PreprintCited by 114Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisFace recognition and analysisSpeech and Audio Processing

EMO: Emote Portrait Alive - Generating Expressive Portrait Videos with Audio2Video Diffusion Model under Weak Conditions

Open access
Tian, Linrui, Wang, Qi, Zhang, Bang, Bo, Liefeng·2024·arXiv

Abstract

In this work, we tackle the challenge of enhancing the realism and expressiveness in talking head video generation by focusing on the dynamic and nuanced relationship between audio cues and facial movements. We identify the limitations of traditional techniques that often fail to capture the full spectrum of human expressions and the uniqueness of individual facial styles. To address these issues, we propose EMO, a novel framework that utilizes a direct audio-to-video synthesis approach, bypassing the need for intermediate 3D models or facial landmarks. Our method ensures seamless frame transitions and consistent identity preservation throughout the video, resulting in highly expressive and lifelike animations. Experimental results demonsrate that EMO is able to produce not only convincing speaking videos but also singing videos in various styles, significantly outperforming existing state-of-the-art methodologies in terms of expressiveness and realism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2402.17485

Cites

27 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent speech-driven video generation methods such as Loopy, Hallo3, and EMO predominantly focus on synthesizing talking-head videos confined to facial regions, neglecting full-body movements and multi-character interactions.

    “On the other hand, recent speech-driven video generation methods, such as Loopy, Hallo3, and EMO [18, 24, 33-35, 40], predominantly focus on synthesizing talking-head videos confined to facial regions. These approaches neglect essential fullbody movements and multi-character interactions critical for expressive storytelling, thus significantly limiting their applicability in realistic and inter”

    From MoCha: Towards Movie-Grade Talking Character Synthesis (2025) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Method (p. 4) describes EMO as generating a talking-portrait video from a single character image. Limitations and Future Work (p. 21) says its primary focus is the head region and that it can render body parts incorrectly, supporting the point about limited full-body movement. The paper does not assess multi-character interactions or establish the claim for Loopy and Hallo3. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Unlike prior works that rely on external control signals, MoCha is trained directly on text and speech without auxiliary conditioning, which simplifies the model architecture and improves motion diversity and generalization.

    “Unlike prior works such as EMO [33, 35], SONIC [17], Echomimicv2 [24], Loopy [18], and Hallo3 [40], which rely heavily on external control signals (e.g., reference images, skeletons, keypoints), MoCha is trained directly on text and speech without any auxiliary conditioning. This simplifies the model architecture and improves motion diversity and generalization.”

    From MoCha: Towards Movie-Grade Talking Character Synthesis (2025) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Introduction (p. 2) describes EMO as using a reference portrait image, so it supports citing EMO as a model with image-based conditioning. But the Limitations (p. 21) say EMO does not use explicit signals to control motion, and Network Pipelines (pp. 7–8) describes its face-region and speed inputs as weak—not heavy—control conditions. The paper does not establish the citing authors’ claims about MoCha’s architecture or performance. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Features in the U-Net's self-attention layers can reflect the consistency of image appearance.

    “It is well known that the features in the U-Net's selfattention layers can reflect the consistency of image appearance.”

    From DiffSim: Taming Diffusion Models for Evaluating Visual Similarity (2024) · cites this paper as [47]

  • Recent works such as EMO and Hallo generate audio-driven portrait videos end-to-end using diffusion models, eliminating intermediate facial representations and learning natural motion from data.

    “Recently works, such as EMO [34] and Hallo [40], generate audio-driven portrait videos end-to-end using diffusion models, which eliminate intermediate facial representations and learn natural motion from data [10, 18, 34, 37, 40].”

    From MoCha: Towards Movie-Grade Talking Character Synthesis (2025) · cites this paper as [34]

  • Recent speech-driven video generation methods such as Loopy, Hallo3, and EMO predominantly focus on synthesizing talking-head videos confined to facial regions, neglecting full-body movements and multi-character interactions.

