The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tune As You Scale: Hyperparameter Optimization For Compute Efficient Training
Open accessAbstract
Hyperparameter tuning of deep learning models can lead to order-of-magnitude performance gains for the same amount of compute. Despite this, systematic tuning is uncommon, particularly for large models, which are expensive to evaluate and tend to have many hyperparameters, necessitating difficult judgment calls about tradeoffs, budgets, and search bounds. To address these issues and propose a practical method for robustly tuning large models, we present Cost-Aware Pareto Region Bayesian Search (CARBS), a Bayesian optimization algorithm that performs local search around the performance-cost Pareto frontier. CARBS does well even in unbounded search spaces with many hyperparameters, learns scaling relationships so that it can tune models even as they are scaled up, and automates much of the "black magic" of tuning. Among our results, we effectively solve the entire ProcGen benchmark just by tuning a simple baseline (PPO, as provided in the original ProcGen paper). We also reproduce the model size vs. training tokens scaling result from the Chinchilla project (Hoffmann et al. 2022), while simultaneously discovering scaling laws for every other hyperparameter, via an easy automated process that uses significantly less compute and is applicable to any deep learning problem (not just language models).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“consistent with neural scaling laws for dense transformers which suggest that training data size should scale roughly with the square root of training compute (Hoffmann et al., 2022; Dey et al., 2023; Fetterman et al., 2023).”
From Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated data (2022) · cites this paper as Fetterman et al., 2023
Citations
Cites
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated data
Villalobos, P., Ho, A., Sevilla, J., Besiroglu, T., Heim, L., & Hobbhahn, M. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.04325 · Cited by 80
“…as the biggest ones on our list. demand for larger training datasets, consistent with neural scaling laws for dense transformers which suggest that training data size should scale roughly with the square root of training compute (Hoffmann et al., 2022; Dey et al., 2023; Fetterman et al., 2023).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Fetterman, A. J., Kitanidis, E., Albrecht, J., Polizzi, Z., Fogelman, B., Knutins, M., Wróblewski, B., Simon, J. B., & Qiu, K.
- ORCID
- Simon, James B.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2306.08055
- OpenAlex
- W4380990044
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Keywords
- hyperparameter optimization, Bayesian optimization, Pareto front, cost-performance trade-off, large language models, model scaling, computational efficiency, Procgen, PPO, scaling laws, hyperparameter search
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tune As You Scale: Hyperparameter Optimization For Compute Efficient Training. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2306.08055
- The paper
- Fetterman, A. J., Kitanidis, E., Albrecht, J., Polizzi, Z., Fogelman, B., Knutins, M., Wróblewski, B., Simon, J. B., & Qiu, K. (2023). Tune As You Scale: Hyperparameter Optimization For Compute Efficient Training. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2306.08055