The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generative AI for Product Design: Getting the Right Design and the Design Right
Open accessAbstract
Generative AI (GenAI) models excel in their ability to recognize patterns in existing data and generate new and unexpected content. Recent advances have motivated applications of GenAI tools (e.g., Stable Diffusion, ChatGPT) to professional practice across industries, including product design. While these generative capabilities may seem enticing on the surface, certain barriers limit their practical application for real-world use in industry settings. In this position paper, we articulate and situate these barriers within two phases of the product design process, namely "getting the right design" and "getting the design right," and propose a research agenda to stimulate discussions around opportunities for realizing the full potential of GenAI tools in product design.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In design, AI has been integrated into product design workflows, fostering innovation in idea generation [22, 39] and advancing user interface design through features such as adaptability [21, 109].”
From Understanding Screenwriters' Practices, Attitudes, and Future Expectations in Human-AI Co-Creation (2025) · cites this paper as [39]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models
Wei, J., Tay, Y., Bommasani, R., Raffel, C., Zoph, B., Borgeaud, S., Yogatama, D., Bosma, M., Zhou, D., Metzler, D., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.07682 · Cited by 1,264
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Matthew Barthet, Ahmed Khalifa, Antonios Liapis, and Georgios Yannakakis. 2022. Generative personas that behave and experience like humans. In Proceed- ings of the 17th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. 1-10.
- Tom Hope, Ronen Tamari, Daniel Hershcovich, Hyeonsu B Kang, Joel Chan, Aniket Kittur, and Dafna Shahaf. 2022. Scaling Creative Inspiration with Fine- Grained Functional Aspects of Ideas. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-15.
- Ben Hutchinson, Jason Baldridge, and Vinodkumar Prabhakaran. 2022. Un- derspecification in Scene Description-to-Depiction Tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.05815 (2022). · arXiv
- Hyeonsu B Kang, Sheshera Mysore, Kevin Huang, Haw-Shiuan Chang, Thorben Prein, Andrew McCallum, Aniket Kittur, and Elsa Olivetti. 2022. Augmenting Scientific Creativity with Retrieval across Knowledge Domains. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.01328 (2022). · arXiv
- Shibani Santurkar, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Cinoo Lee, Percy Liang, and Tat- sunori Hashimoto. 2023. Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect? arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17548 (2023). · arXiv
- Jaime Sevilla, Lennart Heim, Anson Ho, Tamay Besiroglu, Marius Hobbhahn, and Pablo Villalobos. 2022. Compute trends across three eras of machine learn- ing. In 2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 1-8.
- Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).
- Robert J Youmans and Thomaz Arciszewski. 2014. Design fixation: Classifica- tions and modern methods of prevention. AI EDAM 28, 2 (2014), 129-137.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Screenwriters' Practices, Attitudes, and Future Expectations in Human-AI Co-Creation
Tang, Y., Li, H., Lan, M., Ma, X., & Qu, H. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714120 · Cited by 18
Navigating Ethics of AI-Powered Creativity in Midjourney
Naik, T., Gostu, H., & Sharma, R. (2024) · 2024 3rd International Conference for Innovation in Technology (INOCON) · doi:10.1109/inocon60754.2024.10511571 · Cited by 8
Understanding Screenwriters' Practices, Attitudes, and Future Expectations in Human-AI Co-Creation
Tang, Y., Li, H., Lan, M., Ma, X., & Qu, H. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Hong, M. K., Hakimi, S., Chen, Y.-Y., Toyoda, H., Wu, C., & Klenk, M.
- Affiliations
- Toyota Motor Corporation (Switzerland) (CH)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2306.01217
- OpenAlex
- W4379471495
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Architecture and Computational Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Digital Media and Visual Art
- Keywords
- generative AI, product design, design process, AI adoption barriers, research agenda
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
