CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 61UAV Applications and OptimizationIoT Networks and ProtocolsIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 288 of the 300 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 151 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV-based IoT Networks

Open access
Joshi, Poorvi, Kalita, Alakesh, Gurusamy, Mohan·2023·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2311.05303arXiv 2311.05303
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) involves sensors for monitoring and wireless networks for efficient communication. However, resource-constrained IoT devices and limitations in existing wireless technologies hinder its full potential. Integrating Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) into IoT networks can address some challenges by expanding its' coverage, providing security, and bringing computing closer to IoT devices. Nevertheless, effective data collection in UAV-assisted IoT networks is hampered by factors, including dynamic UAV behavior, environmental variables, connectivity instability, and security considerations. In this survey, we first explore UAV-based IoT networks, focusing on communication and networking aspects. Next, we cover various UAV-based data collection methods their advantages and disadvantages, followed by a discussion on performance metrics for data collection. As this article primarily emphasizes reliable and efficient data collection in UAV-assisted IoT networks, we briefly discuss existing research on data accuracy and consistency, network connectivity, and data security and privacy to provide insights into reliable data collection. Additionally, we discuss efficient data collection strategies in UAV-based IoT networks, covering trajectory and path planning, collision avoidance, sensor network clustering, data aggregation, UAV swarm formations, and artificial intelligence for optimization. We also present two use cases of UAVs as a service for enhancing data collection reliability and efficiency. Finally, we discuss future challenges in data collection for UAV-assisted IoT networks.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This survey reviews reliable and efficient data collection in UAV-assisted IoT networks, organizing existing work around reliability (data accuracy/consistency, connectivity, security/privacy) and efficiency (trajectory planning, clustering, aggregation, swarm formations, AI optimization). It also discusses communication technologies, performance metrics, two UAV-as-a-service use cases, and future challenges such as interoperability and interference.

Key findings

  • The survey categorizes reliable data collection into three main areas: data accuracy and consistency, network connectivity, and data security and privacy; efficient data collection is categorized into trajectory and path planning, sensor network clustering, data aggregation, UAV swarm formations, and AI optimization techniques.
  • It compares wireless communication technologies for UAV-IoT networks, reporting examples such as BLE proximity detection within 30 meters extendable to 100 meters, Wi-Fi throughput from 54 Mbps for 802.11a to as high as 2.4 Gbps for 802.11ax, and 6G anticipated to offer rates 100 times faster than 5G.
  • It cites simulation results for Directional Hierarchical AODV (DH-AODV): reduced end-to-end delay by 47%, improved throughput by 11.2%, and decreased packet loss rate by 20% compared with standard AODV.
  • It presents two use cases—UAV as a Mobile Edge Computing server and UAV as a Wireless Power Transfer source—and identifies interoperability and interference in massive UAV-IoT networks as future challenges.

Methods

  • Design: A survey article that reviews and categorizes existing research on UAV-assisted IoT data collection, focusing on reliability and efficiency.
  • Data/sample: No primary dataset or experimental sample; the paper synthesizes prior literature, protocols, schemes, and use cases, with comparison tables for communication technologies, data collection modes, routing protocols, trajectory/path planning, cluster-head selection, and UAV swarm formations.
  • Analysis: Qualitative categorization and comparison of existing schemes, performance metrics, and open challenges; no new experiments or quantitative meta-analysis are reported.

Limitations

  • The paper does not state explicit limitations of its own survey.
  • Evident from the text: it is a secondary review without new experiments, simulations, or primary data collection, so its findings depend on the cited literature.
  • Evident from the text: many comparisons are qualitative or table-based, and the survey notes future challenges such as interoperability and interference rather than providing a systematic validation of all reviewed schemes.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2311.05303

Cites

288 of 288 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 151 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 51 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 118
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 180
226 of 226

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A clear roadmap for achieving reliable and efficient data collection in UAV-assisted IoT networks remains elusive.

    “However, a clear roadmap for achieving reliable and efficient data collection in UAV-assisted IoT networks remains elusive.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    UAVs have limited battery capacity.

    “which is crucial for UAVs with limited battery capacity.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    IoT devices are resource-constrained.

    “Due to the resourceconstrained IoT devices”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The full deterministic position of the eavesdropper is not known in the real world.

    “which is not the case in real world.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Network topology in UAV networks is subject to rapid changes or is highly diverse.

