PURR: Efficiently Editing Language Model Hallucinations by Denoising Language Model Corruptions
Open accessAbstract
The remarkable capabilities of large language models have been accompanied by a persistent drawback: the generation of false and unsubstantiated claims commonly known as "hallucinations". To combat this issue, recent research has introduced approaches that involve editing and attributing the outputs of language models, particularly through prompt-based editing. However, the inference cost and speed of using large language models for editing currently bottleneck prompt-based methods. These bottlenecks motivate the training of compact editors, which is challenging due to the scarcity of training data for this purpose. To overcome these challenges, we exploit the power of large language models to introduce corruptions (i.e., noise) into text and subsequently fine-tune compact editors to denoise the corruptions by incorporating relevant evidence. Our methodology is entirely unsupervised and provides us with faux hallucinations for training in any domain. Our Petite Unsupervised Research and Revision model, PURR, not only improves attribution over existing editing methods based on fine-tuning and prompting, but also achieves faster execution times by orders of magnitude.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PURR fine-tunes an editor to denoise corruptions and uses the editor to correct hallucinations in the initial outputs.
“Petite Unsupervised Research and Revision (PURR) [27] fine-tune an editor to denoise the corruptions and use the editor to correct the hallucinations in the initial outputs.”
From Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation (2023) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 7
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- Rami Aly, Christos Christodoulopoulos, Oana Co- carascu, Zhijiang Guo, Arpit Mittal, Michael Schlichtkrull, James Thorne, and Andreas Vlachos, editors. 2021. Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER). As- sociation for Computational Linguistics, Dominican Republic.
- Raviteja Anantha, Svitlana Vakulenko, Zhucheng Tu, Shayne Longpre, Stephen Pulman, and Srinivas Chappidi. 2021. Open-domain question answering goes conversational via question rewriting. In Pro- ceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North Amer- ican Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 520-534, Online. Association for Computational Lin- guistics. · DOI · Paper page
- Vidhisha Balachandran, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, William Cohen, and Yulia Tsvetkov. 2022. Correcting diverse factual errors in abstractive summarization via post- editing and language model infilling. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Process- ing.
- Vidhisha Balachandran, Ashish Vaswani, Yulia Tsvetkov, and Niki Parmar. 2021. Simple and ef- ficient ways to improve REALM. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Machine Reading for Question Answering, pages 158-164, Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
- Max Bartolo, Tristan Thrush, Sebastian Riedel, Pontus Stenetorp, Robin Jia, and Douwe Kiela. 2022. Mod- els in the loop: Aiding crowdworkers with generative annotation assistants. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 3754-3767, Seattle, United States. Association for Computational Lin- guistics. · DOI
- Emily M. Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan- Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell. 2021. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Confer- ence on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency.
- Lucas Beyer, Xiaohua Zhai, Amélie Royer, Larisa Mar- keeva, Rohan Anil, and Alexander Kolesnikov. 2021. Knowledge distillation: A good teacher is patient and consistent. 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 10915-10924.
- Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, T. J. Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeff Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. ArXiv, abs/2005.14165. · arXiv
- Meng Cao, Yue Dong, Jiapeng Wu, and Jackie Chi Kit Cheung. 2020. Factual error correction for abstrac- tive summarization models. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 6251-6258, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
- Nicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Katherine Lee, Adam Roberts, Tom B. Brown, Dawn Xiaodong Song, Úlfar Erlingsson, Alina Oprea, and Colin Raf- fel. 2020. Extracting training data from large lan- guage models. In USENIX Security Symposium.
