PreprintCited by 35Speech Recognition and SynthesisDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningTopic Modeling

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

SpeechPrompt v2: Prompt Tuning for Speech Classification Tasks

Open access

Abstract

Prompt tuning is a technology that tunes a small set of parameters to steer a pre-trained language model (LM) to directly generate the output for downstream tasks. Recently, prompt tuning has demonstrated its storage and computation efficiency in both natural language processing (NLP) and speech processing fields. These advantages have also revealed prompt tuning as a candidate approach to serving pre-trained LM for multiple tasks in a unified manner. For speech processing, SpeechPrompt shows its high parameter efficiency and competitive performance on a few speech classification tasks. However, whether SpeechPrompt is capable of serving a large number of tasks is unanswered. In this work, we propose SpeechPrompt v2, a prompt tuning framework capable of performing a wide variety of speech classification tasks, covering multiple languages and prosody-related tasks. The experiment result shows that SpeechPrompt v2 achieves performance on par with prior works with less than 0.15M trainable parameters in a unified framework.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2303.00733

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other recent audio LLMs primarily focus on only speech.

    “Other recent audio LLMs [11,12,13,14] primarily focus on only speech.”

    From Joint Audio and Speech Understanding (2023) · cites this paper as [13]

    The paper focuses primarily on speech classification, as described in Section 5.1. But Section 4.1 also evaluates classification of non-speech environmental sounds, so the claim that its focus is “only speech” is too absolute. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. A.Mohamed, H.-y.Lee, L.Borgholt, J. D.Havtorn, J.Edin, C.Igel, K.Kirchhoff, S.-W.Li, K.Livescu, L.Maaløe, et al., "Self-supervised speech representation learning: A review," arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.10643, 2022. · arXiv
  2. P.Liu, W.Yuan, J.Fu, Z.Jiang, H.Hayashi, and G.Neubig, "Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing," arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.13586, 2021. · arXiv
  3. X. L.Li and P.Liang, "Prefix-tuning: Optimizing con- tinuous prompts for generation," in ACL/IJCNLP (1). 2021, pp. 4582-4597, Association for Computational Linguistics.
  4. K.Lakhotia, E.Kharitonov, W.-N.Hsu, Y.Adi, A.Polyak, B.Bolte, T.-A.Nguyen, J.Copet, A.Baevski, A.Mohamed, et al., "On generative spoken language modeling from raw audio," Transactions of the As- sociation for Computational Linguistics, vol. 9, pp. 1336-1354, 2021.
  5. E.Kharitonov, A.Lee, A.Polyak, Y.Adi, J.Copet, K.Lakhotia, T. A.Nguyen, M.Rivière, A.Mohamed, E.Dupoux, and W.Hsu, "Text-free prosody-aware gen- erative spoken language modeling," in ACL (1), 2022, pp. 8666-8681.
  6. H.Gao, J.Ni, K.Qian, Y.Zhang, S.Chang, and M.Hasegawa-Johnson, "Wavprompt: Towards few-shot spoken language understanding with frozen language models," in INTERSPEECH. 2022, pp. 2738-2742, ISCA.
  7. C. H.Yang, Y.Tsai, and P.Chen, "Voice2series: Re- programming acoustic models for time series classifi- cation," in ICML. 2021, vol. 139 of Proceedings of Ma- chine Learning Research, pp. 11808-11819, PMLR.
  8. H.Yen, P.Ku, C. H.Yang, H.Hu, S. M.Siniscalchi, P.Chen, and Y.Tsao, "A study of low-resource speech commands recognition based on adversarial reprogram- ming," CoRR, vol. abs/2110.03894, 2021. · arXiv
  9. R.Vygon and N.Mikhaylovskiy, "Learning efficient representations for keyword spotting with triplet loss," in International Conference on Speech and Computer, 2021, pp. 773-785.
  10. Y.Tian and P. J.Gorinski, "Improving end-to-end speech-to-intent classification with reptile," in INTER- SPEECH. 2020, pp. 891-895, ISCA.
