Interpreting Song Lyrics with an Audio-Informed Pre-trained Language Model
Open accessAbstract
Lyric interpretations can help people understand songs and their lyrics quickly, and can also make it easier to manage, retrieve and discover songs efficiently from the growing mass of music archives. In this paper we propose BART-fusion, a novel model for generating lyric interpretations from lyrics and music audio that combines a large-scale pre-trained language model with an audio encoder. We employ a cross-modal attention module to incorporate the audio representation into the lyrics representation to help the pre-trained language model understand the song from an audio perspective, while preserving the language model's original generative performance. We also release the Song Interpretation Dataset, a new large-scale dataset for training and evaluating our model. Experimental results show that the additional audio information helps our model to understand words and music better, and to generate precise and fluent interpretations. An additional experiment on cross-modal music retrieval shows that interpretations generated by BART-fusion can also help people retrieve music more accurately than with the original BART.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- [1][1] K. Watanabe and M. Goto, 'Lyrics information processing: Analysis, generation, and applications,' in Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on NLP for Music and Audio (NLP4MusA) , 2020, pp. 6-12. -
- [2][2] M. Fell, Y. Nechaev, E. Cabrio, and F. Gandon, 'Lyrics segmentation: Textual macrostructure detection using convolutions,' in COLING , 2018, pp. 2044-2054. -
- [8][8] J. Son and Y. Shin, 'Music lyrics summarization method using textrank algorithm,' Journal of Korea Multimedia Society , vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 45-50, 2018. -
- [11][11] Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, D. Wang, and G. Xia, 'BUTTER: A representation learning framework for bi-directional music-sentence retrieval and generation,' in Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on NLP for Music and Audio (NLP4MusA) , 2020, pp. 54-58. -
- [22][22] A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, 'Attention is all you need,' in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2017, pp. 5998-6008. -
- [28][28] N. Shazeer and M. Stern, 'Adafactor: Adaptive learning rates with sublinear memory cost,' in ICML . PMLR, 2018, pp. 4596-4604. -
- [29][29] C.-Y. Lin, 'ROUGE: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries,' in Text Summarization Branches Out: Proceedings of the ACL-04 Workshop , 2004, pp. 74-81. -
- [30][30] S. Banerjee and A. Lavie, 'METEOR: An automatic metric for MT evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments,' in Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or Summarization , 2005, pp. 65-72. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
LP-MusicCaps: LLM-Based Pseudo Music Captioning
Doh, S., Choi, K., Lee, J., & Nam, J. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.16372 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“We used a cross-modal encoder-decoder transformer architecture that has achieved outstanding results on various natural language processing tasks [33], lyrics interpretation [34], and speech recognition [35], as shown in Figure 3.”
MethodCharting the Universe of Metal Music Lyrics and Analyzing Their Relation to Perceived Audio Hardness
Czedik-Eysenberg, I., Wieczorek, O., Flexer, A., & Reuter, C. W. (2024) · Transactions of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval · doi:10.5334/tismir.182 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
ALCAP: Alignment-Augmented Music Captioner
He, Z., Hao, W., Lu, W.-T., Chen, C., Lerman, K., & Song, X. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.1028 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, Y., Jiang, J., Xia, G., & Dixon, S.
- Affiliations
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- New York University Shanghai (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2208.11671
- OpenAlex
- W4293138843
- Semantic Scholar
- 9c84ec7c97170d78a3805dfcb387b82c2543adb9
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Queen Mary University of London
- UK Research and Innovation
- China Scholarship Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- cross-modal attention, audio encoder, pre-trained language models, music information retrieval, music archives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review