PreprintCited by 8Digital Media Forensic DetectionSpeech and Audio ProcessingFace recognition and analysis

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

NPVForensics: Jointing Non-critical Phonemes and Visemes for Deepfake Detection

Open access

Abstract

Deepfake technologies empowered by deep learning are rapidly evolving, creating new security concerns for society. Existing multimodal detection methods usually capture audio-visual inconsistencies to expose Deepfake videos. More seriously, the advanced Deepfake technology realizes the audio-visual calibration of the critical phoneme-viseme regions, achieving a more realistic tampering effect, which brings new challenges. To address this problem, we propose a novel Deepfake detection method to mine the correlation between Non-critical Phonemes and Visemes, termed NPVForensics. Firstly, we propose the Local Feature Aggregation block with Swin Transformer (LFA-ST) to construct non-critical phoneme-viseme and corresponding facial feature streams effectively. Secondly, we design a loss function for the fine-grained motion of the talking face to measure the evolutionary consistency of non-critical phoneme-viseme. Next, we design a phoneme-viseme awareness module for cross-modal feature fusion and representation alignment, so that the modality gap can be reduced and the intrinsic complementarity of the two modalities can be better explored. Finally, a self-supervised pre-training strategy is leveraged to thoroughly learn the audio-visual correspondences in natural videos. In this manner, our model can be easily adapted to the downstream Deepfake datasets with fine-tuning. Extensive experiments on existing benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed approach outperforms state-of-the-art methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2306.06885

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NPVForensics achieves lower performance than MMMS-BA due to its limited ability to capture temporal dependencies and interactions across multiple sequences.

    “NPVForensics is based on mining the correlation between non-critical phonemes and visemes using a Swin Transformer and cross-modal fusion, but it achieves lower performance over MMMS-BA due to its limited ability to capture temporal dependencies and interactions across multiple sequences.”

    From Contextual Cross-Modal Attention for Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection and Localization (2024) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Method (p. 3) supports the description of NPVForensics as using a Swin Transformer and cross-modal fusion to mine non-critical phoneme–viseme correlations. The Introduction (p. 2) says it captures long-range dependencies, and the paper does not establish a performance comparison with MMMS-BA or attribute one to the stated limitation. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MMMS-BA outperforms NPVForensics, which also utilizes face, audio, and lip movement data.

    “In particular, our MMMS-BA model outperforms NPVForensics [11] which also utilizes face, audio, and lip movement data.”
  • The additional lip modality enriched the information available to the model, ultimately improving its discriminatory power and performance.

