The DOI matches its DataCite record; 27 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SAM-Med3D: Towards General-purpose Segmentation Models for Volumetric Medical Images
Open accessAbstract
Existing volumetric medical image segmentation models are typically task-specific, excelling at specific target but struggling to generalize across anatomical structures or modalities. This limitation restricts their broader clinical use. In this paper, we introduce SAM-Med3D for general-purpose segmentation on volumetric medical images. Given only a few 3D prompt points, SAM-Med3D can accurately segment diverse anatomical structures and lesions across various modalities. To achieve this, we gather and process a large-scale 3D medical image dataset, SA-Med3D-140K, from a blend of public sources and licensed private datasets. This dataset includes 22K 3D images and 143K corresponding 3D masks. Then SAM-Med3D, a promptable segmentation model characterized by the fully learnable 3D structure, is trained on this dataset using a two-stage procedure and exhibits impressive performance on both seen and unseen segmentation targets. We comprehensively evaluate SAM-Med3D on 16 datasets covering diverse medical scenarios, including different anatomical structures, modalities, targets, and zero-shot transferability to new/unseen tasks. The evaluation shows the efficiency and efficacy of SAM-Med3D, as well as its promising application to diverse downstream tasks as a pre-trained model. Our approach demonstrates that substantial medical resources can be utilized to develop a general-purpose medical AI for various potential applications. Our dataset, code, and models are available at https://github.com/uni-medical/SAM-Med3D.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Most promptable medical segmentation methods, however, are still developed and evaluated around clean-prompt protocols.”
From Correction-aware interactive 3D tumor segmentation with sparse and revisable prompts (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“3DSAM-Adapter [5] and SAM-Med3D [29] adapt SAM-style prompting to 3D medical images, while ProMISe [17] is a prompt-driven 3D medical segmenta-tion method based on pretrained image foundation models.”
From Correction-aware interactive 3D tumor segmentation with sparse and revisable prompts (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision
Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.00020 · Cited by 15,293
nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation
Isensee, F., Jaeger, P. F., Kohl, S. A. A., Petersen, J., & Maier-Hein, K. H. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z · Cited by 10,477
UNETR: Transformers for 3D Medical Image Segmentation
Hatamizadeh, A., Tang, Y., Nath, V., Yang, D., Myronenko, A., Landman, B., Roth, H. R., & Xu, D. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv51458.2022.00181 · Cited by 3,586
Segment anything in medical images
Ma, J., He, Y., Li, F., Han, L., You, C., & Wang, B. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-44824-z · Cited by 2,913
H-DenseUNet: Hybrid Densely Connected UNet for Liver and Tumor Segmentation From CT Volumes
Li, X., Chen, H., Qi, X., Dou, Q., Fu, C., & Heng, P. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2845918 · Cited by 2,530
Zero-shot text-to-image generation
Ramesh, A., Pavlov, M., Goh, G., Gray, S., Voss, C., Radford, A., Chen, M., & Sutskever, I. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.12092 · Cited by 2,417
TotalSegmentator: Robust Segmentation of 104 Anatomic Structures in CT Images
Wasserthal, J., Breit, H.-C., Meyer, M. T., Pradella, M., Hinck, D., Sauter, A. W., Heye, T., Boll, D. T., Cyriac, J., Yang, S., et al. (2023) · Radiology: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1148/ryai.230024 · Cited by 1,657
Segment anything model for medical image analysis: An experimental study
Mazurowski, M. A., Dong, H., Gu, H., Yang, J., Konz, N., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2023.102918 · Cited by 802
Segment anything model for medical images?
