CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 23Robot Manipulation and LearningReinforcement Learning in RoboticsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

VideoDex: Learning dexterity from internet videos

Open access
Shaw, Kenneth, Bahl, Shikhar, Pathak, Deepak·2022·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2212.04498arXiv 2212.04498
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

To build general robotic agents that can operate in many environments, it is often imperative for the robot to collect experience in the real world. However, this is often not feasible due to safety, time, and hardware restrictions. We thus propose leveraging the next best thing as real-world experience: internet videos of humans using their hands. Visual priors, such as visual features, are often learned from videos, but we believe that more information from videos can be utilized as a stronger prior. We build a learning algorithm, VideoDex, that leverages visual, action, and physical priors from human video datasets to guide robot behavior. These actions and physical priors in the neural network dictate the typical human behavior for a particular robot task. We test our approach on a robot arm and dexterous hand-based system and show strong results on various manipulation tasks, outperforming various state-of-the-art methods. Videos at https://video-dex.github.io

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2212.04498

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Learning from videos of direct human demonstrations limits robot deployment because it relies on third-person visual observations and lacks real-world physical interaction data.

    “However, robot deployment is limited by its reliance on third-person visual observations and the absence of real-world physical interaction data.”

    From LEGATO: Cross-Embodiment Imitation Using a Grasping Tool (2025) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Introduction (pp. 1–2) says prior work often uses human videos only for visual pretraining and that collecting real-world robot interaction data is difficult. It does not characterize those videos as third-person observations; the paper cites egocentric datasets and says VideoDex supplements videos with real-world demonstrations. Thus, the claimed limitations are only partly supported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. [1][1] K. Grauman, A. Westbury, E. Byrne, Z. Chavis, A. Furnari, R. Girdhar, J. Hamburger, H. Jiang, M. Liu, X. Liu, et al. Ego4d: Around the world in 3,000 hours of egocentric video. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 18995-19012, 2022. -
  2. [2][2] D. Damen, H. Doughty, G. M. Farinella, S. Fidler, A. Furnari, E. Kazakos, D. Moltisanti, J. Munro, T. Perrett, W. Price, and M. Wray. Scaling egocentric vision: The epic-kitchens dataset. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) , 2018. -
  3. [3][3] R. Goyal, S. Ebrahimi Kahou, V. Michalski, J. Materzynska, S. Westphal, H. Kim, V. Haenel, I. Fruend, P. Yianilos, M. Mueller-Freitag, F. Hoppe, C. Thurau, I. Bax, and R. Memisevic. The 'something something' video database for learning and evaluating visual common sense. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , Oct 2017. -
  4. [4][4] L. Pinto, D. Gandhi, Y. Han, Y.-L. Park, and A. Gupta. The curious robot: Learning visual representations via physical interactions. In ECCV , 2016. -
  5. [5][5] P. Sermanet, C. Lynch, Y. Chebotar, J. Hsu, E. Jang, S. Schaal, and S. Levine. Time-contrastive networks: Self-supervised learning from video. In ICRA , 2018. -
  6. [6][6] S. Nair, A. Rajeswaran, V. Kumar, C. Finn, and A. Gupta. R3m: A universal visual representation for robot manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.12601 , 2022. - · arXiv
  7. [7][7] T. Xiao, I. Radosavovic, T. Darrell, and J. Malik. Masked visual pre-training for motor control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.06173 , 2022. - · arXiv
  8. [8][8] A. V. Nair, V. Pong, M. Dalal, S. Bahl, S. Lin, and S. Levine. Visual reinforcement learning with imagined goals. In NeurIPS , pages 9191-9200, 2018. -