    “Thus, the additional lip modality enriched the information available to the model, ultimately improving its discriminatory power and performance, also supported by the NPVForensics model [11] for audio-visual deepfake detection.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. [1][1] X. Ding, N. Zhu, L. Li, Y. Li, and G. Yang, 'Robust localization of interpolated frames by motion-compensated frame interpolation based on an artifact indicated map and tchebichef moments,' IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1893-1906, 2018. -
  2. [2][2] A. O. Kwok and S. G. Koh, 'Deepfake: a social construction of technology perspective,' Current Issues in Tourism , vol. 24, no. 13, pp. 1798-1802, 2021. -
  3. [3][3] A. S. Abdulreda and A. J. Obaid, 'A landscape view of deepfake techniques and detection methods,' International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications , vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 745-755, 2022. -
  4. [4][4] J. Yamagishi, X. Wang, M. Todisco, M. Sahidullah, J. Patino, A. Nautsch, X. Liu, K. A. Lee, T. Kinnunen, N. Evans et al. , 'Asvspoof 2021: accelerating progress in spoofed and deepfake speech detection,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.00537 , 2021. - · arXiv
  5. [5][5] Y. Jia, Y. Zhang, R. Weiss, Q. Wang, J. Shen, F. Ren, P. Nguyen, R. Pang, I. Lopez Moreno, Y. Wu et al. , 'Transfer learning from speaker verification to multispeaker text-to-speech synthesis,' Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 31, 2018. -
  6. [6][6] S. Chen, S. Tan, B. Li, and J. Huang, 'Automatic detection of objectbased forgery in advanced video,' IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 2138-2151, 2015. -
  7. [7][7] C. Feng, Z. Xu, S. Jia, W. Zhang, and Y. Xu, 'Motion-adaptive frame deletion detection for digital video forensics,' IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for video Technology , vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 25432554, 2016. -
  8. [8][8] L. D'Amiano, D. Cozzolino, G. Poggi, and L. Verdoliva, 'A patchmatchbased dense-field algorithm for video copy-move detection and localization,' IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 669-682, 2018. -
  9. [9][9] C. Kong, B. Chen, H. Li, S. Wang, A. Rocha, and S. Kwong, 'Detect and locate: Exposing face manipulation by semantic-and noise-level telltales,' IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , vol. 17, pp. 1741-1756, 2022. -
  10. [10][10] I. Masi, A. Killekar, R. M. Mascarenhas, S. P. Gurudatt, and W. AbdAlmageed, 'Two-branch recurrent network for isolating deepfakes in videos,' in European conference on computer vision . Springer, 2020, pp. 667-684. -
  11. [11][11] S. Xie, H. Hu, and Y. Chen, 'Facial expression recognition with twobranch disentangled generative adversarial network,' IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 23592371, 2020. -
  12. [12][12] Y. Yu, R. Ni, and Y. Zhao, 'Mining generalized features for detecting ai-manipulated fake faces,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.14129 , 2020. - · arXiv
  13. [13][13] J. Hu, X. Liao, W. Wang, and Z. Qin, 'Detecting compressed deepfake videos in social networks using frame-temporality two-stream convolutional network,' IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1089-1102, 2021. -
  14. [14][14] M. Aloraini, M. Sharifzadeh, and D. Schonfeld, 'Sequential and patch analyses for object removal video forgery detection and localization,' IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 917-930, 2020. -
  15. [15][15] A. Haliassos, K. Vougioukas, S. Petridis, and M. Pantic, 'Lips don't lie: A generalisable and robust approach to face forgery detection,' in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2021, pp. 5039-5049. -
  16. [16][16] X. Li, R. Ni, P. Yang, Z. Fu, and Y. Zhao, 'Artifacts-disentangled adversarial learning for deepfake detection,' IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , 2022. -
  17. [17][17] H. Khalid, M. Kim, S. Tariq, and S. S. Woo, 'Evaluation of an audiovideo multimodal deepfake dataset using unimodal and multimodal detectors,' in Proceedings of the 1st workshop on synthetic multimediaaudiovisual deepfake generation and detection , 2021, pp. 7-15. -
  18. [18][18] K. Chugh, P. Gupta, A. Dhall, and R. Subramanian, 'Not made for each other-audio-visual dissonance-based deepfake detection and localization,' in Proceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on multimedia , 2020, pp. 439-447. -
  19. [19][19] S. Agarwal, H. Farid, O. Fried, and M. Agrawala, 'Detecting deepfake videos from phoneme-viseme mismatches,' in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops , 2020, pp. 660-661. -
  20. [20][20] M. Bedi, S. Kumar, M. S. Akhtar, and T. Chakraborty, 'Multi-modal sarcasm detection and humor classification in code-mixed conversations,' IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing , 2021. -
  21. [21][21] H. Cheng, Y. Guo, T. Wang, Q. Li, T. Ye, and L. Nie, 'Voice-face homogeneity tells deepfake,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.02195 , 2022. - · arXiv
  22. [22][22] W. Yang, X. Zhou, Z. Chen, B. Guo, Z. Ba, Z. Xia, X. Cao, and K. Ren, 'Avoid-df: Audio-visual joint learning for detecting deepfake,' IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , 2023. -
  23. [23][23] Y. Zhou and S.-N. Lim, 'Joint audio-visual deepfake detection,' in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , 2021, pp. 14 800-14 809. -
  24. [24][24] S. B. Hegde, K. Prajwal, R. Mukhopadhyay, V. P. Namboodiri, and C. Jawahar, 'Lip-to-speech synthesis for arbitrary speakers in the wild,' in Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia , 2022, pp. 6250-6258. -
