BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Model
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to be able to perform new tasks based on a few demonstrations or natural language instructions. While these capabilities have led to widespread adoption, most LLMs are developed by resource-rich organizations and are frequently kept from the public. As a step towards democratizing this powerful technology, we present BLOOM, a 176B-parameter open-access language model designed and built thanks to a collaboration of hundreds of researchers. BLOOM is a decoder-only Transformer language model that was trained on the ROOTS corpus, a dataset comprising hundreds of sources in 46 natural and 13 programming languages (59 in total). We find that BLOOM achieves competitive performance on a wide variety of benchmarks, with stronger results after undergoing multitask prompted finetuning. To facilitate future research and applications using LLMs, we publicly release our models and code under the Responsible AI License.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ALiBi has been adopted by BLOOM for achieving strong extrapolation capabilities.
“For example, ALiBi has been adopted by BLOOM [108] for achieving strong extrapolation capabilities.”
From A Survey of Large Language Models (2026) · cites this paper as [108]
Section 3.2.3 (p. 15) confirms that BLOOM adopted ALiBi and says ALiBi was initially motivated by its ability to extrapolate to longer sequences. It does not establish that BLOOM achieved strong extrapolation capabilities; the benefits the authors report for BLOOM are smoother training and better downstream performance at the original sequence length. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSystems like AllenAI's OLMo Instruct, BloomZ and LLM360's AmberChat are approaching full openness status and top the openness leaderboard.
“One is the broad open source approach seen in systems like AllenAI's OLMo Instruct [20], BloomZ [61] and LLM360's AmberChat [33], which are approaching full openness status and top the openness leaderboard.”
From Rethinking open source generative AI: open washing and the EU AI Act (2024) · cites this paper as [61]
Section 3.5 Training (p. 22) identifies BLOOMZ as finetuned BLOOM models, and Section 3.6 Release (p. 24) describes openness as central to BLOOM and documents its public release. The paper does not say that BLOOMZ approaches full openness or tops an openness leaderboard; those ranking claims are unsupported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBloomZ's multiple preprints document data curation and finetuning in great detail; in contrast, Llama's single preprint offers fewer details and appears strategically vague on crucial details such as training datasets and instruction tuning.
“BloomZ's multiple preprints document data curation and finetuning [50, 61] in great detail; in contrast, Llama's single preprint offers fewer details and appears strategically vague on crucial details (for instance, training datasets and instruction tuning).”
From Rethinking open source generative AI: open washing and the EU AI Act (2024) · cites this paper as [61]
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredTrue openness of this kind, and not just open weight models, can speed up innovation and afford inclusion and diversity.
“It is true openness of this kind, and not just open weight models, that can speed up innovation and afford inclusion and diversity [20, 61].”
From Rethinking open source generative AI: open washing and the EU AI Act (2024) · cites this paper as [61]
Section 2.2 (pp. 6–7) describes an open international collaboration aimed at linguistic, geographical, and scientific diversity; Section 3.6 (p. 24) describes releasing documentation and code as well as the model. The Abstract (p. 3) says these releases aim to facilitate future research and applications. The paper does not establish that this broader openness speeds innovation relative to releasing model weights alone. (LLM, conf=0.79)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBLOOM-176B was trained on 1,161,261 A100-hours at a throughput of 150 TFLOP/GPU/s at 48% model FLOPs utilization and a cost of $3 million (including experiments).
“BLOOM-176B was trained on 1,161,261 A100-hours at a throughput of 150 TFLOP/GPU/s at 48% model FLOPs utilization and a cost of $3 million (including experiments) [25].”
From The rising costs of training frontier AI models (2024) · cites this paper as [25]
The Hardware section (p. 18) says BLOOM training used A100 GPUs but reports 1,082,990 compute hours, not 1,161,261 A100-hours. The performance passage (p. 19) reports 156 TFLOPs in the fastest configuration—about half of the 312-TFLOP theoretical peak—not the stated training throughput of 150 TFLOP/GPU/s at 48% model FLOPs utilization. The passages do not substantiate a $3 million cost including experiments. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Training costs and compute resources are independently known for BLOOM-176B and OPT-175B.