  9. [9][9] K. He, G. Gkioxari, P. Dollar, and R. Girshick. Mask r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , Oct 2017. -
  10. [10][10] T. Chen, S. Kornblith, M. Norouzi, and G. Hinton. A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. In H. D. III and A. Singh, editors, Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning , volume 119 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 1597-1607. PMLR, 13-18 Jul 2020. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v119/ chen20j.html . -
  11. [12][12] J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 , 2018. - · arXiv
  12. [13][13] S. Bahl, M. Mukadam, A. Gupta, and D. Pathak. Neural dynamic policies for end-to-end sensorimotor learning. In NeurIPS , 2020. -
  13. [15][15] D. Kalashnikov, A. Irpan, P. Pastor, J. Ibarz, A. Herzog, E. Jang, D. Quillen, E. Holly, M. Kalakrishnan, V. Vanhoucke, et al. Qt-opt: Scalable deep reinforcement learning for vision-based robotic manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.10293 , 2018. - · arXiv
  14. [16][16] S. Levine, C. Finn, T. Darrell, and P. Abbeel. End-to-end training of deep visuomotor policies. JMLR , 2016. -
  15. [17][17] E. Todorov, T. Erez, and Y. Tassa. MuJoCo: A physics engine for model-based control. In IROS , 2012. -
  16. [18][18] V. Makoviychuk, L. Wawrzyniak, Y. Guo, M. Lu, K. Storey, M. Macklin, D. Hoeller, N. Rudin, A. Allshire, A. Handa, et al. Isaac gym: High performance gpu-based physics simulation for robot learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.10470 , 2021. - · arXiv
  17. [19][19] D. A. Pomerleau. Alvinn: An autonomous land vehicle in a neural network. In D. Touretzky, editor, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 1. Morgan-Kaufmann, 1988. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/1988/file/ 812b4ba287f5ee0bc9d43bbf5bbe87fb-Paper.pdf . -
  18. [20][20] M. Bojarski, D. Del Testa, D. Dworakowski, B. Firner, B. Flepp, P. Goyal, L. D. Jackel, M. Monfort, U. Muller, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, J. Zhao, and K. Zieba. End to end learning for self-driving cars, 2016. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.07316 . - · arXiv
  19. [21][21] S. P. Arunachalam, S. Silwal, B. Evans, and L. Pinto. Dexterous imitation made easy: A learning-based framework for efficient dexterous manipulation, 2022. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2203.13251 . -
  20. [22][22] Y. Qin, H. Su, and X. Wang. From one hand to multiple hands: Imitation learning for dexterous manipulation from single-camera teleoperation, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2204. 12490 . -
  21. [23][23] Y. Qin, Y.-H. Wu, S. Liu, H. Jiang, R. Yang, Y. Fu, and X. Wang. Dexmv: Imitation learning for dexterous manipulation from human videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.05877 , 2021. - · arXiv
  22. [24][24] P. Mandikal and K. Grauman. Dexvip: Learning dexterous grasping with human hand pose priors from video. In Conference on Robot Learning , pages 651-661. PMLR, 2022. -
  23. [25][25] C. Zimmermann, D. Ceylan, J. Yang, B. Russell, M. Argus, and T. Brox. Freihand: A dataset for markerless capture of hand pose and shape from single rgb images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 813-822, 2019. -
  24. [26][26] D. Shan, J. Geng, M. Shu, and D. F. Fouhey. Understanding human hands in contact at internet scale. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 9869-9878, 2020. -
  25. [27][27] C. Ionescu, D. Papava, V. Olaru, and C. Sminchisescu. Human3. 6m: Large scale datasets and predictive methods for 3d human sensing in natural environments. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , 36(7):1325-1339, 2013. -
  26. [29][29] B. G. Fabian Caba Heilbron, Victor Escorcia and J. C. Niebles. Activitynet: A large-scale video benchmark for human activity understanding. In CVPR , pages 961-970, 2015. -
  27. [30][30] P. Das, C. Xu, R. F. Doell, and J. J. Corso. A thousand frames in just a few words: Lingual description of videos through latent topics and sparse object stitching. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 2634-2641, 2013. -
