The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Real-World Robot Learning with Masked Visual Pre-training
Abstract
In this work, we explore self-supervised visual pre-training on images from diverse, in-the-wild videos for real-world robotic tasks. Like prior work, our visual representations are pre-trained via a masked autoencoder (MAE), frozen, and then passed into a learnable control module. Unlike prior work, we show that the pre-trained representations are effective across a range of real-world robotic tasks and embodiments. We find that our encoder consistently outperforms CLIP (up to 75%), supervised ImageNet pre-training (up to 81%), and training from scratch (up to 81%). Finally, we train a 307M parameter vision transformer on a massive collection of 4.5M images from the Internet and egocentric videos, and demonstrate clearly the benefits of scaling visual pre-training for robot learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“MVP [55], a ViT-Base model with 86M parameters, learns representations with 4.5M inthe-wild images on task-agnostic real world data using a self-supervised masked reconstruction objective.”
From THE COLOSSEUM: A Benchmark for Evaluating Generalization for Robotic Manipulation (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotations
Gidaris, S., Singh, P., & Komodakis, N. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.07728 · Cited by 2,477 · cited 1×
“These approaches either learn pretext tasks that distinguish views from 73 the augmentations [34, 35, 36, 37], or learn to be invariant to the augmentations by modeling sim74 ilarities [38, 39, 40, 41].”
BackgroundR3M: A Universal Visual Representation for Robot Manipulation
Nair, S., Rajeswaran, A., Kumar, V., Finn, C., & Gupta, A. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.12601 · Cited by 492
Cited by
Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models : Open X-Embodiment Collaboration 0
O’Neill, A., Rehman, A., Maddukuri, A., Gupta, A., Padalkar, A., Lee, A., Pooley, A., Gupta, A., Mandlekar, A., Jain, A., et al. (2024) · 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10611477 · Cited by 210
Self-citationAffordances from Human Videos as a Versatile Representation for Robotics
Bahl, S., Mendonca, R., Chen, L., Jain, U., & Pathak, D. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01324 · Cited by 119
“At best, the visual representation might be pretrained on some dataset [65, 79, 91, 100, 115, 117].”
BackgroundAnyTeleop: A General Vision-Based Dexterous Robot Arm-Hand Teleoperation System
Qin, Y., Yang, W., Huang, B., Wyk, K., Su, H., Wang, X., Chao, Y.-W., & Fox, D. (2023) · Robotics: Science and Systems XIX · doi:10.15607/rss.2023.xix.015 · Cited by 109
CroCo v2: Improved Cross-view Completion Pre-training for Stereo Matching and Optical Flow
Weinzaepfel, P., Lucas, T., Leroy, V., Cabon, Y., Arora, V., Brégier, R., Csurka, G., Antsfeld, L., Chidlovskii, B., & Revaud, J. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01647 · Cited by 110
GNM: A General Navigation Model to Drive Any Robot
Shah, D., Sridhar, A., Bhorkar, A., Hirose, N., & Levine, S. (2023) · 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra48891.2023.10161227 · Cited by 85
Where are we in the search for an Artificial Visual Cortex for Embodied Intelligence?
Majumdar, A., Yadav, K., Arnaud, S., Ma, Y. J., Chen, C., Silwal, S., Jain, A., Berges, V.-P., Abbeel, P., Malik, J., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.18240 · Cited by 49
“, 2021) was pretrained on 400M image-text pairs from the web; MVP (Radosavovic et al., 2022) on 4.”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationAirExo: Low-Cost Exoskeletons for Learning Whole-Arm Manipulation in the Wild
Fang, H., Fang, H.-S., Wang, Y., Ren, J., Chen, J., Zhang, R., Wang, W., & Lu, C. (2024) · 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10610799 · Cited by 38
THE COLOSSEUM: A Benchmark for Evaluating Generalization for Robotic Manipulation
Pumacay, W., Singh, I., Duan, J., Krishna, R., Thomason, J., & Fox, D. (2024) · Robotics: Science and Systems XX · doi:10.15607/rss.2024.xx.133 · Cited by 29
Behavior Retrieval: Few-Shot Imitation Learning by Querying Unlabeled Datasets
Du, M., Nair, S., Sadigh, D., & Finn, C. (2023) · Robotics: Science and Systems XIX · doi:10.15607/rss.2023.xix.011 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Radosavovic, I., Xiao, T., James, S., Abbeel, P., Malik, J., & Darrell, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- arXiv
- 2210.03109
- References
- 2
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