    “On the other hand, recent speech-driven video generation methods, such as Loopy, Hallo3, and EMO [18, 24, 33-35, 40], predominantly focus on synthesizing talking-head videos confined to facial regions. These approaches neglect essential fullbody movements and multi-character interactions critical for expressive storytelling, thus significantly limiting their applicability in realistic and inter”

    From MoCha: Towards Movie-Grade Talking Character Synthesis (2025) · cites this paper as [34]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [9]9. Heusel, M., Ramsauer, H., Unterthiner, T., Nessler, B., Hochreiter, S.: Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017)
  2. [8]8. Guo, Y., Yang, C., Rao, A., Wang, Y., Qiao, Y., Lin, D., Dai, B.: Animatediff: Animate your personalized text-to-image diffusion models without specific tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04725 (2023) · arXiv
  3. [10]10. Ho, J., Jain, A., Abbeel, P.: Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems 33 , 6840-6851 (2020)
  4. [12]12. Hu, L., Gao, X., Zhang, P., Sun, K., Zhang, B., Bo, L.: Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image-to-video synthesis for character animation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17117 (2023) · arXiv
  5. [14]14. Kingma, D.P., Welling, M.: Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes. In: 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2014, Banff, AB, Canada, April 1416, 2014, Conference Track Proceedings (2014)
  6. [18]18. Ma, X., Wang, Y., Jia, G., Chen, X., Liu, Z., Li, Y.F., Chen, C., Qiao, Y.: Latte: Latent diffusion transformer for video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.03048 (2024) · arXiv
  7. [19]19. Ma, Y., Zhang, S., Wang, J., Wang, X., Zhang, Y., Deng, Z.: Dreamtalk: When expressive talking head generation meets diffusion probabilistic models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.09767 (2023) · arXiv
  8. [22]22. Poole, B., Jain, A., Barron, J.T., Mildenhall, B.: Dreamfusion: Text-to-3d using 2d diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14988 (2022) · arXiv
  9. [27]27. Schneider, S., Baevski, A., Collobert, R., Auli, M.: wav2vec: Unsupervised pretraining for speech recognition. pp. 3465-3469 (09 2019). https://doi.org/10. 21437/Interspeech.2019-1873
  10. [26]26. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., Frangi, A.F. (eds.) Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2015. pp. 234-241. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2015)
  11. [31]31. Sohl-Dickstein, J., Weiss, E., Maheswaranathan, N., Ganguli, S.: Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. In: International conference on machine learning. pp. 2256-2265. PMLR (2015)
  12. [33]33. Stypułkowski, M., Vougioukas, K., He, S., Zięba, M., Petridis, S., Pantic, M.: Diffused Heads: Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Talking-Face Generation. In: https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.03396 (2023) · arXiv
  13. [32]32. Song, J., Meng, C., Ermon, S.: Denoising diffusion implicit models. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2021), https://openreview.net/forum? id=St1giarCHLP
  14. [34]34. Sun, X., Zhang, L., Zhu, H., Zhang, P., Zhang, B., Ji, X., Zhou, K., Gao, D., Bo, L., Cao, X.: Vividtalk: One-shot audio-driven talking head generation based on 3d hybrid prior. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.01841 (2023) · arXiv
  15. [38]38. Ye, Z., Zhong, T., Ren, Y., Yang, J., Li, W., Huang, J., Jiang, Z., He, J., Huang, R., Liu, J., et al.: Real3d-portrait: One-shot realistic 3d talking portrait synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.08503 (2024) · arXiv
  16. [42]42. Zhou, Y., Han, X., Shechtman, E., Echevarria, J., Kalogerakis, E., Li, D.: Makeittalk: Speaker-aware talking-head animation. ACM Transactions on Graphics 39 (6) (2020)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tian, L., Wang, Q., Zhang, B., & Bo, L.
Affiliations
Alibaba Group (China) (CN)
Corresponding author
Tian, Linrui
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
Pages
244-260
ISSN
0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404199654
Cited by
92
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 10
FWCI
19.05
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
facial expressions, audio-visual alignment, identity preservation, weak conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review