers. arxiv:2202.04053 , 2022. - · arXiv
  12. [13][13] Özgün Çiçek, Ahmed Abdulkadir, Soeren S Lienkamp, Thomas Brox, and Olaf Ronneberger. 3d u-net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. In International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention , pages 424-432. Springer, 2016. -
  13. [14][14] Aidan Clark, Jeff Donahue, and Karen Simonyan. Adversarial video generation on complex datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.06571 , 2019. - · arXiv
  14. [15][15] Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HLT , pages 4171-4186. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019. -
  15. [16][16] Prafulla Dhariwal and Alexander Nichol. Diffusion models beat GANs on image synthesis. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 34, 2021. -
  16. [17][17] Frederik Ebert, Chelsea Finn, Alex X Lee, and Sergey Levine. Self-supervised visual planning with temporal skip connections. In CoRL , pages 344-356, 2017. -
  17. [18][18] Cade Gordon and Natalie Parde. Latent neural differential equations for video generation. In NeurIPS 2020 Workshop on Pre-registration in Machine Learning , pages 73-86. PMLR, 2021. -
  18. [19][19] Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter. GANs trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local Nash equilibrium. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 6626-6637, 2017. -
  19. [20][20] Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans. Classifier-free diffusion guidance. In NeurIPS 2021 Workshop on Deep Generative Models and Downstream Applications , 2021. -
  20. [21][21] Jonathan Ho, Nal Kalchbrenner, Dirk Weissenborn, and Tim Salimans. Axial attention in multidimensional transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.12180 , 2019. - · arXiv
  21. [22][22] Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 6840-6851, 2020. -
  22. [23][23] Jonathan Ho, Chitwan Saharia, William Chan, David J Fleet, Mohammad Norouzi, and Tim Salimans. Cascaded diffusion models for high fidelity image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.15282 , 2021. - · arXiv
  23. [24][24] Zahra Kadkhodaie and Eero Simoncelli. Stochastic solutions for linear inverse problems using the prior implicit in a denoiser. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 34, 2021. -
  24. [25][25] Zahra Kadkhodaie and Eero P Simoncelli. Solving linear inverse problems using the prior implicit in a denoiser. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.13640 , 2020. - · arXiv
  25. [27][27] Will Kay, Joao Carreira, Karen Simonyan, Brian Zhang, Chloe Hillier, Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Fabio Viola, Tim Green, Trevor Back, Paul Natsev, et al. The kinetics human action video dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.06950 , 2017. - · arXiv
  26. [28][28] Diederik P Kingma, Tim Salimans, Ben Poole, and Jonathan Ho. Variational diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.00630 , 2021. - · arXiv
  27. [29][29] Zhifeng Kong, Wei Ping, Jiaji Huang, Kexin Zhao, and Bryan Catanzaro. DiffWave: A versatile diffusion model for audio synthesis. In 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR , 2021. -
  28. [30][30] Manoj Kumar, Mohammad Babaeizadeh, Dumitru Erhan, Chelsea Finn, Sergey Levine, Laurent Dinh, and Durk Kingma. VideoFlow: A flow-based generative model for video. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.01434 , 2019. - · arXiv
  29. [31][31] Guillaume Le Moing, Jean Ponce, and Cordelia Schmid. Ccvs: Context-aware controllable video synthesis. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 34, 2021. -
  30. [32][32] Alex X Lee, Richard Zhang, Frederik Ebert, Pieter Abbeel, Chelsea Finn, and Sergey Levine. Stochastic adversarial video prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.01523 , 2018. - · arXiv
  31. [33][33] Pauline Luc, Aidan Clark, Sander Dieleman, Diego de Las Casas, Yotam Doron, Albin Cassirer, and Karen Simonyan. Transformation-based adversarial video prediction on large-scale data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.04035 , 2020. - · arXiv
  32. [34][34] Jacob Menick and Nal Kalchbrenner. Generating high fidelity images with subscale pixel networks and multidimensional upscaling. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2019. -
  33. [35][35] Charlie Nash, João Carreira, Jacob Walker, Iain Barr, Andrew Jaegle, Mateusz Malinowski, and Peter Battaglia. Transframer: Arbitrary frame prediction with generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.09494 , 2022. - · arXiv
  34. [36][36] Alex Nichol, Prafulla Dhariwal, Aditya Ramesh, Pranav Shyam, Pamela Mishkin, Bob McGrew, Ilya Sutskever, and Mark Chen. Glide: Towards photorealistic image generation and editing with text-guided diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10741 , 2021. - · arXiv
  35. [37][37] Alexander Quinn Nichol and Prafulla Dhariwal. Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In Marina Meila and Tong Zhang, editors, Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML , 2021. -
  36. [38][38] Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention , pages 234-241. Springer, 2015. -
  37. [39][39] Chitwan Saharia, William Chan, Huiwen Chang, Chris A Lee, Jonathan Ho, Tim Salimans, David J Fleet, and Mohammad Norouzi. Palette: Image-to-image diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.05826 , 2021. - · arXiv
