PreprintCited by 2Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstronomical Observations and Instrumentation

DeepAstroUDA: Semi-Supervised Universal Domain Adaptation for Cross-Survey Galaxy Morphology Classification and Anomaly Detection

Open access

Abstract

Artificial intelligence methods show great promise in increasing the quality and speed of work with large astronomical datasets, but the high complexity of these methods leads to the extraction of dataset-specific, non-robust features. Therefore, such methods do not generalize well across multiple datasets. We present a universal domain adaptation method, \textit{DeepAstroUDA}, as an approach to overcome this challenge. This algorithm performs semi-supervised domain adaptation and can be applied to datasets with different data distributions and class overlaps. Non-overlapping classes can be present in any of the two datasets (the labeled source domain, or the unlabeled target domain), and the method can even be used in the presence of unknown classes. We apply our method to three examples of galaxy morphology classification tasks of different complexities ($3$-class and $10$-class problems), with anomaly detection: 1) datasets created after different numbers of observing years from a single survey (LSST mock data of $1$ and $10$ years of observations); 2) data from different surveys (SDSS and DECaLS); and 3) data from observing fields with different depths within one survey (wide field and Stripe 82 deep field of SDSS). For the first time, we demonstrate the successful use of domain adaptation between very discrepant observational datasets. \textit{DeepAstroUDA} is capable of bridging the gap between two astronomical surveys, increasing classification accuracy in both domains (up to $40\%$ on the unlabeled data), and making model performance consistent across datasets. Furthermore, our method also performs well as an anomaly detection algorithm and successfully clusters unknown class samples even in the unlabeled target dataset.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2302.02005

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-supervised models are much easier to adapt to perform new tasks and apply to datasets from new data releases or different astronomical surveys.

    “Self-supervised models are also much easier to adapt to perform new tasks, and apply to datasets from new data releases or different astronomical surveys (Ćiprijanović et al. 2023)”

    From Detecting galaxy tidal features using self-supervised representation learning (2024) · cites this paper as Ćiprijanović et al. 2023

    The Results (§5.1 and §5.2) and Discussion (§6; pages not provided) describe adapting DeepAstroUDA to different data releases and surveys, and §6 says it can be used for classification, regression, and anomaly detection. But Methods (§2) calls it a method combining self-supervised contrastive learning with supervised learning, not a self-supervised model; the copy does not establish that self-supervised models in general are “much easier” to adapt. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

This paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ćiprijanović, A., Lewis, A., Pedro, K., Madireddy, S., Nord, B., Perdue, G. N., & Wild, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
  • Argonne National Laboratory (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319451961
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
Keywords
universal domain adaptation, semi-supervised domain adaptation, galaxy morphology classification, anomaly detection, astronomical surveys, unknown class detection, SDSS, DECaLS, Stripe 82

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review