  11. D.Bermuth, A.Poeppel, and W.Reif, "Finstreder: Sim- ple and fast spoken language understanding with finite state transducers using modern speech-to-text models," arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.14589, 2022. · arXiv
  12. J.Shor, A.Jansen, W.Han, D.Park, and Y.Zhang, "Uni- versal paralinguistic speech representations using self- supervised conformers," in ICASSP, 2022, pp. 3169- 3173.
  13. A.Ahamad, A.Anand, and P.Bhargava, "Accentdb: A database of non-native english accents to assist neural speech recognition," in LREC. 2020, pp. 5351-5358, European Language Resources Association.
  14. S.Castro, D.Hazarika, V.Pérez-Rosas, R.Zimmermann, R.Mihalcea, and S.Poria, "Towards multimodal sarcasm detection (an obviously perfect paper)," in Proceed- ings of the 57th Conference of ACL, 2019, pp. 4619- 4629.
  15. A.Ray, S.Mishra, A.Nunna, and P.Bhattacharyya, "A multimodal corpus for emotion recognition in sarcasm," in Proceedings of the Thirteenth LREC, 2022, pp. 6992- 7003.
  16. K.Hechmi, T. N.Trong, V.Hautamäki, and T.Kinnunen, "Voxceleb enrichment for age and gender recognition," in ASRU, 2021, pp. 687-693.
  17. F.Jia, S.Majumdar, and B.Ginsburg, "Marblenet: Deep 1d time-channel separable convolutional neural network for voice activity detection," in ICASSP, 2021, pp. 6818-6822.
  18. K.Chen, X.Du, B.Zhu, Z.Ma, T.Berg-Kirkpatrick, and S.Dubnov, "Hts-at: A hierarchical token-semantic audio transformer for sound classification and detection," in ICASSP, 2022, pp. 646-650.
  19. P.Warden, "Speech commands: A dataset for limited-vocabulary speech recognition," arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.03209, 2018. · arXiv
  20. V.Renkens, S.Janssens, B.Ons, J. F.Gemmeke, et al., "Acquisition of ordinal words using weakly supervised nmf," in SLT, 2014, pp. 30-35.
  21. A.Kolesau and D. Šešok, "Unsupervised pre-training for voice activation," Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 23, pp. 8643, 2020.
  22. L.Lugosch, M.Ravanelli, P.Ignoto, V. S.Tomar, and Y.Bengio, "Speech model pre-training for end-to-end spoken language understanding," in INTERSPEECH. 2019, pp. 814-818, ISCA.
  23. A.Nautsch, X.Wang, N.Evans, T. H.Kinnunen, V.Vestman, M.Todisco, H.Delgado, M.Sahidullah, J.Yamagishi, and K. A.Lee, "Asvspoof 2019: spoofing countermeasures for the detection of synthesized, converted and replayed speech," IEEE Trans. Biom. Behav. Identity Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 252-265, 2021.
  24. C.Busso, M.Bulut, C.-C.Lee, A.Kazemzadeh, E.Mower, S.Kim, J. N.Chang, S.Lee, and S. S.Narayanan, "Iemo- cap: Interactive emotional dyadic motion capture database," Language resources and evaluation, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 335-359, 2008.
  25. E.Fonseca, J.Pons, X.Favory, F.Font, D.Bogdanov, A.Ferraro, S.Oramas, A.Porter, and X.Serra, "Freesound datasets: A platform for the creation of open audio datasets," in ISMIR, 2017, pp. 486-493.
  26. K. J.Piczak, "Esc: Dataset for environmental sound classification," in Proceedings of the 23rd ACM interna- tional conference on Multimedia, 2015, pp. 1015-1018.
  27. W.Hsu, B.Bolte, Y. H.Tsai, K.Lakhotia, R.Salakhutdinov, and A.Mohamed, "Hubert: Self- supervised speech representation learning by masked prediction of hidden units," IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process., vol. 29, pp. 3451-3460, 2021.
  28. C.Liu, H.Lee, and W.Yih, "Structured prompt tuning," CoRR, vol. abs/2205.12309, 2022. · arXiv
  29. S. M.Lundberg and S.-I.Lee, "A unified approach to interpreting model predictions," Advances in neural in- formation processing systems, vol. 30, 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chang, K.-W., Wang, Y.-K., Shen, H., Kang, I.-T., Tseng, W.-C., Li, S.-W., & Lee, H.-Y.
Affiliations
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Meta (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4322825254
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 8 · 2023: 7
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
prompt tuning, speech classification, pre-trained language models, parameter efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review