“Training costs and compute resources are independently known for BLOOM-176B and OPT-175B, so we compare our estimates with these.”
From The rising costs of training frontier AI models (2024) · cites this paper as [25]
The Hardware section (p. 18) gives BLOOM’s training duration, compute hours, and GPU configuration. The Carbon Footprint section (p. 23) compares training energy consumption for BLOOM and OPT. These passages support the availability of some compute-resource figures, but they do not establish training costs for both models or give OPT’s compute configuration. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredReciprocal and share-alike licensing, such as the Responsible AI License under which BLOOM was released, is the architectural attempt to convert appropriation into provision, and its enforceability is among the open problems.
“Reciprocal and share-alike licensing, the Responsible AI License under which BLOOM was released (BigScience Workshop et al., 2022) being one instance, is the architectural attempt to convert appropriation into provision, and its enforceability is among the open problems of Section 14.”
From Commons-Governed Artificial Intelligence: A Taxonomy of Collective Governance (2026) · cites this paper as BigScience Workshop et al., 2022
The Abstract (p. 3) says BLOOM was publicly released under the Responsible AI License, and §3.6 (p. 24) describes the license developed for the model. Those passages do not establish that it is a reciprocal or share-alike license. The claims about converting appropriation into provision and enforceability are the citing authors’ framing, not points attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFP16 can compromise computational accuracy.
“However, research has demonstrated that FP16 can compromise computational accuracy [108].”
From A Survey of Large Language Models (2026) · cites this paper as [108]
Open generative AI systems are on the rise, with small players and academic initiatives leading the way in open innovation and scientific documentation and several larger corporations joining the fray by releasing models billed as open.
“Open generative AI systems are on the rise, with small players and academic initiatives leading the way in open innovation and scientific documentation [20, 32, 61] and several larger corporations joining the fray by releasing models billed as 'open'.”
From Rethinking open source generative AI: open washing and the EU AI Act (2024) · cites this paper as [61]
The LLM data used to train the base model is documented in great detail by Bloom, while for Llama only the vaguest details are provided in a corporate preprint.
“The LLM data that was used to train the base model is documented in great detail by Bloom [61], while for Llama only the vaguest details are provided in a corporate preprint: 'a new mix of data from publicly available sources, which does not include data from Meta's products or services' [57].”
From Rethinking open source generative AI: open washing and the EU AI Act (2024) · cites this paper as [61]
An average of 1 to 2 failures per week occurred when training the BLOOM model on a cluster of 384 NVIDIA A100 GPUs.
“an average of 1 to 2 failures per week occurred when training the BLOOM model on a cluster of 384 NVIDIA A100 GPUs [25].”
From The rising costs of training frontier AI models (2024) · cites this paper as [25]
The model layer acquires its commons exemplar in the openly built BLOOM (BigScience Workshop et al., 2022), its accountability machinery in the Foundation Model Transparency Index (Bommasani et al., 2023), and its critical self-correction in the openwashing diagnosis of Widder et al. (2024) and the Open Source AI Definition (Open Source Initiative, 2024).
“The model layer acquires its commons exemplar in the openly built BLOOM (BigScience Workshop et al., 2022), its accountability machinery in the Foundation Model Transparency Index (Bommasani et al., 2023), and its critical self-correction in the openwashing diagnosis of Widder et al. (2024) and the Open Source AI Definition (Open Source Initiative, 2024).”
From Commons-Governed Artificial Intelligence: A Taxonomy of Collective Governance (2026) · cites this paper as BigScience Workshop et al., 2022
BLOOM is a 176-billion-parameter multilingual model built by an open scientific collaboration on a publicly granted national supercomputer and released under a Responsible AI License.
“The collaborative exemplar of the layer is the BigScience workshop's BLOOM, a 176-billion-parameter multilingual model built by an open scientific collaboration on a publicly granted national supercomputer and released under a Responsible AI License (BigScience Workshop et al., 2022).”
From Commons-Governed Artificial Intelligence: A Taxonomy of Collective Governance (2026) · cites this paper as BigScience Workshop et al., 2022
The open-weight model collaboration of the model layer is, in its governance, an extension of scientific peer production to artifacts that were previously proprietary, as BLOOM demonstrates.