  28. [31][31] J. Romero, D. Tzionas, and M. J. Black. Embodied hands: Modeling and capturing hands and bodies together. ACM Transactions on Graphics, (Proc. SIGGRAPH Asia) , 36(6), Nov. 2017. -
  29. [32][32] M. Loper, N. Mahmood, J. Romero, G. Pons-Moll, and M. J. Black. Smpl: A skinned multiperson linear model. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) , 34(6):1-16, 2015. -
  30. [33][33] G. Pavlakos, V. Choutas, N. Ghorbani, T. Bolkart, A. A. A. Osman, D. Tzionas, and M. J. Black. Expressive body capture: 3D hands, face, and body from a single image. In Proceedings IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages 10975-10985, 2019. -
  31. [34][34] J. Wang, F. Mueller, F. Bernard, S. Sorli, O. Sotnychenko, N. Qian, M. A. Otaduy, D. Casas, and C. Theobalt. Rgb2hands: real-time tracking of 3d hand interactions from monocular rgb video. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , 39(6):1-16, 2020. -
  32. [35][35] A. Kanazawa, M. J. Black, D. W. Jacobs, and J. Malik. End-to-end recovery of human shape and pose. CoRR , abs/1712.06584, 2017. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.06584 . - · arXiv
  33. [36][36] Y. Rong, T. Shiratori, and H. Joo. Frankmocap: A monocular 3d whole-body pose estimation system via regression and integration. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) Workshops , pages 1749-1759, October 2021. -
  34. [37][37] S. Han, B. Liu, R. Wang, Y. Ye, C. D. Twigg, and K. Kin. Online optical marker-based hand tracking with deep labels. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , 37(4):1-10, 2018. -
  35. [38][38] V. Kumar and E. Todorov. Mujoco haptix: A virtual reality system for hand manipulation. In 2015 IEEE-RAS 15th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids) , pages 657-663, 2015. doi:10.1109/HUMANOIDS.2015.7363441. - · DOI · Paper page
  36. [39][39] S. Li, X. Ma, H. Liang, M. G¨ orner, P. Ruppel, B. Fang, F. Sun, and J. Zhang. Vision-based teleoperation of shadow dexterous hand using end-to-end deep neural network. In 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , pages 416-422. IEEE, 2019. -
  37. [40][40] A. Handa, K. Van Wyk, W. Yang, J. Liang, Y.-W. Chao, Q. Wan, S. Birchfield, N. Ratliff, and D. Fox. Dexpilot: Vision-based teleoperation of dexterous robotic hand-arm system. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , pages 9164-9170, 2020. doi:10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9197124. - · DOI
  38. [41][41] L. Shao, T. Migimatsu, Q. Zhang, K. Yang, and J. Bohg. Concept2robot: Learning manipulation concepts from instructions and human demonstrations. The International Journal of Robotics Research , 40(12-14), 2021. -
  39. [42][42] A. S. Chen, S. Nair, and C. Finn. Learning generalizable robotic reward functions from' in-the-wild' human videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.16817 , 2021. - · arXiv
  40. [44][44] K. Schmeckpeper, O. Rybkin, K. Daniilidis, S. Levine, and C. Finn. Reinforcement learning with videos: Combining offline observations with interaction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.06507 , 2020. - · arXiv
  41. [45][45] P. Sharma, D. Pathak, and A. Gupta. Third-person visual imitation learning via decoupled hierarchical controller. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.09676 , 2019. - · arXiv
  42. [47][47] S. Young, D. Gandhi, S. Tulsiani, A. Gupta, P. Abbeel, and L. Pinto. Visual imitation made easy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.04899 , 2020. - · arXiv
  43. [48][48] J. Lee and M. S. Ryoo. Learning robot activities from first-person human videos using convolutional future regression. In CVPR Workshops , pages 1-2, 2017. -
  44. [49][49] N. Das, S. Bechtle, T. Davchev, D. Jayaraman, A. Rai, and F. Meier. Model-based inverse reinforcement learning from visual demonstrations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.09034 , 2020. - · arXiv
