Nonlocality and Nonlinearity Implies Universality in Operator Learning
Open accessAbstract
Neural operator architectures approximate operators between infinite-dimensional Banach spaces of functions. They are gaining increased attention in computational science and engineering, due to their potential both to accelerate traditional numerical methods and to enable data-driven discovery. As the field is in its infancy basic questions about minimal requirements for universal approximation remain open. It is clear that any general approximation of operators between spaces of functions must be both nonlocal and nonlinear. In this paper we describe how these two attributes may be combined in a simple way to deduce universal approximation. In so doing we unify the analysis of a wide range of neural operator architectures and open up consideration of new ones. A popular variant of neural operators is the Fourier neural operator (FNO). Previous analysis proving universal operator approximation theorems for FNOs resorts to use of an unbounded number of Fourier modes, relying on intuition from traditional analysis of spectral methods. The present work challenges this point of view: (i) the work reduces FNO to its core essence, resulting in a minimal architecture termed the ``averaging neural operator'' (ANO); and (ii) analysis of the ANO shows that even this minimal ANO architecture benefits from universal approximation. This result is obtained based on only a spatial average as its only nonlocal ingredient (corresponding to retaining only a \emph{single} Fourier mode in the special case of the FNO). The analysis paves the way for a more systematic exploration of nonlocality, both through the development of new operator learning architectures and the analysis of existing and new architectures. Numerical results are presented which give insight into complexity issues related to the roles of channel width (embedding dimension) and number of Fourier modes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many architectures (e.g., FNO, Laplace neural operator, DeepONet) contain kernel functions that recover the averaging kernel and thus are universal under Theorem 1.
“The key corollary to Theorem 1 is that, many of the architectures aforementioned (e.g. FNO, Laplace neural operator, DeepONet) contain kernel functions K l that recover the averaging kernel and thus are universal under the setting of Theorem 1.”
From Stabilization of nonlinear systems with unknown delays via delay-adaptive neural operator approximate predictors (2025) · cites this paper as [35]
Cites
Advances in neural information processing systems 7
Cios, K. J., & Shields, M. E. (1997) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/s0925-2312(97)90018-7 · Cited by 22,089 · see citing works
Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators
Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. (1989) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 · Cited by 21,728 · see citing works
Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions (PMS-30)
Stein, E. M. (1971) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400883882 · Cited by 10,375 · see citing works
Learning nonlinear operators via DeepONet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators
Lu, L., Jin, P., Pang, G., Zhang, Z., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2021) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-021-00302-5 · Cited by 3,656 · see citing works
Universal approximation bounds for superpositions of a sigmoidal function
Barron, A. R. (1993) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.256500 · Cited by 2,861 · see citing works
Approximation theory of the MLP model in neural networks
Pinkus, A. M. (1999) · Acta Numerica · doi:10.1017/s0962492900002919 · Cited by 1,542 · see citing works
Chen, T., & Chen, H. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.392253 · Cited by 1,230 · see citing works
Non-intrusive reduced order modeling of nonlinear problems using neural networks
Hesthaven, J. S., & Ubbiali, S. (2018) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.02.037 · Cited by 627 · see citing works
U-FNO—An enhanced Fourier neural operator-based deep-learning model for multiphase flow
Wen, G., Li, Z., Azizzadenesheli, K., Anandkumar, A., & Benson, S. M. (2022) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2022.104180 · Cited by 565 · see citing works
Self-citationModel Reduction And Neural Networks For Parametric PDEs
Bhattacharya, K., Hosseini, B., Kovachki, N., & Stuart, A. M. (2021) · SMAI Journal of Computational Mathematics · doi:10.5802/smai-jcm.74 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Self-citationConvergence Rates of Best N-term Galerkin Approximations for a Class of Elliptic sPDEs
Cohen, A. K., DeVore, R., & Schwab, C. (2010) · Foundations of Computational Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10208-010-9072-2 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Approximation of high-dimensional parametric PDEs
Cohen, A. K., & DeVore, R. (2015) · Acta Numerica · doi:10.1017/s0962492915000033 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
MIONet: Learning Multiple-Input Operators via Tensor Product
Jin, P., Meng, S., & Lu, L. (2022) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/22m1477751 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Cai, S., Wang, Z., Lu, L., Zaki, T. A., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2021) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110296 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Tripura, T., & Chakraborty, S. (2022) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2022.115783 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Error estimates for DeepONets: a deep learning framework in infinite dimensions