“the open-weight model collaboration of the model layer is, in its governance, an extension of scientific peer production to artifacts that were previously proprietary, as the BigScience workshop's BLOOM demonstrates (BigScience Workshop et al., 2022).”
From Commons-Governed Artificial Intelligence: A Taxonomy of Collective Governance (2026) · cites this paper as BigScience Workshop et al., 2022
Many educators and educational institutions may not have the knowledge or expertise to effectively integrate new technologies in their teaching.
“Many educators and educational institutions may not have the knowledge or expertise to effectively integrate new technologies in their teaching [56].”
From ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education (2023) · cites this paper as [56]
The discussion of social limitations (BLOOM, p. 5) concerns barriers to developing and using large language models within the research community, not educators’ ability to integrate technology into teaching. Searches for educators, teachers, and education found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed lack of knowledge or expertise. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Julien Abadji, Pedro Javier Ortiz Suárez, Laurent Romary, and Benoˆ ıt Sagot. Ungoliant: An optimized pipeline for the generation of a very large-scale multilingual web corpus. In Harald L¨ ungen, Marc Kupietz, Piotr Ba´ nski, Adrien Barbaresi, Simon Clematide, and Ines Pisetta, editors, Proceedings of the Workshop on Challenges in the Management of Large Corpora (CMLC-9) , pages 1-9, Limerick, Ireland, 2021. Leibniz-Institut f¨ ur Deutsche Sprache. doi: 10.14618/ids-pub-10468. URL https://nbn-resolving.org/ urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-104688 . https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-104688 · DOI
- Yossi Adi, Einat Kermany, Yonatan Belinkov, Ofer Lavi, and Yoav Goldberg. Fine-grained analysis of sentence embeddings using auxiliary prediction tasks. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , April 2017.
- Christopher Akiki, Giada Pistilli, Margot Mieskes, Matthias Gallé, Thomas Wolf, Suzana Ili´ c, and Yacine Jernite. BigScience: A Case Study in the Social Construction of a Multilingual Large Language Model, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.04960 . · arXiv
- Rami Al-Rfou, Dokook Choe, Noah Constant, Mandy Guo, and Llion Jones. Character-level language modeling with deeper self-attention. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , 2019.
- Yousef Altaher, Ali Fadel, Mazen Alotaibi, Mazen Alyazidi, Mishari Al-Mutairi, Mutlaq Aldhbuiub, Abdulrahman Mosaibah, Abdelrahman Rezk, Abdulrazzaq Alhendi, Mazen Abo Shal, Emad A. Alghamdi, Maged Saeed AlShaibani, Jezia Zakraoui, Wafaa Mohammed, Kamel Gaanoun, Khalid N. Elmadani, Mustafa Ghaleb, Nouamane Tazi, Raed Alharbi, Maraim Masoud, and Zaid Alyafeai. Masader plus: A new interface for exploring +500 arabic NLP datasets. CoRR , abs/2208.00932, 2022. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2208.00932. URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.00932 . · DOI
- Zaid Alyafeai, Maraim Masoud, Mustafa Ghaleb, and Maged Saeed AlShaibani. Masader: Metadata sourcing for arabic text and speech data resources. CoRR , abs/2110.06744, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.06744 . · arXiv
- Stephen Bach, Victor Sanh, Zheng Xin Yong, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Nihal V. Nayak, Abheesht Sharma, Taewoon Kim, M Saiful Bari, Thibault Fevry, Zaid Alyafeai, Manan Dey, Andrea Santilli, Zhiqing Sun, Srulik Ben-david, Canwen Xu, Gunjan Chhablani, Han Wang, Jason Fries, Maged Al-shaibani, Shanya Sharma, Urmish Thakker, Khalid Almubarak, Xiangru Tang, Dragomir Radev, Mike Tian-jian Jiang, and Alexander Rush. PromptSource: An integrated development environment and repository for natural language prompts. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations , pages 93-104, Dublin, Ireland, May 2022. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2022.acl-demo.9. URL https://aclanthology.org/2022.acl-demo.9 . · DOI · Paper page
- Nesrine Bannour, Sahar Ghannay, Aurélie Névéol, and Anne-Laure Ligozat. Evaluating the carbon footprint of NLP methods: a survey and analysis of existing tools. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Simple and Efficient Natural Language Processing , pages 1121, Virtual, November 2021. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/ v1/2021.sustainlp-1.2. URL https://aclanthology.org/2021.sustainlp-1.2 .