  45. [50][50] J. Pari, N. Muhammad, S. P. Arunachalam, L. Pinto, et al. The surprising effectiveness of representation learning for visual imitation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.01511 , 2021. - · arXiv
  46. [51][51] S. Dasari, J. Wang, J. Hong, S. Bahl, Y. Lin, A. S. Wang, A. Thankaraj, K. S. Chahal, B. Calli, S. Gupta, et al. Rb2: Robotic manipulation benchmarking with a twist. In NeurIPS Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 2) , 2021. -
  47. [53][53] M. Prada, A. Remazeilles, A. Koene, and S. Endo. Dynamic movement primitives for humanrobot interaction: Comparison with human behavioral observation. In International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems , 2013. -
  48. [54][54] S. Schaal. Dynamic movement primitives-a framework for motor control in humans and humanoid robotics. In Adaptive motion of animals and machines . Springer, 2006. -
  49. [55][55] P. Pastor, H. Hoffmann, T. Asfour, and S. Schaal. Learning and generalization of motor skills by learning from demonstration. In ICRA , 2009. -
  50. [58][58] K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. CoRR , abs/1512.03385, 2015. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.03385 . - · arXiv
  51. [61][61] Z. Cao, G. Hidalgo, T. Simon, S.-E. Wei, and Y. Sheikh. Openpose: realtime multi-person 2d pose estimation using part affinity fields. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , 43(1):172-186, 2019. -
  52. [62][62] M. A. Fischler and R. C. Bolles. Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun. ACM , 24(6):381-395, jun 1981. ISSN 0001-0782. doi:10.1145/358669.358692. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/ 358669.358692 . - · DOI · Paper page
  53. [63][63] J. L. Sch¨ onberger, E. Zheng, M. Pollefeys, and J.-M. Frahm. Pixelwise View Selection for Unstructured Multi-View Stereo. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) , 2016. -
  54. [64][64] C. Campos, R. Elvira, J. J. G. Rodr´ ıguez, J. M. Montiel, and J. D. Tard´ os. Orb-slam3: An accurate open-source library for visual, visual-inertial, and multimap slam. IEEE Transactions on Robotics , 37(6):1874-1890, 2021. -
  55. [65][65] X. Zhou, R. Girdhar, A. Joulin, P. Kr¨ ahenb¨ uhl, and I. Misra. Detecting twenty-thousand classes using image-level supervision. In ECCV , 2022. -
  56. [66][66] S. F. Bhat, I. Alhashim, and P. Wonka. Adabins: Depth estimation using adaptive bins. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 4009-4018, 2021. -
  57. [67][67] A. Kumar, A. Zhou, G. Tucker, and S. Levine. Conservative q-learning for offline reinforcement learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 33:1179-1191, 2020. -
  58. [68][68] K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 , 2014. - · arXiv
  59. [69][69] K. He, X. Chen, S. Xie, Y. Li, P. Doll´ ar, and R. Girshick. Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 16000-16009, 2022. -
  60. [70][70] J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L.-J. Li, K. Li, and L. Fei-Fei. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 248-255. Ieee, 2009. -
  61. [71][71] A. Handa, K. Van Wyk, W. Yang, J. Liang, Y.-W. Chao, Q. Wan, S. Birchfield, N. Ratliff, and D. Fox. Dexpilot: Vision-based teleoperation of dexterous robotic hand-arm system. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , pages 9164-9170. IEEE, 2020. -
  62. [72][72] M. I. Takuma Seno. d3rlpy: An offline deep reinforcement library. In NeurIPS 2021 Offline Reinforcement Learning Workshop , December 2021.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaw, K., Bahl, S., & Pathak, D.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
ORCID
Pathak, Deepak
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2212.04498
arXiv
2212.04498
OpenAlex
W4311001827
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Samsung
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-22-1-2096, ONR-N00014, N00014-22, N00014)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
human demonstrations, online video, robotic manipulation, physical priors, visual priors, robot manipulators, dexterous hand, imitation learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review