PreprintCited by 45Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

TemporalWiki: A Lifelong Benchmark for Training and Evaluating Ever-Evolving Language Models

Open access

Abstract

Language Models (LMs) become outdated as the world changes; they often fail to perform tasks requiring recent factual information which was absent or different during training, a phenomenon called temporal misalignment. This is especially a challenging problem because the research community still lacks a coherent dataset for assessing the adaptability of LMs to frequently-updated knowledge corpus such as Wikipedia. To this end, we introduce TemporalWiki, a lifelong benchmark for ever-evolving LMs that utilizes the difference between consecutive snapshots of English Wikipedia and English Wikidata for training and evaluation, respectively. The benchmark hence allows researchers to periodically track an LM's ability to retain previous knowledge and acquire updated/new knowledge at each point in time. We also find that training an LM on the diff data through continual learning methods achieves similar or better perplexity than on the entire snapshot in our benchmark with 12 times less computational cost, which verifies that factual knowledge in LMs can be safely updated with minimal training data via continual learning. The dataset and the code are available at https://github.com/joeljang/temporalwiki.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2204.14211

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Oshin Agarwal and Ani Nenkova. 2021. Temporal ef- fects on pre-trained models for language processing tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.12790. · arXiv
  2. Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Jordan Hoffmann, Trevor Cai, Eliza Rutherford, Katie Millican, George van den Driessche, Jean-Baptiste Lespiau, Bogdan Damoc, Aidan Clark, et al. 2021. Improving lan- guage models by retrieving from trillions of tokens. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.04426. · arXiv
  3. Tom B Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. In NeurIPS.
  4. Sanyuan Chen, Yutai Hou, Yiming Cui, Wanxiang Che, Ting Liu, and Xiangzhan Yu. 2020. Recall and learn: Fine-tuning deep pretrained language models with less forgetting. In Proceedings of the 2020 Confer- ence on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 7870-7881, Online. As- sociation for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  5. Wenhu Chen, Xinyi Wang, and William Yang Wang. 2021. A dataset for answering time-sensitive ques- tions. In NeurIPS.
  6. Bhuwan Dhingra, Jeremy R. Cole, Julian Martin Eisenschlos, Daniel Gillick, Jacob Eisenstein, and William W. Cohen. 2022. Time-aware language mod- els as temporal knowledge bases. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 10:257- 273. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Emily Dinan, Stephen Roller, Kurt Shuster, Angela Fan, Michael Auli, and Jason Weston. 2019. Wizard of wikipedia: Knowledge-powered conversational agents. In ICLR.
  8. Kelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung, Panupong Pasu- pat, and Ming-Wei Chang. 2020. Realm: Retrieval- augmented language model pre-training. In ICML.
  9. Tianxing He, Jun Liu, Kyunghyun Cho, Myle Ott, Bing Liu, James Glass, and Fuchun Peng. 2021. Analyzing the forgetting problem in pretrain-finetuning of open- domain dialogue response models. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume, pages 1121-1133, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  10. Spurthi Amba Hombaiah, Tao Chen, Mingyang Zhang, Michael Bendersky, and Marc Najork. 2021. Dy- namic language models for continuously evolving content. In KDD.
  11. Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, and Weizhu Chen. 2022. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. ICLR.
  12. Joel Jang, Seonghyeon Ye, Sohee Yang, Joongbo Shin, Janghoon Han, Gyeonghun Kim, Stanley Jungkyu Choi, and Minjoon Seo. 2022. Towards continual knowledge learning of language models. In ICLR.
  13. Xisen Jin, Dejiao Zhang, Henghui Zhu, Wei Xiao, Shang-Wen Li, Xiaokai Wei, Andrew Arnold, and Xiang Ren. 2022. Lifelong pretraining: Continually adapting language models to emerging corpora. In Proceedings of BigScience Episode #5 -Workshop on Challenges & Perspectives in Creating Large Lan- guage Models, pages 1-16, virtual+Dublin. Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  14. James Kirkpatrick, Razvan Pascanu, Neil Rabinowitz, Joel Veness, Guillaume Desjardins, Andrei A Rusu, Kieran Milan, John Quan, Tiago Ramalho, Ag- nieszka Grabska-Barwinska, et al. 2017. Over- coming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 114(13):3521-3526.
  15. Tom Kwiatkowski, Jennimaria Palomaki, Olivia Red- field, Michael Collins, Ankur Parikh, Chris Alberti, Danielle Epstein, Illia Polosukhin, Jacob Devlin, Ken- ton Lee, Kristina Toutanova, Llion Jones, Matthew Kelcey, Ming-Wei Chang, Andrew M. Dai, Jakob Uszkoreit, Quoc Le, and Slav Petrov. 2019. Natu- ral questions: A benchmark for question answering research. Transactions of the Association for Compu- tational Linguistics, 7:452-466. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Angeliki Lazaridou, Adhi Kuncoro, Elena Gribovskaya, Devang Agrawal, Adam Liska, Tayfun Terzi, Mai Gimenez, Cyprien de Masson d'Autume, Tomas Ko- cisky, Sebastian Ruder, et al. 2021. Mind the gap: Assessing temporal generalization in neural language models. In NeurIPS.
  17. Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Hein- rich Küttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rock- täschel, et al. 2020. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. In NeurIPS.
  18. Patrick Lewis, Pontus Stenetorp, and Sebastian Riedel. 2021. Question and answer test-train overlap in open- domain question answering datasets. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume, pages 1000-1008, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Robert L Logan IV, Alexandre Passos, Sameer Singh, and Ming-Wei Chang. 2021. Fruit: Faithfully re- flecting updated information in text. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.08634. · arXiv