- Rachel Bawden and Fran¸ cois Yvon. Investigating the translation performance of a large multilingual language model: the case of BLOOM. CoRR , abs/2303.01911, 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.01911. URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.01911 . · DOI · Paper page
- Authors
- Workshop, B., :, Scao, T. L., Fan, A., Akiki, C., Pavlick, E., Ilić, S., Hesslow, D., Castagné, R., Luccioni, A. S., Yvon, F., Gallé, M., Tow, J., Rush, A. M., Biderman, S., Webson, A., Ammanamanchi, P. S., Wang, T., Sagot, B., Muennighoff, N., del Moral, A. V., Ruwase, O., Bawden, R., Bekman, S., McMillan-Major, A., Beltagy, I., Nguyen, H., Saulnier, L., Tan, S., Suarez, P. O., Sanh, V., Laurençon, H., Jernite, Y., Launay, J., Mitchell, M., Raffel, C., Gokaslan, A., Simhi, A., Soroa, A., Aji, A. F., Alfassy, A., Rogers, A., Nitzav, A. K., Xu, C., Mou, C., Emezue, C., Klamm, C., Leong, C., van Strien, D., Adelani, D. I., Radev, D., Ponferrada, E. G., Levkovizh, E., Kim, E., Natan, E. B., De Toni, F., Dupont, G., Kruszewski, G., Pistilli, G., Elsahar, H., Benyamina, H., Tran, H., Yu, I., Abdulmumin, I., Johnson, I., Gonzalez-Dios, I., de la Rosa, J., Chim, J., Dodge, J., Zhu, J., Chang, J., Frohberg, J., Tobing, J., Bhattacharjee, J., Almubarak, K., Chen, K., Lo, K., Von Werra, L., Weber, L., Phan, L., allal, L. B., Tanguy, L., Dey, M., Muñoz, M. R., Masoud, M., Grandury, M., Šaško, M., Huang, M., Coavoux, M., Singh, M., Jiang, M. T.-J., Vu, M. C., Jauhar, M. A., Ghaleb, M., Subramani, N., Kassner, N., Khamis, N., Nguyen, O., Espejel, O., de Gibert, O., Villegas, P., Henderson, P., Colombo, P., Amuok, P., Lhoest, Q., Harliman, R., Bommasani, R., López, R. L., Ribeiro, R., Osei, S., Pyysalo, S., Nagel, S., Bose, S., Muhammad, S. H., Sharma, S., Longpre, S., Nikpoor, S., Silberberg, S., Pai, S., Zink, S., Torrent, T. T., Schick, T., Thrush, T., Danchev, V., Nikoulina, V., Laippala, V., Lepercq, V., Prabhu, V., Alyafeai, Z., Talat, Z., Raja, A., Heinzerling, B., Si, C., Taşar, D. E., Salesky, E., Mielke, S. J., Lee, W. Y., Sharma, A., Santilli, A., Chaffin, A., Stiegler, A., Datta, D., Szczechla, E., Chhablani, G., Wang, H., Pandey, H., Strobelt, H., Fries, J. A., Rozen, J., Gao, L., Sutawika, L., Bari, M. S., Al-shaibani, M. S., Manica, M., Nayak, N., Teehan, R., Albanie, S., Shen, S., Ben-David, S., Bach, S. H., Kim, T., Bers, T., Fevry, T., Neeraj, T., Thakker, U., Raunak, V., Tang, X., Yong, Z.-X., Sun, Z., Brody, S., Uri, Y., Tojarieh, H., Roberts, A., Chung, H. W., Tae, J., Phang, J., Press, O., Li, C., Narayanan, D., Bourfoune, H., Casper, J., Rasley, J., Ryabinin, M., Mishra, M., Zhang, M., Shoeybi, M., Peyrounette, M., Patry, N., Tazi, N., Sanseviero, O., von Platen, P., Cornette, P., Lavallée, P. F., Lacroix, R., Rajbhandari, S., Gandhi, S., Smith, S., Requena, S., Patil, S., Dettmers, T., Baruwa, A., Singh, A., Cheveleva, A., Ligozat, A.