Lanthaler, S., Mishra, S., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2022) · Transactions of Mathematics and Its Applications · doi:10.1093/imatrm/tnac001 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Self-citationMao, Z., Lu, L., Marxen, O., Zaki, T. A., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2021) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110698 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Laplace neural operator for solving differential equations
Cao, Q., Goswami, S., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2024) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-024-00844-4 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
You, H., Zhang, Q., Ross, C. J., Lee, C., & Yu, Y. (2022) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2022.115296 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
The Random Feature Model for Input-Output Maps between Banach Spaces
Nelsen, N. H., & Stuart, A. M. (2021) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/20m133957x · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Self-citationA physics-informed operator regression framework for extracting data-driven continuum models
Patel, R. G., Trask, N., Wood, M. A., & Cyr, E. C. (2020) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2020.113500 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
The Cost-Accuracy Trade-Off in Operator Learning with Neural Networks
de Hoop, M. V., Huang, D. Z., Qian, E., & Stuart, A. M. (2022) · Journal of Machine Learning · doi:10.4208/jml.220509 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationErn, A., & Guermond, J. (2015) · Computational Methods in Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1515/cmam-2015-0034 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Exponential Convergence of Deep Operator Networks for Elliptic Partial Differential Equations
Marcati, C., & Schwab, C. (2023) · SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis · doi:10.1137/21m1465718 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Learning neural operators on Riemannian manifolds
Chen, G., Liu, X., Meng, Q., Lü, C., Liu, C., & Li, Y. (2024) · National Science Open · doi:10.1360/nso/20240001 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Convergence Rates for Learning Linear Operators from Noisy Data
de Hoop, M. V., Kovachki, N., Nelsen, N. H., & Stuart, A. M. (2023) · SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification · doi:10.1137/21m1442942 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationBelNet: basis enhanced learning, a mesh-free neural operator
Zhang, Z., Leung, W. T., & Schaeffer, H. (2023) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2023.0043 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Blouza, A., & Dret, H. L. (2001) · SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis · doi:10.1137/s0036141000380012 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Neural and spectral operator surrogates: unified construction and expression rate bounds
Herrmann, L., Schwab, C., & Zech, J. (2024) · Advances in Computational Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10444-024-10171-2 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Kaarnioja, V., Kuo, F. Y., & Sloan, I. H. (2024) · Springer proceedings in mathematics & statistics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-59762-6_4 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neural operators for accelerating scientific simulations and design
Azizzadenesheli, K., Kovachki, N., Li, Z., Liu-Schiaffini, M., Kossaifi, J., & Anandkumar, A. (2024) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-024-00712-5 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Self-citationTanyu, D. N., Ning, J., Freudenberg, T., Heilenkötter, N., Rademacher, A., Iben, U., & Maaß, P. (2023) · Inverse Problems · doi:10.1088/1361-6420/ace9d4 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Neural Operators for Bypassing Gain and Control Computations in PDE Backstepping
Bhan, L., Shi, Y., & Krstic, M. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2023.3347499 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Plasma surrogate modelling using Fourier neural operators
Gopakumar, V., Pamela, S. J. P., Zanisi, L., Li, Z., Gray, A., Brennand, D., Bhatia, N., Stathopoulos, G., Kusner, M. J., Deisenroth, M. P., et al. (2024) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ad313a · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationJafarzadeh, S., Silling, S. A., Liu, N., Zhang, Z., & Yu, Y. (2024) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2024.116914 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Gain Scheduling With a Neural Operator for a Transport PDE With Nonlinear Recirculation
Lamarque, M., Bhan, L., Vázquez, R., & Krstić, M. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2025.3549700 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Architectures, variants, and performance of neural operators: A comparative review
Liu, S., Yu, Y., Zhang, T., Liu, H., Liu, X., & Meng, D. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.130518 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Point cloud neural operator for parametric PDEs on complex and variable geometries
Zeng, C., Yanshu, Z., Zhou, J., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Liu, Y., Wu, L., & Huang, D. Z. (2025) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2025.118022 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Adaptive neural-operator backstepping control of a benchmark hyperbolic PDE
Lamarque, M., Bhan, L., Shi, Y., & Krstic, M. (2025) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2025.112329 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
The parametric complexity of operator learning
Lanthaler, S., & Stuart, A. M. (2025) · IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis · doi:10.1093/imanum/draf028 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationLee, D., Zhang, L., Yu, Y., & Chen, W. (2024) · Advanced Optical Materials · doi:10.1002/adom.202303087 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Fourier neural operator based fluid–structure interaction for predicting the vesicle dynamics