  20. Shayne Longpre, Kartik Perisetla, Anthony Chen, Nikhil Ramesh, Chris DuBois, and Sameer Singh. 2021. Entity-based knowledge conflicts in question answering. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Process- ing, pages 7052-7063, Online and Punta Cana, Do- minican Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Daniel Loureiro, Francesco Barbieri, Leonardo Neves, Luis Espinosa Anke, and Jose Camacho-collados. 2022. TimeLMs: Diachronic language models from Twitter. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meet- ing of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pages 251-260, Dublin, Ire- land. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Kelvin Luu, Daniel Khashabi, Suchin Gururangan, Kar- ishma Mandyam, and Noah A Smith. 2021. Time waits for no one! analysis and challenges of temporal misalignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.07408. · arXiv
  23. R Thomas McCoy, Paul Smolensky, Tal Linzen, Jian- feng Gao, and Asli Celikyilmaz. 2021. How much do language models copy from their training data? evaluating linguistic novelty in text generation using raven. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.09509. · arXiv
  24. Miles Osborne, Ashwin Lall, and Benjamin Van Durme. 2014. Exponential reservoir sampling for streaming language models. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 687-692, Baltimore, Maryland. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  25. Fabio Petroni, Aleksandra Piktus, Angela Fan, Patrick Lewis, Majid Yazdani, Nicola De Cao, James Thorne, Yacine Jernite, Vladimir Karpukhin, Jean Maillard, Vassilis Plachouras, Tim Rocktäschel, and Sebastian Riedel. 2021. KILT: a benchmark for knowledge intensive language tasks. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 2523-2544, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Fabio Petroni, Tim Rocktäschel, Sebastian Riedel, Patrick Lewis, Anton Bakhtin, Yuxiang Wu, and Alexander Miller. 2019. Language models as knowl- edge bases? In Proceedings of the 2019 Confer- ence on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Pro- cessing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 2463-2473, Hong Kong, China. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Dmytro Okhonko, Samuel Broscheit, Gautier Izacard, Patrick Lewis, Barlas Oguz, Edouard Grave, Wen-tau Yih, et al. 2021. The web is your oyster-knowledge- intensive nlp against a very large web corpus. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.09924. · arXiv
  28. Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J Liu. 2019. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text trans- former. JMLR.
  29. Adam Roberts, Colin Raffel, and Noam Shazeer. 2020. How much knowledge can you pack into the param- eters of a language model? In Proceedings of the 6246 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 5418-5426, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Guy D Rosin, Ido Guy, and Kira Radinsky. 2021. Time masking for temporal language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.06366. · arXiv
  31. Paul Röttger and Janet Pierrehumbert. 2021. Temporal adaptation of BERT and performance on downstream document classification: Insights from social media. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021, pages 2400-2412, Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Association for Compu- tational Linguistics. · DOI
  32. Victor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen H Bach, Lintang Sutawika, Zaid Alyafeai, Antoine Chaffin, Arnaud Stiegler, Teven Le Scao, Arun Raja, et al. 2022. Multitask prompted training enables zero-shot task generalization. In ICLR.
  33. Leslie N Smith. 2018. A disciplined approach to neu- ral network hyper-parameters: Part 1-learning rate, batch size, momentum, and weight decay. In CVPR.
  34. James Thorne, Andreas Vlachos, Christos Christodoulopoulos, and Arpit Mittal. 2018. FEVER: a large-scale dataset for fact extraction and VERification. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), pages 809-819, New Orleans, Louisiana. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Ruize Wang, Duyu Tang, Nan Duan, Zhongyu Wei, Xuanjing Huang, Jianshu Ji, Guihong Cao, Daxin Jiang, and Ming Zhou. 2021. K-Adapter: Infusing Knowledge into Pre-Trained Models with Adapters. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021, pages 1405-1418, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  36. Dani Yogatama, Chong Wang, Bryan R. Routledge, Noah A. Smith, and Eric P. Xing. 2014. Dynamic language models for streaming text. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2:181- 192. · DOI
  37. Michael Zhang and Eunsol Choi. 2021. SituatedQA: In- corporating extra-linguistic contexts into QA. In Pro- ceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Meth- ods in Natural Language Processing, pages 7371- 7387, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jang, J., Ye, S., Lee, C., Yang, S., Shin, J., Han, J., Kim, G., & Seo, M.
Affiliations
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
  • LG AI Research (South Korea) (KR)
Corresponding author
Seo, Minjoon
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
Pages
6237-6250
OpenAlex
W4385572901
Cited by
45
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 2
FWCI
5.39
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (2019-0-00075, 2021-0-02068)
  • Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea (2021-0-02068, 2019-0-00075, No.2019-0-00075, No.2021-0-02068)
  • Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion (2021-0-02068, 2022-, 2022-0-00113, 2019-0-00075, No.2021-0-02068)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
temporal misalignment, Wikipedia, Wikidata, continual learning, knowledge retention, knowledge acquisition, benchmark dataset, SARS-CoV-2 variants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review