PreprintCited by 738Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyReinforcement Learning in RoboticsGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

GAIA-1: A Generative World Model for Autonomous Driving

Open access
Hu, Anthony, Russell, Lloyd, Yeo, Hudson, Murez, Zak, Fedoseev, George, Kendall, Alex, Shotton, Jamie, Corrado, Gianluca·2023·arXiv

Abstract

Autonomous driving promises transformative improvements to transportation, but building systems capable of safely navigating the unstructured complexity of real-world scenarios remains challenging. A critical problem lies in effectively predicting the various potential outcomes that may emerge in response to the vehicle's actions as the world evolves. To address this challenge, we introduce GAIA-1 ('Generative AI for Autonomy'), a generative world model that leverages video, text, and action inputs to generate realistic driving scenarios while offering fine-grained control over ego-vehicle behavior and scene features. Our approach casts world modeling as an unsupervised sequence modeling problem by mapping the inputs to discrete tokens, and predicting the next token in the sequence. Emerging properties from our model include learning high-level structures and scene dynamics, contextual awareness, generalization, and understanding of geometry. The power of GAIA-1's learned representation that captures expectations of future events, combined with its ability to generate realistic samples, provides new possibilities for innovation in the field of autonomy, enabling enhanced and accelerated training of autonomous driving technology.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2309.17080

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing generative models for autonomous driving typically support only a subset of the required capabilities, such as limited conditioning types, lack of multi-camera generation, or poor spatial-temporal coherence.

    “However, existing models typically support only a subset of the required capabilities, such as limited conditioning types, lack of multi-camera generation, or poor spatial-temporal coherence.”
  • GAIA-2 employs a continuous latent space, improving temporal smoothness and reconstruction fidelity compared to GAIA-1's discrete latent variables.

    “Unlike its predecessor GAIA-1 [5], which relied on discrete latent variables, GAIA-2 employs a continuous latent space, improving temporal smoothness and reconstruction fidelity.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 94 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hu, A., Russell, L., Yeo, H., Murez, Z., Fedoseev, G., Kendall, A., Shotton, J., & Corrado, G.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387294122
Cited by
28
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Keywords
autonomous driving, generative world models, next-token prediction, scene dynamics, context awareness, generalization, geometric understanding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review