Towards human-like RL: Taming non-naturalistic behavior in deep RL via adaptive behavioral costs in 3D games
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we propose a new approach called Adaptive Behavioral Costs in Reinforcement Learning (ABC-RL) for training a human-like agent with competitive strength. While deep reinforcement learning agents have recently achieved superhuman performance in various video games, some of these unconstrained agents may exhibit actions, such as shaking and spinning, that are not typically observed in human behavior, resulting in peculiar gameplay experiences. To behave like humans and retain similar performance, ABC-RL augments behavioral limitations as cost signals in reinforcement learning with dynamically adjusted weights. Unlike traditional constrained policy optimization, we propose a new formulation that minimizes the behavioral costs subject to a constraint of the value function. By leveraging the augmented Lagrangian, our approach is an approximation of the Lagrangian adjustment, which handles the trade-off between the performance and the human-like behavior. Through experiments conducted on 3D games in DMLab-30 and Unity ML-Agents Toolkit, we demonstrate that ABC-RL achieves the same performance level while significantly reducing instances of shaking and spinning. These findings underscore the effectiveness of our proposed approach in promoting more natural and human-like behavior during gameplay.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RL approaches that aim to enhance human-likeness lack specific methods for directing the learned policy to demonstrate a particular play style.
“Nonetheless, they lack specific methods for directing the learned policy to demonstrate a particular play style.”
From UBCL: A Reinforcement Learning Framework for Controllable and Diverse Player Behaviors (2026) · cites this paper as [35]
The Introduction describes methods for making agents more human-like, and §2.1 says unconstrained RL does not guarantee human-like behavior. Neither passage says that human-likeness approaches lack methods for directing a learned policy toward a particular play style. Searches for play-style control and steering a policy did not find that claim in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.68)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Felisa Vázquez Abad and Vikram Krishnamurthy. Self learning control of constrained markov de- cision processes -a gradient approach. In IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 2003.
- Joshua Achiam, David Held, Aviv Tamar, and Pieter Abbeel. Constrained policy optimization. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2017.
- Adrià Puigdomènech Badia, Bilal Piot, Steven Kapturowski, Pablo Sprechmann, Alex Vitvitskyi, Zhaohan Daniel Guo, and Charles Blundell. Agent57: Outperforming the atari human benchmark. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2020. *. https://github.com/deepmind/lab/tree/master/game scripts/levels/contributed/dmlab30#watermaze
- Charles Beattie, Joel Z. Leibo, Denis Teplyashin, Tom Ward, Marcus Wainwright, Heinrich Küttler, Andrew Lefrancq, Simon Green, Víctor Valdés, Amir Sadik, Julian Schrittwieser, Keith Anderson, Sarah York, Max Cant, Adam Cain, Adrian Bolton, Stephen Gaffney, Helen King, Demis Hassabis, Shane Legg, and Stig Petersen. Deepmind lab. CoRR, abs/1612.03801, 2016. · arXiv
- Christopher Berner, Greg Brockman, Brooke Chan, Vicki Cheung, Przemyslaw Debiak, Christy Den- nison, David Farhi, Quirin Fischer, Shariq Hashme, Christopher Hesse, Rafal Józefowicz, Scott Gray, Catherine Olsson, Jakub Pachocki, Michael Petrov, Henrique Pondé de Oliveira Pinto, Jonathan Raiman, Tim Salimans, Jeremy Schlatter, Jonas Schneider, Szymon Sidor, Ilya Sutskever, Jie Tang, Filip Wolski, and Susan Zhang. Dota 2 with large scale deep reinforce- ment learning. CoRR, abs/1912.06680, 2019. · arXiv
- Vivek S. Borkar. An actor-critic algorithm for constrained markov decision processes. Systems and Control Letters, 2005.
- Yinlam Chow, Mohammad Ghavamzadeh, Lucas Janson, and Marco Pavone. Risk-constrained rein- forcement learning with percentile risk criteria. Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR), 2017.
- Sam Devlin, Raluca Georgescu, Ida Momennejad, Jaroslaw Rzepecki, Evelyn Zuniga, Gavin Costello, Guy Leroy, Ali Shaw, and Katja Hofmann. Navigation turing test (NTT): learning to evaluate human-like navigation. In Marina Meila and Tong Zhang, editors, International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2021.
- Ran Emuna, Avinoam Borowsky, and Armin Biess. Deep reinforcement learning for human-like driving policies in collision avoidance tasks of self-driving cars. CoRR, abs/2006.04218, 2020. · arXiv
- Javier García and Fernando Fernández. A comprehensive survey on safe reinforcement learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR), 2015.