  25. [25][25] H. Zhao, W. Zhou, D. Chen, W. Zhang, and N. Yu, 'Self-supervised transformer for deepfake detection,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.01265 , 2022. - · arXiv
  26. [26][26] L. Chen, Z. Wu, J. Ling, R. Li, X. Tan, and S. Zhao, 'Transformer-s2a: Robust and efficient speech-to-animation,' in ICASSP 2022-2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) . IEEE, 2022, pp. 7247-7251. -
  27. [27][27] A. Vajpayee, Z. Zhang, A. Jain, and V. Bhat, 'A simple and efficient method for dubbed audio sync detection using compressive sensing,' in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision , 2023, pp. 565-572. -
  28. [28][28] O. Fried, A. Tewari, M. Zollh¨ ofer, A. Finkelstein, E. Shechtman, D. B. Goldman, K. Genova, Z. Jin, C. Theobalt, and M. Agrawala, 'Text-based editing of talking-head video,' ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1-14, 2019. -
  29. [29][29] Z. Xia, T. Qiao, M. Xu, N. Zheng, and S. Xie, 'Towards deepfake video forensics based on facial textural disparities in multi-color channels,' Information Sciences , vol. 607, pp. 654-669, 2022. -
  30. [30][30] J. Cao, C. Ma, T. Yao, S. Chen, S. Ding, and X. Yang, 'End-toend reconstruction-classification learning for face forgery detection,' in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2022, pp. 4113-4122. -
  31. [31][31] L. Chen, Y. Zhang, Y. Song, L. Liu, and J. Wang, 'Self-supervised learning of adversarial example: Towards good generalizations for deepfake detection,' in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2022, pp. 18 710-18 719. -
  32. [32][32] L. Li, J. Bao, T. Zhang, H. Yang, D. Chen, F. Wen, and B. Guo, 'Face x-ray for more general face forgery detection,' in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2020, pp. 5001-5010. -
  33. [33][33] K. Shiohara and T. Yamasaki, 'Detecting deepfakes with self-blended images,' in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2022, pp. 18 720-18 729. -
  34. [34][34] J. S. Chung and A. Zisserman, 'Lip reading in the wild,' Springer, Cham , 2016. -
  35. [35][35] S. Rubin, F. Berthouzoz, G. J. Mysore, W. Li, and M. Agrawala, 'Content-based tools for editing audio stories,' in Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology , 2013, pp. 113-122. -
  36. [36][36] Z. Liu, J. Ning, Y. Cao, Y. Wei, Z. Zhang, S. Lin, and H. Hu, 'Video swin transformer,' in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2022, pp. 3202-3211. -
  37. [37][37] L. Chai, D. Bau, S.-N. Lim, and P. Isola, 'What makes fake images detectable? understanding properties that generalize,' in European conference on computer vision . Springer, 2020, pp. 103-120. -
  38. [38][38] S.-Y. Wang, O. Wang, R. Zhang, A. Owens, and A. A. Efros, 'Cnngenerated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for now,' in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2020, pp. 8695-8704. -
  39. [39][39] A. Rossler, D. Cozzolino, L. Verdoliva, C. Riess, J. Thies, and M. Nießner, 'Faceforensics++: Learning to detect manipulated facial images,' in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , 2019, pp. 1-11. -
  40. [40][40] J. S. Chung, A. Nagrani, and A. Zisserman, 'Voxceleb2: Deep speaker recognition,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.05622 , 2018. - · arXiv
  41. [41][41] A. Ephrat, I. Mosseri, O. Lang, T. Dekel, K. Wilson, A. Hassidim, W. T. Freeman, and M. Rubinstein, 'Looking to listen at the cocktail party: A speaker-independent audio-visual model for speech separation,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.03619 , 2018. - · arXiv
  42. [42][42] L. Li, J. Bao, H. Yang, D. Chen, and F. Wen, 'Faceshifter: Towards high fidelity and occlusion aware face swapping,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.13457 , 2019. - · arXiv
  43. [43][43] Y. Li, X. Yang, P. Sun, H. Qi, and S. Lyu, 'Celeb-df: A largescale challenging dataset for deepfake forensics,' in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2020, pp. 3207-3216. -
  44. [44][44] L. Jiang, R. Li, W. Wu, C. Qian, and C. C. Loy, 'Deeperforensics-1.0: A large-scale dataset for real-world face forgery detection,' in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2020, pp. 2889-2898. -
  45. [45][45] B. Dolhansky, J. Bitton, B. Pflaum, J. Lu, R. Howes, M. Wang, and C. C. Ferrer, 'The deepfake detection challenge (dfdc) dataset,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.07397 , 2020. - · arXiv
  46. [46][46] H. Khalid, S. Tariq, M. Kim, and S. S. Woo, 'Fakeavceleb: a novel audio-video multimodal deepfake dataset,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.05080 , 2021. - · arXiv
  47. [47][47] S. Suwajanakorn, S. M. Seitz, and I. Kemelmacher-Shlizerman, 'Synthesizing obama: learning lip sync from audio,' ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) , vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1-13, 2017. -
  48. [48][48] T. Mittal, U. Bhattacharya, R. Chandra, A. Bera, and D. Manocha, 'Emotions don't lie: An audio-visual deepfake detection method using affective cues,' in Proceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on multimedia , 2020, pp. 2823-2832. -
  49. [49][49] E. Sabir, J. Cheng, A. Jaiswal, W. AbdAlmageed, I. Masi, and P. Natarajan, 'Recurrent convolutional strategies for face manipulation detection in videos,' Interfaces (GUI) , vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 80-87, 2019.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Y., Yu, Y., Ni, R., Zhao, Y., & Li, H.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4380558574
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
deepfake detection, audio-visual consistency, Swin Transformer, local feature aggregation, cross-modal feature fusion, self-supervised pre-training, audio-visual correspondence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review