- Aakanksha Chowdhery, Sharan Narang, Jacob Devlin, Maarten Bosma, Gaurav Mishra, Adam Roberts, Paul Barham, Hyung Won Chung, Charles Sutton, Sebas- tian Gehrmann, Parker Schuh, Kensen Shi, Sasha Tsvyashchenko, Joshua Maynez, Abhishek Rao, Parker Barnes, Yi Tay, Noam M. Shazeer, Vinod- kumar Prabhakaran, Emily Reif, Nan Du, Benton C. Hutchinson, Reiner Pope, James Bradbury, Jacob Austin, Michael Isard, Guy Gur-Ari, Pengcheng Yin, Toju Duke, Anselm Levskaya, Sanjay Ghemawat, Sunipa Dev, Henryk Michalewski, Xavier García, Vedant Misra, Kevin Robinson, Liam Fedus, Denny Zhou, Daphne Ippolito, David Luan, Hyeontaek Lim, Barret Zoph, Alexander Spiridonov, Ryan Sepassi, David Dohan, Shivani Agrawal, Mark Omernick, An- drew M. Dai, Thanumalayan Sankaranarayana Pillai, Marie Pellat, Aitor Lewkowycz, Erica Moreira, Re- won Child, Oleksandr Polozov, Katherine Lee, Zong- wei Zhou, Xuezhi Wang, Brennan Saeta, Mark Díaz, Orhan Firat, Michele Catasta, Jason Wei, Kathleen S. Meier-Hellstern, Douglas Eck, Jeff Dean, Slav Petrov, and Noah Fiedel. 2022. Palm: Scaling language mod- eling with pathways. ArXiv, abs/2204.02311. · arXiv
- Hyung Won Chung, Le Hou, S. Longpre, Barret Zoph, Yi Tay, William Fedus, Eric Li, Xuezhi Wang, Mostafa Dehghani, Siddhartha Brahma, Albert Web- son, Shixiang Shane Gu, Zhuyun Dai, Mirac Suz- gun, Xinyun Chen, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Dasha Valter, Sharan Narang, Gaurav Mishra, Adams Wei Yu, Vincent Zhao, Yanping Huang, Andrew M. Dai, Hongkun Yu, Slav Petrov, Ed Huai hsin Chi, Jeff Dean, Jacob Devlin, Adam Roberts, Denny Zhou, Quoc Le, and Jason Wei. 2022. Scaling instruction- finetuned language models. ArXiv, abs/2210.11416. · arXiv
- Jacob Eisenstein, Daniel Andor, Bernd Bohnet, Michael Collins, and David Mimno. 2022. Honest students from untrusted teachers: Learning an interpretable question-answering pipeline from a pretrained lan- guage model. ArXiv, abs/2210.02498. · arXiv
- Luyu Gao, Zhuyun Dai, Panupong Pasupat, Anthony Chen, Arun Tejasvi Chaganty, Yicheng Fan, Vincent Zhao, N. Lao, Hongrae Lee, Da-Cheng Juan, and Kelvin Guu. 2022. Rarr: Researching and revising what language models say, using language models. ArXiv, abs/2210.08726. · arXiv
- Samuel Gehman, Suchin Gururangan, Maarten Sap, Yejin Choi, and Noah A. Smith. 2020. RealToxi- cityPrompts: Evaluating neural toxic degeneration in language models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, pages 3356-3369, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
- Mor Geva, Daniel Khashabi, Elad Segal, Tushar Khot, Dan Roth, and Jonathan Berant. 2021. Did aristotle use a laptop? a question answering benchmark with implicit reasoning strategies. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 9:346- 361. · DOI · Paper page
- Hangfeng He, Hongming Zhang, and Dan Roth. 2022. Rethinking with Retrieval: Faithful Large Language Model Inference. ArXiv.
