Cited by 134Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesAdvanced Text Analysis Techniques

Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summarization Models

Open access
Cao, Meng, Dong, Yue, Wu, Jiapeng, Cheung, Jackie Chi Kit·2020·Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)

Abstract

Neural abstractive summarization systems have achieved promising progress, thanks to the availability of large-scale datasets and models pre-trained with self-supervised methods.However, ensuring the factual consistency of the generated summaries for abstractive summarization systems is a challenge.We propose a post-editing corrector module to address this issue by identifying and correcting factual errors in generated summaries.The neural corrector model is pre-trained on artificial examples that are created by applying a series of heuristic transformations on reference summaries.These transformations are inspired by an error analysis of state-of-the-art summarization model outputs.Experimental results show that our model is able to correct factual errors in summaries generated by other neural summarization models and outperforms previous models on factual consistency evaluation on the CNN/DailyMail dataset.We also find that transferring from artificial error correction to downstream settings is still very challenging 1 .Article: Jerusalem (CNN)The flame of remembrance burns in Jerusalem, and a song of memory haunts Valerie Braham as it never has before.(...) "Now I truly understand everyone who has lost a loved one," Braham said.Her husband, Philippe Braham, was one of 17 people killed in January's terror attacks in Paris.He was in a kosher supermarket when a gunman stormed in, killing four people, all of them Jewish.(...) Original: Valerie braham was one of 17 people killed in january's terror attacks in paris.(inconsistent) Corrected: Philippe braham was one of 17 people killed in january's terror attacks in paris.(consistent) Article: (...) Thursday's attack by al-Shabaab militants killed 147 people, including 142 students, three security officers and two university security personnel.The attack left 104 people injured, including 19 who are in critical condition, Nkaissery said.(...) Original: 147 people, including 142 students, are in critical condition.(inconsistent) Corrected: 19 people, including 142 students, are in critical condition.(inconsistent) Article: (CNN) Officer Michael Slager's five-year career with the North Charleston Police Department in South Carolina ended after he resorted to deadly force following a routine traffic stop.(...) His back is to Slager, who, from a few yards away, raises his gun and fires.Slager is now charged with murder.The FBI is involved in the investigation of the slaying of the father of four.(...) Original: Slager is now charged with murder.(consistent) Corrected: Michael Slager is now charged with murder.(consistent) Article: (CNN)The announcement this year of a new, original Dr. Seuss book sent a wave of nostalgic giddiness across Twitter, and months before publication, the number of pre-orders for "What Pet Should I Get?" continues to climb.(...) It features the spirited siblings from the beloved classic "One Fish Two Fish Red Fish Blue Fish" and is believed to have been written between 1958 and 1962.(...) Original: Seuss book sent a wave of nostalgic giddiness across twitter.(consistent) Corrected: "One Fish Two Fish Red Fish Blue Fish" book sent a wave of nostalgic giddiness across twitter.(inconsistent)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.506

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LLMs struggle to generate accurate and up-to-date responses on current topics due to outdated knowledge, lack of domain-specific expertise, or hallucination.

    “LLMs struggle to generate accurate and up-to-date responses on current topics, due to outdated knowledge, lack of domain-specific expertise, or hallucination13–17.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cao, M., Dong, Y., Wu, J., & Cheung, J. C. K.
Affiliations
Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute (CA)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)
Published
2020
Pages
6251-6258
OpenAlex
W3102645206
Cited by
132
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 3
FWCI
9.55
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Compute Canada
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
Keywords
abstractive summarization, factual error correction, factual consistency, post-editing, CNN/DailyMail, self-supervised pre-training, error analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review