Unveiling the Potential of Sentiment: Can Large Language Models Predict Chinese Stock Price Movements?
Open accessAbstract
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has spurred discussions about their potential to enhance quantitative trading strategies. LLMs excel in analyzing sentiments about listed companies from financial news, providing critical insights for trading decisions. However, the performance of LLMs in this task varies substantially due to their inherent characteristics. This paper introduces a standardized experimental procedure for comprehensive evaluations. We detail the methodology using three distinct LLMs, each embodying a unique approach to performance enhancement, applied specifically to the task of sentiment factor extraction from large volumes of Chinese news summaries. Subsequently, we develop quantitative trading strategies using these sentiment factors and conduct back-tests in realistic scenarios. Our results will offer perspectives about the performances of Large Language Models applied to extracting sentiments from Chinese news texts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LLMs specifically fine-tuned with financial-related datasets (FinGPT, OPT, etc.) demonstrated further improvement by aligning LLMs with domain-specific knowledge.
“Additionally, [18, 56] researched the performance of LLMs(FinGPT, OPT, etc.) that specifically fine-tuned with financial related dataset and demonstrated further improvement by aligning LLMs with domain-specific knowledge.”
From Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey (2026) · cites this paper as [56]
In [56], stocks are grouped based on their signal rankings, with the top-ranked group showing the best returns compared to others.
“In [56], stocks are grouped based on their signal rankings, with the top-ranked group showing the best returns compared to others.”
From Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey (2026) · cites this paper as [56]
In [10] and [56], win rate is used to measure proportion of profitable trades out of all executed trades.
“Meanwhile, [10] and [56] use the win rate to measure the proportion of profitable trades out of all executed trades.”
From Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey (2026) · cites this paper as [56]
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chen, W., Liu, W., Zheng, J., & Zhang, X. (2025) · Discover Computing · doi:10.1007/s10791-025-09573-7 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Guo, J., Wang, S., Ni, L. M.-S., & Shum, H. (2024) · Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering · doi:10.1631/fitee.2300720 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationLarge Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey
Ding, H., Li, Y., Wang, J., Chen, H., Guo, D., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 9th International Conference on Computers in Management and Business · doi:10.1145/3802463.3802475 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Cheng, Y., Zeng, Y., & Zou, J. (2024) · The British Accounting Review · doi:10.1016/j.bar.2024.101507 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Abdelsamie, M., & Wang, H. (2024) · International Conference on Data Science and Information Technology (DSIT) · doi:10.1109/dsit61374.2024.10881868 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
GenAI and LLM for Financial Institutions: A Corporate Strategic SurveyPreprint
Xu, J. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4988118 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Framework
Xiao, Y., Sun, E., Luo, D., & Wang, W. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.20138 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Xu, T., Piao, Z. H., Mukai, T., Murayama, Y., & Izumi, K. (2025) · Intelligent Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.iswa.2025.200496 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Varghese, R. R., & Mohan, B. R. (2023) · Annual International Conference on Emerging Research Areas and International Conference on Microelectronics, Communications and Renewable Energy · doi:10.1109/aicera/icis59538.2023.10420348 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Comparing ChatGPT And LSTM In Predicting Changes In Quarterly Financial Metrics
Chaiko, V. (2024) · Business & Management Compass · doi:10.56065/crmc1136 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Zhang, H., Kong, H., & Wang, S. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-4158-4_13
Self-citation
- Authors
- Zhang, H., Hua, F., Xu, C., Kong, H., Zuo, R., & Guo, J.
- Affiliations
- The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- arXiv
- 2306.14222
- OpenAlex
- W4382322511
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- large language models, sentiment analysis, stock price prediction, quantitative trading strategies, news summaries, backtesting, LLM evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
