Conditional Generation with a Question-Answering Blueprint
Open accessAbstract
The ability to convey relevant and faithful information is critical for many tasks in conditional generation and yet remains elusive for neural seq-to-seq models whose outputs often reveal hallucinations and fail to correctly cover important details. In this work, we advocate planning as a useful intermediate representation for rendering conditional generation less opaque and more grounded. Our work proposes a new conceptualization of text plans as a sequence of question-answer (QA) pairs. We enhance existing datasets (e.g., for summarization) with a QA blueprint operating as a proxy for both content selection (i.e.,~what to say) and planning (i.e.,~in what order). We obtain blueprints automatically by exploiting state-of-the-art question generation technology and convert input-output pairs into input-blueprint-output tuples. We develop Transformer-based models, each varying in how they incorporate the blueprint in the generated output (e.g., as a global plan or iteratively). Evaluation across metrics and datasets demonstrates that blueprint models are more factual than alternatives which do not resort to planning and allow tighter control of the generation output.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A strategy similar to comprehensive question generation has been employed to train text-planning models.
“A similar strategy has been employed to train textplanning models (Narayan et al., 2022).”
From RARR: Researching and revising what language models say, using language models (2023) · cites this paper as Narayan et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 95
- Chris Alberti, Daniel Andor, Emily Pitler, Jacob Devlin, and Michael Collins. 2019. Synthetic QA corpora generation with roundtrip con- sistency. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics, pages 6168-6173, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguis- tics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1 /P19-1620 · DOI
- Kristjan Arumae and Fei Liu. 2018. Rein- forced extractive summarization with question- focused rewards. In Proceedings of ACL 2018, Student Research Workshop, pages 105-111, Melbourne, Australia. Association for Compu- tational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10 .18653/v1/P18-3015 · DOI
- Kristjan Arumae and Fei Liu. 2019. Guid- ing extractive summarization with question- answering rewards. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguis- tics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 2566-2577, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Association for Com- putational Linguistics. https://doi.org /10.18653/v1/N19-1264 · DOI
- Regina Barzilay and Mirella Lapata. 2008. Modeling local coherence: An entity-based ap- proach. Computational Linguistics, 34(1):1-34. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli.2008 .34.1.1 · DOI
- Iz Beltagy, Matthew E. Peters, and Arman Cohan. 2020. Longformer: The long-document transformer. ArXiv, abs/2004.05150. · arXiv
- Daniela Brook Weiss, Paul Roit, Ayal Klein, Ori Ernst, and Ido Dagan. 2021. QA-align: Representing cross-text content overlap by aligning question-answer propositions. In Pro- ceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 9879-9894, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Association for Compu- tational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10 .18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.778 · DOI
- Shuyang Cao and Lu Wang. 2022. HIBRIDS: Attention with hierarchical biases for structure- aware long document summarization. In Pro- ceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguis- tics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 786-807, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. https://doi.org/10 .18653/v1/2022.acl-long. · DOI
- L. Carlson. 1983. Dialogue Games: An Approach to Discourse Analysis. Riedel, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015 -3963-0 9 · DOI
- Asli Celikyilmaz, Antoine Bosselut, Xiaodong He, and Yejin Choi. 2018. Deep communicat- ing agents for abstractive summarization. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Lan- guage Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), pages 1662-1675, New Orleans, Louisiana. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18 -1150 · DOI
- Mingda Chen, Zewei Chu, Sam Wiseman, and Kevin Gimpel. 2022. SummScreen: A dataset for abstractive screenplay summarization. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 8602-8615, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. https://doi.org/10 .18653/v1/2022.acl-long.589 · DOI · Paper page
- Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, and Ilya Sutskever. 2019. Generating long se- quences with sparse transformers. ArXiv, abs/1904.10509. https://doi.org/10.48550 /arXiv.1904.10509 · DOI · Paper page
- Kordula De Kuthy, Madeeswaran Kannan, Haemanth Santhi Ponnusamy, and Detmar Meurers. 2020. Towards automatically generat- ing questions under discussion to link informa tion and discourse structure. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computa- tional Linguistics, pages 5786-5798, Barcelona, Spain (Online). International Committee on Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org /10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.509 · DOI
- Kordula De Kuthy, Nils Reiter, and Arndt Riester. 2018. QUD-based annotation of discourse structure and information structure: Tool and evaluation. In Proceedings of the Eleventh In- ternational Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018), Miyazaki, Japan. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
- Daniel Deutsch and Dan Roth. 2021a. Question- based salient span selection for more control- lable text summarization. ArXiv, abs/2111 .07935. https://doi.org/10.48550 /arXiv.2111.07935 · DOI
- Daniel Deutsch and Dan Roth. 2021b. Under- standing the extent to which content quality metrics measure the information quality of sum- maries. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 300-309, Online. Association for Com- putational Linguistics. https://doi.org /10.18653/v1/2021.conll-1. · DOI
- Zi-Yi Dou, Pengfei Liu, Hiroaki Hayashi, Zhengbao Jiang, and Graham Neubig. 2021. GSum: A general framework for guided neu- ral abstractive summarization. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 4830-4842, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org /10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.384 · DOI · Paper page
- Esin Durmus, He He, and Mona Diab. 2020. FEQA: A question answering evaluation frame- work for faithfulness assessment in abstractive summarization. In Proceedings of the 58th An- nual Meeting of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics, pages 5055-5070, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020 .acl-main.454 · DOI · Paper page
- Ori Ernst, Avi Caciularu, Ori Shapira, Ramakanth Pasunuru, Mohit Bansal, Jacob Goldberger, and Ido Dagan. 2022. Proposition-level clus- tering for multi-document summarization. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 1765-1779, Seattle, United States. Association for Compu- tational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10 .18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.128 · DOI
- Matan Eyal, Tal Baumel, and Michael Elhadad. 2019. Question answering as an automatic evaluation metric for news article summa- rization. In Proceedings of the 2019 Con- ference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguis- tics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 3938-3948, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Association for Com- putational Linguistics. https://doi.org /10.18653/v1/N19-1395 · DOI
- Alexander R. Fabbri, Wojciech Kryściński, Bryan McCann, Caiming Xiong, Richard Socher, and Dragomir Radev. 2021. Summ- Eval: Re-evaluating summarization evaluation. Transactions of the Association for Compu- tational Linguistics, 9:391-409. https:// doi.org/10.1162/tacl a 00373 · DOI · Paper page
- Tobias Falke, Leonardo F. R. Ribeiro, Prasetya Ajie Utama, Ido Dagan, and Iryna Gurevych. 2019. Ranking generated summaries by cor- rectness: An interesting but challenging ap- plication for natural language inference. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 2214-2220, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi .org/10.18653/v1/P19-1213 · DOI · Paper page
- Tim Fischer, Steffen Remus, and Chris Biemann. 2022. Measuring faithfulness of abstractive summaries. In Proceedings of the 18th Con- ference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS 2022), pages 63-73, Potsdam, Germany.
- Saadia Gabriel, Asli Celikyilmaz, Rahul Jha, Yejin Choi, and Jianfeng Gao. 2021. GO FIGURE: A meta evaluation of factuality in summarization. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021, pages 478-487, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org /10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.42 · DOI · Paper page
- Sebastian Gehrmann, Yuntian Deng, and Alexander Rush. 2018. Bottom-up abstractive summarization. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natu- ral Language Processing, pages 4098-4109. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Jonathan Ginzburg. 1994. An update semantics for dialogue. In Proceedings of the 1st Tilburg International Workshop on Computational Se- mantics. Tilburg, The Netherlands.
