Computational Pathology at Health System Scale -- Self-Supervised Foundation Models from Three Billion Images
Open accessAbstract
Recent breakthroughs in self-supervised learning have enabled the use of large unlabeled datasets to train visual foundation models that can generalize to a variety of downstream tasks. While this training paradigm is well suited for the medical domain where annotations are scarce, large-scale pre-training in the medical domain, and in particular pathology, has not been extensively studied. Previous work in self-supervised learning in pathology has leveraged smaller datasets for both pre-training and evaluating downstream performance. The aim of this project is to train the largest academic foundation model and benchmark the most prominent self-supervised learning algorithms by pre-training and evaluating downstream performance on large clinical pathology datasets. We collected the largest pathology dataset to date, consisting of over 3 billion images from over 423 thousand microscopy slides. We compared pre-training of visual transformer models using the masked autoencoder (MAE) and DINO algorithms. We evaluated performance on six clinically relevant tasks from three anatomic sites and two institutions: breast cancer detection, inflammatory bowel disease detection, breast cancer estrogen receptor prediction, lung adenocarcinoma EGFR mutation prediction, and lung cancer immunotherapy response prediction. Our results demonstrate that pre-training on pathology data is beneficial for downstream performance compared to pre-training on natural images. Additionally, the DINO algorithm achieved better generalization performance across all tasks tested. The presented results signify a phase change in computational pathology research, paving the way into a new era of more performant models based on large-scale, parallel pre-training at the billion-image scale.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Virchow is the largest foundation model for computational pathology to date.
“we present Virchow, the largest foundation model for computational pathology to date.”
From A foundation model for clinical-grade computational pathology and rare cancers detection (2024) · cites this paper as [42]
Recent pioneering works have utilized datasets ranging from 30,000 to 400,000 WSIs to train foundation models ranging in size from 28 million to 307 million parameters.
“Despite the challenges in collecting large-scale datasets in the pathology domain, recent pioneering works have utilized datasets ranging from 30,000 to 400,000 WSIs to train foundation models ranging in size from 28 million to 307 million parameters35–42”
From A foundation model for clinical-grade computational pathology and rare cancers detection (2024) · cites this paper as [42]
These works demonstrate that image features produced with self-supervised learning of pathology images outperform image features trained on natural images and that performance improves with scale.
“These works demonstrate that image features produced with self-supervised learning of pathology images outperform image features trained on natural images and that performance improves with scale.”
From A foundation model for clinical-grade computational pathology and rare cancers detection (2024) · cites this paper as [42]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Dosovitskiy, A. et al. An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recogni�on at Scale. (2020) doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2010.11929. · DOI · Paper page
- Yang, X. et al. A large language model for electronic health records. Npj Digit. Med. 5, 194 (2022).
- Ghesu, F. C. et al. Self-supervised Learning from 100 Million Medical Images. (2022) doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2201.01283. · DOI
- Mei, X. et al. RadImageNet: An Open Radiologic Deep Learning Research Dataset for Effec�ve Transfer Learning. Radiol. Artif. Intell. 4, e210315 (2022).
- Wang, X. et al. Transformer-based unsupervised contras�ve learning for histopathological image classifica�on. Med. Image Anal. 81, 102559 (2022).
