PreprintCited by 22Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsDigital Media Forensic Detection

I2VGen-XL: High-Quality Image-to-Video Synthesis via Cascaded Diffusion Models

Open access
Zhang, Shiwei, Wang, Jiayu, Zhang, Yingya, Zhao, Kang, Yuan, Hangjie, Qin, Zhiwu, Wang, Xiang, Zhao, Deli +1 more·2023·arXiv

Abstract

Video synthesis has recently made remarkable strides benefiting from the rapid development of diffusion models. However, it still encounters challenges in terms of semantic accuracy, clarity and spatio-temporal continuity. They primarily arise from the scarcity of well-aligned text-video data and the complex inherent structure of videos, making it difficult for the model to simultaneously ensure semantic and qualitative excellence. In this report, we propose a cascaded I2VGen-XL approach that enhances model performance by decoupling these two factors and ensures the alignment of the input data by utilizing static images as a form of crucial guidance. I2VGen-XL consists of two stages: i) the base stage guarantees coherent semantics and preserves content from input images by using two hierarchical encoders, and ii) the refinement stage enhances the video's details by incorporating an additional brief text and improves the resolution to 1280$\times$720. To improve the diversity, we collect around 35 million single-shot text-video pairs and 6 billion text-image pairs to optimize the model. By this means, I2VGen-XL can simultaneously enhance the semantic accuracy, continuity of details and clarity of generated videos. Through extensive experiments, we have investigated the underlying principles of I2VGen-XL and compared it with current top methods, which can demonstrate its effectiveness on diverse data. The source code and models will be publicly available at \url{https://i2vgen-xl.github.io}.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2311.04145

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Features in the U-Net's self-attention layers can reflect the consistency of image appearance.

    “It is well known that the features in the U-Net's selfattention layers can reflect the consistency of image appearance.”

    From DiffSim: Taming Diffusion Models for Evaluating Visual Similarity (2024) · cites this paper as [58]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, S., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhao, K., Yuan, H., Qin, Z., Wang, X., Zhao, D., & Zhou, J.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388514904
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
image-to-video synthesis, diffusion models, video-text alignment, hierarchical encoder, spatiotemporal continuity, semantic accuracy, image-text pairs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review