- Mandy Guo, Joshua Ainslie, David C. Uthus, Santiago Ontañón, Jianmo Ni, Yun-Hsuan Sung, and Yinfei Yang. 2021. LongT5: Effi- cient text-to-text transformer for long sequences. ArXiv, abs/2112.07916. https://doi.org /10.18653/v1/2022.findings-naacl.55 · DOI · Paper page
- Luheng He, Mike Lewis, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2015. Question-answer driven semantic role labeling: Using natural language to annotate natural language. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Nat- ural Language Processing, pages 643-653, Lisbon, Portugal. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. https://doi.org/10 .18653/v1/D15-1076 · DOI
- Honovich, Roee Aharoni, Jonathan Herzig, Hagai Taitelbaum, Doron Kukliansy, Vered Cohen, Thomas Scialom, Idan Szpektor, Avinatan Hassidim, and Yossi Matias. 2022. TRUE: Re-evaluating factual consistency evaluation. In Proceedings of the Second DialDoc Workshop on Document-grounded Dialogue and Conversational Question An- swering, pages 161-175, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022 .dialdoc-1. · DOI · Paper page
- Or Honovich, Leshem Choshen, Roee Aharoni, Ella Neeman, Idan Szpektor, and Omri Abend. 2021. Q2: Evaluating factual consistency in knowledge-grounded dialogues via question generation and question answering. In Pro- ceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 7856-7870. https://doi.org/10 .18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.619 · DOI · Paper page
- David M. Howcroft, Anya Belz, Miruna-Adriana Clinciu, Dimitra Gkatzia, Sadid A. Hasan, Saad Mahamood, Simon Mille, Emiel van Miltenburg, Sashank Santhanam, and Verena Rieser. 2020. Twenty years of confusion in hu- man evaluation: NLG needs evaluation sheets and standardised definitions. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Nat- ural Language Generation, pages 169-182, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics.
- Hayate Iso, Yui Uehara, Tatsuya Ishigaki, Hiroshi Noji, Eiji Aramaki, Ichiro Kobayashi, Yusuke Miyao, Naoaki Okazaki, and Hiroya Takamura. 2019. Learning to select, track, and generate for data-to-text. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 2102-2113, Florence, Italy. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. https://doi.org/10 .18653/v1/P19-1202 · DOI
- Nikiforos Karamanis. 2004. Entity Coherence for Descriptive Text Structuring. Ph.D. thesis, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh.
- Rodger Kibble and Richard Power. 2004. Optimizing referential coherence in text generation. Computational Linguistics, 30(4):401-416. https://doi.org/10.1162 /0891201042544893 · DOI
- Wei-Jen Ko, Te-yuan Chen, Yiyan Huang, Greg Durrett, and Junyi Jessy Li. 2020. Inquisi- tive question generation for high level text comprehension. In Proceedings of the 2020 Con- ference on Empirical Methods in Natural Lan- guage Processing (EMNLP), pages 6544-6555, Online. Association for Computational Lin- guistics. https://doi.org/10.18653 /v1/2020.emnlp-main.530 · DOI
- Wei-Jen Ko, Cutter Dalton, Mark P. Simmons, Eliza Fisher, Greg Durrett, and Junyi Jessy Li. 2021. Discourse comprehension: A question answering framework to represent sentence connections. ArXiv, abs/2111.00701. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv .2111.00701 · DOI
- Wei-Jen Ko and Junyi Jessy Li. 2020. Assessing discourse relations in language generation from GPT-2. In Proceedings of the 13th Interna- tional Conference on Natural Language Generation, pages 52-59, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Ivana Kruijff-Korbayová and Mark Steedman. 2003. Discourse and information structure. Journal of logic, language and information, 12(3):249-259. https://doi.org/10.1023 /A:1024160025821 · DOI
- Wojciech Kryscinski, Bryan McCann, Caiming Xiong, and Richard Socher. 2020. Eval- uating the factual consistency of abstrac- tive text summarization. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 9332-9346, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org /10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.750 · DOI · Paper page
