The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Generative Retrieval as Dense Retrieval
Open accessAbstract
Generative retrieval is a promising new neural retrieval paradigm that aims to optimize the retrieval pipeline by performing both indexing and retrieval with a single transformer model. However, this new paradigm faces challenges with updating the index and scaling to large collections. In this paper, we analyze two prominent variants of generative retrieval and show that they can be conceptually viewed as bi-encoders for dense retrieval. Specifically, we analytically demonstrate that the generative retrieval process can be decomposed into dot products between query and document vectors, similar to dense retrieval. This analysis leads us to propose a new variant of generative retrieval, called Tied-Atomic, which addresses the updating and scaling issues by incorporating techniques from dense retrieval. In experiments on two datasets, NQ320k and the full MSMARCO, we confirm that this approach does not reduce retrieval effectiveness while enabling the model to scale to large collections.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, storing raw document content directly in limited parameter spaces often lead to significant information loss (which is reflected in the suboptimal retrieval performance of GR models [138])”
From Foundations of GenIR (2025) · cites this paper as [138]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
From Matching to Generation: A Survey on Generative Information Retrieval
Li, X., Jin, J., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, P., Zhu, Y., & Dou, Z. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3722552 · Cited by 172
Ai, Q., Zhan, J., & Liu, Y. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.02842
“…raw document content directly in limited parameter spaces often lead to significant information loss (which is reflected in the suboptimal retrieval performance of GR models [138]), and using model parameters as indexes make the whole system uncontrollable by both system developers and users.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Nguyen, T., & Yates, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2306.11397
- OpenAlex
- W4381573673
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Keywords
- generative retrieval, dense retrieval, bi-encoder
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review