- Hayate Iso, Chao Qiao, and Hang Li. 2020. Fact-based Text Editing. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics, pages 171-182, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
- Robert Iv, Alexandre Passos, Sameer Singh, and Ming- Wei Chang. 2022. FRUIT: Faithfully reflecting up- dated information in text. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 3670-3686, Seattle, United States. Association for Computational Lin- guistics. · DOI
- Gautier Izacard and Edouard Grave. 2021. Leveraging passage retrieval with generative models for open do- main question answering. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Associ- ation for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume, pages 874-880, Online. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
- Tomasz Korbak, Kejian Shi, Angelica Chen, Rasika Bhalerao, Christopher L. Buckley, Jason Phang, Sam Bowman, and Ethan Perez. 2023. Pretraining language models with human preferences. ArXiv, abs/2302.08582. · arXiv
- Kalpesh Krishna, Aurko Roy, and Mohit Iyyer. 2021. Hurdles to progress in long-form question answering. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 4940-4957, Online. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
- Tom Kwiatkowski, Jennimaria Palomaki, Olivia Red- field, Michael Collins, Ankur Parikh, Chris Alberti, Danielle Epstein, Illia Polosukhin, Jacob Devlin, Ken- ton Lee, Kristina Toutanova, Llion Jones, Matthew Kelcey, Ming-Wei Chang, Andrew M. Dai, Jakob Uszkoreit, Quoc Le, and Slav Petrov. 2019. Natu- ral questions: A benchmark for question answering research. Transactions of the Association for Compu- tational Linguistics, 7:452-466. · DOI · Paper page
- Hunter Lang, Monica Agrawal, Yoon Kim, and David A. Sontag. 2022. Co-training improves prompt-based learning for large language models. In International Conference on Machine Learning.
- Alisa Liu, Swabha Swayamdipta, Noah A. Smith, and Yejin Choi. 2022. WANLI: Worker and AI collabora- tion for natural language inference dataset creation. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022, pages 6826-6847, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Association for Com- putational Linguistics.
- Shayne Longpre, Kartik Kumar Perisetla, Anthony Chen, Nikhil Ramesh, Chris DuBois, and Sameer Singh. 2021. Entity-based knowledge conflicts in question answering. ArXiv, abs/2109.05052. · arXiv
- Joshua Maynez, Shashi Narayan, Bernd Bohnet, and Ryan T. McDonald. 2020. On faithfulness and factuality in abstractive summarization. ArXiv, abs/2005.00661. · arXiv
- Sewon Min, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Han- naneh Hajishirzi. 2021. Metaicl: Learning to learn in context. ArXiv, abs/2110.15943. · arXiv
- Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J. Liu. 2020. Exploring the Lim- its of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(140):1-67.
- Hannah Rashkin, Vitaly Nikolaev, Matthew Lamm, Michael Collins, Dipanjan Das, Slav Petrov, Gau- rav Singh Tomar, Iulia Turc, and D. Reitter. 2021. Measuring attribution in natural language generation models. ArXiv, abs/2112.12870. · arXiv
- Vikas Raunak, Arul Menezes, and Marcin Junczys- Dowmunt. 2021. The curious case of hallucinations in neural machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chap- ter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 1172-1183, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
- Marco Tulio Ribeiro and Scott Lundberg. 2022. Adap- tive testing and debugging of NLP models. In Pro- ceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 3253-3267, Dublin, Ireland. Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
- Victor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen H. Bach, Lintang Sutawika, Zaid Alyafeai, Antoine Chaffin, Arnaud Stiegler, Teven Le Scao, Arun Raja, Manan Dey, M Saiful Bari, Canwen Xu, Urmish Thakker, Shanya Sharma, Eliza Szczechla, Taewoon Kim, Gunjan Chhablani, Nihal V. Nayak, Debajyoti Datta, Jonathan Chang, Mike Tian-Jian Jiang, Han Wang, Matteo Manica, Sheng Shen, Zheng Xin Yong, Harshit Pandey, Rachel Bawden, Thomas Wang, Tr- ishala Neeraj, Jos Rozen, Abheesht Sharma, An- drea Santilli, Thibault Févry, Jason Alan Fries, Ryan Teehan, Stella Rose Biderman, Leo Gao, Tali Bers, Thomas Wolf, and Alexander M. Rush. 2021. Multi- task prompted training enables zero-shot task gener- alization. ArXiv, abs/2110.08207. · arXiv
- Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Zhengbao Jiang, Fabio Petroni, Patrick Lewis, Gautier Izacard, Qingfei You, Christoforos Nalmpantis, Edouard Grave, and Sebas- tian Riedel. 2022. Peer: A collaborative language model. ArXiv, abs/2208.11663. · arXiv
- Ryan Smith, Jason Alan Fries, Braden Hancock, and Stephen H. Bach. 2022. Language models in the loop: Incorporating prompting into weak supervision. ArXiv, abs/2205.02318. · arXiv
- Samuel Stanton, Pavel Izmailov, P. Kirichenko, Alexan- der A. Alemi, and Andrew Gordon Wilson. 2021. Does knowledge distillation really work? ArXiv, abs/2106.05945. · arXiv
- Nisan Stiennon, Long Ouyang, Jeff Wu, Daniel M. Ziegler, Ryan J. Lowe, Chelsea Voss, Alec Radford, Dario Amodei, and Paul Christiano. 2020. Learn- ing to summarize from human feedback. ArXiv, abs/2009.01325. · arXiv
- Romal Thoppilan, Daniel De Freitas, Jamie Hall, Noam M. Shazeer, Apoorv Kulshreshtha, Heng- Tze Cheng, Alicia Jin, Taylor Bos, Leslie Baker, Yu Du, Yaguang Li, Hongrae Lee, Huaixiu Zheng, Amin Ghafouri, Marcelo Menegali, Yanping Huang, Maxim Krikun, Dmitry Lepikhin, James Qin, Dehao Chen, Yuanzhong Xu, Zhifeng Chen, Adam Roberts, Maarten Bosma, Yanqi Zhou, Chung-Ching Chang, I. A. Krivokon, Willard James Rusch, Marc Pick- ett, Kathleen S. Meier-Hellstern, Meredith Ringel Morris, Tulsee Doshi, Renelito Delos Santos, Toju Duke, Johnny Hartz Søraker, Ben Zevenbergen, Vin- odkumar Prabhakaran, Mark Díaz, Ben Hutchinson, Kristen Olson, Alejandra Molina, Erin Hoffman- John, Josh Lee, Lora Aroyo, Ravindran Rajakumar, Alena Butryna, Matthew Lamm, V. O. Kuzmina, Joseph Fenton, Aaron Cohen, Rachel Bernstein, Ray Kurzweil, Blaise Aguera-Arcas, Claire Cui, Marian Croak, Ed Huai hsin Chi, and Quoc Le. 2022. Lamda: Language models for dialog applications. ArXiv, abs/2201.08239. · arXiv
- James Thorne and Andreas Vlachos. 2020. Evidence- based factual error correction. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timothée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, Aur'elien Rodriguez, Armand Joulin, Edouard Grave, and Guillaume Lample. 2023. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. ArXiv, abs/2302.13971. · arXiv
- Shuohang Wang, Yang Liu, Yichong Xu, Chenguang Zhu, and Michael Zeng. 2021. Want to reduce la- beling cost? GPT-3 can help. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021, pages 4195-4205, Punta Cana, Dominican Re- public. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
- Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, brian ichter, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc V Le, and Denny Zhou. 2022. Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 35, pages 24824-24837.
- Seonghyeon Ye, Doyoung Kim, Joel Jang, Joongbo Shin, and Minjoon Seo. 2022. Guess the instruction! flipped learning makes language models stronger zero-shot learners. ArXiv, abs/2210.02969. · arXiv
- Tony Zhao, Eric Wallace, Shi Feng, Dan Klein, and Sameer Singh. 2021. Calibrate before use: Improv- ing few-shot performance of language models. ArXiv, abs/2102.09690. · arXiv
- Daniel M. Ziegler, Nisan Stiennon, Jeff Wu, Tom B. Brown, Alec Radford, Dario Amodei, Paul Chris- tiano, and Geoffrey Irving. 2019. Fine-tuning lan- guage models from human preferences. ArXiv, abs/1909.08593. · arXiv
- Authors
- Chen, A., Pasupat, P., Singh, S., Lee, H., & Guu, K.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Google (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2305.14908
- OpenAlex
- W4378465094
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Keywords
- large language model hallucination, unsupervised training, corruption, inference efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review