- Wojciech Kryściński, Nazneen Rajani, Divyansh Agarwal, Caiming Xiong, and Dragomir Radev. 2021. Booksum: A collection of da- tasets for long-form narrative summarization. ArXiv, abs/2105.08209. https://doi.org /10.48550/arXiv.2105.08209 · DOI
- Sayali Kulkarni, Sheide Chammas, Wan Zhu, Fei Sha, and Eugene Ie. 2020. Aquamuse: Automatically generating datasets for query- based multi-document summarization. ArXiv, abs/2010.12694. https://doi.org/10.48550 /arXiv.2010.12694 · DOI
- Sayali Kulkarni, Sheide Chammas, Wan Zhu, Fei Sha, and Eugene Ie. 2021. Comsum and sibert: A dataset and neural model for query- based multi-document summarization. In Document Analysis and Recognition -ICDAR 2021, pages 84-98, Cham. Springer Inter- national Publishing. ArXiv, abs/2010.12694 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030 -86331-9 6 · DOI
- Tom Kwiatkowski, Jennimaria Palomaki, Olivia Redfield, Michael Collins, Ankur Parikh, Chris Alberti, Danielle Epstein, Illia Polosukhin, Jacob Devlin, Kenton Lee, Kristina Toutanova, Llion Jones, Matthew Kelcey, Ming-Wei Chang, Andrew M. Dai, Jakob Uszkoreit, Quoc Le, and Slav Petrov. 2019. Natural questions: A benchmark for question answering research. Transactions of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics, 7:452-466. https://doi .org/10.1162/tacl_a_00276 · DOI · Paper page
- Staffan Larson. 2002. Issue-based Dialogue Man- agement. Ph.D. thesis, Göteborg University, Sweden.
- Logan Lebanoff, John Muchovej, Franck Dernoncourt, Doo Soon Kim, Seokhwan Kim, Walter Chang, and Fei Liu. 2019. Analyzing sentence fusion in abstractive summarization. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on New Frontiers in Summarization, pages 104-110, Hong Kong, China. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. https://doi.org/10 .18653/v1/D19-5413 · DOI
- Willem J. M. Levelt. 1993. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress /6393.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Wei Li, Xinyan Xiao, Yajuan Lyu, and Yuanzhuo Wang. 2018. Improving neural abstractive doc- ument summarization with explicit informa- tion selection modeling. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Nat- ural Language Processing, pages 1787-1796, Brussels, Belgium. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. https://doi.org/10 .18653/v1/D18-1205 · DOI
- Chin-Yew Lin and Eduard Hovy. 2003. Automatic evaluation of summaries using n-gram co- occurrence statistics. In Proceedings of the 2003 Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 150-157.
- Yang Liu and Mirella Lapata. 2019. Hierarchical transformers for multi-document summariza- tion. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguis- tics, pages 5070-5081, Florence, Italy. Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics. https:// doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1500 · DOI
- Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2019. RoBERTa: A ro- bustly optimized BERT pretraining approach. ArXiv, abs/1907.11692. https://doi.org /10.48550/arXiv.1907.11692 · DOI · Paper page
- Chao-Yi Lu and Sin-En Lu. 2021. A survey of approaches to automatic question generation: From 2019 to early 2021. In Proceedings of the 33rd Conference on Computational Linguis- tics and Speech Processing (ROCLING 2021), pages 151-162, Taoyuan, Taiwan. The Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing (ACLCLP).
- Joshua Maynez, Shashi Narayan, Bernd Bohnet, and Ryan McDonald. 2020. On faithfulness and factuality in abstractive summarization. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meet- ing of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1906-1919, Online. As- sociation for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020 .acl-main.173 · DOI · Paper page
- Kathleen McKeown. 1985. Text Generation: Us- ing Discourse Strategies and Focus Constraints to generate Natural Language Text. Studies in Natural language Processing. Cambridge University Press.
