CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 24Numerical Methods and AlgorithmsAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsLow-power high-performance VLSI design

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microscaling Data Formats for Deep Learning

Open access
Rouhani, Bita Darvish, Zhao, Ritchie, More, Ankit, Hall, Mathew, Khodamoradi, Alireza, Deng, Summer, Choudhary, Dhruv, Cornea, Marius, Dellinger, Eric, Denolf, Kristof, Dusan, Stosic, Elango, Venmugil, Golub, Maximilian, Heinecke, Alexander, James-Roxby, Phil, Jani, Dharmesh, Kolhe, Gaurav, Langhammer, Martin, Li, Ada, Melnick, Levi, Mesmakhosroshahi, Maral, Rodriguez, Andres, Schulte, Michael, Shafipour, Rasoul, Shao, Lei, Siu, Michael, Dubey, Pradeep, Micikevicius, Paulius, Naumov, Maxim, Verrilli, Colin, Wittig, Ralph, Burger, Doug, Chung, Eric·2023·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2310.10537arXiv 2310.10537
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Narrow bit-width data formats are key to reducing the computational and storage costs of modern deep learning applications. This paper evaluates Microscaling (MX) data formats that combine a per-block scaling factor with narrow floating-point and integer types for individual elements. MX formats balance the competing needs of hardware efficiency, model accuracy, and user friction. Empirical results on over two dozen benchmarks demonstrate practicality of MX data formats as a drop-in replacement for baseline FP32 for AI inference and training with low user friction. We also show the first instance of training generative language models at sub-8-bit weights, activations, and gradients with minimal accuracy loss and no modifications to the training recipe.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2310.10537

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MXFP4, as used in GPT-OSS, adopts a microscaling-based representation.

    “For example, MXFP4, as used in GPT-OSS [100], adopts a microscaling-based representation [175].”

    From A Survey of Large Language Models (2026) · cites this paper as [175]

  • Minimizing the conventional KL-divergence surrogate does not guarantee maximizing the acceptance rate for a capacity-limited draft model.

    “Since minimizing the conventional KL-divergence surrogate does not guarantee maximizing this rate for a capacity-limited draft model, we directly optimize the likelihood-based LK loss [104]”

    From Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence (2026) · cites this paper as [104]

    The Introduction describes microscaling data formats, and §4.4 reports generative-inference results for those formats. Searches for KL-divergence, draft-model acceptance rates, and likelihood-based loss found no passage addressing the claimed relationship. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Mario Drumond, Tao Lin, Martin Jaggi, and Babak Falsafi. Training DNNs with Hybrid Block Floating Point. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 31, 2018.
  2. Bita Darvish Rouhani, Daniel Lo, Ritchie Zhao, Ming Liu, Jeremy Fowers, Kalin Ovtcharov, Anna Vinogradsky, Sarah Massengill, Lita Yang, Ray Bittner, Alessandro Forin, Haishan Zhu, Taesik Na, Prerak Patel, Shuai Che, Lok Chand Koppaka, XIA SONG, Subhojit Som, Kaustav Das, Saurabh T, Steve Reinhardt, Sitaram Lanka, Eric Chung, and Doug Burger. Pushing the Limits of Narrow Precision Inferencing at Cloud Scale with Microsoft Floating Point. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 33:10271-10281, 2020.
  3. Bita Darvish Rouhani, Ritchie Zhao, Venmugil Elango, Rasoul Shafipour, Mathew Hall, Maral Mes- makhosroshahi, Ankit More, Levi Melnick, Maximilian Golub, Girish Varatkar, Lei Shao, Gaurav Kolhe, Dimitry Melts, Jasmine Klar, Renee L'Heureux, Matt Perry, Doug Burger, and Eric Chung. With Shared Microexponents, A Little Shifting Goes a Long Way. Int'l Symp. on Computer Architecture (ISCA), pages 1-13, 2023.
  4. Jinjie Zhang, Yixuan Zhou, and Rayan Saab. Post-training quantization for neural networks with provable guarantees. arXiv:2201.11113, 2022. · arXiv
  5. Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Chris Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 33:1877-1901, 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Rouhani, B. D., Zhao, R., More, A., Hall, M., Khodamoradi, A., Deng, S., Choudhary, D., Cornea, M., Dellinger, E., Denolf, K., Dusan, S., Elango, V., Golub, M., Heinecke, A., James-Roxby, P., Jani, D., Kolhe, G., Langhammer, M., Li, A., Melnick, L., Mesmakhosroshahi, M., Rodriguez, A., Schulte, M., Shafipour, R., Shao, L., Siu, M., Dubey, P., Micikevicius, P., Naumov, M., Verrilli, C., Wittig, R., Burger, D., & Chung, E.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2310.10537
arXiv
2310.10537
OpenAlex
W4387725429
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 11 · 2024: 8
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Numerical Methods and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
Keywords
deep learning training, AI inference, model accuracy, hardware efficiency, storage cost reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review