-L., Subramonian, A., Névéol, A., Lovering, C., Garrette, D., Tunuguntla, D., Reiter, E., Taktasheva, E., Voloshina, E., Bogdanov, E., Winata, G. I., Schoelkopf, H., Kalo, J.-C., Novikova, J., Forde, J. Z., Clive, J., Kasai, J., Kawamura, K., Hazan, L., Carpuat, M., Clinciu, M., Kim, N., Cheng, N., Serikov, O., Antverg, O., van der Wal, O., Zhang, R., Zhang, R., Gehrmann, S., Mirkin, S., Pais, S., Shavrina, T., Scialom, T., Yun, T., Limisiewicz, T., Rieser, V., Protasov, V., Mikhailov, V., Pruksachatkun, Y., Belinkov, Y., Bamberger, Z., Kasner, Z., Rueda, A., Pestana, A., Feizpour, A., Khan, A., Faranak, A., Santos, A., Hevia, A., Unldreaj, A., Aghagol, A., Abdollahi, A., Tammour, A., HajiHosseini, A., Behroozi, B., Ajibade, B., Saxena, B., Ferrandis, C. M., McDuff, D., Contractor, D., Lansky, D., David, D., Kiela, D., Nguyen, D. A., Tan, E., Baylor, E., Ozoani, E., Mirza, F., Ononiwu, F., Rezanejad, H., Jones, H., Bhattacharya, I., Solaiman, I., Sedenko, I., Nejadgholi, I., Passmore, J., Seltzer, J., Sanz, J. B., Dutra, L., Samagaio, M., Elbadri, M., Mieskes, M., Gerchick, M., Akinlolu, M., McKenna, M., Qiu, M., Ghauri, M., Burynok, M., Abrar, N., Rajani, N., Elkott, N., Fahmy, N., Samuel, O., An, R., Kromann, R., Hao, R., Alizadeh, S., Shubber, S., Wang, S., Roy, S., Viguier, S., Le, T., Oyebade, T., Le, T., Yang, Y., Nguyen, Z., Kashyap, A. R., Palasciano, A., Callahan, A., Shukla, A., Miranda-Escalada, A., Singh, A., Beilharz, B., Wang, B., Brito, C., Zhou, C., Jain, C., Xu, C., Fourrier, C., Periñán, D. L., Molano, D., Yu, D., Manjavacas, E., Barth, F., Fuhrimann, F., Altay, G., Bayrak, G., Burns, G., Vrabec, H. U., Bello, I., Dash, I., Kang, J., Giorgi, J., Golde, J., Posada, J. D., Sivaraman, K. R., Bulchandani, L., Liu, L., Shinzato, L., de Bykhovetz, M. H., Takeuchi, M., Pàmies, M., Castillo, M. A., Nezhurina, M., Sänger, M., Samwald, M., Cullan, M., Weinberg, M., De Wolf, M., Mihaljcic, M., Liu, M., Freidank, M., Kang, M., Seelam, N., Dahlberg, N., Broad, N. M., Muellner, N., Fung, P., Haller, P., Chandrasekhar, R., Eisenberg, R., Martin, R., Canalli, R., Su, R., Su, R., Cahyawijaya, S., Garda, S., Deshmukh, S. S., Mishra, S., Kiblawi, S., Ott, S., Sang-aroonsiri, S., Kumar, S., Schweter, S., Bharati, S., Laud, T., Gigant, T., Kainuma, T., Kusa, W., Labrak, Y., Bajaj, Y. S., Venkatraman, Y., Xu, Y., Xu, Y., Xu, Y., Tan, Z., Xie, Z., Ye, Z., Bras, M., Belkada, Y., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- arXiv
- 2211.05100
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review