- Adam Meyers, Ruth Reeves, Catherine Macleod, Rachel Szekely, Veronika Zielinska, Brian Young, and Ralph Grishman. 2004. The Nom- Bank project: An interim report. In Proceedings of the Workshop Frontiers in Corpus An- notation at HLT-NAACL 2004, pages 24-31, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Amit Moryossef, Yoav Goldberg, and Ido Dagan. 2019a. Improving quality and efficiency in plan-based neural data-to-text generation. In Proceedings of the 12th International Con- ference on Natural Language Generation, pages 377-382, Tokyo, Japan. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi .org/10.18653/v1/W19-8645 · DOI
- Amit Moryossef, Yoav Goldberg, and Ido Dagan. 2019b. Step-by-step: Separating planning from realization in neural data-to-text generation. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Associ- ation for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 2267-2277, Minneapo- lis, Minnesota. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. https://doi.org/10 .18653/v1/N19-1236 · DOI
- Shashi Narayan, Joshua Maynez, Jakub Adamek, Daniele Pighin, Blaz Bratanic, and Ryan McDonald. 2020. Stepwise extractive summa- rization and planning with structured transform- ers. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 4143-4159, On- line. Association for Computational Linguis- tics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1 /2020.emnlp-main.339 · DOI
- Shashi Narayan, Gonc ¸alo Simões, Yao Zhao, Joshua Maynez, Dipanjan Das, Michael Collins, and Mirella Lapata. 2022. A well- composed text is half done! Composition sam- pling for diverse conditional generation. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1319-1339, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. https://doi.org/10 .18653/v1/2022.acl-long.94 · DOI
- Shashi Narayan, Yao Zhao, Joshua Maynez, Gonc ¸alo Simões, Vitaly Nikolaev, and Ryan McDonald, Cambridge, MA. 2021. Planning with learned entity prompts for abstractive sum- marization. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 9:1475-1492. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl a 00438 · DOI
- Yixin Nie, Adina Williams, Emily Dinan, Mohit Bansal, Jason Weston, and Douwe Kiela. 2020. Adversarial NLI: A new benchmark for natu- ral language understanding. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 4885-4901, Online. Association for Computational Lin- guistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1 /2020.acl-main.441 · DOI · Paper page
- Martha Palmer, Daniel Gildea, and Paul Kingsbury. 2005. The Proposition Bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computa- tional Linguistics, 31(1):71-106. https:// doi.org/10.1162/0891201053630264 · DOI
- Laura Perez-Beltrachini, Yang Liu, and Mirella Lapata. 2019. Generating summaries with topic templates and structured convolutional de- coders. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 5107-5116, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Ratish Puduppully, Li Dong, and Mirella Lapata. 2019a. Data-to-text generation with content se- lection and planning. In Proceedings of the 33rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelli- gence. AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10 .1609/aaai.v33i01.33016908 · DOI
- Ratish Puduppully, Li Dong, and Mirella Lapata. 2019b. Data-to-text generation with entity modeling. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 2023-2035, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Ratish Puduppully, Yao Fu, and Mirella Lapata. 2022. Data-to-text generation with varia- tional sequential planning. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 10:697-715. https://doi.org/10.1162 /tacl a 00484 · DOI
- Ratish Puduppully and Mirella Lapata. 2021. Data-to-text generation with macro planning. Transactions of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics, 9:510-527. https://doi .org/10.1162/tacl_a_00381 · DOI · Paper page
- Valentina Pyatkin, Ayal Klein, Reut Tsarfaty, and Ido Dagan. 2020. QADiscourse -discourse relations as QA pairs: Representation, crowd- sourcing and baselines. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 2804-2819, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org /10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.224 · DOI
- Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J. Liu. 2020. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(140):1-67.