Wang, X., Gao, T., Liu, K., Duan, J., & Zhao, M. (2024) · Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/j.physd.2024.134145 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Adaptive control of reaction–diffusion PDEs via neural operator-approximated gain kernels
Bhan, L., Shi, Y., & Krstic, M. (2025) · Systems & Control Letters · doi:10.1016/j.sysconle.2024.105968 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Brivio, S., Fresca, S., & Manzoni, A. (2025) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2025.117989 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Parametric learning of time-advancement operators for unstable flame evolution
Yu, R., & Hodzic, E. (2024) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0203546 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Critical Analyses of RVE Concepts in Local and Peridynamic Micromechamics of Composites
Buryachenko, V. A. (2025) · Journal of Peridynamics and Nonlocal Modeling · doi:10.1007/s42102-025-00132-8 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Duthé, G., Abdallah, I., & Chatzi, E. (2026) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.j065387 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Learning high-dimensional ionic model dynamics using Fourier Neural Operators
Pellegrini, L., Ghiotto, M., Centofanti, E., & Pavarino, L. F. (2025) · Machine learning for computational science and engineering · doi:10.1007/s44379-025-00046-8 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Pahlavan, H. A., Hassanzadeh, P., & Alexander, M. J. (2025) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2024gl114136 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Banach neural operator for Navier–Stokes equations
Zhang, B. (2025) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0284818 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Deep operator network approximation rates for Lipschitz operators
Schwab, C., Stein, A., & Zech, J. (2025) · Analysis and Applications · doi:10.1142/s0219530525500307 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
A learning-based domain decomposition method
Wu, R. F., Kovachki, N., & Liu, B. (2026) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2026.118799 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Buryachenko, V. A. (2025) · Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids · doi:10.1177/10812865251379065 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Buryachenko, V. A. (2026) · Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids · doi:10.1177/10812865261421526 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
HyperNOs: automated and parallel library for neural operators research
Ghiotto, M. (2025) · Bollettino Della Unione Matematica Italiana · doi:10.1007/s40574-025-00516-0 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Fourier Neural Operator Based Fluid-Structure Interaction for Predicting the Vesicle DynamicsPreprint
Wang, X., Gao, T., Liu, K., Duan, J., & Zhao, M. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4689737 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Bhan, L., Krstic, M., & Shi, Y. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.26443
Point Cloud Neural Operator for Parametric Pdes on Complex and Variable GeometriesPreprint
Zeng, C., Zhang, Y., Zhou, J., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Liu, Y., Wu, L., & Huang, D. Z. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5119827
Neural Operators for Spark Plasma Sintering Simulation
Sicard, D., Naïmi, F., & Ariane, M. (2025) · Journal of the Japan Society of Powder and Powder Metallurgy · doi:10.2497/jjspm.15a-t3-04
Ye, X., Liu, C., & Gao, J. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-4109-6_12
Sampling-Horizon Neural Operator Predictors for Nonlinear Control Under Delayed Inputs
Bhan, L., Quawas, P., Krstic, M., & Shi, Y. (2026) · IEEE Control Systems Letters · doi:10.1109/lcsys.2026.3698435
Hauptmann, A., & Öktem, O. (2026) · Handbook of numerical analysis · doi:10.1016/bs.hna.2026.05.002
Quantitative approximation theorem for neural operators for semilinear elliptic PDEs
Furuya, T. (2026) · Journal of Advanced Simulation in Science and Engineering · doi:10.15748/jasse.13.119
Deep Micro Solvers for Rough-Wall Stokes Flow in a Heterogeneous Multiscale Method
Ström, E., Tornberg, A., & Öktem, O. (2026) · Multiscale Modeling and Simulation · doi:10.1137/25m1779735
Injective attention neural operators for partial differential equations on large-scale problems
Zhong, M., Lu, L., Weng, W., & Yan, Z. (2026) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2026.115457
Anjidani, E. (2026) · Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s00009-026-03222-z
- Authors
- Lanthaler, S., Li, Z., & Stuart, A. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Vienna (AT)
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lanthaler, Samuel
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 261-303
- ISSN
- 0176-4276 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2304.13221
- OpenAlex
- W4413127858
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 6.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Constructive Approximation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Department of Defense
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (206737)
- Universität Wien
- Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (FA9550-20–1-0358)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- neural operators, universal approximation, nonlocality, nonlinearity, Fourier neural operator, operator learning, infinite-dimensional Banach spaces, spatial averaging, Fourier modes, embedding dimension, channel width
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review