PreprintCited by 3Speech Recognition and SynthesisMusic and Audio ProcessingDigital Media Forensic Detection

Adaptive Fake Audio Detection with Low-Rank Model Squeezing

Open access
Zhang, Xiaohui, Yi, Jiangyan, Tao, Jianhua, Wang, Chenlong, Xu, Le, Fu, Ruibo·2023·arXiv

Abstract

The rapid advancement of spoofing algorithms necessitates the development of robust detection methods capable of accurately identifying emerging fake audio. Traditional approaches, such as finetuning on new datasets containing these novel spoofing algorithms, are computationally intensive and pose a risk of impairing the acquired knowledge of known fake audio types. To address these challenges, this paper proposes an innovative approach that mitigates the limitations associated with finetuning. We introduce the concept of training low-rank adaptation matrices tailored specifically to the newly emerging fake audio types. During the inference stage, these adaptation matrices are combined with the existing model to generate the final prediction output. Extensive experimentation is conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the proposed method. The results demonstrate that our approach effectively preserves the prediction accuracy of the existing model for known fake audio types. Furthermore, our approach offers several advantages, including reduced storage memory requirements and lower equal error rates compared to conventional finetuning methods, particularly on specific spoofing algorithms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2306.04956

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies design an adaptation module to train a few parameters of detectors on new types of fake samples, such as leveraging low-rank adaptation matrices and designing a domain alignment loss on the source and target domain.