- Pranav Rajpurkar, Robin Jia, and Percy Liang. 2018a. Know what you don't know: Unanswer- able questions for squad. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 784-789. https://doi.org /10.18653/v1/P18-2124 · DOI · Paper page
- Pranav Rajpurkar, Robin Jia, and Percy Liang. 2018b. Know what you don't know: Unan- swerable questions for SQuAD. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 784-789, Melbourne, Australia. Association for Computational Lin- guistics. https://doi.org/10.18653 /v1/P18-2124 · DOI · Paper page
- Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang, Konstantin Lopyrev, and Percy Liang. 2016. SQuAD: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empir- ical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2383-2392, Austin, Texas. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi .org/10.18653/v1/D16-1264 · DOI · Paper page
- Ehud Reiter and Robert Dale. 2000. Build- ing Natural Language Generation Sys- tems. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1017 /CBO9780511519857 · DOI
- Arndt Riester. 2019. Constructing QUD trees, Questions in Discourse, volume 2: Pragmatics, pages 164-193. Brill. https://doi.org /10.1163/9789004378322_007 · DOI
- Craige Roberts. 2012. Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal the- ory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics, 5(6):1-69. https://doi.org/10.3765 /sp.5.6 · DOI
- Tobias Rohde, Xiaoxia Wu, and Yinhan Liu. 2021. Hierarchical learning for generation with long source sequences. ArXiv, abs/2104.07545. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv .2104.07545 · DOI
- Thomas Scialom, Sylvain Lamprier, Benjamin Piwowarski, and Jacopo Staiano. 2019. An- swers unite! Unsupervised metrics for rein- forced summarization models. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Meth- ods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natu- ral Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 3246-3256, Hong Kong, China. Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics. https:// doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-1320 · DOI · Paper page
- Uri Shaham, Elad Segal, Maor Ivgi, Avia Efrat, Ori Yoran, Adi Haviv, Ankit Gupta, Wenhan Xiong, Mor Geva, Jonathan Berant, and Omer Levy. 2022. SCROLLS: Standardized comparison over long language sequences. ArXiv, abs/2201.03533. https://doi.org /10.48550/arXiv.2201.03533 · DOI
- Kaiqiang Song, Lin Zhao, and Fei Liu. 2018. Structure-infused copy mechanisms for ab- stractive summarization. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computa- tional Linguistics, pages 1717-1729, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics.
- Yun-Zhu Song, Yi-Syuan Chen, and Hong-Han Shuai. 2022. Improving multi-document sum- marization through referenced flexible extrac- tion with credit-awareness. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics: Human Language Tech- nologies, pages 1667-1681, Seattle, United States. Association for Computational Linguis- tics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1 /2022.naacl-main.120 · DOI
- Gabriel Stanovsky, Julian Michael, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Ido Dagan. 2018. Supervised open information extraction. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), pages 885-895, New Orleans, Louisiana. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. https://doi.org/10 .18653/v1/N18-1081 · DOI
- Ivan Stelmakh, Yi Luan, Bhuwan Dhingra, and Ming-Wei Chang. 2022. ASQA: Factoid questions meet long-form answers. In Proceed- ings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 8273-8288, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Nisan Stiennon, Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Daniel Ziegler, Ryan Lowe, Chelsea Voss, Alec Radford, Dario Amodei, and Paul F. Christiano. 2020. Learning to summarize with human feedback. In Advances in Neural In- formation Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 3008-3021.