- Chen, X., Xie, S. & He, K. An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformers. (2021) doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2104.02057. · DOI
- Liu, Z. et al. Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shi�ed Windows. (2021) doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2103.14030. · DOI · Paper page
- Kang, M., Song, H., Park, S., Yoo, D. & Pereira, S. Benchmarking Self-Supervised Learning on Diverse Pathology Datasets. (2022) doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2212.04690. · DOI
- Chen, X., Fan, H., Girshick, R. & He, K. Improved Baselines with Momentum Contras�ve Learning. (2020) doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2003.04297. · DOI
- Caron, M. et al. Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contras�ng Cluster Assignments. (2020) doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2006.09882. · DOI · Paper page
- Zbontar, J., Jing, L., Misra, I., LeCun, Y. & Deny, S. Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reduc�on. (2021) doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2103.03230. · DOI
- Caron, M. et al. Emerging Proper�es in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers. (2021) doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2104.14294. · DOI · Paper page
- Filiot, A. et al. Scaling Self-Supervised Learning for Histopathology with Masked Image Modeling. htp://medrxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2023.07.21.23292757 (2023) doi:10.1101/2023.07.21.23292757. · DOI · Paper page
- Zhou, J. et al. iBOT: Image BERT Pre-Training with Online Tokenizer. (2021) doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2111.07832. · DOI
- Lu, M. Y. et al. Towards a Visual-Language Founda�on Model for Computa�onal Pathology. (2023) doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2307.12914. · DOI
- Yu, J. et al. CoCa: Contras�ve Cap�oners are Image-Text Founda�on Models. (2022) doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2205.01917. · DOI
- Tu, T. et al. Towards Generalist Biomedical AI. Preprint at htp://arxiv.org/abs/2307.14334 (2023).
- He, X., Zhang, Y., Mou, L., Xing, E. & Xie, P. PathVQA: 30000+ Ques�ons for Medical Visual Ques�on Answering. (2020) doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2003.10286. · DOI · Paper page
- Driess, D. et al. PaLM-E: An Embodied Mul�modal Language Model. (2023) doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2303.03378. · DOI · Paper page
- Chen, R. J. et al. A General-Purpose Self-Supervised Model for Computa�onal Pathology. (2023) doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2308.15474. · DOI
- Oquab, M. et al. DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision. (2023) doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2304.07193. · DOI · Paper page
- Vorontsov, E. et al. Virchow: A Million-Slide Digital Pathology Founda�on Model. (2023) doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2309.07778. · DOI
- He, K. et al. Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learners. Preprint at htp://arxiv.org/abs/2111.06377 (2021).
- Tian, Y., Henaff, O. J. & Oord, A. van den. Divide and Contrast: Self-supervised Learning from Uncurated Data. (2021) doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2105.08054. · DOI
- Li, S. et al. PyTorch Distributed: Experiences on Accelera�ng Data Parallel Training. (2020) doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2006.15704. · DOI
- Campanella, G. et al. H&E-based Computa�onal Biomarker Enables Universal EGFR Screening for Lung Adenocarcinoma. ArXiv Prepr. ArXiv220610573 (2022).
- Ilse, M., Tomczak, J. M. & Welling, M. Aten�on-based Deep Mul�ple Instance Learning. (2018) doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1802.04712. · DOI
- Loshchilov, I. & Huter, F. Decoupled Weight Decay Regulariza�on. (2017) doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1711.05101. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Towards a general-purpose foundation model for computational pathology
Chen, R. J., Ding, T., Lu, M. Y., Williamson, D. F. K., Jaume, G., Song, A. H., Chen, B., Zhang, A., Shao, D., Shaban, M., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-02857-3 · Cited by 1,560 · see citing works
A foundation model for clinical-grade computational pathology and rare cancers detection
Vorontsov, E., Bozkurt, A., Casson, A., Shaikovski, G., Zelechowski, M., Severson, K., Zimmermann, E., Hall, J., Tenenholtz, N., Fusi, N., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03141-0 · Cited by 572 · see citing works
Self-citationA clinical benchmark of public self-supervised pathology foundation models
Campanella, G., Chen, S., Singh, M., Verma, R., Muehlstedt, S., Zeng, J., Stock, A., Croken, M., Veremis, B., Elmas, A., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58796-1 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Campanella, G., Kwan, R., Fluder, E., Zeng, J., Stock, A., Veremis, B., Polydorides, A. D., Hedvat, C., Schoenfeld, A., Vanderbilt, C., Kovatch, P., Cordon-Cardo, C., & Fuchs, T. J.
- Affiliations
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2310.07033
- OpenAlex
- W4387595925
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 8 · 2024: 7
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance (UL1TR004419)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- computational pathology, self-supervised learning, vision foundation models, pre-training, masked autoencoder, DINO, vision transformer, breast cancer detection, EGFR mutation prediction, lung adenocarcinoma
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review