- Divyansh Garg, Joey Hejna, Matthieu Geist, and Stefano Ermon. Extreme q-learning: Maxent RL without entropy. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023.
- Jonathan Ho and Stefano Ermon. Generative adversarial imitation learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2016.
- Dan Horgan, John Quan, David Budden, Gabriel Barth-Maron, Matteo Hessel, Hado van Hasselt, and David Silver. Distributed prioritized experience replay. In International Conference on Learning Representations, (ICLR), 2018.
- Athul Paul Jacob, David J. Wu, Gabriele Farina, Adam Lerer, Hengyuan Hu, Anton Bakhtin, Jacob Andreas, and Noam Brown. Modeling strong and human-like gameplay with kl-regularized search. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2022.
- Arthur Juliani, Vincent-Pierre Berges, Esh Vckay, Yuan Gao, Hunter Henry, Marwan Mattar, and Danny Lange. Unity: A general platform for intelligent agents. CoRR, abs/1809.02627, 2018. · arXiv
- Steven Kapturowski, Georg Ostrovski, John Quan, Rémi Munos, and Will Dabney. Recurrent experience replay in distributed reinforcement learning. In International Conference on Learning Representations, (ICLR), 2019.
- Aviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, and Sergey Levine. Conservative q-learning for of- fline reinforcement learning. In Hugo Larochelle, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, Raia Hadsell, Maria- Florina Balcan, and Hsuan-Tien Lin, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2020.
- Yongshuai Liu, Jiaxin Ding, and Xin Liu. IPO: interior-point policy optimization under constraints. CoRR, abs/1910.09615, 2019. · arXiv
- Stephanie Milani, Arthur Juliani, Ida Momennejad, Raluca Georgescu, Jaroslaw Rzepecki, Alison Shaw, Gavin Costello, Fei Fang, Sam Devlin, and Katja Hofmann. Navigates like me: Under- standing how people evaluate human-like AI in video games. In International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 2023.
- Volodymyr Mnih, Adrià Puigdomènech Badia, Mehdi Mirza, Alex Graves, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Tim Harley, David Silver, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2016.
- Ida Momennejad. A rubric for human-like agents and neuroai. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 2023.
- Ariel Rosenfeld, Moshe Cohen, Matthew E. Taylor, and Sarit Kraus. Leveraging human knowledge in tabular reinforcement learning: a study of human subjects. The knowledge engineering review, 2018.
- John Schulman, Filip Wolski, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alec Radford, and Oleg Klimov. Proximal policy optimization algorithms. CoRR, abs/1707.06347, 2017. · arXiv
- Richard S Sutton and Andrew G Barto. Reinforcement learning: An introduction. MIT press, second edition, 2018.
- Chen Tessler, Daniel J. Mankowitz, and Shie Mannor. Reward constrained policy optimization. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2019.
- Hado van Hasselt, Arthur Guez, and David Silver. Deep reinforcement learning with double q- learning. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 2016.
- Ziyu Wang, Tom Schaul, Matteo Hessel, Hado van Hasselt, Marc Lanctot, and Nando de Freitas. Dueling network architectures for deep reinforcement learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning, (ICML), 2016.
- Tsung-Yen Yang, Justinian Rosca, Karthik Narasimhan, and Peter J. Ramadge. Projection- based constrained policy optimization. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2020.
- Meixin Zhu, Xuesong Wang, and Yinhai Wang. Human-like autonomous car-following model with deep reinforcement learning. CoRR, abs/1901.00569, 2019. · arXiv
- Evelyn Zuniga, Stephanie Milani, Guy Leroy, Jaroslaw Rzepecki, Raluca Georgescu, Ida Momen- nejad, David Bignell, Mingfei Sun, Alison Shaw, Gavin Costello, Mikhail Jacob, Sam Devlin, and Katja Hofmann. How humans perceive human-like behavior in video game navigation. In International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) Extended Abstracts, 2022.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
UBCL: A Reinforcement Learning Framework for Controllable and Diverse Player Behaviors
Cilan, A., & Ozgovde, A. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Games · doi:10.1109/tg.2026.3703355
UBCL: A Reinforcement Learning Framework for Controllable and Diverse Player Behaviors
Cilan, A., & Özgövde, A. (2025) · arXiv
- Authors
- Ho, K.-H., Hsieh, P.-C., Lin, C.-C., Luo, Y.-R., Wang, F.-J., & Wu, I.-C.
- Affiliations
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2309.15484
- OpenAlex
- W4387158278
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
- Keywords
- human-like behavior, deep reinforcement learning, 3D games, augmented Lagrangian method, constrained policy optimization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review