Evaluating Spatial Understanding of Large Language Models
Open accessAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) show remarkable capabilities across a variety of tasks. Despite the models only seeing text in training, several recent studies suggest that LLM representations implicitly capture aspects of the underlying grounded concepts. Here, we explore LLM representations of a particularly salient kind of grounded knowledge -- spatial relationships. We design natural-language navigation tasks and evaluate the ability of LLMs, in particular GPT-3.5-turbo, GPT-4, and Llama2 series models, to represent and reason about spatial structures. These tasks reveal substantial variability in LLM performance across different spatial structures, including square, hexagonal, and triangular grids, rings, and trees. In extensive error analysis, we find that LLMs' mistakes reflect both spatial and non-spatial factors. These findings suggest that LLMs appear to capture certain aspects of spatial structure implicitly, but room for improvement remains.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LLMs and VLMs still struggle to perform well in complex, dynamic environments.
“however, they still struggle to perform well in complex, dynamic environments”
From BALROG: Benchmarking Agentic LLM and VLM Reasoning On Games (2024) · cites this paper as Yamada et al., 2023
Section 7 (Conclusion; page not available) says LLM performance on spatial tasks is far from perfect and varies by task and structure. Section 6 (Related Work; page not available) describes this study as controlled experiments using synthetic grid data. The paper supports difficulty with some spatial tasks, but does not establish that VLMs struggle or that either model type struggles in complex, dynamic environments. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMost studies of spatial reasoning in large neural models do not directly examine internal representations.
“By comparison, most studies of spatial reasoning in large neural models do not directly examine internal representations, leaving the basis of their spatial behavior largely opaque”
From From Human Cognition to Neural Activations: Probing the Computational Primitives of Spatial Reasoning in LLMs (2026) · cites this paper as Yamada et al., 2023
The Related Work section describes several spatial-reasoning studies in terms of navigation tasks and model answers, which supports the point that these studies evaluate behavior. It does not establish that *most* studies avoid directly examining internal representations or say that the basis of spatial behavior is largely opaque. The Introduction also notes studies of language models’ internal representations. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- BIG-bench collaboration. Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models. Transactions on Machine Learning Research, May 2023. ISSN 2835-8856.
- Roma Patel and Ellie Pavlick. Mapping Language Models to Grounded Conceptual Spaces. In International Conference on Learning Representations, January 2022.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scaffolding Language Learning via Multi-modal Tutoring Systems with Pedagogical Instructions
Liu, Z., Yin, S. X., Lee, C., & Chen, N. F. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) · doi:10.1109/cai59869.2024.00223 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Evaluating large language models on geospatial tasks: a multiple geospatial task benchmarking study
Xu, L.-C., Zhao, S., Lin, Q.-M., Chen, L., Luo, Q.-Q., Wu, S.-S., Ye, X., Feng, H.-L., & Du, Z.-H. (2025) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2025.2480268 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Li, Z., Zhang, H., Peng, C., & Peiris, R. (2025) · 2025 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) · doi:10.1109/vr59515.2025.00025 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Yin, H., Lin, Z., Liu, X., Sun, B., & Li, K. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10888462 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
BALROG: Benchmarking Agentic LLM and VLM Reasoning On Games
Paglieri, D., Cupiał, B., Coward, S., Piterbarg, U., Wolczyk, M., Khan, A., Pignatelli, E., Kuciński, Ł., Pinto, L., Fergus, R., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.13543 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“For example, LLMs fail to act robustly in dynamic environments, and they cannot reliably learn from mistakes, reason about space and time, or plan over long time horizons (Xing et al., 2024; Yamada et al., 2023; Kambhampati et al., 2024).”
Ghidary, S. S., Chen, D., Mohammadi, F., Petrilli-Barceló, A. E., Luces, J. V. S., & Hirata, Y. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO) · doi:10.1109/robio64047.2024.10907326 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Generating simulated data with a large language model
Kerley, J., Anderson, D. T., Buck, A. R., & Alvey, B. J. (2024) · Synthetic Data for Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: Tools, Techniques, and Applications · doi:10.1117/12.3013460 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Enhancing spatially-disaggregated simulations with large language models
Zaslavsky, I., Lei, J., Graham, R., Handcock, M. S., & Aronoff-Spencer, E. S. (2024) · International Conference on Mathematics and Statistics (ICoMS) · doi:10.1145/3686592.3686595 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
An, J., Yang, L., Wang, M., Lu, L., An, W., & Yang, E. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.26323
From Text to Space: Mapping Abstract Spatial Models in LLMs during a Grid-World Navigation Task
Martorell, N. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.16690
Large Language Models for Social ProductivityPreprint
Li, E. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5365332
- Authors
- Yamada, Y., Bao, Y., Lampinen, A. K., Kasai, J., & Yildirim, I.
- Affiliations
- Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2310.14540
- OpenAlex
- W4387929233
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Keywords
- large language models, spatial reasoning, spatial relations, implicit representation, hexagonal grid, tree structure, error analysis, GPT-4, Llama 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