    “Instead of fine-tuning the entire model, some studies design an adaption module to train a few parameters of detectors on new types of fake samples, such as leveraging low-rank adaptation matrices [152, 192] and designing a domain alignment loss on the source and target domain [193].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. M. Todisco, H. Delgado, N. W. D. Evans, A new feature for automatic speaker verification anti- spoofing: Constant Q cepstral coefficients, in: L. J. Rodríguez-Fuentes, E. Lleida (Eds.), Odyssey 2016: The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop, Bilbao, Spain, June 21-24, 2016, ISCA, 2016, pp. 283- 290.
  2. R. K. Das, J. Yang, H. Li, Assessing the scope of generalized countermeasures for anti-spoofing, in: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Acous- tics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2020, Barcelona, Spain, May 4-8, 2020, IEEE, 2020, pp. 6589-6593.
  3. X. Wang, J. Yamagishi, Investigating self- supervised front ends for speech spoofing coun- termeasures, in: T. F. Zheng (Ed.), Odyssey 2022: The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop, 28 June -1 July 2022, Beijing, China, ISCA, 2022, pp. 100-106.
  4. Z. Wu, T. Kinnunen, N. W. D. Evans, J. Yamagishi, C. Hanilçi, M. Sahidullah, A. Sizov, Asvspoof 2015: the first automatic speaker verification spoofing and countermeasures challenge, in: INTERSPEECH 2015, 16th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Dresden, Ger- many, September 6-10, 2015, ISCA, 2015, pp. 2037- 2041.
  5. T. Kinnunen, M. Sahidullah, H. Delgado, M. Todisco, N. W. D. Evans, J. Yamagishi, K. Lee, The asvspoof 2017 challenge: Assessing the limits of replay spoof- ing attack detection, in: F. Lacerda (Ed.), Inter- speech 2017, 18th Annual Conference of the Interna- tional Speech Communication Association, Stock- holm, Sweden, August 20-24, 2017, ISCA, 2017, pp. 2-6.
  6. M. Todisco, X. Wang, V. Vestman, M. Sahidullah, H. Delgado, A. Nautsch, J. Yamagishi, N. W. D. Evans, T. H. Kinnunen, K. A. Lee, Asvspoof 2019: Future horizons in spoofed and fake audio detec- tion, in: G. Kubin, Z. Kacic (Eds.), Interspeech 2019, 20th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Graz, Austria, 15-19 September 2019, ISCA, 2019, pp. 1008-1012.
  7. J. Yamagishi, X. Wang, M. Todisco, M. Sahidullah, J. Patino, A. Nautsch, X. Liu, K. A. Lee, T. Kin- nunen, N. W. D. Evans, H. Delgado, Asvspoof 2021: accelerating progress in spoofed and deep- fake speech detection, CoRR abs/2109.00537 (2021). arXiv:2109.00537. · arXiv
  8. J. Yi, R. Fu, J. Tao, S. Nie, H. Ma, C. Wang, T. Wang, Z. Tian, Y. Bai, C. Fan, S. Liang, S. Wang, S. Zhang, X. Yan, L. Xu, Z. Wen, H. Li, ADD 2022: the first audio deep synthesis detection challenge, in: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2022, Virtual and Singa- pore, 23-27 May 2022, IEEE, 2022, pp. 9216-9220.
  9. H. Ma, J. Yi, J. Tao, Y. Bai, Z. Tian, C. Wang, Contin- ual learning for fake audio detection, in: H. Herman- sky, H. Cernocký, L. Burget, L. Lamel, O. Scharen- borg, P. Motlícek (Eds.), Interspeech 2021, 22nd An- nual Conference of the International Speech Com- munication Association, Brno, Czechia, 30 August - 3 September 2021, ISCA, 2021, pp. 886-890.
  10. Y. Zhang, G. Zhu, F. Jiang, Z. Duan, An empirical study on channel effects for synthetic voice spoof- ing countermeasure systems, in: H. Hermansky, H. Cernocký, L. Burget, L. Lamel, O. Scharenborg, P. Motlícek (Eds.), Interspeech 2021, 22nd Annual Conference of the International Speech Communi- cation Association, Brno, Czechia, 30 August -3 September 2021, ISCA, 2021, pp. 4309-4313.
  11. J. Kirkpatrick, R. Pascanu, N. C. Rabinowitz, J. Ve- ness, G. Desjardins, A. A. Rusu, K. Milan, J. Quan, T. Ramalho, A. Grabska-Barwinska, D. Hassabis, C. Clopath, D. Kumaran, R. Hadsell, Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks, CoRR abs/1612.00796 (2016). arXiv:1612.00796. · arXiv
  12. E. J. Hu, Y. Shen, P. Wallis, Z. Allen-Zhu, Y. Li, S. Wang, L. Wang, W. Chen, Lora: Low-rank adap- tation of large language models, in: The Tenth International Conference on Learning Representa- tions, ICLR 2022, Virtual Event, April 25-29, 2022, OpenReview.net, 2022.
  13. N. Houlsby, A. Giurgiu, S. Jastrzebski, B. Morrone, Q. de Laroussilhe, A. Gesmundo, M. Attariyan, S. Gelly, Parameter-efficient transfer learning for NLP, in: K. Chaudhuri, R. Salakhutdinov (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2019, 9-15 June 2019, Long Beach, California, USA, volume 97 of Proceed- ings of Machine Learning Research, PMLR, 2019, pp. 2790-2799.
  14. Guyon, U. von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. M. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. V. N. Vishwanathan, R. Garnett (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: An- nual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2017, December 4-9, 2017, Long Beach, CA, USA, 2017, pp. 506-516.
  15. J. Pfeiffer, A. Kamath, A. Rücklé, K. Cho, I. Gurevych, Adapterfusion: Non-destructive task composition for transfer learning, in: P. Merlo, J. Tiedemann, R. Tsarfaty (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume, EACL 2021, Online, April 19 -23, 2021, As- sociation for Computational Linguistics, 2021, pp. 487-503.
  16. A. Rücklé, G. Geigle, M. Glockner, T. Beck, J. Pfeiffer, N. Reimers, I. Gurevych, Adapterdrop: On the effi- ciency of adapters in transformers, in: M. Moens, X. Huang, L. Specia, S. W. Yih (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2021, Vir- tual Event / Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, 7-11 November, 2021, Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021, pp. 7930-7946.
  17. T. B. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, S. Agarwal, A. Herbert-Voss, G. Krueger, T. Henighan, R. Child, A. Ramesh, D. M. Ziegler, J. Wu, C. Winter, C. Hesse, M. Chen, E. Sigler, M. Litwin, S. Gray, B. Chess, J. Clark, C. Berner, S. McCandlish, A. Radford, I. Sutskever, D. Amodei, Language models are few-shot learners, in: H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M. Bal- can, H. Lin (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33: Annual Conference on Neu- ral Information Processing Systems 2020, NeurIPS 2020, December 6-12, 2020, virtual, 2020.
  18. N. M. Müller, P. Czempin, F. Dieckmann, A. Frogh- yar, K. Böttinger, Does audio deepfake detection generalize?, in: H. Ko, J. H. L. Hansen (Eds.), Inter- speech 2022, 23rd Annual Conference of the Inter- national Speech Communication Association, In- cheon, Korea, 18-22 September 2022, ISCA, 2022, pp. 2783-2787.
  19. Y. Lei, N. Scheffer, L. Ferrer, M. McLaren, A novel scheme for speaker recognition using a phonetically-aware deep neural network, in: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2014, Florence, Italy, May 4-9, 2014, IEEE, 2014, pp. 1695-1699.
  20. J. Hu, L. Shen, G. Sun, Squeeze-and-excitation net- works, in: 2018 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2018, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, June 18-22, 2018, Computer Vision Foundation / IEEE Computer Society, 2018, pp. 7132-7141.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., Yi, J., Tao, J., Wang, C., Xu, L., & Fu, R.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4380187117
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21B2010, 62276259, 61971419, 61831022, 62206278, 62101553, 62006223, 62201572)
  • Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (Z211100004821013)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
anti-spoofing, low-rank adaptation, voice spoofing, memory-efficient inference, equal error rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review