Large Language Models as Simulated Economic Agents: What Can We Learn from Homo Silicus?
Open accessAbstract
We argue that newly-developed large language models (LLMs), because of how they are trained and designed, are implicit computational models of humans -- a Homo silicus. LLMs can be used like economists use Homo economicus: they can be given endowments, information, preferences, and so on, and then their behavior can be explored in scenarios via simulation. Experiments using this approach, derived from Charness and Rabin (2002), Kahneman et al. (1986), Samuelson and Zeckhauser (1988), Oprea (2024b), and Horton (2025), show qualitatively similar results to the original, and when they differ, it is often generative for future research. We discuss potential applications, conceptual issues, and why this approach can inform the study of humans.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GPT-3 can reproduce several classic studies in behavioral economics.
“Horton, for example, argues synthetic research respondents created using GPT-3 can be used to reproduce several classic studies in behavioral economics (19).”
From Can Generative AI improve social science? (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior
Park, J. S., O'Brien, J., Cai, C. J., Morris, M. R., Liang, P., & Bernstein, M. S. (2023) · Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · doi:10.1145/3586183.3606763 · Cited by 2,187 · see citing works
A survey on large language model based autonomous agents
Wang, L., Ma, C., Feng, X., Zhang, Z., Yang, H., Zhang, J., Chen, Z., Tang, J., Chen, X., Lin, Y., et al. (2024) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-024-40231-1 · Cited by 1,941 · see citing works
GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models
Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., & Rock, D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.10130 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
Welcome to the Era of ChatGPT et al.: The Prospects of Large Language Models
Teubner, T., Flath, C. M., Weinhardt, C., van der Aalst, W., & Hinz, O. (2023) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-023-00795-x · Cited by 384 · see citing works
Can Generative AI improve social science?
Bail, C. A. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2314021121 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Diminished diversity-of-thought in a standard large language model
Park, P. S., Schoenegger, P., & Zhu, C. (2024) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02307-x · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Veselovsky, V., Ribeiro, M. H., & West, R. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.07899 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Can Generative AI Improve Social Science?
Bail, C. A. (2023) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/rwtzs · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Synthetic Replacements for Human Survey Data? The Perils of Large Language Models
Bisbee, J., Clinton, J. D., Dorff, C., Kenkel, B., & Larson, J. (2023) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/5ecfa · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Loya, M., Sinha, D., & Futrell, R. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.241 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Judgments of learning distinguish humans from large language models in predicting memory
Huff, M., & Ulakci, E. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-22290-x · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Busch, C. (2025) · German Law Journal · doi:10.1017/glj.2026.10188 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
The Energy Society: A Simulation Environment for Studying Agent Cooperation under Survival Pressure
Hansen, L. B., Torrielli, F., Tonini, F., & Poech, L. G. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.14865
- Authors
- Horton, J. J., Filippas, A., & Manning, B. S.
- Corresponding author
- Horton, John J.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- arXiv
- 2301.07543
- OpenAlex
- W4317552966
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Keywords
- large language models, homo economicus, agent-based modeling, behavioral economics, preference elicitation, endowment effect
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
