PreprintCited by 95Artificial Intelligence in GamesTopic ModelingNatural Language Processing Techniques

Re3: Generating Longer Stories With Recursive Reprompting and Revision

Open access
Yang, Kevin, Tian, Yuandong, Peng, Nanyun, Klein, Dan·2022·arXiv

Abstract

We consider the problem of automatically generating longer stories of over two thousand words. Compared to prior work on shorter stories, long-range plot coherence and relevance are more central challenges here. We propose the Recursive Reprompting and Revision framework (Re3) to address these challenges by (a) prompting a general-purpose language model to construct a structured overarching plan, and (b) generating story passages by repeatedly injecting contextual information from both the plan and current story state into a language model prompt. We then revise by (c) reranking different continuations for plot coherence and premise relevance, and finally (d) editing the best continuation for factual consistency. Compared to similar-length stories generated directly from the same base model, human evaluators judged substantially more of Re3's stories as having a coherent overarching plot (by 14% absolute increase), and relevant to the given initial premise (by 20%).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2210.06774

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Nader Akoury, Shufan Wang, Josh Whiting, Stephen Hood, Nanyun Peng, and Mohit Iyyer. 2020. Sto- rium: A dataset and evaluation platform for machine- in-the-loop story generation. In the 2020 Conference
  2. Meng-Hsuan Yu, Juntao Li, Danyang Liu, Dongyan Zhao, Rui Yan, Bo Tang, and Haisong Zhang. 2020. Draft and edit: Automatic storytelling through multi- pass hierarchical conditional variational autoencoder. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 34, pages 1741-1748.
  3. Ruiqi Zhong, Kristy Lee, Zheng Zhang, and Dan Klein. 2021. Adapting language models for zero-shot learn- ing by meta-tuning on dataset and prompt collections. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.04670. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, K., Tian, Y., Peng, N., & Klein, D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
Pages
4393-4479
OpenAlex
W4385572830
Cited by
91
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 1
FWCI
10.51
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
plot coherence, structured planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review