  38. [40][40] Chitwan Saharia, Jonathan Ho, William Chan, Tim Salimans, David J Fleet, and Mohammad Norouzi. Image super-resolution via iterative refinement. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.07636 , 2021. - · arXiv
  39. [41][41] Masaki Saito, Shunta Saito, Masanori Koyama, and Sosuke Kobayashi. Train sparsely, generate densely: Memory-efficient unsupervised training of high-resolution temporal GAN. International Journal of Computer Vision , 128(10):2586-2606, 2020. -
  40. [42][42] Tim Salimans and Jonathan Ho. Progressive distillation for fast sampling of diffusion models. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2021. -
  41. [43][43] Tim Salimans, Ian Goodfellow, Wojciech Zaremba, Vicki Cheung, Alec Radford, and Xi Chen. Improved techniques for training gans. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 2234-2242, 2016. -
  42. [44][44] Tim Salimans, Andrej Karpathy, Xi Chen, and Diederik P Kingma. PixelCNN++: Improving the PixelCNN with discretized logistic mixture likelihood and other modifications. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2017. -
  43. [45][45] Peter Shaw, Jakob Uszkoreit, and Ashish Vaswani. Self-attention with relative position representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.02155 , 2018. - · arXiv
  44. [46][46] Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Eric Weiss, Niru Maheswaranathan, and Surya Ganguli. Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 2256-2265, 2015. -
  45. [47][47] Yang Song and Stefano Ermon. Generative modeling by estimating gradients of the data distribution. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 11895-11907, 2019. -
  46. [48][48] Yang Song, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Diederik P Kingma, Abhishek Kumar, Stefano Ermon, and Ben Poole. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations. International Conference on Learning Representations , 2021. -
  47. [50][50] Ryan Steed and Aylin Caliskan. Image representations learned with unsupervised pre-training contain human-like biases. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , FAccT '21, page 701-713. Association for Computing Machinery, 2021. -
  48. [51][51] Du Tran, Lubomir Bourdev, Rob Fergus, Lorenzo Torresani, and Manohar Paluri. Learning spatiotemporal features with 3d convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision , pages 4489-4497, 2015. -
  49. [52][52] Sergey Tulyakov, Ming-Yu Liu, Xiaodong Yang, and Jan Kautz. Mocogan: Decomposing motion and content for video generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 1526-1535, 2018. -
  50. [53][53] Belinda Tzen and Maxim Raginsky. Neural stochastic differential equations: Deep latent gaussian models in the diffusion limit. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.09883 , 2019. - · arXiv
  51. [54][54] Thomas Unterthiner, Sjoerd van Steenkiste, Karol Kurach, Raphael Marinier, Marcin Michalski, and Sylvain Gelly. Towards accurate generative models of video: A new metric & challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.01717 , 2018. - · arXiv
  52. [55][55] Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 5998-6008, 2017. -
  53. [56][56] Pascal Vincent. A connection between score matching and denoising autoencoders. Neural Computation , 23(7):1661-1674, 2011. -
  54. [57][57] Jacob Walker, Ali Razavi, and Aäron van den Oord. Predicting video with vqvae. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.01950 , 2021. - · arXiv
  55. [58][58] Xiaolong Wang, Ross Girshick, Abhinav Gupta, and Kaiming He. Non-local neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 7794-7803, 2018. -
  56. [59][59] Dirk Weissenborn, Oscar Täckström, and Jakob Uszkoreit. Scaling autoregressive video models. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2019. -
  57. [60][60] Jay Whang, Mauricio Delbracio, Hossein Talebi, Chitwan Saharia, Alexandros G Dimakis, and Peyman Milanfar. Deblurring via stochastic refinement. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.02475 , 2021. - · arXiv
  58. [61][61] Chenfei Wu, Jian Liang, Lei Ji, Fan Yang, Yuejian Fang, Daxin Jiang, and Nan Duan. NÜWA: Visual synthesis pre-training for neural visual world creation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.12417 , 2021. - · arXiv
  59. [62][62] Wilson Yan, Yunzhi Zhang, Pieter Abbeel, and Aravind Srinivas. Videogpt: Video generation using vq-vae and transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.10157 , 2021. - · arXiv
  60. [63][63] Ruihan Yang, Prakhar Srivastava, and Stephan Mandt. Diffusion probabilistic modeling for video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.09481 , 2022. - · arXiv
  61. [64][64] Vladyslav Yushchenko, Nikita Araslanov, and Stefan Roth. Markov decision process for video generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops , pages 0-0, 2019. -
  62. [65][65] Sergey Zagoruyko and Nikos Komodakis. Wide residual networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.07146 , 2016. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ho, J., Salimans, T., Gritsenko, A., Chan, W., Norouzi, M., & Fleet, D. J.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4226057201
Cited by
301
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 132 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
Keywords
video diffusion models, video generation, conditional sampling, video prediction, temporal coherence, high-resolution video

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review