Martinize2 and Vermouth: Unified Framework for Topology Generation
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.7554/elife.90627 · Paper page
Abstract
Ongoing advances in force field and computer hardware development enable the use of molecular dynamics (MD) to simulate increasingly complex systems with the ultimate goal of reaching cellular complexity. At the same time, rational design by high-throughput (HT) simulations is another forefront of MD. In these areas, the Martini coarse-grained force field, especially the latest version (i.e. v3), is being actively explored because it offers an enhanced spatial-temporal resolution. However, the automation tools for preparing simulations with the Martini force field, accompanying the previous version, were not designed for HT simulations or studies of complex cellular systems. Therefore, they become a major limiting factor. To address these shortcomings, we present the open-source Vermouth python library. Vermouth is designed to become the unified framework for developing programs, which prepare, run, and analyze Martini simulations of complex systems. To demonstrate the power of the Vermouth library, the Martinize2 program is showcased as a generalization of the martinize script, originally aimed to set up simulations of proteins. In contrast to the previous version, Martinize2 automatically handles protonation states in proteins and post-translation modifications, offers more options to fine-tune structural biases such as the elastic network (EN), and can convert non-protein molecules such as ligands. Finally, Martinize2 is used in two high-complexity benchmarks. The entire I-TASSER protein template database as well as a subset of 200,000 structures from the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database are converted to CG resolution and we illustrate how the checks on input structure quality can safeguard high-throughput applications.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Martinize2 performs quality checks on atomistic protein structures and alerts to potential problems.
“The workflow used in Martinize2 additionally performs quality checks on the atomistic protein structures and alerts to potential problems making it ideal for such a high-complexity use case (Kroon et al., 2022).”
From Molecular dynamics simulation of an entire cell (2023) · cites this paper as Kroon et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Marrink S. J., Risselada H. J., Yefimov S., Tieleman D. P., De Vries A. H. (2007) The MARTINI Force Field: Coarse Grained Model for Biomolecular Simulations Journal of Physical Chemistry B 111:7812-7824 Google Scholar
- Canzar S., El-Kebir M., Pool R., Elbassioni K., Malde A. K., Mark A. E., Geerke D. P., Stougie L., Klau G. W. (2013) Charge Group Partitioning in Biomolecular Simulation Journal of Computational Biology 20:188-198 Google Scholar
- Jorgensen W. L., Tirado-Rives J. (2005) Potential Energy Functions for Atomic-Level Simulations of Water and Organic and Biomolecular Systems Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102:6665-6670 Google Scholar
- Hagberg A. A., Schult D. A., Swart P. J. (2008) Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function Using NetworkX In: Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference pp. 11- 15 Google Scholar
- Panizon E., Bochicchio D., Monticelli L., Rossi G. (2015) MARTINI Coarse-Grained Models of Polyethylene and Polypropylene Journal of Physical Chemistry B 119:8209-8216 Google Scholar
- Engler M. S., Caron B., Mark A. E. (2018) Multiple-Choice Knapsack for Assigning Partial Atomic Charges in Drug-Like Molecules In: 18th International Workshop on Algorithms in Bioinformatics (WABI 2018) pp. 1-13 Google Scholar
- Cook S. A. (1971) The Complexity of Theorem-Proving Procedures In: Proceedings of the third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing -STOC '71 pp. 151-158 Google Scholar
- Webb M. A., Delannoy J.-Y., de Pablo J. J. (2018) Graph-Based Approach to Systematic Molecular Coarse-Graining Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation acs.jctc.8b00920 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00920 | Google Scholar · DOI
- Chakraborty M., Xu C., White A. D. (2018) Encoding and selecting coarse-grain mapping operators with hierarchical graphs The Journal of Chemical Physics 149:134106 Google
- Karp R. M. (1972) Reducibility among Combinatorial Problems In: Miller R. E., Thatcher J. W., Bohlinger J. D., editors. Complexity of Computer Computations Springer US pp. 85-103 https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2001-2_9 | Google Scholar · DOI · Paper page
- Taketomi H., Ueda Y., Gō N. (1975) Studies on protein folding, unfolding and fluctuations by computer simulation. I. The effect of specific amino acid sequence represented by specific inter-unit interactions International journal of peptide and protein research 7:445- 459 Google Scholar
- Cordella L. P., Foggia P., Sansone C., Vento M. (2001) An improved algorithm for matching large graphs In: Proceedings of the 3rd IAPR Workshop on Graph-Based Representations in Pattern Recognition pp. 149-159 Google Scholar
- Cordella L. P., Foggia P., Sansone C., Vento M. (2004) A (sub)graph isomorphism algorithm for matching large graphs IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 26:1367-1372 Google Scholar
- Brooks B. R., et al. (1983) CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations Journal of Computational Chemistry 4:187-217 Google Scholar
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Molecular dynamics simulation of an entire cell
Stevens, J. A., Grünewald, F., van Tilburg, P. A. M., König, M., Gilbert, B. R., Brier, T. A., Thornburg, Z. R., Luthey-Schulten, Z., & Marrink, S. J. (2023) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2023.1106495 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Kroon, P. C., Grünewald, F., Barnoud, J., van Tilburg, M., Brasnett, C., Souza, P. C. T., Wassenaar, T. A., & Marrink, S.-J.
- Affiliations
- University of Groningen (NL)
- École Normale Supérieure de Lyon (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Grünewald, Fabian
- Marrink, Siewert-Jan
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 12
- ISSN
- 2050-084X (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2212.01191
- PMC
- PMC12634043
- OpenAlex
- W7106126080
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 73 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 7
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- European Commission (866559, 2019–2022, 2021-2024)
- Novo Nordisk
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
- Klaus Tschira Stiftung
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (2019-2022, NNF20OC0063808)
- Xunta de Galicia (ED431G-2019/04, 2019-2022 ED431G-2019/04, ED431G, 2019-2022, 2021-2024)
- École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
- European Regional Development Fund (2019-2022, 2019-2022 ED431G-2019/04, ED431G 2019/04)
- Agencia Estatal de Investigación (2019-2022)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- Martini coarse-grained force field, vermouth, high-throughput molecular dynamics, protonation states, post-translational modification, elastic networks, AlphaFold structures
- MeSH terms
- Proteins, Software, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
