The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating Long-Term Memory in 3D Mazes
Open accessAbstract
Intelligent agents need to remember salient information to reason in partially-observed environments. For example, agents with a first-person view should remember the positions of relevant objects even if they go out of view. Similarly, to effectively navigate through rooms agents need to remember the floor plan of how rooms are connected. However, most benchmark tasks in reinforcement learning do not test long-term memory in agents, slowing down progress in this important research direction. In this paper, we introduce the Memory Maze, a 3D domain of randomized mazes specifically designed for evaluating long-term memory in agents. Unlike existing benchmarks, Memory Maze measures long-term memory separate from confounding agent abilities and requires the agent to localize itself by integrating information over time. With Memory Maze, we propose an online reinforcement learning benchmark, a diverse offline dataset, and an offline probing evaluation. Recording a human player establishes a strong baseline and verifies the need to build up and retain memories, which is reflected in their gradually increasing rewards within each episode. We find that current algorithms benefit from training with truncated backpropagation through time and succeed on small mazes, but fall short of human performance on the large mazes, leaving room for future algorithmic designs to be evaluated on the Memory Maze.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Memory Maze, the credit assignment length is upper bounded by the size of the maze.
“Although their longest horizon T can be 4000, the credit assignment length is upper bounded by the size of the maze.”
From When Do Transformers Shine in RL? Decoupling Memory from Credit Assignment (2023) · cites this paper as Pasukonis et al., 2022
In Memory Maze, the optimal policy memory length can be much longer than O(N^2) steps and close to the horizon T.
“Nevertheless, the optimal policy memory length can be much longer than O(N 2 ) steps and close to the horizon T .”
From When Do Transformers Shine in RL? Decoupling Memory from Credit Assignment (2023) · cites this paper as Pasukonis et al., 2022
In Memory Maze, the reward is given only when the agent picks up the correct ball and solely depends on current observation and action, thus m_reward = 1.
“As for the reward memory, the reward is given only when the agent picks up the correct ball and solely depends on current observation and action, thus m M reward = 1.”
From When Do Transformers Shine in RL? Decoupling Memory from Credit Assignment (2023) · cites this paper as Pasukonis et al., 2022
Citations
Cites
Ha, D., & Schmidhuber, J. (2018) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1207631 · Cited by 187
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
When Do Transformers Shine in RL? Decoupling Memory from Credit Assignment
Ni, T., Ma, M., Eysenbach, B., & Bacon, P.-L. (2023) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.52202/075280-2194 · Cited by 7
Design and evaluation of a global workspace agent embodied in a realistic multimodal environment
Dossa, R. F. J., Arulkumaran, K., Juliani, A., Sasai, S., & Kanai, R. (2024) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2024.1352685 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Pasukonis, J., Lillicrap, T., & Hafner, D.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2210.13383
- OpenAlex
- W4307323274
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- DeepMind
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Keywords
- long-term memory, reinforcement learning benchmarks, online reinforcement learning, maze navigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review