PreprintCited by 77Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Language Models are Multilingual Chain-of-Thought Reasoners

Open access
Shi, Freda, Suzgun, Mirac, Freitag, Markus, Wang, Xuezhi, Srivats, Suraj, Vosoughi, Soroush, Chung, Hyung Won, Tay, Yi +4 more·2022·arXiv

Abstract

We evaluate the reasoning abilities of large language models in multilingual settings. We introduce the Multilingual Grade School Math (MGSM) benchmark, by manually translating 250 grade-school math problems from the GSM8K dataset (Cobbe et al., 2021) into ten typologically diverse languages. We find that the ability to solve MGSM problems via chain-of-thought prompting emerges with increasing model scale, and that models have strikingly strong multilingual reasoning abilities, even in underrepresented languages such as Bengali and Swahili. Finally, we show that the multilingual reasoning abilities of language models extend to other tasks such as commonsense reasoning and word-in-context semantic judgment. The MGSM benchmark is publicly available at https://github.com/google-research/url-nlp.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2210.03057

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gödel Agent was evaluated on language understanding and mathematical benchmarks rather than coding benchmarks.

    “And as such, as with ADAS, it was evaluated on language understanding and mathematical benchmarks (DROP Dua et al., 2019, MGSM Shi et al., 2022, MMLU Hendrycks et al., 2020and GPQA Rein et al., 2023), rather than coding benchmarks.”

    From A Self-Improving Coding Agent (2025) · cites this paper as Shi et al., 2022

  • Strong gains on MGSM were observed from adding translated synthetic quantitative reasoning data.

    “We observed strong gains on MGSM (Shi et al., 2022) from adding this translated data.”

    From The Llama 3 Herd of Models (2024) · cites this paper as Shi et al., 2022

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shi, F., Suzgun, M., Freitag, M., Wang, X., Srivats, S., Vosoughi, S., Chung, H. W., Tay, Y., Ruder, S., Zhou, D., Das, D., & Wei, J.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4303648904
Cited by
60
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
multilingual reasoning, chain-of-thought prompting, large language models, GSM8K, arithmetic problem solving, typologically diverse languages, Bengali language, Swahili language, commonsense reasoning, model scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review