Active Data Discovery: Mining Unknown Data using Submodular Information Measures
Open accessAbstract
Active Learning is a very common yet powerful framework for iteratively and adaptively sampling subsets of the unlabeled sets with a human in the loop with the goal of achieving labeling efficiency. Most real world datasets have imbalance either in classes and slices, and correspondingly, parts of the dataset are rare. As a result, there has been a lot of work in designing active learning approaches for mining these rare data instances. Most approaches assume access to a seed set of instances which contain these rare data instances. However, in the event of more extreme rareness, it is reasonable to assume that these rare data instances (either classes or slices) may not even be present in the seed labeled set, and a critical need for the active learning paradigm is to efficiently discover these rare data instances. In this work, we provide an active data discovery framework which can mine unknown data slices and classes efficiently using the submodular conditional gain and submodular conditional mutual information functions. We provide a general algorithmic framework which works in a number of scenarios including image classification and object detection and works with both rare classes and rare slices present in the unlabeled set. We show significant accuracy and labeling efficiency gains with our approach compared to existing state-of-the-art active learning approaches for actively discovering these rare classes and slices.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clustering algorithms have been widely applied to optimise criteria such as diversity, representativeness, rarity, and density.
“Clustering algorithms, for example, have been widely applied to optimise criteria such as diversity [49], representativeness [67], rarity [15,50], and density [16,78].”
From Ten Years of Active Learning Techniques and Object Detection: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [50]
The most advanced companies and research centres in AI are interested in continuing research around active learning and exploring its potential benefits further.
“On the other hand, the most advanced companies and research centres in the field of AI are also interested in continuing research around AL and exploring its potential benefits further [14,36,50,59,78].”
From Ten Years of Active Learning Techniques and Object Detection: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [50]
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ten Years of Active Learning Techniques and Object Detection: A Systematic Review
Garcia, D., Carias, J., Adão, T., Jesus, R., Cunha, A., & Magalhães, L. G. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app131910667 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kothawade, S., Chopra, S., Ghosh, S., & Iyer, R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2206.08566
- OpenAlex
- W4283214474
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Keywords
- active learning (machine learning), submodular optimization, class imbalance, label efficiency, image classification, object detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review