I2VGen-XL: High-Quality Image-to-Video Synthesis via Cascaded Diffusion Models
Open accessAbstract
Video synthesis has recently made remarkable strides benefiting from the rapid development of diffusion models. However, it still encounters challenges in terms of semantic accuracy, clarity and spatio-temporal continuity. They primarily arise from the scarcity of well-aligned text-video data and the complex inherent structure of videos, making it difficult for the model to simultaneously ensure semantic and qualitative excellence. In this report, we propose a cascaded I2VGen-XL approach that enhances model performance by decoupling these two factors and ensures the alignment of the input data by utilizing static images as a form of crucial guidance. I2VGen-XL consists of two stages: i) the base stage guarantees coherent semantics and preserves content from input images by using two hierarchical encoders, and ii) the refinement stage enhances the video's details by incorporating an additional brief text and improves the resolution to 1280$\times$720. To improve the diversity, we collect around 35 million single-shot text-video pairs and 6 billion text-image pairs to optimize the model. By this means, I2VGen-XL can simultaneously enhance the semantic accuracy, continuity of details and clarity of generated videos. Through extensive experiments, we have investigated the underlying principles of I2VGen-XL and compared it with current top methods, which can demonstrate its effectiveness on diverse data. The source code and models will be publicly available at \url{https://i2vgen-xl.github.io}.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Features in the U-Net's self-attention layers can reflect the consistency of image appearance.
“It is well known that the features in the U-Net's selfattention layers can reflect the consistency of image appearance.”
From DiffSim: Taming Diffusion Models for Evaluating Visual Similarity (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tian, L., Wang, Q., Zhang, B., & Bo, L. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.17485 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
How Far is Video Generation from World Model: A Physical Law Perspective
Kang, B., Yue, Y., Lu, R., Lin, Z., Zhao, Y., Wang, K., Huang, G., & Feng, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.02385 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Video Diffusion Models: A Survey
Melnik, A., Ljubljanac, M., Lu, C., Yan, Q., Ren, W., & Ritter, H. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.03150 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
DiffSim: Taming Diffusion Models for Evaluating Visual Similarity
Song, Y., Liu, X., & Shou, M. Z. (2024) · arXiv · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Previous works [8, 10, 22, 28, 41–45, 69, 70, 76, 77, 84, 87, 88] have utilized this characteristic to achieve high-consistency image and video generation.”
- Authors
- Zhang, S., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhao, K., Yuan, H., Qin, Z., Wang, X., Zhao, D., & Zhou, J.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2311.04145
- OpenAlex
- W4388514904
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Keywords
- image-to-video synthesis, diffusion models, video-text alignment, hierarchical encoder, spatiotemporal continuity, semantic accuracy, image-text pairs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review