On the Origin of Hallucinations in Conversational Models: Is it the Datasets or the Models?
Open accessAbstract
Knowledge-grounded conversational models are known to suffer from producing factually invalid statements, a phenomenon commonly called hallucination. In this work, we investigate the underlying causes of this phenomenon: is hallucination due to the training data, or to the models? We conduct a comprehensive human study on both existing knowledge-grounded conversational benchmarks and several state-of-the-art models. Our study reveals that the standard benchmarks consist of >60% hallucinated responses, leading to models that not only hallucinate but even amplify hallucinations. Our findings raise important questions on the quality of existing datasets and models trained using them. We make our annotations publicly available for future research.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Advanced computational models for natural language processing, such as ChatGPT, occasionally hallucinate, generating information or responses that are not based on factual data.
“For example, advanced computational models for natural language processing, such as ChatGPT, occasionally hallucinate, i.e., generate information or responses that are not based on factual data [28].”
From Biomedical Ethical Aspects Towards the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- Kimberly A Arditte, Demet Çek, Ashley M Shaw, and Kiara R Timpano. 2016. The importance of assessing clinical phenomena in mechanical turk research. Psychological assessment , 28(6):684.
- Emily M Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillanMajor, and Shmargaret Shmitchell. 2021. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages 610-623.
- Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel HerbertVoss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Chris Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 33, pages 1877-1901. Curran Associates, Inc.
- Harry Bunt, Volha Petukhova, Emer Gilmartin, Catherine Pelachaud, Alex Fang, Simon Keizer, and Laurent Prévot. 2020. The ISO standard for dialogue act annotation, second edition. In Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference , pages 549-558, Marseille, France. European Language Resources Association.
- Emily Dinan, Stephen Roller, Kurt Shuster, Angela Fan, Michael Auli, and Jason Weston. 2018. Wizard of wikipedia: Knowledge-powered conversational agents. In International Conference on Learning Representations .
- Esin Durmus, He He, and Mona Diab. 2020. FEQA: A question answering evaluation framework for faithfulness assessment in abstractive summarization. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages 50555070, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Nouha Dziri, Andrea Madotto, Osmar Zaïane, and Avishek Joey Bose. 2021a. Neural path hunter: Reducing hallucination in dialogue systems via path grounding. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 2197-2214, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Nouha Dziri, Hannah Rashkin, Tal Linzen, and David Reitter. 2021b. Evaluating groundedness in dialogue systems: The begin benchmark. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.00071 . · arXiv
- Karthik Gopalakrishnan, Behnam Hedayatnia, Qinlang Chen, Anna Gottardi, Sanjeev Kwatra, Anu Venkatesh, Raefer Gabriel, and Dilek HakkaniTür. 2019. Topical-Chat: Towards KnowledgeGrounded Open-Domain Conversations. In Proc. Interspeech 2019 , pages 1891-1895.
- Paul Grice. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words . Harvard University Press.
- Ari Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes, and Yejin Choi. 2019. The curious case of neural text degeneration. In International Conference on Learning Representations .
- Daniel Kang and Tatsunori B. Hashimoto. 2020. Improved natural language generation via loss truncation. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages 718-731, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Nitish Shirish Keskar, Bryan McCann, Lav R Varshney, Caiming Xiong, and Richard Socher. 2019. Ctrl: A conditional transformer language model for controllable generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.05858 . · arXiv
- Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2015. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In ICLR (Poster) .
- Mike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Abdelrahman Mohamed, Omer Levy, Veselin Stoyanov, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2020. BART: Denoising sequence-to-sequence pretraining for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages 7871-7880, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Sabrina J Mielke, Arthur Szlam, Y-Lan Boureau, and Emily Dinan. 2020. Linguistic calibration through metacognition: aligning dialogue agent responses with expected correctness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.14983 . · arXiv
- Seungwhan Moon, Pararth Shah, Anuj Kumar, and Rajen Subba. 2019. OpenDialKG: Explainable conversational reasoning with attention-based walks over knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages 845-854, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Moin Nadeem, Anna Bethke, and Siva Reddy. 2021. StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages 5356-5371, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Shrimai Prabhumoye, Kazuma Hashimoto, Yingbo Zhou, Alan W Black, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2021. Focused attention improves documentgrounded generation. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies , pages 4274-4287, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever, et al. 2019. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog , 1(8):9.
- Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J. Liu. 2020. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-totext transformer. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 21(140):1-67.
- Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, Sumit Chopra, Michael Auli, and Wojciech Zaremba. 2016. Sequence level training with recurrent neural networks. In 4th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2016, San Juan, Puerto Rico, May 2-4, 2016, Conference Track Proceedings .
- Hannah Rashkin, Vitaly Nikolaev, Matthew Lamm, Michael Collins, Dipanjan Das, Slav Petrov, Gaurav Singh Tomar, Iulia Turc, and David Reitter. 2021a. Measuring attribution in natural language generation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.12870 . · arXiv
- Hannah Rashkin, David Reitter, Gaurav Singh Tomar, and Dipanjan Das. 2021b. Increasing faithfulness in knowledge-grounded dialogue with controllable features. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages 704-718, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Vikas Raunak, Arul Menezes, and Marcin JunczysDowmunt. 2021. The curious case of hallucinations in neural machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies , pages 1172-1183, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Nithya Sambasivan, Shivani Kapania, Hannah Highfill, Diana Akrong, Praveen Paritosh, and Lora M Aroyo. 2021. 'everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work': Data cascades in high-stakes ai. In proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages 1-15.
- Kurt Shuster, Spencer Poff, Moya Chen, Douwe Kiela, and Jason Weston. 2021. Retrieval augmentation reduces hallucination in conversation. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021 , pages 3784-3803, Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2014. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. The journal of machine learning research , 15(1):1929-1958.
- William B Stiles. 1992. Describing talk: A taxonomy of verbal response modes . Sage Publications.
- Svitlana Vakulenko, Evangelos Kanoulas, and Maarten de Rijke. 2021. A large-scale analysis of mixed initiative in information-seeking dialogues for conversational search. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.07096 . · arXiv
- Chaojun Wang and Rico Sennrich. 2020. On exposure bias, hallucination and domain shift in neural machine translation. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages 3544-3552, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Thomas Wolf, Lysandre Debut, Victor Sanh, Julien Chaumond, Clement Delangue, Anthony Moi, Pierric Cistac, Tim Rault, Remi Louf, Morgan Funtowicz, Joe Davison, Sam Shleifer, Patrick von Platen, Clara Ma, Yacine Jernite, Julien Plu, Canwen Xu, Teven Le Scao, Sylvain Gugger, Mariama Drame, Quentin Lhoest, and Alexander Rush. 2020. Transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations , pages 38-45, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Thomas Wolf, Victor Sanh, Julien Chaumond, and Clement Delangue. 2019. Transfertransfo: A transfer learning approach for neural network based conversational agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.08149 . · arXiv
- Kangyan Zhou, Shrimai Prabhumoye, and Alan W Black. 2018. A dataset for document grounded conversations. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 708-713, Brussels, Belgium. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Busch, F., Adams, L. C., & Bressem, K. K. (2023) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-023-01815-x · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Calibrated Language Models Must Hallucinate
Kalai, A. T., & Vempala, S. S. (2024) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing · doi:10.1145/3618260.3649777 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Simulating Opinion Dynamics with Networks of LLM-based Agents
Chuang, Y.-S., Goyal, A., Harlalka, N., Suresh, S., Hawkins, R., Yang, S., Shah, D., Hu, J., & Rogers, T. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-naacl.211 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Creating Trustworthy LLMs: Dealing with Hallucinations in Healthcare AI
Ahmad, M. A., Yaramis, I., & Roy, T. D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.01463 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Calibrated Language Models Must Hallucinate
Kalai, A. T., & Vempala, S. S. (2023) · arXiv · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Vakharia, P., Kufeldt, A., Meyers, M., Lane, I., & Gilpin, L. H. (2024) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-71170-1_23 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
From Illusion to Insight: A Taxonomic Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in LLMs
Kazlaris, I., Antoniou, E., Diamantaras, K., & Bratsas, C. (2025) · doi:10.20944/preprints202508.1942.v1 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dziri, N., Milton, S., Yu, M., Zaiane, O., & Reddy, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- McGill University (CA)
- ORCID
- Reddy, Siva
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2204.07931
- OpenAlex
- W4224903240
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2015: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
- Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- hallucinations, training data quality, human evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