- Richard Sutton and Andew Barto. 2018. Re- inforcement Learning: An Introduction, 2nd edition. MIT Press. 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 2, Short Papers, pages 291-297, Valencia, Spain. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. https://doi.org/10 .18653/v1/E17-2047 · DOI
- Bowen Tan, Zichao Yang, Maruan Al-Shedivat, Eric Xing, and Zhiting Hu. 2021. Progressive generation of long text with pretrained language models. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Associ- ation for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 4313-4324, Online. Association for Computational Lin- guistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1 /2021.naacl-main.341 · DOI · Paper page
- Jiwei Tan, Xiaojun Wan, and Jianguo Xiao. 2017a. Abstractive document summarization with a graph-based attentional neural model. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1171-1181, Vancouver, Canada. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. https://doi.org/10 .18653/v1/P17-1108 · DOI
- Jiwei Tan, Xiaojun Wan, and Jianguo Xiao. 2017b. Abstractive document summariza- tion with a graph-based attentional neural model. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1171-1181. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. https://doi.org/10 .18653/v1/P17-1108 · DOI
- Ran Tian, Shashi Narayan, Thibault Sellam, and Ankur P. Parikh. 2019. Sticking to the facts: Confident decoding for faithful data-to-text generation. ArXiv, abs/1910.08684. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv .1910.08684 · DOI · Paper page
- Enric Vallduví and Maria Vilkuna. 1998. On rheme and kontrast. The Limits of Syntax, pages 79-108. Brill.
- Jan Van Kuppevelt. 1995. Discourse structure, topicality and questioning. Journal of Lin- guistics, 31(1):109-147. https://doi.org /10.1017/S002222670000058X · DOI · Paper page
- Guyon, U. V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems 30, pages 5998-6008.
- Alex Wang, Kyunghyun Cho, and Mike Lewis. 2020. Asking and answering questions to evaluate the factual consistency of sum- maries. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics, pages 5008-5020, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020 .acl-main.450 · DOI
- Matthijs Westera, Laia Mayol, and Hannah Rohde. 2020. TED-Q: TED talks and the questions they evoke. In Proceedings of the 12th Lan- guage Resources and Evaluation Conference, pages 1118-1127, Marseille, France. European Language Resources Association.
- Sam Wiseman, Stuart Shieber, and Alexander Rush. 2017. Challenges in data-to-document generation. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natu- ral Language Processing, pages 2253-2263, Copenhagen, Denmark. Association for Com- putational Linguistics. https://doi.org /10.18653/v1/D17-1239 · DOI · Paper page
- Sam Wiseman, Stuart Shieber, and Alexander Rush. 2018. Learning neural templates for text generation. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natu- ral Language Processing, pages 3174-3187, Brussels, Belgium. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. https://doi.org/10 .18653/v1/D18-1356 · DOI
- Xinnuo Xu, Ondřej Dušek, Verena Rieser, and Ioannis Konstas. 2021. AggGen: Or- dering and aggregating while generating. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1419-1434, Online. Association for Computational Linguis- tics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1 /2021.acl-long.113 · DOI
- Ming Zhong, Da Yin, Tao Yu, Ahmad Zaidi, Mutethia Mutuma, Rahul Jha, Ahmed Hassan Awadallah, Asli Celikyilmaz, Yang Liu, Xipeng Qiu, and Dragomir Radev. 2021. QMSum: A new benchmark for query-based multi-domain meeting summarization. In Pro- ceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Com- putational Linguistics: Human Language Tech- nologies, pages 5905-5921, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi .org/10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.472 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
RARR: Researching and revising what language models say, using language models
Gao, L., Dai, Z., Pasupat, P., Chen, A., Chaganty, A. T., Fan, Y., Zhao, V., Lao, N., Lee, H., Juan, D.-C., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.910 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
- Authors
- Narayan, S., Maynez, J., Amplayo, R. K., Ganchev, K., Louis, A., Huot, F., Sandholm, A., Das, D., & Lapata, M.
- Affiliations
- Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Google (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Narayan, Shashi
- Maynez, Joshua
- Amplayo, Reinald Kim
- Ganchev, Kuzman
- Louis, Annie
- Huot, Fantine
- Sandholm, Anders
- Das, Dipanjan
- Lapata, Mirella
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 11
- Pages
- 974-996
- ISSN
- 2307-387X (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2207.00397
- OpenAlex
- W4385859649
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- conditional generation, text planning, question-answer pairs, question generation, text summarization, hallucination mitigation, factual accuracy, content selection, transformer models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review