Huang, Y., Yang, X., Liu, L., Zhou, H., Chang, A., Zhou, X., Chen, R., Yu, J., Chen, J., Chen, C., et al. (2024) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2023.103061 · Cited by 536
Self-citationSegment Everything Everywhere All at Once
Zou, X., Yang, J., Zhang, H., Li, F., Li, L., Wang, J., Yang, J., Gao, J., & Lee, Y. J. (2023) · neural information processing systems · doi:10.52202/075280-0868 · Cited by 528
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Baid, U., Ghodasara, S., Bilello, M., Mohan, S., Calabrese, E., Colak, E., Farahani, K., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Kitamura, F.C., Pati, S., Prevedello, L.M., Rudie, J.D., Sako, C., Shinohara, R.T., Bergquist, T., Chai, R., Eddy, J.A., Elliott, J., Reade, W., Schaffter, T., Yu, T., Zheng, J., Annotators, B., Davatzikos, C., Mongan, J., Hess, C., Cha, S., Villanueva-Meyer, J.E., Freymann, J.B., Kirby, J.S., Wiestler, B., Crivellaro, P., Colen, R.R., Kotrotsou, A., Marcus, D.S., Milchenko, M., Naz- eri, A., Fathallah-Shaykh, H.M., Wiest, R., Jakab, A., Weber, M., Mahajan, A., Menze, B.H., Flanders, A.E., Bakas, S.: The RSNA-ASNR-MICCAI brats 2021 benchmark on brain tumor segmentation and radiogenomic classification. CoRR abs/2107.02314 (2021), https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.02314 · arXiv
- Cheng, J., Ye, J., Deng, Z., Chen, J., Li, T., Wang, H., Su, Y., Huang, Z., Chen, J., Jiang, L., et al.: Sam-med2d. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.16184 (2023) · arXiv
- Du, Y., Bai, F., Huang, T., Zhao, B.: Segvol: Universal and interactive volumetric medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.13385 (2023) · arXiv
- Huang, Z., Wang, H., Deng, Z., Ye, J., Su, Y., Sun, H., He, J., Gu, Y., Gu, L., Zhang, S., et al.: Stu-net: Scalable and transferable medical image segmen- tation models empowered by large-scale supervised pre-training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.06716 (2023) · arXiv
- Ji, Y., Bai, H., Yang, J., Ge, C., Zhu, Y., Zhang, R., Li, Z., Zhang, L., Ma, W., Wan, X., et al.: Amos: A large-scale abdominal multi-organ benchmark for versatile medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.08023 (2022) · arXiv
- Kirillov, A., Mintun, E., Ravi, N., Mao, H., Rolland, C., Gustafson, L., Xiao, T., Whitehead, S., Berg, A.C., Lo, W.Y., et al.: Segment anything. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.02643 (2023) · arXiv
- Landman, B., Xu, Z., Igelsias, J., Styner, M., Langerak, T., Klein, A.: Miccai multi- atlas labeling beyond the cranial vault-workshop and challenge. In: Proc. MICCAI Multi-Atlas Labeling Beyond Cranial Vault-Workshop Challenge. vol. 5, p. 12 (2015)
- Lei, W., Wei, X., Zhang, X., Li, K., Zhang, S.: Medlsam: Localize and segment anything model for 3d medical images. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.14752 (2023) · arXiv
- Wang, C., Li, D., Wang, S., Zhang, C., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Yang, G.: Sammed: A medical image annotation framework based on large vision model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.05617 (2023) · arXiv
- Wu, J., Fu, R., Fang, H., Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Xu, Y., Jin, Y., Arbel, T.: Medical sam adapter: Adapting segment anything model for medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.12620 (2023) · arXiv
- Yang, T., Zhu, Y., Xie, Y., Zhang, A., Chen, C., Li, M.: Aim: Adapting image mod- els for efficient video action recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.03024 (2023) · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Addressing fairness issues in deep learning-based medical image analysis: a systematic review
Xu, Z., Li, J., Yao, Q., Li, H., Zhao, M., & Zhou, S. K. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01276-5 · Cited by 101
Large-vocabulary segmentation for medical images with text prompts
Zhao, Z., Zhang, Y., Wu, C., Zhang, X., Zhou, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Xie, W. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01964-w · Cited by 123
Large models in medical imaging: Advances and prospects
Fang, M., Wang, Z., Pan, S., Feng, X., Zhao, Y., Hou, D., Wu, L., Xie, X., Zhang, X.-Y., Tian, J., et al. (2025) · Chinese Medical Journal · doi:10.1097/cm9.0000000000003699 · Cited by 43
Jiang, Z., Cheng, D., Qin, Z., Gao, J. Y., Lao, Q., Ismoilovich, A. B., Gayrat, U., Yuldashov, E., Habibullo, B., Tang, D., et al. (2024) · Big Data Mining and Analytics · doi:10.26599/bdma.2024.9020058 · Cited by 33
Multi-modal large language models in radiology: principles, applications, and potential
Shen, Y., Xu, Y., Ma, J., Rui, W., Zhao, C., Heacock, L. C., & Huang, C. (2024) · Abdominal Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00261-024-04708-8 · Cited by 34
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, H., Guo, S., Ye, J., Deng, Z., Cheng, J., Li, T., Chen, J., Su, Y., Huang, Z., Shen, Y., Fu, B., Zhang, S., He, J., & Qiao, Y.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- He, Junjun
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 51-67
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2310.15161
- OpenAlex
- W4410838785
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 82.55
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- 3D medical image segmentation, Segment Anything Model, cross-modal generalization, zero-shot transfer, pre-trained segmentation models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