    “They are especially useful in scenarios where the network topology is subject to rapid changes or is highly diverse.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Using multiple UAVs working together is more effective for challenging tasks compared to a single UAV.

    “Using multiple UAVs or drones, working together is more effective for challenging tasks compared to a single UAV.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    FANETs face significant challenges like fast mobility, frequent topology changes, unreliable connectivity, and limited energy.

    “This collaborative approach, known as Flying Ad-Hoc Networks (FANETs), faces significant challenges like fast mobility, frequent topology changes, unreliable connectivity, and limited energy.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    RL is fundamental to autonomous decision-making in UAV systems.

    “RL is a dynamic approach fundamental to autonomous decision-making in UAV systems.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The framework of the sensor network becomes complex, and the cost of routing between sensors increases as the number of sensors increases.

    “The framework of the sensor network becomes complex, and the cost of routing between sensors increases as the number of sensors increases.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    K-means is a common clustering method in UAV networks due to its effectiveness and simplicity.

    “K-means is a common clustering method in UAV networks due to its effectiveness and simplicity.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    GAN is currently popular in the field of UAVs.

    “GAN is currently popular in the field of UAVs.”
11 of 11

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • LoRaWAN is classified as short-range despite being described as long-range

    Minor

    The interoperability section groups LoRaWAN with short-range technologies, whereas the communication overview explicitly describes it as long-range.

  • Table VII gives the wrong authors and year for reference [180]

    Minor

    Table VII labels [180] as Arafat et al. (2020), but the reference list identifies [180] as a 2011 paper by C. Zang and S. Zang.

  • Description of [174] does not match its listed paper

    Minor

    The text describes [174] as a cooperative UGV-UAV data-collection study, while the listed reference is titled as a cluster-head transmission-power scheme.

  • Interzone routing is described as both proactive and reactive

    Minor

    The hybrid-routing overview says interzone routing is performed in advance, but the ZRP description says communication between zones uses reactive routing.

  • Description of [173] does not match its listed paper

    Minor

    The text attributes work on an industrial metaverse and 6G packet architectures to [173], whose listed title instead concerns completion time for UAV-UGV data collection.

5 of 5

Citations

Cites

Items 201–288 of 288

Flagged first, then by citations

12 of the 300 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. J. de Carvalho Silva, J. J. P. C. Rodrigues, A. M. Alberti, P. Solic, and A. L. L. Aquino, "LoRaWAN -A low power WAN protocol for Internet of Things: A review and opportunities," in 2017 2nd International Multidisciplinary Conference on Computer and Energy Science (SpliTech), 2017, pp. 1-6.
  2. --, "An AUV-assisted data gathering scheme based on clustering and matrix completion for smart ocean," IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 9904-9918, 2020.
  3. M. Mozaffari, W. Saad, M. Bennis, Y.-H. Nam, and M. Debbah, "A tutorial on UAVs for wireless networks: Applications, challenges, and open problems," IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 2334-2360, 2019.
  4. D. Pan, M. Lin, and L. Chen, "Space-Aware Spray and Transfer Routing Protocol for Opportunistic Networks," Chinese Journal of Electronics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 363-368, 2013.
  5. Q. Zhang, M. Jiang, Z. Feng, W. Li, W. Zhang, and M. Pan, "IoT enabled UAV: Network architecture and routing algorithm," IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 3727-3742, 2019.
  6. I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio, "Generative adversarial nets," Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 27, 2014.
  7. J. Heaton, "Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville: Deep learning: The MIT Press, 2016, 800 pp, ISBN: 0262035618," Genetic programming and evolvable machines, vol. 19, no. 1-2, pp. 305-307, 2018.
  8. F. Zhou, R. Q. Hu, Z. Li, and Y. Wang, "Mobile edge computing in unmanned aerial vehicle networks," IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 140-146, 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 61

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Joshi, P., Kalita, A., & Gurusamy, M.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore
  • Indian Institute of Technology Dhanbad (IN)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
Volume
28
Pages
2531-2571
ISSN
1553-877X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2311.05303
arXiv
2311.05303
OpenAlex
W4408305012
Semantic Scholar
1b2dc08237da180aec2f4e3aeec08565155905b0
Cited by
61
References
300
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
19.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › UAV Applications and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › IoT Networks and Protocols
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
data collection, trajectory planning, data aggregation, data security and privacy, network connectivity, federated learning, decentralized reinforcement learning, generative AI, blockchain, network topology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review