PreprintCited by 3Music and Audio ProcessingMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsTopic Modeling

Interpreting Song Lyrics with an Audio-Informed Pre-trained Language Model

Open access
Zhang, Yixiao, Jiang, Junyan, Xia, Gus, Dixon, Simon·2022·arXiv

Abstract

Lyric interpretations can help people understand songs and their lyrics quickly, and can also make it easier to manage, retrieve and discover songs efficiently from the growing mass of music archives. In this paper we propose BART-fusion, a novel model for generating lyric interpretations from lyrics and music audio that combines a large-scale pre-trained language model with an audio encoder. We employ a cross-modal attention module to incorporate the audio representation into the lyrics representation to help the pre-trained language model understand the song from an audio perspective, while preserving the language model's original generative performance. We also release the Song Interpretation Dataset, a new large-scale dataset for training and evaluating our model. Experimental results show that the additional audio information helps our model to understand words and music better, and to generate precise and fluent interpretations. An additional experiment on cross-modal music retrieval shows that interpretations generated by BART-fusion can also help people retrieve music more accurately than with the original BART.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2208.11671

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [1][1] K. Watanabe and M. Goto, 'Lyrics information processing: Analysis, generation, and applications,' in Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on NLP for Music and Audio (NLP4MusA) , 2020, pp. 6-12. -
  2. [2][2] M. Fell, Y. Nechaev, E. Cabrio, and F. Gandon, 'Lyrics segmentation: Textual macrostructure detection using convolutions,' in COLING , 2018, pp. 2044-2054. -
  3. [8][8] J. Son and Y. Shin, 'Music lyrics summarization method using textrank algorithm,' Journal of Korea Multimedia Society , vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 45-50, 2018. -
  4. [11][11] Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, D. Wang, and G. Xia, 'BUTTER: A representation learning framework for bi-directional music-sentence retrieval and generation,' in Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on NLP for Music and Audio (NLP4MusA) , 2020, pp. 54-58. -
  5. [22][22] A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, 'Attention is all you need,' in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2017, pp. 5998-6008. -
  6. [28][28] N. Shazeer and M. Stern, 'Adafactor: Adaptive learning rates with sublinear memory cost,' in ICML . PMLR, 2018, pp. 4596-4604. -
  7. [29][29] C.-Y. Lin, 'ROUGE: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries,' in Text Summarization Branches Out: Proceedings of the ACL-04 Workshop , 2004, pp. 74-81. -
  8. [30][30] S. Banerjee and A. Lavie, 'METEOR: An automatic metric for MT evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments,' in Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or Summarization , 2005, pp. 65-72. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Jiang, J., Xia, G., & Dixon, S.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • New York University Shanghai (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293138843
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Queen Mary University of London
  • UK Research and Innovation
  • China Scholarship Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
cross-modal attention, audio encoder, pre-trained language models, music information retrieval, music archives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review